Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Icehouse Requirements

2013-12-10 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/09/12 17:15, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: - As an infrastructure administrator, Anna wants to be able to unallocate a node from a deployment. Why? Whats her motivation. One plausible one for me is 'a machine needs to be serviced so Anna wants to remove it from the

[openstack-dev] [UX] Weekly topic - Horizon Navigation

2013-12-10 Thread Jaromir Coufal
in navigation topic or has some preferences one way or another, we are looking forward to hearing from you here or in the Askbot thread. Cheers -- Jarda --- Jaromir Coufal (jcoufal) --- OpenStack User Experience --- IRC: #openstack-ux (at FreeNode) --- Forum: http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com --- Wiki

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Icehouse Requirements

2013-12-10 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/09/12 21:22, Robert Collins wrote: Ironic today will want IPMI address + MAC for each NIC + disk/cpu/memory stats For registration it is just Management MAC address which is needed right? Or does Ironic need also IP? I think that MAC address might be enough, we can display IP in

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Icehouse Requirements

2013-12-10 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/09/12 23:38, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: Thanks for the explanation! I'm going to claim that the thread revolves around two main areas of disagreement. Then I'm going to propose a way through: a) Manual Node Assignment I think that everyone is agreed that automated node assignment through

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Nominations to Horizon Core

2013-12-11 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/10/12 21:24, Lyle, David wrote: I would like to nominate Tatiana Mazur to Horizon Core. Tatiana has been a significant code contributor in the last two releases, understands the code base well and has been doing a significant number of reviews for the last to milestones. +1

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Icehouse Requirements

2013-12-11 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/10/12 23:09, Robert Collins wrote: On 11 December 2013 05:42, Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com wrote: On 2013/09/12 23:38, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: The disagreement comes from whether we need manual node assignment or not. I would argue that we need to step back and take a look

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Icehouse Requirements

2013-12-11 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/10/12 19:39, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: Ideally, we don't. But with this approach we would take out the possibility to change something or decide something from the user. The 'easiest' way is to support bigger companies with huge deployments, tailored infrastructure, everything connected

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UI] Icehouse Requirements - Summary, Milestones

2013-12-13 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hey folks, after a bit longer but very useful discussion about requirements (almost 60 e-mails so far) I think we need to get to some conclusion what to deliver in Icehouse, what are the steps and what we should continue discussing to get better understanding for. Time is running mercilessly

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] UI Wireframes for Resource Management - ready for implementation

2013-12-13 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/13/12 11:20, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: These look good! Quick question - can you explain the purpose of Node Tags? Are they an additional way to filter nodes through nova-scheduler (is that even possible?), or are they there solely for display in the UI? Mainn We start easy, so that's

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UI] Icehouse Requirements - Summary, Milestones

2013-12-13 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Quick note - I want to keep this discussion a bit high-level and not to get into big implementation details. For everyone, please, let's agree in this thread on the direction and approach and we can start follow-up threads with bigger details of how to get those things done. On 2013/13/12

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Horizon] [Tuskar] [UI] Horizon and Tuskar-UI merge

2013-12-16 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/16/12 14:03, Matthias Runge wrote: On 12/13/2013 03:08 PM, Ladislav Smola wrote: Horizoners, As discussed in TripleO and Horizon meetings, we are proposing to move Tuskar UI under the Horizon umbrella. Since we are building our UI solution on top of Horizon, we think this is a good

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] UI Wireframes for Resource Management - ready for implementation

2013-12-17 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/13/12 19:53, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: We start easy, so that's solely for UI needs of filtering and monitoring (grouping of nodes). It is already in Ironic, so there is no reason why not to take advantage of it. -- Jarda Okay, great. Just for further clarification, are you expecting this

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] UI Wireframes for Resource Management - ready for implementation

2013-12-17 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/16/12 20:48, Jay Dobies wrote: I might be getting ahead of things, but will the tags be free-form entered by the user, pre-entered in a separate settings and selectable at node register/update time, or locked into a select few that we specify? So what I would expect is completely

Re: [openstack-dev] [governance] Becoming a Program, before applying for incubation

2013-12-17 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/16/12 15:19, Flavio Percoco wrote: 1. Programs that are not part of OpenStack's release cycle shouldn't be considered official nor they should have the rights that integrated projects have. I don't agree on this point. There might be supportive teams, which are helping OpenStack in

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Terminology

2013-12-17 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/13/12 23:11, Jordan OMara wrote: On 13/12/13 16:20 +1300, Robert Collins wrote: However, on instance - 'instance' is a very well defined term in Nova and thus OpenStack: Nova boot gets you an instance, nova delete gets rid of an instance, nova rebuild recreates it, etc. Instances run

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Horizon] [Tuskar] [UI] Horizon and Tuskar-UI codebase merge

2013-12-17 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/17/12 11:04, Ladislav Smola wrote: Horizoners, As an alternative merge option, we could merge directly to Horizon code base. After some conversation, we have realized that it is possible to mix codebase of incubated and integrated projects, as Trove showed us. Contrary to what was said

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Horizon] [Tuskar] [UI] Horizon and Tuskar-UI codebase merge

2013-12-18 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi All, After yesterday's weekly meeting it seems that majority of us is leaning towards this approach (codebase merge). However there are few concerns regarding speed of development and resources especially for reviews. With this e-mail, I'd like to kick off discussion about how we might

Re: [openstack-dev] Horizon and Tuskar-UI codebase merge

2013-12-19 Thread Jaromir Coufal
So basically this is our first proposal what we send out: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-December/022196.html After Horizon meetings, several e-mails and also couple of other discussions of people who are for/against codebase merge, it looks that in the end upstream

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Deployment Management section - Wireframes

2014-01-10 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi everybody, there is first stab of Deployment Management section with future direction (note that it was discussed as a scope for Icehouse). I tried to add functionality in time and break it down to steps. This will help us to focus on one functionality at a time and if we will be in time

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Deployment Management section - Wireframes

2014-01-13 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi Jeff, many thanks for great feedback. Few comments are inline: On 2014/10/01 16:16, Walls, Jeffrey Joel (Cloud OS RD) wrote: Jarda, I love how this is progressing. It will be very nice once it's implemented! The iconography seems to be inconsistent. The ! triangle is used for error

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Deployment Management section - Wireframes

2014-01-13 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi Jay, thanks for your questions, they are great. I am going to answer inline: On 2014/10/01 17:18, Jay Dobies wrote: Thanks for recording this. A few questions: - I'm guessing the capacity metrics will come from Ceilometer. Will Ceilometer provide the averages for the role or is that

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Deployment Management section - Wireframes

2014-01-13 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/10/01 19:02, Dougal Matthews wrote: Hi, Thanks for the wireframes and the walkthrough. Very useful. I've a few comments. - I'd like to echo the comments from the recording about Role I think the term probably isn't specific enough but I don't have a great suggestion. However, this is

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Deployment Management section - Wireframes

2014-01-13 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/10/01 21:17, Jay Dobies wrote: Another question: - A Role (sounds like we're moving away from that so I'll call it Resource Category) can have multiple Node Profiles defined (assuming I'm interpretting the + and the tabs in the Create a Role wireframe correctly). But I don't see

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Deployment Management section - Wireframes

2014-01-15 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/13/01 13:15, Ladislav Smola wrote: The usage of roles is new metric which doesn't exist. It is the most consumed HW resource (which means if CPU is consumed by 60 % and RAM or disk are less, then the role usage is 60 %). It would be great to have such a metric from Ceilometer. However, I

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Deployment Management section - Wireframes

2014-01-15 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/13/01 12:20, Ladislav Smola wrote: [snip of larger amount of text] - When on the change deployments screen, after making a change but not yet applying it, how are the projected capacity changes calculated? I believe we wanted to make just simple algorithm, that was considering, that

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Deployment Management section - Wireframes

2014-01-15 Thread Jaromir Coufal
1) Check for an already deleted server before deleting any. This is related to stack convergence: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/stack-convergence This will allow users to just delete a server they want to delete, and then update the template to reflect reality. 2) Allow resources

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Deployment Management section - Wireframes

2014-01-15 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/13/01 16:45, Jiří Stránský wrote: [snip] The other approach is just to scale the number of nodes in a role and let system decide the best match (which node profile is chosen will be decided on the best fit, probably). Hmm i'm not sure i understand - what do you think by best fit here?

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes

2014-01-15 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi folks, thanks everybody for feedback. Based on that I updated wireframes and tried to provide a minimum scope for Icehouse timeframe. http://people.redhat.com/~jcoufal/openstack/tripleo/2014-01-16_tripleo-ui-icehouse.pdf Hopefully we are able to deliver described set of features. But if

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Deployment Management section - Wireframes

2014-01-16 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/14/01 21:35, Vitaly Kramskikh wrote: Hi Jaromir, 2014/1/13 Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com mailto:jcou...@redhat.com So what we can do at the moment (until there is some way to specify which node to remove) is to inform user, which nodes were removed in the end

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Docker and TripleO

2014-01-16 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/01/01 03:35, Robert Collins wrote: So, we've spoken about using containers on baremetal - e.g. the lxc provider - in the past, and with the [righteously deserved] noise Docker is receiving, I think we need to have a short expectation-setting discussion. Previously we've said that

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Domain Model Locations

2014-01-16 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi Jay, Awesome. I'll just add quick note inline (and sorry for smaller delay): On 2014/09/01 18:22, Jay Dobies wrote: I'm trying to hash out where data will live for Tuskar (both long term and for its Icehouse deliverables). Based on the expectations for Icehouse (a combination of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Domain Model Locations

2014-01-16 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/12/01 20:40, Jay Pipes wrote: On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 10:28 -0500, Jay Dobies wrote: So, it's not as simple as it may initially seem :) Ah, I should have been clearer in my statement - my understanding is that we're scrapping concepts like Rack entirely. That was my understanding as

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Editing Nodes

2014-01-16 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/15/01 22:33, Jay Dobies wrote: On 01/15/2014 08:07 AM, James Slagle wrote: [snip] I may be misinterpreting, but let me say that I don't think Tuskar should be building images. There's been a fair amount of discussion around a Nova native image building service [1][2]. I'm actually

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes

2014-01-17 Thread Jaromir Coufal
:50:00AM +0100, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hi folks, thanks everybody for feedback. Based on that I updated wireframes and tried to provide a minimum scope for Icehouse timeframe. http://people.redhat.com/~__jcoufal/openstack/tripleo/__2014-01

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes

2014-01-20 Thread Jaromir Coufal
huge changes. Cheers -- Jarda On 2014/16/01 01:50, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hi folks, thanks everybody for feedback. Based on that I updated wireframes and tried to provide a minimum scope for Icehouse timeframe. http://people.redhat.com/~jcoufal/openstack/tripleo/2014-01-16_tripleo-ui

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Terminology Revival #1 - Roles

2014-01-21 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi folks, when I was getting feedback on wireframes and we talked about Roles, there were various objections and not much suggestions. I would love to call for action and think a bit about the term for concept currently known as Role (= Resource Category). Definition: Role is a

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Terminology Revival #1 - Roles

2014-01-22 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/22/01 00:56, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: Hiya - Resource is actually a Heat term that corresponds to what we're deploying within the Overcloud Stack - i.e., if we specify that we want an Overcloud with 1 Controller and 3 Compute, Heat will create a Stack that contains 1 Controller and 3

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Terminology Revival #1 - Roles

2014-01-22 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/22/01 00:56, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: Hiya - Resource is actually a Heat term that corresponds to what we're deploying within the Overcloud Stack - i.e., if we specify that we want an Overcloud with 1 Controller and 3 Compute, Heat will create a Stack that contains 1 Controller and 3

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Terminology Revival #1 - Roles

2014-01-22 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/22/01 10:00, Jaromir Coufal wrote: On 2014/22/01 00:56, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: Hiya - Resource is actually a Heat term that corresponds to what we're deploying within the Overcloud Stack - i.e., if we specify that we want an Overcloud with 1 Controller and 3 Compute, Heat will create

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Terminology Revival #1 - Roles

2014-01-22 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Oh dear user... :) I'll step a little bit back. We need to agree if we want to name concepts one way in the background and other way in the UI for user (did we already agree on this point?). We all know pros and cons. And I will still fight for users to get global infrastructure terminology

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes

2014-01-22 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hey everybody, I am sending updated wireframes. http://people.redhat.com/~jcoufal/openstack/tripleo/2014-01-22_tripleo-ui-icehouse.pdf Updates: * p15-18 for down-scaling deployment Any questions are welcome, I am happy to answer them. -- Jarda On 2014/16/01 01:50, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Terminology Revival #1 - Roles

2014-01-23 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/22/01 19:46, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: - Original Message - Oh dear user... :) I'll step a little bit back. We need to agree if we want to name concepts one way in the background and other way in the UI for user (did we already agree on this point?). We all know pros and cons.

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon]

2014-01-27 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Awesome, thanks a lot for setting this up, David! -- Jarda On 2014/26/01 02:10, Lyle, David wrote: With meeting logging now available in #openstack-meeting-3, the official Horizon meeting time is now Tuesdays at 1600 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3. Looking forward to seeing all Horizon folks

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Terminology Revival #1 - Roles

2014-01-27 Thread Jaromir Coufal
for this suggestion, if we don't get to agreement of majority by the end of the week, I would call for voting starting next week. Thanks -- Jarda On 2014/21/01 15:19, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hi folks, when I was getting feedback on wireframes and we talked about Roles, there were various

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Deployment Configuration in the UI

2014-01-28 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi folks, based on overcloud.yaml file (thanks Rob for pointing me there), I put together attributes for deployment configuration which should appear in the UI. Can I ask for a help, to review the list if it is accurate and if not to correct it?

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Roadmap towards heterogenous hardware support

2014-02-02 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/30/01 12:59, Ladislav Smola wrote: On 01/30/2014 12:39 PM, Jiří Stránský wrote: On 01/30/2014 11:26 AM, Tomas Sedovic wrote: [snip] I am for implementing support for Heterogeneous hardware properly, lifeless should post what he recommends soon, so I would rather discuss that. We

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Roadmap towards heterogenous hardware support

2014-02-02 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/30/01 19:29, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: Wouldn't lying about the hardware specs when registering nodes be problematic for upgrades? Users would have to re-register their nodes. +1 for problematic area here One reason why a custom filter feels attractive is that it provides us with a clear

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Roadmap towards heterogenous hardware support

2014-02-02 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/30/01 23:33, Devananda van der Veen wrote: I was responding based on Treat similar hardware configuration as equal. When there is a very minor difference in hardware (eg, 1TB vs 1.1TB disks), enrolling them with the same spec (1TB disk) is sufficient to solve all these issues and mask

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Roadmap towards heterogenous hardware support

2014-02-02 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/30/01 21:28, Robert Collins wrote: On 30 January 2014 23:26, Tomas Sedovic tsedo...@redhat.com wrote: Hi all, I've seen some confusion regarding the homogenous hardware support as the first step for the tripleo UI. I think it's time to make sure we're all on the same page. Here's what

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Roadmap towards heterogenous hardware support

2014-02-02 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/31/01 22:03, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: So after reading the replies on this thread, it seems like I (and others advocating a custom scheduler) may have overthought things a bit. The reason this route was suggested was because of conflicting goals for Icehouse: a) homogeneous nodes (to

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Roadmap towards heterogenous hardware support

2014-02-04 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/03/02 12:23, Tomas Sedovic wrote: My apologies for firing this off and then hiding under the FOSDEM rock. In light of the points raised by Devananda and Robert, I no longer think fiddling with the scheduler is the way to go. Note this was never intended to break/confuse all TripleO

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Roadmap towards heterogenous hardware support

2014-02-04 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/03/02 00:21, Robert Collins wrote: [snip] However me and Robert, we look to have different opinions on what 'homogeneous' means in our context. I think we should clarify that. So I think my point is more this: - either this iteration is entirely limited to homogeneous hardware, in

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes

2014-02-04 Thread Jaromir Coufal
://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2fv6vebFhM On 2014/16/01 01:50, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hi folks, thanks everybody for feedback. Based on that I updated wireframes and tried to provide a minimum scope for Icehouse timeframe. http://people.redhat.com/~jcoufal/openstack/tripleo/2014-01-16_tripleo-ui

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes

2014-02-05 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi Tomas, thanks for the questions, I am replying inline. On 2014/05/02 11:19, Tomas Sedovic wrote: On 05/02/14 03:58, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hi to everybody, based on the feedback from last week [0] I incorporated changes in the wireframes so that we keep them up to date with latest

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes

2014-02-05 Thread Jaromir Coufal
/2014 08:41 AM, Hugh O. Brock wrote: On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 01:50:00AM +0100, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hi folks, thanks everybody for feedback. Based on that I updated wireframes and tried to provide a minimum scope for Icehouse timeframe

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Icehouse Requirements

2014-02-05 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/05/02 15:27, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: Hi, In parallel to Jarda's updated wireframes, and based on various discussions over the past weeks, here are the updated Tuskar requirements for Icehouse: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/TuskarIcehouseRequirements Any feedback is

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] RFC - Suggestion for switching from Less to Sass (Bootstrap 3 Sass support)

2014-02-05 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Dear Horizoners, in last days there were couple of interesting discussions about updating to Bootstrap 3. In this e-mail, I would love to give a small summary and propose a solution for us. As Bootstrap was heavily dependent on Less, when we got rid of node.js we started to use lesscpy.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Nominating Radomir Dopieralski to Horizon Core

2014-03-06 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/05/03 23:36, Lyle, David wrote: I'd like to nominate Radomir Dopieralski to Horizon Core. I find his reviews very insightful and more importantly have come to rely on their quality. He has contributed to several areas in Horizon and he understands the code base well. Radomir is also

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Horizon] Searching for a new name for Tuskar UI

2014-03-27 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi OpenStackers, User interface which is managing the OpenStack Infrastructure is currently named Tuskar-UI because of historical reasons. Tuskar itself is a small service, which is giving logic into generating and managing Heat templates and helps user to model and manage his deployment. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Horizon] Searching for a new name for Tuskar UI

2014-03-31 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/27/03 19:04, Jiří Stránský wrote: On 27.3.2014 18:21, Dougal Matthews wrote: [snip] As a side, but related note, I think we should rename the Tuskar client to whatever name the Tuskar UI gets called. The client will eventually have feature parity with the UI and thus will have the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TRIPLEO] tripleo-core update october

2013-10-09 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/08/10 23:53, Robert Collins wrote: On 9 October 2013 07:24, Jiří Stránský ji...@redhat.com wrote: Clint and Monty, thank you for such good responses. I am new in TripleO team indeed and I was mostly concerned by the line in the sand. Your responses shed some more light on the issue for

[openstack-dev] Incubation Request for OpenStack UX

2013-10-14 Thread Jaromir Coufal
about UX of OpenStack, get in touch with all OpenStack projects at once and figure out the best way for our cooperation. [0] https://plus.google.com/115177641540718537778/posts/iumZKYXbe4N Sincerely yours, Jaromir Coufal Proposed UX Technical Lead Red Hat

Re: [openstack-dev] Incubation Request for OpenStack UX

2013-10-14 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hey Thierry, thanks for your notes. Few comments are following inline. On 2013/14/10 11:00, Thierry Carrez wrote: Jaromir Coufal wrote: Dear Technical Committee Members and OpenStack Community, after previous brainstorming, suggestions and discussions in community, we came out with OpenStack

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Tuskar UI - Resource Class Creation Wireframes - updated

2013-10-16 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hey folks, I am sending an updated version of wireframes for Resource Class Creation. Thanks everybody for your feedback, I tried to cover most of your concerns and I am sending updated version for your reviews. If you have any concerns, I am happy to discuss it with you.

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Tuskar UI - Resource Class Creation Wireframes - updated

2013-10-17 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi Jay, thank you very much for your feedback. Some comments will follow inline: On 2013/16/10 19:15, Jay Pipes wrote: Hi Jarda, wireframes look really nice :) One tiny suggestion: Assistant (proper halfing of resources) If I understand correctly, I think a better layout/UI/wording might be

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Tuskar UI L2-Group Creation and Nodes Registering wireframes

2013-10-22 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi everybody, you can find updated version of workflows for Creating L2-Group and Adding New Nodes at new discussion tool for UX: http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com/question/7/tuskar-ui-l2-groups-and-nodes/ For any feedback, please follow the conversation there Thanks -- Jarda

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Tuskar UI - Resource Class Creation Wireframes - updated

2013-10-22 Thread Jaromir Coufal
on the latest version of the Resource Class Creation wireframes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Liz On Oct 16, 2013, at 12:31 PM, Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com mailto:jcou...@redhat.com wrote: Hey folks, I am sending an updated version of wireframes for Resource Class

[openstack-dev] [summit] Youtube stream from Design Summit?

2013-11-01 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hello community, I was wondering, since there is a lot of people who cannot attend Design Sessions, if we can help them to be present at least in some way. My thinking was going in the way of doing a hangout from the session. However hangout has limited audience of 10 people, so what we can

Re: [openstack-dev] [summit] Youtube stream from Design Summit?

2013-11-01 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/01/11 13:48, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Jarda, Here are some lessons learned from a friend who is on a team that used Google Hangout - http://drbacchus.com/google-hangout-lessons-learned -- dims Awesome, thanks a lot for this cheat sheet :) I have done couple of them, having quite a

Re: [openstack-dev] [summit] Youtube stream from Design Summit?

2013-11-01 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/01/11 18:42, Stefano Maffulli wrote: On 11/01/2013 05:33 AM, Jaromir Coufal wrote: I was wondering, since there is a lot of people who cannot attend Design Sessions, if we can help them to be present at least in some way. We tried in the past to setup systems to enable remote

[openstack-dev] Search Project - summit follow up

2013-11-19 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hey OpenStackers, I hope you all enjoyed Hong Kong Summit and for those who couldn't attend, I hope we will see each other next time! For all of you, I'd like to follow up on conversation from Summit about Search project [0], which Dmitri introduced and I believe it has great potential for

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack][Horizon] poweroff/shutdown action in horizon

2013-11-20 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hey Gareth, I am for sake of consistency and it looks that what we want here is 'Shutting down'. There is discussion forum for similar topics, feel free to join: http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com. Also, for live discussions, you can join #openstack-ux

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Summit session wrapup

2013-11-25 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hey Rob, can we add 'Slick Overcloud deployment through the UI' to the list? There was no session about that, but we discussed it afterwords and agreed that it is high priority for Icehouse as well. I just want to keep it on the list, so we are aware of that. Thanks -- Jarda On 2013/25/11

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Summit session wrapup

2013-11-27 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/27/11 00:00, Robert Collins wrote: On 26 November 2013 07:41, Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com wrote: Hey Rob, can we add 'Slick Overcloud deployment through the UI' to the list? There was no session about that, but we discussed it afterwords and agreed that it is high priority

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Summit session wrapup

2013-11-28 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/28/11 06:41, Robert Collins wrote: Certainly. Do we have Personas for those people? (And have we done any validation of them?) We have shorter paragraph to each. But not verified by any survey, so we don't have very solid basis in this area right now and I believe we all are trying to

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Summit session wrapup

2013-11-28 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi Mark, thanks for your insight, I mostly agree. Just few points below. On 2013/27/11 21:54, Mark McLoughlin wrote: Hi Jarda, ... Yes, I buy this. And I think it's the point worth dwelling on. It would be quite a bit of work to substantiate the point with hard data - e.g. doing user

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Summit session wrapup

2013-11-28 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/27/11 16:37, James Slagle wrote: On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com wrote: V0: basic slick installer - flexibility and control first - enable user to auto-discover (or manual register) nodes - let user decide, which node is going to be controller, which

Re: [openstack-dev] [UX] Automatically post new threads from AskBot to the list

2013-11-29 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/20/11 01:23, Stefano Maffulli wrote: On 11/19/2013 08:19 AM, Julie Pichon wrote: I've been thinking about the AskBot UX website [0] and its lack of visibility, particularly for new community members. Indeed, it's one of the drawbacks of splitting groups: information tends not to flow

[openstack-dev] [UX] Topics Summary

2013-12-03 Thread Jaromir Coufal
efforts to move forward, you are the most certainly welcome Cheers -- Jarda --- Jaromir Coufal (jcoufal) --- OpenStack User Experience --- IRC: #openstack-ux (at FreeNode) --- Forum: http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com --- Wiki: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/UX

[openstack-dev] {TripleO] UI Wireframes - close to implementation start

2013-12-03 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hey folks, I opened 2 issues on UX discussion forum with TripleO UI topics: Resource Management: http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com/question/95/tripleo-ui-resource-management/ - this section was already reviewed before, there is not much surprises, just smaller updates - we are about to

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] UI Wireframes - close to implementation start

2013-12-03 Thread Jaromir Coufal
I am sorry for mistake in tag - fixed in this reply and keeping the original text below. On 2013/03/12 10:25, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hey folks, I opened 2 issues on UX discussion forum with TripleO UI topics: Resource Management: http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com/question/95/tripleo-ui

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] UI Wireframes - close to implementation start

2013-12-03 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Wireframes walkthrough: https://www.youtube.com/enhance?v=oRtL3aCuEEc On 2013/03/12 10:25, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hey folks, I opened 2 issues on UX discussion forum with TripleO UI topics: Resource Management: http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com/question/95/tripleo-ui-resource-management

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] UI Wireframes - close to implementation start

2013-12-03 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Please, instead of 'enhance', use 'watch': http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRtL3aCuEEc (this link is correct) Thanks -- Jarda On 2013/03/12 12:53, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Wireframes walkthrough: https://www.youtube.com/enhance?v=oRtL3aCuEEc On 2013/03/12 10:25, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hey folks

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] Core reviewer update Dec

2013-12-06 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/06/12 00:33, Robert Collins wrote: There isn't a plan yet, it's just discussion so far. I don't have a strong feeling of consensus. Lets discuss it more real-time at the coming TripleO meeting; and I suggest that the Horizon meeting should also do that, and we can loop back to email

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] Core reviewer update Dec

2013-12-06 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/04/12 08:12, Robert Collins wrote: Hi, like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted with -core responsibilities. In this

Re: [openstack-dev] How to best make User Experience a priority in every project

2013-12-06 Thread Jaromir Coufal
and expressing your opinions. I really appreciate that. -- Jarda --- Jaromir Coufal (jcoufal) --- OpenStack User Experience --- IRC: #openstack-ux (at FreeNode) --- Forum: http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com --- Wiki: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/UX On 2013/20/11 16:09, Thierry Carrez wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [UX] Topics Summary

2013-12-06 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/05/12 23:14, Mark McLoughlin wrote: On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 09:36 +0100, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hey OpenStackers, based on the latest discussions, it was asked if we can try to post regular updates of what is happening in our community (mostly on Askbot forum: http://ask

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] UI Wireframes - close to implementation start

2013-12-06 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hey Matt, thanks for the comments, I'll try to reply below: On 2013/05/12 20:32, Matt Wagner wrote: On Tue Dec 3 06:53:04 2013, Jaromir Coufal wrote: I've somehow overlooked the 'Node tags' previously. I'm curious what format these would take, or if this is something we've discussed. I

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] UI Wireframes for Resource Management - ready for implementation

2013-12-06 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hey everybody, based on feedback, I updated wireframes for resource management and summarized changes in Askbot tool: http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com/question/95/tripleo-ui-resource-management/?answer=110#post-id-110 Feel free to follow the discussion there. I am passing these wireframes

Re: [openstack-dev] How to best make User Experience a priority in every project

2013-12-06 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/06/12 15:16, Anne Gentle wrote: On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org mailto:thie...@openstack.org wrote: Jaromir Coufal wrote: [...] I am not trying to convince anybody here, I accept the decision 'no' (at least

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Icehouse Requirements

2013-12-09 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/06/12 21:26, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: * can be allocated as one of four node types It's pretty clear by the current verbiage but I'm going to ask anyway: one and only one? Yep, that's right! Confirming. One and only one. My gut reaction is that we want to bite this off sooner rather

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Icehouse Requirements

2013-12-09 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/06/12 22:55, Matt Wagner wrote: - As an infrastructure administrator, Anna wants to review the distribution of the nodes that she has assigned before kicking off the Deploy task. What does she expect to see here on the review screen that she didn't see on the previous screens, if

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Icehouse Requirements

2013-12-09 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/07/12 02:20, Robert Collins wrote: - As an infrastructure administrator, Anna needs to assign a role to each of the necessary nodes in her OpenStack deployment. The nodes could be either controller, compute, networking, or storage resources depending on the needs of this deployment.

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Icehouse Requirements

2013-12-09 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2013/07/12 01:59, Robert Collins wrote: * Creation * Manual registration * hardware specs from Ironic based on mac address (M) Ironic today will want IPMI address + MAC for each NIC + disk/cpu/memory stats For registration it is just Management MAC address which is

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] Less compiler dependency

2013-12-09 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hey all Horizoners, This is last time I am trying to bring this concern up (well at least last time for a while :)). But... Watching latest progress with updating Bootstrap to v3 and dealing with compiling issues, I am more and more concerned about dependency on lesscpy. Currently the

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Heat] Reminder: Mid-cycle Meetup - Attendance Confirmation

2014-06-17 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi all, I would like to remind you to sign up for mid-cycle meetup which is happening July 21-25 in Raleigh: * https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-midcycle-meetup We need number of participants as soon as possible so that we can ask for group discount at the hotel. Also if we don't get

[openstack-dev] [UX] Meeting Reminder - Jun 18th, 14:30 UTC

2014-06-17 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi UXers, this is a reminder that our next regular IRC meeting is happening tomorrow (Wednesday) June 18th at 14:30 UTC at #openstack-meeting-3. Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/UX Feel free to add topics which you are interested in. See you all tomorrow -- Jarda

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] Quick Survey: Horizon Mid-Cycle Meetup

2014-06-18 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hello folks, there were few discussions about meeting during the cycle and discuss ongoing issues, progress and next steps of bigger topics. As long as it is pretty late announcement, I don't think (and I guess we agreed) that it doesn't worth to organize a special event just for Horizon.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Quick Survey: Horizon Mid-Cycle Meetup

2014-06-20 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/19/06 09:58, Matthias Runge wrote: On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:55:59AM +0200, Jaromir Coufal wrote: My quick questions are: * Who would be interested (and able) to get to the meeting? * What topics do we want to discuss? https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/horizon-juno-meetup Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Heat] Reminder: Mid-cycle Meetup - Attendance Confirmation

2014-06-25 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Thanks a lot for your help. Just a side note - we need to fill in the number of requested rooms, so that we don't get charged for extra cost - we have a group discount price. So for everybody, please, go forward and book your room here: http://tinyurl.com/redhat-marriott -- Jarda On

  1   2   >