Hello Kevin.
There is a similar Neutron blueprint [1], originally meant for Havana but
now aiming for Juno.
I would be happy to join efforts with you regarding our blueprints.
See also: [2].
[1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ml2-external-port
[2] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/n
ric API definition and
> implementations
> (including ML2). In "external attachment point" blueprint review, API
> and generic topics are mainly discussed so far and the detail
> implementation is not discussed
> so much yet. ML2 implementation detail can be discussed later
I was at Maruti's presentation and it was very interesting. I have
developed a similar PoC so I got even more interested.
The main difference between them, from my understanding during the
presentation, is that my PoC tries to encompass very heteogeneous kinds of
networking equipment. Say, making
Hello Sumit.
Unfortunately I could not go to the round table meeting, sorry for the
absence.
Did you talk about traffic steering? Is there some place or etherpad with a
summary of what was discussed/outlined?
Cheers,
On 5 November 2014 17:22, Sumit Naiksatam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We had a productive
Hello all,
Also, what about Kevin's https://review.openstack.org/#/c/87825/? One of
its use cases is exactly the L2 gateway. These proposals could probably be
inserted in a more generic work for moving existing datacenter L2 resources
to Neutron.
Cheers,
On 14 November 2014 15:28, Mathieu Rohon w
cram more
>> than
>> >> one abstraction in one single API, as it does violate the above
>> mentioned
>> >> principles. Ultimately I like the L2 GW API proposed by 1 and 2
>> because it's
>> >> in line with those principles. I'd rather
I have developed a new kind of agent (used to remote-configure
heterogeneous legacy switches) and it would definitely benefit from
interacting with, e.g., the ovs agent.
Igor Duarte Cardoso.
http://igordcard.com
Sent from mobile.
On Jul 31, 2014 2:49 AM, "loy wolfe" wrote:
> openstack is designe
>What I really hate is having to throw away my (local, precious for me)
history for all change requests because I need to upload a change to Gerrit.
+1
>3. and now you get the first version that deserves to be seen by
community, so you run 'git review', it asks you for desired commit message,
and
Ivar,
With the currently supported set of services I also agree, but as more
services get supported in the future, or we hand out that choice to
tenants' VMs, it starts to justify a generic model that does not
restrict whether EPs should provide service chains.
That said, I do not yet totally und
