Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Nova][All] requests 2.4.0 breaks glanceclient

2014-09-03 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 9/3/14, 2:20 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 09/03/2014 03:12 PM, Gregory Haynes wrote: Excerpts from Kuvaja, Erno's message of 2014-09-03 12:30:08 +: Hi All, While investigating glanceclient gating issues we narrowed it down to requests 2.4.0 which was released 2014-08-29.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Nova][All] requests 2.4.0 breaks glanceclient

2014-09-09 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 9/3/14, 3:59 PM, Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com wrote: On 9/3/14, 2:20 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 09/03/2014 03:12 PM, Gregory Haynes wrote: Excerpts from Kuvaja, Erno's message of 2014-09-03 12:30:08 +: Hi All, While investigating glanceclient gating issues we

Re: [openstack-dev] Please do *NOT* use vendorized versions of anything (here: glanceclient using requests.packages.urllib3)

2014-09-17 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 9/17/14, 1:46 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas's message of 2014-09-17 10:15:29 -0700: I was trying request-ifying oslo.vmware and ran into this as well: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/121956/ And we don't seem to have urllib3 in global-requirements

Re: [openstack-dev] Please do *NOT* use vendorized versions of anything (here: glanceclient using requests.packages.urllib3)

2014-09-17 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 9/17/14, 3:11 PM, Mike Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote: On Sep 17, 2014, at 3:42 PM, Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com wrote: Circling back to the issue of vendoring though: it’s a conscious decision to do this, and in the last two years there have been 2 CVEs reported for requests

Re: [openstack-dev] Please do *NOT* use vendorized versions of anything (here: glanceclient using requests.packages.urllib3)

2014-09-18 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 9/17/14, 9:24 PM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: On 09/18/2014 08:22 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: I think that all of the conversation to this point has been valuable, the general consensus is vendoring a library is not as desirable as using it strictly as a dependency. It would be

Re: [openstack-dev] Please do *NOT* use vendorized versions of anything (here: glanceclient using requests.packages.urllib3)

2014-09-18 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 9/18/14, 2:27 AM, Chmouel Boudjnah chmo...@enovance.com wrote: Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com writes: urllib3 do that automatically. I haven’t started to investigate exactly why they do this. Likewise, glance client has custom certificate verification

Re: [openstack-dev] Please do *NOT* use vendorized versions of anything (here: glanceclient using requests.packages.urllib3)

2014-09-18 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 9/18/14, 9:18 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Donald Stufft's message of 2014-09-18 04:58:06 -0700: On Sep 18, 2014, at 7:54 AM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: Linux distributions are not the end be all of distribution models and they don’t get to

Re: [openstack-dev] Please do *NOT* use vendorized versions of anything (here: glanceclient using requests.packages.urllib3)

2014-09-18 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 9/18/14, 11:29 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Donald Stufft's message of 2014-09-18 07:30:27 -0700: On Sep 18, 2014, at 10:18 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Donald Stufft's message of 2014-09-18 04:58:06 -0700: On Sep 18, 2014, at

Re: [openstack-dev] Please do *NOT* use vendorized versions of anything (here: glanceclient using requests.packages.urllib3)

2014-09-19 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 9/19/14, 9:01 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2014-09-18 14:35:10 + (+), Ian Cordasco wrote: Except that even OpenStack doesn’t pin requests because of how extraordinarily stable our API is. [...] FWIW, I nearly capped it a few weeks ago with https

Re: [openstack-dev] Please do *NOT* use vendorized versions of anything (here: glanceclient using requests.packages.urllib3)

2014-09-21 Thread Ian Cordasco
, as a package maintainer, to let you know about my view on your argumentation. If you ignore my argumentation, then at least I'll have tried! :) On 09/18/2014 03:42 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: Circling back to the issue of vendoring though: it’s a conscious decision to do this, and in the last two

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [All] API standards working group

2014-09-24 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 9/24/14, 9:51 AM, Lance Bragstad lbrags...@gmail.com wrote: You can add me to this list as well. Thanks! Lance On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Alex Xu x...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: I'm interesting in the group too! On 2014年09月24日 18:01, Salvatore Orlando wrote: Please keep me

Re: [openstack-dev] Taskflow for Juno RC1 effectively require Kombu 3.x

2014-10-01 Thread Ian Cordasco
There just needs to be a fallback import. In v2.5.0 the Message class (which is the only item used from kombu.message) was in kombu.transport.base. Thomas, can you confirm that something like try: from kombu import message except ImportError: from kombu.transport import base as message

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] icehouse failure rates are somewhat catastrophic - who is actually maintaining it?

2014-10-01 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 10/1/14, 11:53 AM, Morgan Fainberg morgan.fainb...@gmail.com wrote: On Wednesday, October 1, 2014, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: As stable branches got discussed recently, I'm kind of curious who is actually stepping up to make icehouse able to pass tests in any real way. Because right

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] Forming the API Working Group

2014-10-14 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 10/14/14, 10:22 AM, Everett Toews everett.to...@rackspace.com wrote: On Oct 14, 2014, at 8:57 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: I personally think proposing patches to an openstack-api repository is the most effective way to make those proposals. Etherpads and wiki pages are fine for

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] add cyclomatic complexity check to pep8 target

2014-10-17 Thread Ian Cordasco
I would also advise pinning the version of mccabe we’re using. Mccabe was originally a proof-of-concept script that Ned Batchelder wrote and which Tarek Ziade vendored into Flake8. After we split it out in v2 of Flake8, we’ve found several (somewhat serious) reporting problems with the tool.

Re: [openstack-dev] URLs

2014-11-11 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 11/11/14, 16:35, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote: Recent recurrence of the Why ios everything on its own port question triggered my desire to take this pattern and put it to rest. My suggestion, from a while ago, was to have a naming scheme that deconflicts putting all of the services onto

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Deprecating osprofiler option 'enabled' in favour of 'profiler_enabled'

2014-12-02 Thread Ian Cordasco
Except for the fact that the person who implemented this was told to change the option name in other projects because it conflicted with a different option. We can keep this if we’re worried about being too obvious (to the point of becoming the Department of Redundancy Department) with our naming.

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Meeting Thursday February 5th at 1500 UTC

2015-02-04 Thread Ian Cordasco
Just a reminder to everyone that Glance’s weekly meeting is on February 5th at 1500 UTC. The agenda can be found here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda We meet in #openstack-meeting-4 Anyone is welcome to add an agenda item and participation is welcome. Cheers, Ian

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] API Definition Formats

2015-01-14 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 1/13/15, 04:16, Chris Dent chd...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, Ian Cordasco wrote: On 1/12/15, 17:21, Chris Dent chd...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 12 Jan 2015, Ian Cordasco wrote: This worked extremely well in my experience and helped improve development time for new

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] Optional Properties in an Entity

2015-01-20 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 1/20/15, 04:13, Chris Dent chd...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 19 Jan 2015, Dean Troyer wrote: Independent of actual implementations in OpenStack, I prefer always including null/empty properties here because it is slightly more self-documenting. Having spent the morning chasing down

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Cross-project DevRef Was Re: Skipping Cross-Project meeting today

2015-01-21 Thread Ian Cordasco
...@gmail.com wrote: On 01/20/2015 01:30 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: On Jan 20, 2015, at 05:23, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Hi everyone, Given that the agenda docket is pretty slim this week, I'd like to skip this cross-project meeting and have the next one on Jan 27. sigmavirus24 posted

[openstack-dev] [API] Upgrading to API WG Recommendations

2015-01-14 Thread Ian Cordasco
Hey all, In the last meeting of the working group, we discussed what the goals of the group are and how those affect existing projects and new ones. In particular, some people seem confused as to whether the group’s goal is to create recommendations for ideal APIs or to document the existing APIs

[openstack-dev] [all] Cross-project DevRef Was Re: Skipping Cross-Project meeting today

2015-01-20 Thread Ian Cordasco
On Jan 20, 2015, at 05:23, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Hi everyone, Given that the agenda docket is pretty slim this week, I'd like to skip this cross-project meeting and have the next one on Jan 27. sigmavirus24 posted the Cross-project DevRef akin to Nova's item but

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Artifacts] Object Version format: SemVer vs pep440

2015-02-10 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 2/10/15, 10:35, Alexander Tivelkov ativel...@mirantis.com wrote: Thanks Monty! Yup, probably I've missed that. I was looking at pbr and its version implementation, but didn't realize that this is actually a fusion of semver and pep440. So, we have this as an extra alternative to choose

[openstack-dev] [stable][requirements] External dependency caps introduced in 499db6b

2015-02-16 Thread Ian Cordasco
Hey everyone, The os-ansible-deployment team was working on updates to add support for the latest version of juno and noticed some interesting version specifiers introduced into global-requirements.txt in January. It introduced some version specifiers that seem a bit impossible like the one for

Re: [openstack-dev] [API] Do we need to specify follow the HTTP RFCs?

2015-02-12 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 2/12/15, 12:01, Chris Dent chd...@redhat.com wrote: I meant to get to this in today's meeting[1] but we ran out of time and based on the rest of the conversation it was likely to lead to a spiral of different interpretations, so I thought I'd put it up here. $SUBJECT says it all: When

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][requirements] External dependency caps introduced in 499db6b

2015-02-16 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 2/16/15, 16:08, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 02/16/2015 02:08 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Mon, Feb 16, 2015, at 01:01 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: Hey everyone, The os-ansible-deployment team was working on updates to add support for the latest version of juno and noticed some

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][requirements] External dependency caps introduced in 499db6b

2015-02-17 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 2/17/15, 16:27, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote: Joe Gordon wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:19 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net mailto:s...@dague.net wrote: On 02/16/2015 08:50 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: On 2/16/15, 16:08, Sean Dague s...@dague.net mailto:s

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] Resources owned by a project/tenant are not cleaned up after that project is deleted from keystone

2015-02-19 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 2/2/15, 15:41, Morgan Fainberg morgan.fainb...@gmail.com wrote: On February 2, 2015 at 1:31:14 PM, Joe Gordon (joe.gord...@gmail.com) wrote: On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Morgan Fainberg morgan.fainb...@gmail.com wrote: I think the simple answer is yes. We (keystone) should emit

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] Next meeting agenda

2015-01-29 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 1/29/15, 04:10, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Everett Toews wrote: A couple of important topics came up as a result of attending the Cross Project Meeting. I’ve added both to the agenda for the next meeting on Thursday 2015/01/29 at 16:00 UTC.

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] API Definition Formats

2015-01-12 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 1/9/15, 15:17, Everett Toews everett.to...@rackspace.com wrote: One thing that has come up in the past couple of API WG meetings [1] is just how useful a proper API definition would be for the OpenStack projects. By API definition I mean a format like Swagger, RAML, API Blueprint, etc. These

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] API Definition Formats

2015-01-12 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 1/12/15, 17:21, Chris Dent chd...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 12 Jan 2015, Ian Cordasco wrote: This worked extremely well in my experience and helped improve development time for new endpoints and new endpoint versions. The documentation was also heavily used for the multiple internal

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Artifacts] Object Version format: SemVer vs pep440

2015-02-10 Thread Ian Cordasco
, Alexander Tivelkov On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com wrote: On 2/10/15, 10:35, Alexander Tivelkov ativel...@mirantis.com wrote: Thanks Monty! Yup, probably I've missed that. I was looking at pbr and its version implementation, but didn't realize

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Artifacts] Object Version format: SemVer vs pep440

2015-02-10 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 2/10/15, 13:55, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 02/10/2015 12:15 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: So Semantic Versioning, as I’ve already mentioned in the past, isn’t really a de facto standard in any language community but it is a language agnostic proposal. That said, just because it’s

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] Missing the next API WG meeting

2015-02-12 Thread Ian Cordasco
I’ll be around so I’ll do this if no one else will be around to do it. On 2/11/15, 16:39, Everett Toews everett.to...@rackspace.com wrote: I’ll be missing the next API WG meeting [1] as I’m in some all day training. Someone else will have to #startmeeting api wg Cheers, Everett [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Metadef-tags create api change request.

2015-02-12 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 2/11/15, 11:10, Okuma, Wayne wayne.ok...@hp.com wrote: Hello, I would like to change the metadef-tags create API which was checked into Kilo (cycle 1). The python-glanceclient that would support metadef-tags has not been released yet and I would like to make this change before doing so. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Testtools 1.7.0 may error if you installed it before reading this email

2015-03-11 Thread Ian Cordasco
I think part of the problem is that we’re still relying on distribution packaged dependencies. If you look earlier in the logs for: http://logs.openstack.org/51/146651/15/check/check-grenade-dsvm/2485c9e/log s/grenade.sh.txt.gz#_2015-03-11_00_58_45_129 you’ll see that “python-unittest2” is being

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] [stable] python-glanceclient release 0.16.1

2015-03-06 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 3/5/15, 10:56, Dr. Jens Rosenboom j.rosenb...@x-ion.de wrote: Am 05/03/15 um 17:37 schrieb Ian Cordasco: The clients in general do not back port patches. Someone should work with stable-maint to raise the cap in Icehouse and Juno. I suspect, however, that those caps were added due

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-06 Thread Ian Cordasco
I like that idea. Can you start it out with Nova or Neutron’s guidelines? On 3/5/15, 17:38, Mikhail Fedosin mfedo...@mirantis.com wrote: I think yes, it does. But I mean that now we're writing a document called Glance Review Guidelines

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-06 Thread Ian Cordasco
the following new members: * Ian Cordasco Who’s that guy? Why is he being nominated? =P * Louis Taylor * Mike Fedosin * Hemanth Makkapati +1 to these three being added though. This way we've a first round of consolidation done. It must be evident that the list-cleanup proposed above

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Nitpicking in code reviews

2015-03-12 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 3/12/15, 09:26, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 09:07:30AM -0500, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 11/03/15 15:06 -1000, John Bresnahan wrote: FWIW I agree with #3 and #4 but not #1 and #2. Spelling is an easy enough thing to get right and speaks to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Proposal to change Glance meeting time.

2015-03-11 Thread Ian Cordasco
I have no opinions on the matter. Either 1400 or 1500 work for me. I think there are a lot of people asking for it to be at 1500 instead though. Would anyone object to changing it to 1500 instead (as long as it is one consistent time for the meeting)? On 3/11/15, 01:53, Inessa Vasilevskaya

Re: [openstack-dev] [os-ansible-deployment] Nominating Nolan Brubaker for core team

2015-03-25 Thread Ian Cordasco
+1 On 3/25/15, 10:36, Hugh Saunders h...@wherenow.org wrote: Great proposal, Nolan will be an asset to the core team. +1 -- Hugh Saunders On 25 March 2015 at 15:24, Kevin Carter kevin.car...@rackspace.com wrote: Greetings, I would like to nominate Nolan Brubaker (palendae on IRC) for the

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] API WG Meeting Time

2015-04-01 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 4/1/15, 08:24, michael mccune m...@redhat.com wrote: On 04/01/2015 08:35 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 03/31/2015 10:13 PM, Everett Toews wrote: Ever since daylight savings time it has been increasing difficult for many API WG members to make it to the Thursday 00:00 UTC meeting time. Do we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-03 Thread Ian Cordasco
, Nikhil Komawar wrote: Hi all, I would like to propose the following members to become part of the Glance core team: Ian Cordasco Louis Taylor Mike Fedosin Hemanth Makkapati Please, yes! Actually - I hope this doesn't come out harsh - I'd really like to stop adding new cores until we

[openstack-dev] [glance] [trove] [heat] [nova] [all] Handling forwarded requests

2015-03-03 Thread Ian Cordasco
Hey all, It appears that currently a number of OpenStack services are not generating version catalogs correctly when the service sits behind a proxy. (Reference: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1384379) Glance already has a fix that was accepted for kilo-1 but it is suboptimal and assumes

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstackclient] doodle for meeting time selection

2015-03-04 Thread Ian Cordasco
+1 On 3/4/15, 08:01, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 3, 2015, at 06:17 PM, Dean Troyer wrote: On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: As we discussed in the meeting today, I’ve created a Doodle to coordinate a good day and time

[openstack-dev] [API] #openstack-api created

2015-03-04 Thread Ian Cordasco
At (or maybe after) the last API-WG meeting, the idea to create an API-WG specific channel came up again and there was consensus that it would be beneficial to have. I registered the channel and have submitted the appropriate changes to system-config and project-config to enable logging of the

[openstack-dev] [os-ansible-deployment] Addition of channel logging

2015-03-04 Thread Ian Cordasco
Hey everyone, I just wanted to make the list aware that the stackforge/os-ansible-deployment project has submitted a change to start logging its channel (#openstack-ansible). Please vote on the proposal https://review.openstack.org/#/c/161412/ Cheers, Ian

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] python-glanceclient release 0.16.1

2015-03-05 Thread Ian Cordasco
The clients in general do not back port patches. Someone should work with stable-maint to raise the cap in Icehouse and Juno. I suspect, however, that those caps were added due to the client breaking other projects. Proposals can be made though and ideally, openstack/requirements’ gate jobs will

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-25 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 2/25/15, 14:41, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Johannes Erdfelt wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2015, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2015-02-24 10:00:51 -0800 (-0800), Johannes Erdfelt wrote: [...] Recently, I have spent a lot more

Re: [openstack-dev] [hacking] disable a check by default

2015-02-20 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 2/20/15, 12:07, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I would like to introduce a hacking check that would be disabled by default: https://review.openstack.org/157894 I see the following commit in flake8:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] IRC logging

2015-01-13 Thread Ian Cordasco
0, 1, 2, and 3. 3 channels. I think Sean has this correct. On 1/13/15, 14:36, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 01/13/2015 03:07 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2015-01-13 13:59:26 -0500 (-0500), Sean Dague wrote: Which is a really important point. I hang in the 3 meeting channels, [...]

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Question about import module

2015-01-29 Thread Ian Cordasco
The requirements files are being updated so this fallback is unnecessary. Newer versions of the library (which should be the new minimum version) will work with the first import without issue. The only reason you would do this is if you’re not following global-requirements.txt and have a very low

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] eventlet 0.17.3 is now fully Python 3 compatible

2015-04-21 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 4/16/15, 17:54, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Joe Gordon's message of 2015-04-16 15:15:01 -0700: On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Victor Stinner vstin...@redhat.com wrote: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Python3#Dependencies appears to be fairly out of date.

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Call to action, revisit CIS state

2015-04-28 Thread Ian Cordasco
, possibly proprietary plugin to Elastic Search itself. In that scenario, it also would not have any input from the community and would not provide benefit to the broader community. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/138051/ On 4/27/15, 10:52 AM, Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com wrote: There¹s

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Call to action, revisit CIS state

2015-04-27 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 4/27/15, 05:39, Kuvaja, Erno kuv...@hp.com wrote: Hi all, As you probably know CIS was expanded from Juno metadefs work this cycle based on spec [1] provided. The implementation was merged in quite a rush just before feature freeze. During the spec review [2] for client functionality for

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][python-heatclient] Does python-heatclient works with keystone sessions?

2015-05-07 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 5/7/15, 14:43, Jay Reslock jresl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, This is my first mail to the group. I hope I set the subject correctly and that this hasn't been asked already. I searched archives and did not see this question asked or answered previously. I am working on a client thing that

Re: [openstack-dev] [PKG-Openstack-devel][horizon][xstatic] XStatic-Angular-Bootstrap in violation of the MIT/Expat license (forwarded from: python-xstatic-angular-bootstrap_0.11.0.2-1_amd64.changes R

2015-05-04 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 5/3/15, 11:46, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: Hi, According to Paul Tagliamonte, who is from the Debian FTP master team (which peer-reviews NEW packages in Debian before they reach the archive) python-xstatic-angular-bootstrap cannot be uploaded as-is to Debian because it doesn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [PKG-Openstack-devel][horizon][xstatic] XStatic-Angular-Bootstrap in violation of the MIT/Expat license (forwarded from: python-xstatic-angular-bootstrap_0.11.0.2-1_amd64.changes R

2015-05-04 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 5/4/15, 18:13, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: On 05/05/2015 12:15 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: For what it’s worth Thomas and Maxime, removing the old versions from PyPI is likely to be a bad idea. Probably, but it's legally wrong (ie: worst case, you can be sued) to leave a package which

Re: [openstack-dev] [Security] [Bandit] Using multiprocessing/threading to speed up analysis

2015-06-08 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 6/8/15, 12:17, Finnigan, Jamie jamie.finni...@hp.com wrote: On 6/8/15, 8:26 AM, Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com wrote: Hey everyone, I drew up a blueprint (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/bandit/+spec/use-threading-when-running - c hecks) to add the ability to use multiprocessing

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-07 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 6/7/15, 03:41, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: On 05/29/2015 09:23 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: Could you explain this as well? Do you mean fragmentation between what distros are offering? In other words, Ubuntu is packaging Kilo @ SHA1 and RHEL is at SHA2. I'm not entirely certain that's

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-07 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 6/7/15, 03:47, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: On 05/29/2015 09:36 PM, Dave Walker wrote: Responses inline. On 29 May 2015 6:15 pm, Haïkel hgue...@fedoraproject.org mailto:hgue...@fedoraproject.org wrote: 2015-05-29 15:41 GMT+02:00 Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [Security] [Bandit] Using multiprocessing/threading to speed up analysis

2015-06-08 Thread Ian Cordasco
to make a few options mutually exclusive. For example, if you use pep8's diff capabilities then multiprocessing is turned off by default. It's unlikely that you'll need it either. -Rob On 08/06/2015 08:26, Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com wrote: Hey everyone, I drew up a blueprint (https

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-06 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 6/6/15, 02:03, Alan Pevec ape...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-06-05 15:16 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org: On 2015-06-05 14:56:30 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote: [...] I was wondering if we could switch to post-versioning on stable branches, and basically generate:

[openstack-dev] [Security] [Bandit] Using multiprocessing/threading to speed up analysis

2015-06-08 Thread Ian Cordasco
Hey everyone, I drew up a blueprint (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/bandit/+spec/use-threading-when-running-c hecks) to add the ability to use multiprocessing (or threading) to Bandit. This essentially means that each thread will be fed a file and analyze it and return the results. (A file will

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra][tc][ptl] Scaling up code review process (subdir cores)

2015-06-02 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 6/2/15, 16:24, Boris Pavlovic bo...@pavlovic.me wrote: Hi stackers, Issue --- Projects are becoming bigger and bigger overtime. More and more people would like to contribute code and usually core reviewers team can't scale enough. It's very hard to find people that understand full

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

2015-06-10 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 6/10/15, 09:12, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: On 06/10/2015 12:25 PM, Dave Walker wrote: The initial core reviewers was seeded by representatives of distro's and vendors to get their input on viability in distro's. Really? James, were you made core on the requirements? I once

Re: [openstack-dev] Debian already using Python 3.5: please gate on that

2015-06-18 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 6/18/15, 08:44, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: Hi! tl;dr: skip this message, the subject line is enough! :) As per the subject line, we already have Python 3.5 in Debian (AFAICT, from Debian Experimental, in version beta 2). As a consequence, we're already running (unit) tests using

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [all] To changes-since or not to changes-since

2015-06-19 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 6/19/15, 14:39, Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com wrote: On 6/19/15, 14:26, Kevin L. Mitchell kevin.mitch...@rackspace.com wrote: On Fri, 2015-06-19 at 10:07 +0100, Chris Dent wrote: * Are there additional relevant pros and cons for the two proposals? * Are there additional

Re: [openstack-dev] [os-ansible-deployment] Core team nomination

2015-06-19 Thread Ian Cordasco
Thanks everyone! On 6/19/15, 11:52, Kevin Carter kevin.car...@rackspace.com wrote: Please join me in welcoming Ian Cordasco to the `os-ansible-deployment` core team! ​​ -- Kevin Carter From: Hugh Saunders h...@wherenow.org Sent: Thursday, June 18

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [all] To changes-since or not to changes-since

2015-06-19 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 6/19/15, 14:26, Kevin L. Mitchell kevin.mitch...@rackspace.com wrote: On Fri, 2015-06-19 at 10:07 +0100, Chris Dent wrote: * Are there additional relevant pros and cons for the two proposals? * Are there additional proposals which can address the shortcomings in either? On the latter

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Switching to SQLAlchemy 1.0.x

2015-06-10 Thread Ian Cordasco
I think it would first require a version of oslo.db to be released inside stable/kilo's bounds that uncapped SQLAlchemy first since the requirement in the version of oslo.db installed is what you see here http://logs.openstack.org/62/190062/2/check/check-tempest-dsvm-neutron-full

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-15 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 6/15/15, 09:24, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: On 06/08/2015 01:55 PM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote: One thing I like about plan D is that it would give also indicator how much the stable branch has moved in each individual project. The only indication you will get is how many patches it has.

Re: [openstack-dev] Looking for help getting git-review to work over https

2015-06-12 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 6/12/15, 14:46, KARR, DAVID dk0...@att.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Kevin L. Mitchell [mailto:kevin.mitch...@rackspace.com] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 12:05 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Looking for help getting git-review to work

Re: [openstack-dev] Looking for help getting git-review to work over https

2015-06-12 Thread Ian Cordasco
/) - What you get when you do `python -c 'import setuptools; print(setuptools.__version__)'` - Output of python -V On 6/12/15, 12:08, KARR, DAVID dk0...@att.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Ian Cordasco [mailto:ian.corda...@rackspace.com] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 9:57 AM To: OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] setup.py executable bit

2015-06-17 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 6/17/15, 13:53, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2015-06-17 14:47:48 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote: +1 both to using -x and to removing the shebang. Agreed. We don't want anyone directly invoking this file as an executable script in PBR-based packages, so I'm strongly in

Re: [openstack-dev] Looking for help getting git-review to work over https

2015-06-12 Thread Ian Cordasco
Python has generally awful support for doing HTTPS over an HTTPS proxy. Can you try doing: # pip install --proxy http://one.proxy.att.com:appropriate-port Cheers, Ian On 6/12/15, 10:26, KARR, DAVID dk0...@att.com wrote: As I apparently have to sudo this, it would likely be more effective, if

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-15 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 6/15/15, 16:24, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: On 06/15/2015 05:19 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: On 6/15/15, 09:24, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: On 06/08/2015 01:55 PM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote: One thing I like about plan D is that it would give also indicator how much the stable

Re: [openstack-dev] Nominating Serge van Ginderachter to the os-ansible-deployment core team

2015-05-28 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 5/28/15, 18:01, Kevin Carter kevin.car...@rackspace.com wrote: Hello, I would like to nominate Serge (svg on IRC) for the os-ansible-deployment-core team. Serge has been involved with the greater Ansible community for some time and has been working with the OSAD project for the last couple of

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-01 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 6/1/15, 06:20, Dimitri John Ledkov dimitri.j.led...@intel.com wrote: On 29 May 2015 at 14:41, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Hi everyone, TL;DR: - We propose to stop tagging coordinated point releases (like 2015.1.1) - We continue maintaining stable branches as a trusted

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] cross project communication: Return request-id to caller

2015-05-27 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 5/27/15, 10:15, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: Excerpts from Kekane, Abhishek's message of 2015-05-27 07:06:56 +: Hi Devs, Each OpenStack service sends a request ID header with HTTP responses. This request ID can be useful for tracking down problems in the logs. However,

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone]Why not common definition about normal HTTP status code like 2xx and 3xx?

2015-06-02 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 6/2/15, 04:45, Boris Bobrov bbob...@mirantis.com wrote: On Tuesday 02 June 2015 09:32:45 Chenhong Liu wrote: There is keystone/exception.py which contains Exceptions defined and used inside keystone provide 4xx and 5xx status code. And we can use it like: exception.Forbidden.code,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-05-29 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 5/29/15, 12:14, Haïkel hgue...@fedoraproject.org wrote: 2015-05-29 15:41 GMT+02:00 Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org: Hi everyone, TL;DR: - We propose to stop tagging coordinated point releases (like 2015.1.1) - We continue maintaining stable branches as a trusted source of stable

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][release] Announcing Liberty-1 release of Kolla

2015-07-01 Thread Ian Cordasco
and repeatable). Are there places where you've found osad to be not consistent or repeatable? On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com wrote: On 6/29/15, 23:59, Steven Dake (stdake) std...@cisco.com wrote: The Kolla community is pleased to announce the release

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][packaging] Adding files to /etc in a package

2015-07-01 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 7/1/15, 09:13, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2015-07-01 12:08:46 +1000 (+1000), Tony Breeds wrote: Okay so I take you point no problem, but I'm not running distro packages and I still want completions. There must be a way to package the file to at least make it easier to

Re: [openstack-dev] Python 2.6 failed jobs for SQLA-Migrate

2015-07-01 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 7/1/15, 09:03, Mike Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote: On 6/30/15 9:51 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, Mike nicely tried to help me to get sqla-migrate to work with sqlalchemy 1.0.6 which is now in Debian. But there's some failures in Python 2.6: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/197144/

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][release] Announcing Liberty-1 release of Kolla

2015-06-30 Thread Ian Cordasco
30, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com wrote: On 6/29/15, 23:59, Steven Dake (stdake) std...@cisco.com wrote: The Kolla community is pleased to announce the release of the Kolla Liberty 1 milestone. This release fixes 56 bugs and implements 14 blueprints! Our community

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] asks from the ops meetup

2015-08-19 Thread Ian Cordasco
Questions in-line, but I'd appreciate a better summary On 8/19/15, 17:50, Matthew Thode prometheanf...@gentoo.org wrote: I'll start by giving this out, but I'll also summarize the asks we had from upstream. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PAO-ops-packaging General services: - gate check on

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][release] Announcing Liberty-1 release of Kolla

2015-06-30 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 6/29/15, 23:59, Steven Dake (stdake) std...@cisco.com wrote: The Kolla community is pleased to announce the release of the Kolla Liberty 1 milestone. This release fixes 56 bugs and implements 14 blueprints! Our community developed the following notable features: * A start at

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Removing python-swiftclient from requirements.txt

2015-07-29 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 7/29/15, 13:27, William M Edmonds edmon...@us.ibm.com wrote: From: Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com To: openstack-dev openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 07/28/2015 07:59 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Removing python-swiftclient from requirements.txt snip I

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] [os-ansible-deployment] Kilo - Liberty Upgrade Problems

2015-07-31 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 7/31/15, 07:40, Jesse Pretorius jesse.pretor...@gmail.com wrote: I'm adding openstack-operators too as this is a discussion that I think it would be useful to have their input for. I've removed them from the CC since I don't think we're supposed to cross-post. So what would the resulting

Re: [openstack-dev] [Security] Would people see a value in the cve-check-tool? (Reshetova, Elena)

2015-08-05 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 8/5/15, 08:14, McPeak, Travis travis.mcp...@hp.com wrote: (Merging thread from security ML) Bandit probably isn¹t the correct integration point for this - cve-check has its own analysis procedures while Bandit uses Python AST. Also I see the use workflows being different. For Bandit a

Re: [openstack-dev] [pbr] [stable] [infra] How to generate .Z version increments on stable/liberty commits

2015-08-03 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 8/3/15, 11:11, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2015-08-03 14:46:51 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote: [...] In order to make this work, it looks like we'd require: * pbr changes so that it supports a mode where every commit on the branch

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] [os-ansible-deployment] Kilo - Liberty Upgrade Problems

2015-07-30 Thread Ian Cordasco
Hey all, As you may have seen elsewhere on openstack-dev, OpenStack is changing the versioning for the service projects. This means our previous upgrade solution will not continue to work. For context, one of our project's goals is to have in-place upgrades be a reality. Previously, using our

Re: [openstack-dev] Would people see a value in the cve-check-tool?

2015-08-04 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 8/4/15, 13:17, Clark, Robert Graham robert.cl...@hp.com wrote: Hi Elena, This is interesting work, thanks for posting it (and for posting it here on openstack-dev, we are trying to wind down the security ML) though maybe use the [Security] tag in the subject line next time. I think this

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] glance_store and glance

2015-08-10 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 8/7/15, 07:19, Nicolas Trangez nicolas.tran...@scality.com wrote: On Fri, 2015-08-07 at 01:21 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote: 3. ease of addition of newer drivers for the developers -- drivers are only being removed since. The OpenStack team at Scality developed a Glance Store driver for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [glance] Removal of Catalog Index Service from Glance

2015-07-27 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 7/27/15, 11:29, Louis Taylor lo...@kragniz.eu wrote: On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 07:50:55PM +0100, Louis Taylor wrote: Hi operators, In Kilo, we added the Catalog Index Service as an experimental API in Glance. It soon became apparent this would be better suited as a separate project, so

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][api] Response when a illegal body is sent

2015-07-24 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 7/23/15, 19:38, michael mccune m...@redhat.com wrote: On 07/23/2015 12:43 PM, Ryan Brown wrote: On 07/23/2015 12:13 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 07/23/2015 10:53 AM, Bunting, Niall wrote: Hi, Currently when a body is passed to an API operation that explicitly does not allow bodies Glance

[openstack-dev] [os-ansible-deployment] [openstack-ansible] [Searchlight] Specs for Liberty (v12.0.0)

2015-07-24 Thread Ian Cordasco
Hey all, It looks like we've started accepting specifications for Liberty development. Is this accurate? If so, I'd like to start writing one to add Searchlight. Anyone experimenting with Glance's Catalog Index Search in Kilo will want Searchlight in Liberty. Cheers, Ian

  1   2   3   4   >