Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

2014-08-20 Thread John Garbutt
On 18 August 2014 11:18, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Doug Hellmann wrote: On Aug 13, 2014, at 4:42 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: Let me try to say it another way. You seemed to say that it wasn't much to ask given the rate at which things happen in OpenStack. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?

2014-08-29 Thread John Garbutt
Going a bit further up the thread where we are still talking about spec reviews and not code reviews... On 28 August 2014 21:42, Dugger, Donald D donald.d.dug...@intel.com wrote: I would contend that that right there is an indication that there's a problem with the process. We got two

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?

2014-08-29 Thread John Garbutt
On 28 August 2014 21:58, Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com wrote: On 08/28/2014 02:25 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 08/28/2014 04:05 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: The overall scheduler-lib Blueprint is marked with a high priority at http://status.openstack.org/release/;. Hopefully that would

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?

2014-08-29 Thread John Garbutt
I think this is now more about code reviews, but this is important... On 29 August 2014 10:30, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:07:33AM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: Joe Gordon wrote: On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Alan Kavanagh

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] refactoring of resize/migrate

2014-08-29 Thread John Garbutt
On 28 August 2014 09:50, Markus Zoeller mzoel...@de.ibm.com wrote: Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote on 08/27/2014 08:57:08 PM: From: Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 08/27/2014 08:59 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] refactoring of

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Kilo Specs Schedule

2014-08-29 Thread John Garbutt
On 28 August 2014 23:53, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: We just finished discussing when to open up Kilo specs at the nova meeting today [0], and Kilo specs will open right after we cut Juno RC1 (around Sept 25th [1]). Additionally, the spec template will most likely be revised. We

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?

2014-08-29 Thread John Garbutt
replies. But I certainly want to respect everyones communication preferences. John -Original Message- From: John Garbutt [mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 4:35 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [vmware][nova] Refactor reseries rebased

2014-09-02 Thread John Garbutt
patches. I made a note of who had approved them: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109754/ Brian Elliott +2 John Garbutt +2 +A https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109755/ Daniel Berrange +2 Andrew Laski +2 John Garbutt +2 +A https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114817/ Brian Elliott +2 Andrew

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Feature Freeze Exception process for Juno

2014-09-04 Thread John Garbutt
On 2 September 2014 19:16, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote: We're soon to hit feature freeze, as discussed in Thierry's recent email. I'd like to outline the process for requesting a freeze exception: * your code must already be up for review * your blueprint must have an

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Feature Freeze Exception process for Juno

2014-09-04 Thread John Garbutt
On 2 September 2014 21:36, Dan Genin daniel.ge...@jhuapl.edu wrote: Just out of curiosity, what is the rational behind upping the number of core sponsors for feature freeze exception to 3 if only two +2 are required to merge? In Icehouse, IIRC, two core sponsors was deemed sufficient. We tried

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Feature Freeze Exception process for Juno

2014-09-04 Thread John Garbutt
Sorry for another top post, but I like how Nikola has pulled this problem apart, and wanted to respond directly to his response. On 3 September 2014 10:50, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote: The reason many features including my own may not make the FF is not because there was not enough

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread John Garbutt
On 4 September 2014 23:48, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/04/2014 06:24 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: Position statement == Over the past year I've increasingly come to the conclusion that Nova is heading for (or probably already at) a major crisis. If steps

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-05 Thread John Garbutt
On 5 September 2014 00:26, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 09/04/2014 10:33 AM, Dugger, Donald D wrote: Basically +1 with what Daniel is saying (note that, as mentioned, a side effect of our effort to split out the scheduler will help but not solve this problem). The difference

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE request v2-on-v3-api

2014-09-05 Thread John Garbutt
but just didn't quite make it through in time. So they shouldn't put any load on reviewers. Sponsoring cores: Kenichi Ohmichi John Garbutt Me Yeah, I am happy to support this work. Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [vmware][nova][FFE] vmware-spawn-refactor

2014-09-05 Thread John Garbutt
Yeah, I have been reviewing these, so happy to sponsor them too. Patches have been re-approved. Thanks, John On 5 September 2014 00:23, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote: So, that's your three. This exception is approved. Michael On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Nikola Đipanov

[openstack-dev] [Nova] FFE flood gates open

2014-09-05 Thread John Garbutt
Hi, We have now tagged juno-3, so we are good to approve patches for FFE now. Given how much there is to get through the gate, it would be nice to concentrate on FFE code, and higher priority bugs, till we break the back of those merges. Thanks, John

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [feature freeze exception] Feature freeze exception for config-drive-image-property

2014-09-05 Thread John Garbutt
Blueprint re-approved, code re-approved. Thanks, John On 4 September 2014 21:11, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote: I'll be the third core here. Approved. @John: can you please remove your -2 from this one? Michael On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] requesting an FFE for SRIOV

2014-09-05 Thread John Garbutt
In the nova-meeting we agreed this gets a FFE, based on previous agreements in nova-meetings. Blueprint is approved for juno-rc1. Thanks, John On 4 September 2014 16:38, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/04/2014 05:16 PM, Dan Smith wrote: The main sr-iov patches have gone

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] libvirt version_cap, a postmortem

2014-09-05 Thread John Garbutt
On 3 September 2014 21:57, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote: Hey The libvirt version_cap debacle continues to come up in conversation and one perception of the whole thing appears to be: A controversial patch

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-16 Thread John Garbutt
On 16 December 2013 15:25, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 06:58:24AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, At the moment the administrator is able to retrieve diagnostics for a running VM. Currently the implementation is very loosely defined, that is, each

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] PCI pass-through network support

2013-12-19 Thread John Garbutt
Apologies for being late onto this thread, and not making the meeting the other day. Also apologies this is almost totally a top post. On 17 December 2013 15:09, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote: Firstly, I disagree that https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PCI_passthrough_SRIOV_support is an

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Future meeting times

2013-12-19 Thread John Garbutt
+1 to 14:00 meeting, I can always make those. I can probably make some of the 21:00 meetings But probably only in the summer when its UTC+1 over here. John On 19 December 2013 07:49, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote: +1, I would make the 14:00 meeting. I often have good intention of making the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] PCI pass-through network support

2013-12-19 Thread John Garbutt
On 19 December 2013 12:21, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote: John: At a high level: Neutron: * user wants to connect to a particular neutron network * user wants a super-fast SRIOV connection Administration: * needs to map PCI device to what neutron network the connect to The

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] PCI pass-through network support

2013-12-19 Thread John Garbutt
On 19 December 2013 12:54, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote: On 19 December 2013 12:21, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote: John: At a high level: Neutron: * user wants to connect to a particular neutron network * user wants a super-fast SRIOV connection Administration

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] PCI pass-through network support

2013-12-19 Thread John Garbutt
use cases. Please see my comments inline. Cool. Regards, Irena -Original Message- From: John Garbutt [mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 1:42 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Docker] Environment variables

2013-12-19 Thread John Garbutt
On 17 December 2013 12:53, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 01:04:33PM -0800, Dan Smith wrote: eg use a 'env_' prefix for glance image attributes We've got a couple of cases now where we want to overrides these same things on a per-instance basis.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-19 Thread John Garbutt
On 16 December 2013 15:50, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 03:37:39PM +, John Garbutt wrote: On 16 December 2013 15:25, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 06:58:24AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote: I'd like to propose

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do we have some guidelines for mock, stub, mox when writing unit test?

2013-12-19 Thread John Garbutt
On 4 December 2013 17:10, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: I think option 3 makes the most sense here (pending anyone saying we should run away screaming from mox3 for some reason). It's actually what I had been assuming since this thread a while back. This means that we don't need

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][BluePrint Register] Shrink the volume when file in the instance was deleted.

2014-01-02 Thread John Garbutt
On 25 December 2013 05:14, Qixiaozhen qixiaoz...@huawei.com wrote: Hi,all A blueprint is registered that is about shrinking the volume in thin provision. Have you got the link? Thin provision means allocating the disk space once the instance writes the data on the area of volume in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] PCI pass-through network support

2014-01-02 Thread John Garbutt
On 22 December 2013 12:07, Irena Berezovsky ire...@mellanox.com wrote: Hi Ian, My comments are inline I would like to suggest to focus the next PCI-pass though IRC meeting on: 1.Closing the administration and tenant that powers the VM use cases. 2. Decouple the nova and

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do we have some guidelines for mock, stub, mox when writing unit test?

2014-01-02 Thread John Garbutt
On 21 December 2013 13:24, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On 12/19/2013 8:51 AM, John Garbutt wrote: On 4 December 2013 17:10, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: I think option 3 makes the most sense here (pending anyone saying we should run away screaming from mox3

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack][Nova][cold migration] Why we need confirm resize after cold migration

2014-01-08 Thread John Garbutt
On 8 January 2014 10:02, David Xie david.script...@gmail.com wrote: In nova/compute/api.py#2289, function resize, there's a parameter named flavor_id, if it is None, it is considered as cold migration. Thus, nova should skip resize verifying. However, it doesn't. Like Jay said, we should skip

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][turbo hipster] unable to rebase

2014-01-09 Thread John Garbutt
On 8 January 2014 12:07, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote: Hi, Patch sets that are cascaded has have the following errors: Database migration testing failed either due to migrations unable to be applied correctly or taking too long. This change was unable to be automatically merged with

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack][Nova][cold migration] Why we need confirm resize after cold migration

2014-01-09 Thread John Garbutt
On 8 January 2014 15:29, Jay Lau jay.lau@gmail.com wrote: 2014/1/8 John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com On 8 January 2014 10:02, David Xie david.script...@gmail.com wrote: In nova/compute/api.py#2289, function resize, there's a parameter named flavor_id, if it is None, it is considered

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] PCI pass-through network support

2014-01-10 Thread John Garbutt
Apologies for this top post, I just want to move this discussion towards action. I am traveling next week so it is unlikely that I can make the meetings. Sorry. Can we please agree on some concrete actions, and who will do the coding? This also means raising new blueprints for each item of work.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] bp proposal: discovery of peer instances through metadata service

2014-01-28 Thread John Garbutt
On 27 January 2014 14:52, Justin Santa Barbara jus...@fathomdb.com wrote: Day, Phil wrote: We already have a mechanism now where an instance can push metadata as a way of Windows instances sharing their passwords - so maybe this could build on that somehow - for example each instance

Re: [openstack-dev] Nova style cleanups with associated hacking check addition

2014-01-28 Thread John Garbutt
On 27 January 2014 10:10, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:42:54AM -0500, Joe Gordon wrote: On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.comwrote: Periodically I've seen people submit big coding style cleanups to Nova code.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] PCI pass-through SRIOV on Jan. 28th

2014-01-28 Thread John Garbutt
On 27 January 2014 21:36, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote: Live migration for the first release is intended to be covered by macvtap, in my mind - direct mapped devices have limited support in hypervisors aiui. It seemed we had a working theory for that, which we test out and see if

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Discuss the option delete_on_termination

2014-01-28 Thread John Garbutt
On 26 January 2014 09:23, 黎林果 lilinguo8...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have started the implementation, Please review. Address: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/67067/ Thanks. Regards, Lee Hi lee, I have added the same comments as Christopher to the blueprint. Please look at updating the

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal for instance-level snapshots in Nova

2014-01-28 Thread John Garbutt
On 24 January 2014 17:05, Jon Bernard jbern...@tuxion.com wrote: * Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com wrote: On Jan 16, 2014, at 1:28 PM, Jon Bernard jbern...@tuxion.com wrote: * Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com wrote: On Jan 14, 2014, at 2:10 PM, Jon Bernard

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Bug Triage Day Proposal - Friday 7th February

2014-02-04 Thread John Garbutt
Hi, Now that we getting close towards the end of Icehouse, it seems a good time to make sure we tame the un-triaged bug backlog (try say that really quickly a few times over), and look at what really needs fixing before Icehouse is released. I propose that we have a bug triage day this Friday,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] os-migrateLive not working with neutron in Havana (or apparently Grizzly)

2014-02-05 Thread John Garbutt
On 4 February 2014 19:16, Jonathan Proulx j...@jonproulx.com wrote: HI all, Trying to get a little love on bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1227836 Short version is the instance migrates, but there's an RPC time out that keeps nova thinking it's still on the old node mid-migration.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Bug Triage Day Proposal - Friday 7th February

2014-02-07 Thread John Garbutt
: On 02/04/2014 05:10 PM, John Garbutt wrote: Hi, Now that we getting close towards the end of Icehouse, it seems a good time to make sure we tame the un-triaged bug backlog (try say that really quickly a few times over), and look at what really needs fixing before Icehouse is released. I propose

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Bug Triage Day Proposal - Friday 7th February

2014-02-07 Thread John Garbutt
, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote: Just a quick reminder, its bug day! Lets collaborate in #openstack-nova We can track progress here: http://webnumbr.com/untouched-nova-bugs And later progress: http://status.openstack.org/bugday Get those bugs tagged: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Nova feature proposal freeze has passed

2014-02-19 Thread John Garbutt
Hi, Lets keep track of things for Nova here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-icehouse-blueprint-cull In a few hours I will start reviewing all the blueprints that are not Needs Code Review and pushing them into next. Anything with some live code will probably go into Juno-1, if that makes

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] v3 API in Icehouse

2014-02-20 Thread John Garbutt
On 20 February 2014 14:55, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 08:22:57 -0500 Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: We're also duplicating a lot of test and review energy in having 2 API stacks. Even before v3 has come out of experimental it's consumed a huge amount of

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Simulating many fake nova compute nodes for scheduler testing

2014-02-24 Thread John Garbutt
On 24 February 2014 16:24, David Peraza david_per...@persistentsys.com wrote: Hello all, I have been trying some new ideas on scheduler and I think I'm reaching a resource issue. I'm running 6 compute service right on my 4 CPU 4 Gig VM, and I started to get some memory allocation issues.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Future of the Nova API

2014-02-25 Thread John Garbutt
On 24 February 2014 18:11, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On 2/24/2014 10:13 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: On 02/24/2014 01:50 AM, Christopher Yeoh wrote: Hi, There has recently been some speculation around the V3 API and whether we should go forward with it or instead

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Future of the Nova API

2014-02-25 Thread John Garbutt
On 25 February 2014 06:11, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:37:04 -0800 Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote: onSharedStorage = True on_shared_storage = False This is a good example. I'm not sure it's worth breaking users _or_ introducing a new microversion

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Future of the Nova API

2014-02-25 Thread John Garbutt
On 25 February 2014 09:44, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 21:15:30 -0500 Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: CC'ing the openstack-operators mailing list to get a wider set of feedback on this question. On 02/24/2014 05:26 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote: 1)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][VMWare] VMware VM snapshot

2014-02-25 Thread John Garbutt
On 25 February 2014 09:27, Qin Zhao chaoc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, One simple question about VCenter driver. I feel the VM snapshot function of VCenter is very useful and is loved by VCenter users. Does anybody think about to let VCenter driver support it? It depends if that can be modelled

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Simulating many fake nova compute nodes for scheduler testing

2014-02-25 Thread John Garbutt
to conductor work should certainly stop the scheduler making those pesky DB calls to update the nova instance. And then, improvements like no-db-scheduler and improvements to scheduling algorithms should shine through much more. Thanks, John -Original Message- From: John Garbutt [mailto:j

Re: [openstack-dev] Nova Bug Scrub meeting

2014-02-25 Thread John Garbutt
On 25 February 2014 02:35, Tracy Jones tjo...@vmware.com wrote: Hi all - i have set up the nova bug scrub meeting for Wednesdays at 1630 UTC in the #openstack-meeting-3 IRC channel The first meeting will be all about triaging the 117 un-triaged bugs (here). Thanks for setting this up. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] why doesn't _rollback_live_migration() always call rollback_live_migration_at_destination()?

2014-02-25 Thread John Garbutt
On 24 February 2014 22:14, Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com wrote: I'm looking at the live migration rollback code and I'm a bit confused. When setting up a live migration we unconditionally run ComputeManager.pre_live_migration() on the destination host to do various things

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] why doesn't _rollback_live_migration() always call rollback_live_migration_at_destination()?

2014-02-27 Thread John Garbutt
On 25 February 2014 15:44, Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com wrote: On 02/25/2014 05:15 AM, John Garbutt wrote: On 24 February 2014 22:14, Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com wrote: What happens if we have a shared-storage instance that we try to migrate and fail and end up

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Proposal to merge blueprints that just missed Icehouse-3 in early Juno-1

2014-03-06 Thread John Garbutt
On 5 March 2014 15:02, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: Nova is now feature frozen for the Icehouse release. Patches for blueprints not already merged will need a feature freeze exception (FFE) to be considered for Icehouse. In addition to evaluation the request in terms of risks and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Proposal to merge blueprints that just missed Icehouse-3 in early Juno-1

2014-03-06 Thread John Garbutt
On 6 March 2014 10:51, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote: On 5 March 2014 15:02, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: Nova is now feature frozen for the Icehouse release. Patches for blueprints not already merged will need a feature freeze exception (FFE) to be considered

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Concrete Proposal for Keeping V2 API

2014-03-06 Thread John Garbutt
On 5 March 2014 03:44, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote: But this plan is certainly something I'm happy to support. +1 On 5 March 2014 03:44, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote: So I think this a good compromise to keep things moving. Some aspects that we'll need to consider:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Proposal to merge blueprints that just missed Icehouse-3 in early Juno-1

2014-03-06 Thread John Garbutt
On 6 March 2014 11:31, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 03/06/2014 05:51 AM, John Garbutt wrote: On 5 March 2014 15:02, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: Nova is now feature frozen for the Icehouse release. Patches for blueprints not already merged will need a feature freeze

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] FFE Request: ISO support for the VMware driver

2014-03-06 Thread John Garbutt
/63084/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/77965/ Sponsors: John Garbutt and Nikola Dipanov One of the things that we are planning on improving in Juno is the way that the Vmops code is arranged and organized. We will soon be posting a wiki for ideas to be discussed. That will enable use

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection

2014-03-06 Thread John Garbutt
On 6 March 2014 08:50, zhangyu (AI) zhangy...@huawei.com wrote: It seems to be an interesting idea. In fact, a China-based public IaaS, QingCloud, has provided a similar feature to their virtual servers. Within 2 hours after a virtual server is deleted, the server owner can decide whether

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Simulating many fake nova compute nodes for scheduler testing

2014-03-06 Thread John Garbutt
complete (using select destination instead of run_instance), the DB calls locking all the eventlet threads seems like the biggest issue. Anyways, looking forward to a good discussion at the summit. John Regards, David Peraza -Original Message- From: John Garbutt [mailto:j

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] [Nova] Status of the nova ironic driver and CI

2014-03-10 Thread John Garbutt
On 9 March 2014 16:04, Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com wrote: With the feature freeze in effect and our driver blocked from the Nova tree for this release cycle, last week we moved our driver into the Ironic tree in this patch set: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/78002/ This

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Proposal to merge blueprints that just missed Icehouse-3 in early Juno-1

2014-03-10 Thread John Garbutt
On 7 March 2014 20:57, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:51 AM, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote: On 5 March 2014 15:02, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: Nova is now feature frozen for the Icehouse release. Patches for blueprints not already

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Concrete Proposal for Keeping V2 API

2014-03-10 Thread John Garbutt
On 6 March 2014 13:18, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:24 PM, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote: On 5 March 2014 03:44, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote: But this plan is certainly something I'm happy to support. One extra thing we need

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] RFC - using Gerrit for Nova Blueprint review approval

2014-03-10 Thread John Garbutt
On 6 March 2014 19:09, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/06/2014 01:05 PM, Sean Dague wrote: One of the issues that the Nova team has definitely hit is Blueprint overload. At some point there were over 150 blueprints. Many of them were a single sentence. The results of this have

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] RFC - using Gerrit for Nova Blueprint review approval

2014-03-10 Thread John Garbutt
On 7 March 2014 19:50, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote: The recent operator gathering (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/operators-feedback-mar14) concluded a similar proposal, based on Blueprint-on-Blueprints (BoB for short). The aim was that operators of production OpenStack clouds should

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [bug?] live migration fails with boot-from-volume

2014-03-12 Thread John Garbutt
On 10 March 2014 18:54, Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com wrote: On 03/08/2014 02:23 AM, ChangBo Guo wrote: Are you using libvirt driver ? As I remember, the way to check if compute nodes with shared storage is : create a temporary file from source node , then check the file

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] An analysis of code review in Nova

2014-03-13 Thread John Garbutt
On 13 March 2014 10:09, Matthew Booth mbo...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/03/14 18:28, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 2/25/2014 6:36 AM, Matthew Booth wrote: I'm new to Nova. After some frustration with the review process, specifically in the VMware driver, I decided to try to visualise how the review

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] question about e41fb84 fix anti-affinity race condition on boot

2014-03-17 Thread John Garbutt
On 15 March 2014 18:39, Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com wrote: Hi, I'm curious why the specified git commit chose to fix the anti-affinity race condition by aborting the boot and triggering a reschedule. It seems to me that it would have been more elegant for the scheduler to do a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] question about e41fb84 fix anti-affinity race condition on boot

2014-03-17 Thread John Garbutt
On 17 March 2014 17:54, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote: On 15 March 2014 18:39, Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com wrote: Hi, I'm curious why the specified git commit chose to fix the anti-affinity race condition by aborting the boot and triggering a reschedule. It seems

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][scheduler] Availability Zones and Host aggregates..

2014-03-26 Thread John Garbutt
Sounds like an extra weighter to try and balance load between your two AZs might be a nicer way to go. The easiest way might be via cells, one for each AZ . But not sure we merged that support yet. But there are patches for that. John On 25 Mar 2014 20:53, Sangeeta Singh sin...@yahoo-inc.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][Nova][VMWare] Enable live migration with one nova compute

2014-03-31 Thread John Garbutt
On 31 March 2014 10:11, Jay Lau jay.lau@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Currently with VMWare VCDriver, one nova compute can manage multiple clusters/RPs, this caused cluster admin cannot do live migration between clusters/PRs if those clusters/PRs managed by one nova compute as the current live

[openstack-dev] [Nova] PTL Candidacy

2014-03-31 Thread John Garbutt
/HypervisorSupportMatrix This will have worked if people understand how best to responsibly contribute new Nova features, and it is easy for their employers to understand and support that. In addition, we would have an open understanding of what parts of Nova are well maintained. Thanks for reading! John Garbutt

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] PTL Candidacy

2014-03-31 Thread John Garbutt
On 31 March 2014 18:53, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote: Hi, I would like to run for the OpenStack Compute (Nova) PTL position. I find it really rewarding to help resolve conflict. Gallup says I am a: Learner, Arranger, Achiever, Relator, Includer. I like to listen to all sides

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] configdrive not presenting IPAddress information

2013-10-15 Thread John Garbutt
Hi, There is some information in the EC2 metadata, or at least I have a patch up for that: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/46286/ I am raising some ideas to improve things here: http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/191 John On 15 October 2013 08:24, Vijay Venkatachalam

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Blueprint review process

2013-10-28 Thread John Garbutt
On 25 October 2013 11:52, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote: On 23/10/13 17:33, Russell Bryant wrote: 4) Blueprint Prioritization I would like to do a better job of using priorities in Icehouse. The priority field services a couple of purposes: - helps reviewers prioritize their

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Blueprint review process

2013-10-28 Thread John Garbutt
On 25 October 2013 10:18, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 24, 2013 9:14 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: On 24 October 2013 04:33, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: Greetings, At the last Nova meeting we started talking about some updates to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Blueprint review process

2013-10-29 Thread John Garbutt
On 28 October 2013 15:39, Anne Gentle a...@openstack.org wrote: On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 9:24 AM, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote: Here is a really bad attempt at codifying what I think about features vs bugs: 1) If its a new API call, or a change in behaviour, or a new config setting

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Blueprint review process

2013-10-29 Thread John Garbutt
John Garbutt wrote: On 25 October 2013 11:52, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote: I don't have the numbers but I have a feeling that what happened in Havana was that a lot of blueprints slipped until the time for feature freeze. Reviewers thought it was a worthwile feature at that point

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Preserving ephemeral block device on rebuild?

2013-10-29 Thread John Garbutt
On 29 October 2013 10:20, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: On 29 October 2013 23:06, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote: Hi Rob, I think it looks like a good option - but I'd like to see it exposed as such to the user rather than a change in the default behavior as such. I.e.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] PCI pass-through network support

2013-10-29 Thread John Garbutt
I would love to see a symmetry between Cinder local volumes and Neutron PCI passthrough VIFs. Not entirely sure I have that clear in my head right now, but I just wanted to share the idea: * describe resource external to nova that is attached to VM in the API (block device mapping and/or vif

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][scheduler] Instance Group Model and APIs - Updated document with an example request payload

2013-10-29 Thread John Garbutt
On 29 October 2013 06:46, Yathiraj Udupi (yudupi) yud...@cisco.com wrote: The Instance Group API document is now updated with a simple example request payload of a nested group, and some description of how the API implementation should handle the registration of the components of a nested

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][qa] user-oriented release notes for v3 api?

2013-10-29 Thread John Garbutt
On 28 October 2013 23:40, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:22 AM, David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com wrote: As I looked at the havana release notes that talk about the v3 api, and as I was reviewing port test_images and test_server_actions into v3 part2

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Thoughs please on how to address a problem with mutliple deletes leading to a nova-compute thread pool problem

2013-10-29 Thread John Garbutt
On 25 October 2013 23:23, Chris Behrens cbehr...@codestud.com wrote: On Oct 25, 2013, at 3:46 AM, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote: Hi Folks, We're very occasionally seeing problems where a thread processing a create hangs (and we've seen when taking to Cinder and Glance). Whilst those

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Support of v1 and v2 glance APIs in Nova

2013-10-29 Thread John Garbutt
Going back to Joe's comment: Can both of these cases be covered by configuring the keystone catalog? +1 If both v1 and v2 are present, pick v2, otherwise just pick what is in the catalogue. That seems cool. Not quite sure how the multiple glance endpoints works in the keystone catalog, but

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova]Ideas of idempotentcy-client-token

2013-10-29 Thread John Garbutt
On 29 October 2013 11:56, haruka tanizawa harube...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Joe! Thank you for your help. I wrote BP https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/idempotentcy-client-token again. Could you review it when you have time. I like the idea but two comments: * Can you fill out the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][scheduler]The database access in the scheduler filters

2013-11-01 Thread John Garbutt
Its intentional. Cells is there to split up your nodes into more manageable chunks. There are quite a few design summit sessions on looking into alternative approaches to our current scheduler. While I would love a single scheduler to make everyone happy, I am thinking we might end up with

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] changing old migrations is verboten

2013-11-01 Thread John Garbutt
On 31 October 2013 16:57, Johannes Erdfelt johan...@erdfelt.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 31, 2013, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: So there is a series of patches starting with - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/53417/ that go back and radically change existing migration files. I initially agreed

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Support of v1 and v2 glance APIs in Nova

2013-11-01 Thread John Garbutt
On 29 October 2013 16:11, Eddie Sheffield eddie.sheffi...@rackspace.com wrote: John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com said: Going back to Joe's comment: Can both of these cases be covered by configuring the keystone catalog? +1 If both v1 and v2 are present, pick v2, otherwise just pick what

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova]Ideas of idempotentcy-client-token

2013-11-01 Thread John Garbutt
On 30 October 2013 01:51, haruka tanizawa harube...@gmail.com wrote: Hi John! Thank you for your reply:) Sorry for inline comment. We also need something that doesn't clash with the cross-service request id, as that is doing something slightly different. Would idempotent-request-id work

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][scheduler] Instance Group Model and APIs - Updated document with an example request payload

2013-11-01 Thread John Garbutt
On 29 October 2013 20:18, Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com wrote: John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote on 10/29/2013 07:29:19 AM: ... Its looking good, but I was thinking about a slightly different approach: * I would like to see instance groups be used to describe all scheduler hints

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Configuration validation

2013-11-11 Thread John Garbutt
I like the idea of a more general config validation phase to help people when first starting out. My worry is that it would slow down the starting back up of servers for people deploying their code using CI, where the have already verified their configuration. But maybe its so fast I don't care,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do we have some guidelines for mock, stub, mox when writing unit test?

2013-11-11 Thread John Garbutt
On 11 November 2013 10:27, Rosa, Andrea (HP Cloud Services) andrea.r...@hp.com wrote: Hi Generally mock is supposed to be used over mox now for python 3 support. That is my understanding too +1 But I don't think we should waste all our time re-writing all our mox and stub tests. Lets just

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Configure overcommit policy

2013-11-12 Thread John Garbutt
On 11 November 2013 12:04, Alexander Kuznetsov akuznet...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi all, While studying Hadoop performance in a virtual environment, I found an interesting problem with Nova scheduling. In OpenStack cluster, we have overcommit policy, allowing to put on one compute more vms than

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Summary of Design Summit Session

2013-11-12 Thread John Garbutt
Hi, I am attempting to extract the consensus we reached in all the design summit sessions here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/IcehouseNovaSummit Help to verify that I have not miss-represented things would be very gratefully received. John ___

[openstack-dev] [Nova] XenAPI meeting, today at 3pm GMT

2013-11-13 Thread John Garbutt
Hi, A quick note to say we will have our regular subteam meeting today, as normal: http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/XenAPI The plan is go through the next steps after the summit: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/IcehouseXenAPIRoadmap Thanks, John

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][object] One question to the resource tracker session

2013-11-14 Thread John Garbutt
On 13 November 2013 23:22, Andrew Laski andrew.la...@rackspace.com wrote: On 11/13/13 at 11:12pm, Jiang, Yunhong wrote: Hi, Dan Smith and all, I noticed followed statement in 'Icehouse tasks' in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/IcehouseNovaExtensibleSchedulerMetrics

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Configure overcommit policy

2013-11-14 Thread John Garbutt
On 13 November 2013 14:51, Khanh-Toan Tran khanh-toan.t...@cloudwatt.com wrote: Well, I don't know what John means by modify the over-commit calculation in the scheduler, so I cannot comment. I was talking about this code:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] When is a blueprint unnecessary?

2013-11-20 Thread John Garbutt
On 20 November 2013 10:21, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Russell Bryant wrote: One of the bits of feedback that came from the Nova Project Structure and Process session at the design summit was that it would be nice to skip having blueprints for smaller items. In an effort to

  1   2   3   4   5   >