[openstack-dev] [Nova] Block-migration keeping migrating state.

2014-08-04 Thread Joe
:) and belowed‍[1][2] is some fragments of my env.‍‍ So, Can someone please explain this situation for me, and, your help is a highly appreciated.‍‍ Thanks. Joe --[1]: source compute node # virsh ‍list 112 instance-0331 paused‍ --[2]: destination compute node # virsh list

Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress] summit events

2015-06-09 Thread D'ANDREA, JOE (JOE)
jd — Joe D’Andrea ATT Labs - Research Cloud Technologies Services Bedminster, NJ __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress] summit events

2015-06-15 Thread D'ANDREA, JOE (JOE)
Tim, On Jun 9, 2015, at 10:04 AM, Tim Hinrichs t...@styra.com wrote: Hi Joe, The telco slides are powerpoint, but are hosted on google drive ... Thanks very much for the OpEx slides (and corresponding design doc)! Is there a deck link for Congress: Introduction, Status, and Future Plans

Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress] summit events

2015-06-15 Thread D'ANDREA, JOE (JOE)
On Jun 15, 2015, at 11:06 AM, Tim Hinrichs t...@styra.com wrote: Hi Joe, Here's the link to the Intro to Congress slide deck. Thank you! I should have re-checked the wiki. :) jd __ OpenStack Development Mailing List

[openstack-dev] [heat] Heat Template Cookbook

2015-05-28 Thread D'ANDREA, JOE (JOE)
[This was originally posted to openst...@lists.openstack.org by accident. Reposting it to openstack-dev.] Calling all Heat neophytes, aficionados, and everyone in between ... I've often thought it would be helpful to add a Heat Template Cookbook to the developer documentation. Like any

[openstack-dev] [heat] RFC: Nested resources missing orchestration UUID at stack lifecycle plugin-time

2016-08-30 Thread D'ANDREA, JOE (JOE)
there are others I haven't thought of. Questions/feedback welcomed and appreciated, especially if it can help me draw a better bead on the scope of this change and what would need altering. I will then use that to help inform an initial blueprint and shepherd it forward. Thank you! jd -- Joe

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] The future of the integrated release

2014-08-07 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Hi everyone, With the incredible growth of OpenStack, our development community is facing complex challenges. How we handle those might determine the ultimate success or failure of OpenStack. With this cycle we hit

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Nova][Neutron] multiple hypervisors on one compute host - neutron agent and compute hostnames

2014-08-11 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: Hi! James has run into an issue implementing the multi-hypervisor spec ( http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/tripleo-specs/tree/specs/juno/tripleo-juno-deploy-cloud-hypervisor-type.rst ) which we're hoping

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][ceilometer] swapping the roles of mongodb and sqlalchemy for ceilometer in Tempest

2014-08-11 Thread Joe Gordon
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote: Hi Folks, Dina Belova has recently landed some infra patches[1,2] to create an experimental mongodb-based Tempest job. This effectively just overrides the ceilometer storage backend config so that mongodb is

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] fair standards for all hypervisor drivers

2014-08-11 Thread Joe Gordon
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2014-08-08 at 09:06 -0400, Russell Bryant wrote: On 08/07/2014 08:06 PM, Michael Still wrote: It seems to me that the tension here is that there are groups who would really like to use features in newer

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][ceilometer] swapping the roles of mongodb and sqlalchemy for ceilometer in Tempest

2014-08-11 Thread Joe Gordon
projects. With the effort to reduce the number of gate variants we have [0] I would prefer to see just ceilometer gate on both mongodb and sqlalchemy and the main integrated gate [1] pick just one. Just checking to see that I fully understand what you mean there, Joe. So would we

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][ceilometer] swapping the roles of mongodb and sqlalchemy for ceilometer in Tempest

2014-08-11 Thread Joe Gordon
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote: Ignoring the question of is it ok to say

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Retrospective veto revert policy

2014-08-12 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/12/2014 10:56 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: Hey (Terrible name for a policy, I know) From the version_cap saga here: https://review.openstack.org/110754 I think we need a better understanding of how to approach

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] The future of the integrated release

2014-08-12 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: On Aug 12, 2014, at 1:44 PM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Kyle Mestery mest

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] fair standards for all hypervisor drivers

2014-08-12 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 15:25 -0700, Joe Gordon wrote: On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2014-08-08 at 09:06 -0400, Russell Bryant wrote: On 08

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] The future of the integrated release

2014-08-13 Thread Joe Gordon
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/13/2014 04:05 AM, Michael Still wrote: On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote: It seems like this is exactly what the slots give us, though. The core review team picks a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] The future of the integrated release

2014-08-13 Thread Joe Gordon
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 5:13 AM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2014-08-07 at 09:30 -0400, Sean Dague wrote: While I definitely think re-balancing our quality responsibilities back into the projects will provide an overall better release, I think it's going to take a

Re: [openstack-dev] Which program for Rally

2014-08-13 Thread Joe Gordon
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote: On 13 August 2014 13:57, Matthew Treinish mtrein...@kortar.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 01:45:17AM +0400, Boris Pavlovic wrote: Keystone, Glance, Cinder, Neutron and Heat are running rally performance jobs,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

2014-08-13 Thread Joe Gordon
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: Just wanted to quickly weigh in with my thoughts on this important topic. I very much valued the face-to-face interaction that came from the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

2014-08-14 Thread Joe Gordon
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:24:36AM +1000, Michael Still wrote: On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:09 AM, Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote: I'm not questioning the value of f2f - I'm questioning the idea of doing f2f

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] The future of the integrated release

2014-08-14 Thread Joe Gordon
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: On Aug 13, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote: At the end of the day, that's probably going to mean saying No to more things. Everytime I turn around everyone wants the TC to say No to

Re: [openstack-dev] Enabling silent Docker tests for Nova?

2014-08-15 Thread Joe Gordon
. Joe Gordon suggests we need a spec to bring the driver back into Nova. Besides the fact that specs are closed and there is no intention of reintegrating the driver for Juno, I'm uncertain of proposing a spec without first having solid history of successful testing, especially given

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] The future of the integrated release

2014-08-15 Thread Joe Gordon
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.com wrote: On 8/14/2014 6:42 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Aug 14, 2014, at 4:41 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: On Aug 13, 2014

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] The future of the integrated release

2014-08-15 Thread Joe Gordon
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote: Additional cross-project resources can be ponied up by the large contributor companies, and existing cross-project resources are not necessarily divertable on command. Sure additional cross-project resources can

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] The future of the integrated release

2014-08-15 Thread Joe Gordon
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote: Additional cross-project resources can be ponied up by the large contributor companies, and existing cross-project resources are not necessarily divertable on command. Sure additional cross-project resources can

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

2014-08-18 Thread Joe Gordon
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Doug Hellmann wrote: On Aug 13, 2014, at 4:42 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: Let me try to say it another way. You seemed to say that it wasn't much to ask given the rate at which things happen in

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

2014-08-18 Thread Joe Gordon
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/18/2014 06:18 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Doug Hellmann wrote: On Aug 13, 2014, at 4:42 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: Let me try to say it another way. You seemed to say that it wasn't much to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

2014-08-18 Thread Joe Gordon
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:18:16PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: Doug Hellmann wrote: On Aug 13, 2014, at 4:42 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: Let me try to say it another way. You seemed to say

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] LOG.warning/LOG.warn

2014-08-18 Thread Joe Gordon
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Jay Bryant jsbry...@electronicjungle.net wrote: +2 I prefer the LOG.warning format and support that given the documentation you shared. If there is agreement I would create a hacking check. I think a better approach is to just not care which i used here.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][VMware] Minesweeper status

2014-08-19 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote: Hi, Minesweeper is back up and running – this is now called “Vmware NSX CI”. A patch for the deprecation of the ESX driver resulted in endless Minesweeper failures (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/108854/). These were

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Specs and approvals

2014-08-19 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 09:31:48PM +1200, Robert Collins wrote: Hey everybody - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/SpecReviews seems pretty sane as we discussed at the last TripleO IRC meeting. I'd like

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Nova] Specs and approvals

2014-08-19 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/19/2014 05:31 AM, Robert Collins wrote: Hey everybody - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/SpecReviews seems pretty sane as we discussed at the last TripleO IRC meeting. I'd like to propose that we adopt

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Scheduler split wrt Extensible Resource Tracking

2014-08-20 Thread Joe Gordon
On Aug 19, 2014 10:45 AM, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Nikola Đipanov [mailto:ndipa...@redhat.com] Sent: 19 August 2014 17:50 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Scheduler split wrt Extensible Resource

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

2014-08-21 Thread Joe Gordon
On Aug 20, 2014 10:56 AM, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote: On 18 August 2014 11:18, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Doug Hellmann wrote: On Aug 13, 2014, at 4:42 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: Let me try to say it another way. You seemed to say that it

[openstack-dev] [nova] Server Group API: add 'action' to authorizer?

2014-08-23 Thread Joe Cropper
treat this as a 'bug' or whether there is a blueprint under which this could be done? Thanks, Joe ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Adding GateFailureFix tag to commit messages

2014-08-23 Thread Joe Gordon
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 2:11 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 09:02:17AM -0700, Armando M. wrote: Hi folks, According to [1], we have ways to introduce external references to commit messages. These are useful to mark certain patches and their

[openstack-dev] [nova] Server Groups - remove VM from group?

2014-08-25 Thread Joe Cropper
, or merely an approach at a staged implementation [that might welcome some additions]? :) Thanks, Joe ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Server Groups - remove VM from group?

2014-08-25 Thread Joe Cropper
want this VM to have an anti-affinity policy relative to the others, etc.). - Joe On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/25/2014 11:10 AM, Joe Cropper wrote: Hello, Is our long-term vision to allow a VMs to be dynamically added/removed from a group

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Server Groups - remove VM from group?

2014-08-25 Thread Joe Cropper
for Paris? If so, count me in! Thanks, Joe On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/25/2014 11:31 AM, Joe Cropper wrote: Thanks Jay. Those are the same types of questions I was pondering as well when debating how someone might use this. I think what we have

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Server Groups - remove VM from group?

2014-08-25 Thread Joe Cropper
to be checked. Thoughts? Thanks, Joe On Aug 25, 2014, at 12:10 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/25/2014 12:56 PM, Joe Cropper wrote: That was indeed a rather long (and insightful) thread on the topic. It sounds like there are still some healthy discussions worth having

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Server Groups - remove VM from group?

2014-08-25 Thread Joe Cropper
some additional functionality; I'm even happy to help implement this, if we can get any type of concurrence on the subject. :-) - Joe On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/25/2014 01:25 PM, Joe Cropper wrote: I was thinking something simple such as only

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] heat.conf.sample is not up to date

2014-08-25 Thread Joe Gordon
On Aug 24, 2014 9:04 AM, Morgan Fainberg morgan.fainb...@gmail.com wrote: On Sunday, August 24, 2014, Anne Gentle a...@openstack.org wrote: I'm following this as well since I have the exact same problem in a docstring patch for heat. Keystone saw an oddity with the new sample config

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] In-tree functional test vision

2014-08-25 Thread Joe Gordon
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Chris Dent chd...@redhat.com wrote: In the Thoughts on the patch test failure rate and moving forward thread[1] there's discussion of moving some of the burden for functional testing to the individual projects. This seems like a good idea to me, but also seems

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] In-tree functional test vision

2014-08-25 Thread Joe Gordon
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Chris Dent chd...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 25 Aug 2014, Joe Gordon wrote: [Other stuff snipped, thanks for that, good to have some pointers.] Why can't you run devstack locally? Maybe there are some changes we can make so its easier to run devstack

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Suggestion that Fix to logic of diskfilter

2014-08-25 Thread Joe Cropper
You're always welcome to submit a patch for a valid bug. Just put: Closes-Bug: #number At the bottom of the commit message to link the change set to the bug. :) - Joe On Aug 25, 2014, at 9:44 PM, Jae Sang Lee hyan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, all. Diskfilter based on host disk usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Specs and approvals

2014-08-25 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:57 AM, James Slagle james.sla...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: While I cannot speak for the dynamics of the tripleo team, if this were to be adopted in nova I would not +2 any blueprints as I don't

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack][Nova]May be performance issues of connect_volume in Nova

2014-08-26 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Wang Shen ws1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, All I have done some work to test the performance of LUN scanning, use iscsiadm with --rescan like what Nova dose. In my test, a host connected with a lot of LUNs , more than 1000 LUNs. Because --rescan will cause kernel

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] The future of the integrated release

2014-08-26 Thread Joe Gordon
of the above. Hi Joe, In coming to that conclusion, have you thought about and explicitly rejected all of the approaches that have been mooted to mitigate those concerns? Is there a strong reason why the following non-exhaustive list would all be doomed to failure: * encouraging projects

Re: [openstack-dev] [rally] Introduction to feature request mechanism in Rally

2014-08-26 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Boris Pavlovic bo...@pavlovic.me wrote: Hi stackers, It goes without saying that end users, that are actually using your tool/project/service, usually don't have enough time to join community, understand all technical details and road map of project and

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] gate debugging

2014-08-28 Thread Joe Gordon
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 08/28/2014 12:48 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Aug 27, 2014, at 5:56 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 08/27/2014 05:27 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Aug 27, 2014, at 2:54 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] gate debugging

2014-08-28 Thread Joe Gordon
learning in simpler times. I think we could develop tools and visualizations that would help the debugging tasks. We could make those tasks more visible, and therefore more appealing to the brave souls that step up to tackle them. Sean and Joe did a ton of work improving the raw data, deriving

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?

2014-08-28 Thread Joe Gordon
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 01:04:57AM +, Dugger, Donald D wrote: I'll try and not whine about my pet project but I do think there is a problem here. For the Gantt project to split out the scheduler there is a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?

2014-08-28 Thread Joe Gordon
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Alan Kavanagh alan.kavan...@ericsson.com wrote: I share Donald's points here, I believe what would help is to clearly describe in the Wiki the process and workflow for the BP approval process and build in this process how to deal with

[openstack-dev] [nova] Kilo Specs Schedule

2014-08-28 Thread Joe Gordon
.2014-08-28-21.01.log.html [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Juno_Release_Schedule [2] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/juno [3] http://54.201.139.117/nova-bugs.html best, Joe ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?

2014-08-28 Thread Joe Gordon
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com wrote: On 08/28/2014 04:01 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Alan Kavanagh alan.kavan...@ericsson.com mailto:alan.kavan...@ericsson.com wrote: I share Donald's points here, I believe what

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] Migration from nova-network to Neutron for large production clouds

2014-08-29 Thread Joe Harrison
, but please make sure it's not fragile and ensure it's fault tolerant! Cheers, Joe -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUAIpaAAoJEHYEICnOV08jDrMQALq9oqx1Qj9j5AKNEPdofA+M jIKW5i0tPFRe+eCfhM3yozGroKDldUcvKGUaZ8B5FkkHT5n959NGhOjIxcxaCkOb rDU5+LaIQG9QBKK4mAvzfE1D8KxhbfM

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?

2014-08-29 Thread Joe Gordon
On Aug 29, 2014 10:42 AM, Dugger, Donald D donald.d.dug...@intel.com wrote: Well, I think that there is a sign of a broken (or at least bent) process and that's what I'm trying to expose. Especially given the ongoing conversations over Gantt it seems wrong that ultimately it was rejected due to

[openstack-dev] Kilo Cycle Goals Exercise

2014-09-03 Thread Joe Gordon
. The goal of this exercise is to help us see if our individual world views align with the greater community, and to get the ball rolling on a larger discussion of where as a project we should be focusing more time. best, Joe Gordon [0] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-August

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][qa][neutron] Neutron full job, advanced services, and the integrated gate

2014-09-03 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote: TL; DR A few folks are proposing to stop running tests for neutron advanced services [ie: (lb|vpn|fw)aas] in the integrated gate, and run them only on the neutron gate. Reason: projects like nova are 100%

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] libvirt version_cap, a postmortem

2014-09-03 Thread Joe Gordon
to Dan Berrange's position, votes -2. Some debate between Dan and Dan continues. Joe Gordon votes +2. Matt Riedemann expresses support-in-principal for Dan Smith's approach. = July 15 = Debate continues ... 16:12 - I -2 the patch and attempt to take a step back and think about how we could have

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Feature Freeze Exception process for Juno

2014-09-03 Thread Joe Gordon
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 2:50 AM, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/02/2014 09:23 PM, Michael Still wrote: On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/02/2014 08:16 PM, Michael Still wrote: Hi. We're soon to hit feature freeze, as

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Feature Freeze Exception process for Juno

2014-09-03 Thread Joe Gordon
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Solly Ross sr...@redhat.com wrote: I will follow up with a more detailed email about what I believe we are missing, once the FF settles and I have applied some soothing creme to my burnout wounds, but currently my sentiment is: Contributing features to

[openstack-dev] [nova] Call for review w.r.t. scheduler being passed requested networks

2014-09-03 Thread Joe Cropper
requested for the initial deployment (unless I'm missing something, which could be the case). This patch aims to 'fix' that. Comments are welcomed. Thanks, Joe ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [feature freeze exception] Move to oslo.db

2014-09-04 Thread Joe Gordon
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote: I'm good with this one too, so that makes three if Joe is ok with this. I am ok with this, I hope the move to oslo.db will fix a few bugs for us and the nova patch to review isn't too bad. @Josh -- can you please take

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Feature Freeze Exception process for Juno

2014-09-04 Thread Joe Gordon
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 2:23 AM, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote: Sorry for another top post, but I like how Nikola has pulled this problem apart, and wanted to respond directly to his response. On 3 September 2014 10:50, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote: The reason many

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-04 Thread Joe Gordon
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:24 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: Position statement == Over the past year I've increasingly come to the conclusion that Nova is heading for (or probably already at) a major crisis. If steps are not taken to avert this, the project

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Feature Freeze Exception process for Juno

2014-09-05 Thread Joe Gordon
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/04/2014 10:25 PM, Solly Ross wrote: Anyway, I think it would be useful to have some sort of page where people could say I'm an SME in X, ask me for reviews and then patch submitters could go and say, oh, I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][FFE] Feature Freeze exception for juno-slaveification

2014-09-05 Thread Joe Gordon
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Mike Wilson geekinu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I am requesting an exception for the juno-slaveification blueprint. There is a single outstanding patch [1] which has already been approved before, but needed to be re-spun due to gate failures which then

Re: [openstack-dev] Feature freeze + Juno-3 milestone candidates available

2014-09-05 Thread Joe Cropper
. :-) - Joe On Sep 5, 2014, at 3:41 PM, Jay Bryant jsbry...@electronicjungle.net wrote: Matt, I don't think that is the right solution. If the string changes I think the only problem is it won't be translated if it is thrown. That is better than breaking the coding standard imho. Jay On Sep

Re: [openstack-dev] Feature freeze + Juno-3 milestone candidates available

2014-09-06 Thread Joe Cropper
Thanks, ttx. If there’s anyone that can do a final review on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/118535/ — would be much appreciated and I’m happy to llet the i18n folks know once it merges. - Joe On Sep 6, 2014, at 9:36 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: In that precise case

[openstack-dev] memory usage in devstack-gate (the oom-killer strikes again)

2014-09-08 Thread Joe Gordon
that some OpenStack services such as nova-api, nova-conductor and cinder-api take up so much memory? Does there memory usage keep growing over time, does anyone have any numbers to answer this? Why do these processes take up so much memory? best, Joe [0] http://logstash.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] Kilo Cycle Goals Exercise

2014-09-09 Thread Joe Gordon
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: As you all know, there has recently been several very active discussions around how to improve assorted aspects of our development process. One idea that was brought up is to come up with a list of cycle goals/project

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Server Groups - remove VM from group?

2014-09-10 Thread Joe Cropper
wouldn’t be violated by the addition of the VM 2. Removing a VM from a server group Just allow it I think this would round out the support that’s there and really allow us to capitalize on the hard work everyone’s already put into them. - Joe On Aug 26, 2014, at 6:39 PM, Chris Friesen

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Server Groups - remove VM from group?

2014-09-10 Thread Joe Cropper
what’s already there [1]. [1] Sure, the to-be-added VM could be in the midst of a migration or something, but that would be pretty simple to check make sure its task state is None or some such. - Joe On Sep 10, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On Sep 10, 2014

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Server Groups - remove VM from group?

2014-09-10 Thread Joe Cropper
think that’s necessary. Overall, this seems like a feasible, fairly minor enhancement--that wouldn’t make us any worse off than we are today (perhaps address some existing race conditions), all whilst providing a large improvement to the overall usability of the server groups. :-) - Joe On Sep 10

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Server Groups - remove VM from group?

2014-09-10 Thread Joe Cropper
Agreed - I’ll draft up a formal proposal in the next week or two and we can focus the discussion there. Thanks for the feedback - this provides a good framework for implementation considerations. - Joe On Sep 10, 2014, at 6:00 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/10/2014 06:46

[openstack-dev] [nova] nova-specs for Kilo?

2014-09-10 Thread Joe Cropper
Hi Folks, Just wondering if the nova-specs master branch will have a ‘kilo’ directory created soon for Kilo proposals? I have a few things I’d like to submit, just looking for the proper home. Thanks, Joe ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] nova-specs for Kilo?

2014-09-10 Thread Joe Cropper
Thanks! Exactly what I was looking for. On Sep 11, 2014, at 12:38 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/11/2014 01:32 AM, Joe Cropper wrote: Hi Folks, Just wondering if the nova-specs master branch will have a ‘kilo’ directory created soon for Kilo proposals? I have a few

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Server Groups - remove VM from group?

2014-09-11 Thread Joe Cropper
Great to hear. I started a blueprint for this [1]. More detail can be added once the kilo nova-specs directory is created… for now, I’ve tried to put some fairly detailed notes on the blueprint’s description. [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/dynamic-server-groups - Joe On Sep

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Server Groups - remove VM from group?

2014-09-11 Thread Joe Cropper
. In any case, I’ve started a blueprint on this [1] and we can continue iterating in the nova-spec once kilo opens up. Thanks all for the good discussion on this thus far. [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/dynamic-server-groups - Joe On Sep 11, 2014, at 5:04 PM, Chris Friesen

Re: [openstack-dev] [zaqar] Juno Performance Testing (Round 2)

2014-09-12 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Kurt Griffiths kurt.griffi...@rackspace.com wrote: Hi folks, In this second round of performance testing, I benchmarked the new Redis driver. I used the same setup and tests as in Round 1 to make it easier to compare the two drivers. I did not test Redis in

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron][cinder] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-12 Thread Joe Gordon
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:23:34AM +1000, Michael Still wrote: On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: a) Sorting out the common code is already accounted for in Dan B's original

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] What's holding nova development back?

2014-09-16 Thread Joe Gordon
On Sep 15, 2014 8:31 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 09/15/2014 08:07 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2014-09-15 17:59:10 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote: [...] Sometimes it's pretty hard to determine whether something in the E-R check page is due to something in the infra scripts,

Re: [openstack-dev] [zaqar] Juno Performance Testing (Round 2)

2014-09-17 Thread Joe Gordon
in the sense of OpenStack Tenants/Project-ID's or in the sense of “clients/workers”? For the latter case, the pilot tests I’ve done so far used multiple clients (though not graphed), but in the former case only one “project” was used. multiple Tenant/Project-IDs From: Joe Gordon joe.gord

[openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Zaqar and SQS Properties of Distributed Queues

2014-09-17 Thread Joe Gordon
Hi All, My understanding of Zaqar is that it's like SQS. SQS uses distributed queues, which have a few unusual properties [0]: Message Order Amazon SQS makes a best effort to preserve order in messages, but due to the distributed nature of the queue, we cannot guarantee you will receive messages

Re: [openstack-dev] PostgreSQL jobs slow in the gate

2014-09-17 Thread Joe Gordon
Postgres is also logging a lot of errors: http://logs.openstack.org/63/122263/1/check/check-tempest-dsvm-postgres-full/2f27252/logs/postgres.txt.gz On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Clark Boylan cboy...@sapwetik.org wrote: Hello, Recent sampling of test run times shows that our tempest jobs

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Its time to start identifying release critical bugs

2014-09-17 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote: Hi. Is time to start identifying (and working on) release critical bugs in nova before we ship RC1. My initial position is that any critical bug is release critical. There are currently critical bugs not targeted to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Zaqar and SQS Properties of Distributed Queues

2014-09-18 Thread Joe Gordon
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/18/2014 04:24 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: Great job highlighting what our friends over at Amazon are doing. It's clear from

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Zaqar and SQS Properties of Distributed Queues

2014-09-18 Thread Joe Gordon
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/18/2014 04:09 PM, Gordon Sim wrote: On 09/18/2014 12:31 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 09/17/2014 10:36 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: My understanding of Zaqar is that it's like SQS. SQS uses distributed queues, which

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Zaqar and SQS Properties of Distributed Queues

2014-09-22 Thread Joe Gordon
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote: On 22/09/14 10:11, Gordon Sim wrote: On 09/19/2014 09:13 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: SQS offers very, very limited guarantees, and it's clear that the reason for that is to make it massively, massively scalable in the way

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Zaqar and SQS Properties of Distributed Queues

2014-09-22 Thread Joe Gordon
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote: On 22/09/14 17:06, Joe Gordon wrote: On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote: On 22/09/14 10:11, Gordon Sim wrote: On 09/19/2014 09:13 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: SQS offers very, very

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Zaqar and SQS Properties of Distributed Queues

2014-09-22 Thread Joe Gordon
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote: On 22/09/14 17:06, Joe Gordon wrote: On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote: On 22/09/14 10:11, Gordon Sim wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Zaqar and SQS Properties of Distributed Queues

2014-09-22 Thread Joe Gordon
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Joe Gordon's message of 2014-09-22 19:04:03 -0700: On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote: On 22/09/14 17:06, Joe Gordon wrote: On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Zane

Re: [openstack-dev] Thoughts on OpenStack Layers and a Big Tent model

2014-09-23 Thread Joe Gordon
way to build the list. Joe Gordon mentioned an interesting idea to address this (which I am probably totally butchering), which is that we make incubation more similar to the ASF Incubator. In other words make it more lightweight with no promise of governance or infrastructure support. you

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Zaqar and SQS Properties of Distributed Queues

2014-09-23 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote: On 22/09/14 22:04, Joe Gordon wrote: To me this is less about valid or invalid choices. The Zaqar team is comparing Zaqar to SQS, but after digging into the two of them, zaqar barely looks like SQS. Zaqar doesn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Zaqar and SQS Properties of Distributed Queues

2014-09-23 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/23/2014 05:13 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Joe Gordon's message of 2014-09-22 19:04:03 -0700: [snip] To me this is less about valid or invalid choices. The Zaqar team is comparing Zaqar to SQS

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] Core reviewer update Dec

2013-12-09 Thread Joe Gordon
On Dec 10, 2013 2:37 AM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: On 6 December 2013 21:56, Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com wrote: Hey there, thanks Rob for keeping eye on this. Speaking for myself, as current non-coder it was very hard to keep pace with others, especially

Re: [openstack-dev] Unified Guest Agent proposal

2013-12-10 Thread Joe Gordon
On Dec 10, 2013 7:00 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Dmitry Mescheryakov's message of 2013-12-10 08:15:15 -0800: Guys, I see two major trends in the thread: * use Salt * write our own solution with architecture similar to Salt or MCollective There were

Re: [openstack-dev] FW: [Bug 1257788] Re: nova-network doesn't handle large amount of concurrent booting instances well

2013-12-10 Thread Joe Gordon
On Dec 10, 2013 7:38 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: Yup, IMHO this is where the rally[1] project, and others that attempt to push the boundaries are really helping openstack become much better around these types of issues. At yahoo! in a short-time it will not be that

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova]

2013-12-11 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote: On 12/11/13 12:43 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On Tuesday, December 10, 2013 4:17:45 PM, Maithem Munshed 71510 wrote: Hello, I was wondering, what is the reason behind having nova audit

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >