Re: [openstack-dev] [all] The future of the integrated release

2014-08-09 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/08/2014 12:12 AM, Stefano Maffulli wrote: On 08/07/2014 01:41 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: My point was simply that we don't have direct control over the contributors' activities This is not correct and I've

Re: [openstack-dev] tempest bug

2014-08-09 Thread John Griffith
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Nikesh Kumar Mahalka nikeshmaha...@vedams.com wrote: I have reported a bug as tempest volume-type test failed for hp_msa_fc driver in tempest project. Bug Id is Bug #1353850 My Tempest tests are failed on cinder driver. No one till responded to my bug. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][Cinder] Cinder Core nomination

2014-08-14 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote: On 06:55 Thu 14 Aug , Boring, Walter wrote: Hey guys, I wanted to pose a nomination for Cinder core. Xing Yang. She has been active in the cinder community for many releases and has worked on several drivers

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] [Cinder] Summer 2014 meetup summary

2014-08-14 Thread John Griffith
Hey Everyone, I wanted to send out a quick message regarding the Cinder Mid-Cycle (kinda) Meetup we just finished up at the Fort Collins HP Site. First off, I want to thank everyone who attended for a great and very productive three days!! Not only did we have a strong physical turn-out (16

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] 3'rd party CI systems: Not Whitelisted Volume type with name * could not be found.

2014-08-15 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Kerr, Andrew andrew.k...@netapp.com wrote: Can the default_volume_type be left empty and get the original None type, so we don't have to create the volume type prior to running tempest tests? Andrew Kerr OpenStack QA Cloud Solutions Group NetApp On

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] 3'rd party CI systems: Not Whitelisted Volume type with name * could not be found.

2014-08-15 Thread John Griffith
-f535b33d3105 | lvmdriver-1 | 2014-08-15 14:10:59.324 | +--+-+ 2014-08-15 14:10:59.360 | + cinder type-key lvmdriver-1 set volume_backend_name=lvmdriver-1 *From:* John Griffith [mailto:john.griff...@solidfire.com] *Sent:* Friday, August 15, 2014 6

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

2014-08-15 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2014-08-14 09:33:20 -0400 (-0400), Russell Bryant wrote: [...] Another issue is that some folks are just fundamentally opposed to using Google [...] I think that's a shallow depiction of the issue. I'm sure

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

2014-08-18 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/18/2014 06:18 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Doug Hellmann wrote: On Aug 13, 2014, at 4:42 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: Let me try to say it another way. You seemed to say that it wasn't much to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [ptls] The Czar system, or how to scale PTLs

2014-08-22 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/22/2014 08:33 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, We all know being a project PTL is an extremely busy job. That's because in our structure the PTL is responsible for almost everything in a project: - Release

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][third-party] How to make progress on cinder driver CI post J3

2014-08-22 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Asselin, Ramy ramy.asse...@hp.com wrote: Many of us are still working on setting up and testing 3rd party ci for cinder drivers. None of them currently have gerrit +1/-1 voting, but I heard there’s a plan to “disable” those that are “not working” post-J3

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][Cinder] Cinder Core nomination

2014-08-27 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Huang Zhiteng winsto...@gmail.com wrote: Definitely +1. Xing has been very active in providing feedback for reviews. Thanks for the help and welcome to the team! On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Avishay Traeger avis...@stratoscale.com wrote: +1 On

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Design Summit reloaded

2014-08-27 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/27/2014 03:26 PM, Sean Dague wrote: On 08/27/2014 08:51 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, I've been thinking about what changes we can bring to the Design Summit format to make it more productive. I've

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Design Summit reloaded

2014-08-27 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote: On 08/27/2014 02:46 PM, John Griffith wrote: On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/27/2014 03:26 PM, Sean Dague wrote: On 08/27/2014 08:51 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]pylint errors with hashlib

2014-08-28 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Clark Boylan cboy...@sapwetik.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 25, 2014, at 06:45 PM, Murali Balcha wrote: Pylint on my patch is failing with the following error: Module 'hashlib' has no 'sha256' Cinder pylint already has following exceptions,

[openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-04 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 09/04/2014 12:11 PM, Duncan Thomas wrote: I think that having a shared review team across all of the drivers has definite benefits in terms of coherency and consistency - it is very easy for experts on one technology to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][FFE] make ssh host key policy configurable

2014-09-05 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Jay Bryant jsbry...@electronicjungle.net wrote: Not sure if the patch to make the ssh strict policy setting configurable needed an official ffe. It merged after the tag so I wanted to cover my bases. This is my request. Thanks! Jay

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] [Cinder] FFE tracking

2014-09-05 Thread John Griffith
Hey Everyone, I was trying to just use Launchpad to track these but there's been requests for an etherpad similar to what Mikal put together. So here it is [1] Thanks, John [1]: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-cinder-approved-ffes ___

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] new cinderclient release this week?

2014-09-07 Thread John Griffith
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: I think we're in dependency freeze or quickly approaching. What are the plans from the Cinder team for doing a python-cinderclient release to pick up any final features before Juno rc1? -- Thanks, Matt

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][Nova][Oslo] Moving Brick out of Cinder

2014-09-17 Thread John Griffith
On Sep 17, 2014 3:48 PM, Walter A. Boring IV walter.bor...@hp.com wrote: Thanks for the effort Ivan. Your interest in brick is also helping us push forward with the idea of the agent that we've had in mind for quite some time. For those interested, I have created an etherpad that discusses

Re: [openstack-dev] Thoughts on OpenStack Layers and a Big Tent model

2014-09-19 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Vishvananda Ishaya wrote: Great writeup. I think there are some great concrete suggestions here. A couple more: 1. I think we need a better name for Layer #1 that actually represents what the goal of it is:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] To slide or not to slide? OpenStack Bootstrapping Hour...

2014-09-22 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, OK, so we had our inaugural OpenStack Bootstrapping Hour last Friday. Thanks to Sean and Dan for putting up with my rambling about unittest and mock stuff. And thanks to one of my pugs, Winnie, for, according to

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Not seeking another term as PTL

2014-09-23 Thread John Griffith
Hey Everyone, I've been kinda mixed on this one, but I think it's a good time for me to not run for Cinder PTL. I've been filling the role since we started the idea back at the Folsom Summit, and it's been an absolute pleasure and honor for me. I don't plan on going anywhere and will still be

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack] [python-cinderclient] Another update to pypi is on the way

2014-09-23 Thread John Griffith
Hey Everyone, Unfortunately after the last tag and push of python-cinderclient to pypi we discovered an issue the resulted in debug mode not working for the client. A fix has been merged and an updated version patch is on making it's way through the gates now. I'll tag and push the new version

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tripleo] New Project - Kolla: Deploy and Manage OpenStack using Kubernetes and Docker

2014-09-23 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/23/2014 05:38 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: I'm interested in how this relates/conflicts with the TripleO goal of using OpenStack to deploy OpenStack. It looks like (maybe just superficially) that Kubernetes is simply a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tripleo] New Project - Kolla: Deploy and Manage OpenStack using Kubernetes and Docker

2014-09-23 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com wrote: I don't know if anyone else has noticed, but you can not install Cinder inside a container. Cinder requires an iSCSI package that fails to install; its install script tries to launch the daemon, and that fails. Yes,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] suggestion to a new driver

2013-12-14 Thread John Griffith
Hi Ronan, Best advice I would give is start with the base driver class ( cinder.volume.driver.py) and the reference LVM driver (cinder .volume.drivers.lvm.py). Those will give you a template of the interfaces, args needed and return values. Also jump in IRC at #openstack-cinder and we can chat

[openstack-dev] [cinder] weekly meeting

2013-12-16 Thread John Griffith
Hi All, Prompted by a recent suggestion from Tom Fifield, I thought I'd gauge some interest in either changing the weekly Cinder meeting time, or proposing a second meeting to accomodate folks in other time-zones. A large number of folks are already in time-zones that are not friendly to our

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] weekly meeting

2013-12-16 Thread John Griffith
lunch time. On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:04 AM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi All, Prompted by a recent suggestion from Tom Fifield, I thought I'd gauge some interest in either changing the weekly Cinder meeting time, or proposing a second meeting to accomodate folks

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] weekly meeting

2013-12-18 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote: 04:00 or 05:00 UTC would basically preclude European participation for most people... that's 4 am for Dosaboy and myself for example. Alternating meetings on different weeks would probably work, though we would need

Re: [openstack-dev] additional core review criteria - recent Jenkins pass - otherwise you break the gates

2013-12-19 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/51793/ Just curious, what about the possibility of automating this? In other words, run through idle patches any time the gate volume gets below a certain threshold. If you come across a patch

[openstack-dev] [openstack][cinder] Driver certification ideas

2013-12-20 Thread John Griffith
Hey Everyone, So we merged the super simple driver cert test script in to devstack a while back. For those that aren't familiar you can check it out here [1]. First iteration of this is simply a do it yourself config and run that goes through the same volume-tests that every cinder patch runs

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do we have some guidelines for mock, stub, mox when writing unit test?

2013-12-23 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/04/2013 12:10 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: On 12/04/2013 11:16 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote: Resurrecting this thread because of an interesting review that came up yesterday [1]. It seems that our lack of a firm decision on

Re: [openstack-dev] Devstack Ceph

2013-12-26 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 4:49 AM, Sebastien Han sebastien@enovance.com wrote: Hello everyone, I’ve been working on a new feature for Devstack that includes a native support for Ceph. The patch includes the following: * Ceph installation (using the ceph.com repo) * Glance integration *

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] minimum review period for functional changes that break backwards compatibility

2013-12-28 Thread John Griffith
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Hi Phil. Thanks for the well reasoned and poignant message urging caution and forethought in change management. I agree with all of the sentiments and think that we can do better in reasoning about the impact of changes. I

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] IDE extensions in .gitignore

2013-12-31 Thread John Griffith
Hey Everyone, I wanted to see where we stand on IDE extensions in .gitignore files. We seem to have some back and forth, one cycle there's a bug and a patch to add things like eclipse, idea etc and the next there's a bug and a patch to remove them. I'd like to have some sort of consensus on what

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] IDE extensions in .gitignore

2013-12-31 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 8:45 AM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote: Hey Everyone, I wanted to see where we stand on IDE extensions in .gitignore files. We seem to have some back and forth, one cycle

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] IDE extensions in .gitignore

2013-12-31 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: On 1 January 2014 06:07, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: I am not sure if this is the global .gitignore you are thinking of but this is the one I am in favor of:

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal for instance-level snapshots in Nova

2014-01-06 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Jon Bernard jbern...@tuxion.com wrote: Hello all, I would like to propose instance-level snapshots as a feature for inclusion in Nova. An initial draft of the more official proposal is

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][Cinder] Cinder driver maintainers/contact wiki

2014-01-11 Thread John Griffith
Hey Cinder Team! One of the things that's getting increasingly difficult as we grow the number of drivers in the tree and I try to get the driver cert initiative kicked off is rounding up an expert for each of the drivers in the tree. I've started a simple wiki page / matrix [1] that is designed

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Disk Eraser

2014-01-15 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Alan Kavanagh alan.kavan...@ericsson.com wrote: Cheers Guys So what would you recommend Oleg. Yes its for linux system. /Alan From: Oleg Gelbukh [mailto:ogelb...@mirantis.com] Sent: January-15-14 10:30 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][Cinder] Unable to run cinder_driver_cert.sh

2014-01-15 Thread John Griffith
A number of folks have contacted me and stated that they couldn't get the newly added cinder certification script to run. I looked into it this morning, sdague pointed out that tempest/run_tests.sh was modified a little while back and it turns out that was the source of the problem. I've logged

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Third party testing

2014-01-15 Thread John Griffith
Hey Everyone, A while back I started talking about this idea of requiring Cinder driver contributors to run a super simple cert script (some info here: [1]). Since then I've been playing with introduction of a third party gate check here in my own lab. My proposal was to have a non-voting check

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Third party testing

2014-01-15 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay sankarshan.mukhopadh...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:58 AM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote: A while back I started talking about this idea of requiring Cinder driver contributors to run a super simple cert

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Third party testing

2014-01-15 Thread John Griffith
Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:28 AM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote: Hey Everyone, A while back I started talking about this idea of requiring Cinder driver

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Cherry picking commit from oslo-incubator

2014-01-16 Thread John Griffith
Hey Everyone, A review came up today that cherry-picked a specific commit to OSLO Incubator, without updating the rest of the files in the module. I rejected that patch, because my philosophy has been that when you update/pull from oslo-incubator it should be done as a full sync of the entire

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Cherry picking commit from oslo-incubator

2014-01-17 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 16/01/14 17:32 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote: On 2014-01-16 13:48, John Griffith wrote: Hey Everyone, A review came up today

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Third party testing

2014-01-17 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: On 16 January 2014 14:51, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote: John -- I agree with you entirely here. My concern is more that I

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Third party testing

2014-01-17 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: On 18 January 2014 06:42, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: Maybe this is going a bit sideways, but my point

Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder unit test failure

2014-01-20 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:07 AM, iKhan ik.ibadk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have imported iniparse to my cinder code, it works fine when I perform execution. But when I run the unit test, it fails while importing iniparse. It says No module named iniparse. Do I have to take care of something

Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder unit test failure

2014-01-20 Thread John Griffith
impression it was there by default. Probably now I have to take care of this in test-requirement.txt as you mentioned. I wonder if there is an alternative to iniparse by default. Regards On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:47 PM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 20

Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder unit test failure

2014-01-20 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:15 AM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:30 AM, iKhan ik.ibadk...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks John, It worked earlier while executing because iniparse was installed, tho this wasn't present in virtual environment. Installing

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Cherry picking commit from oslo-incubator

2014-01-21 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Jan 17, 2014 12:24 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 16/01/14 17:32 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote: On 2014-01-16 13:48, John

Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder unit test failure

2014-01-21 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 08:29 +0530, iKhan wrote: I am worried which one is better in terms of performance? iniparse or ConfigParser? I am aware iniparse will do a better job of maintaining INI file's structure, but I am more

Re: [openstack-dev] Changes coming in gate structure

2014-01-22 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: Changes coming in gate structure Unless you've been living under a rock, on the moon, around Saturn, you'll have noticed that the gate has been quite backed up

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Code proposal deadline for Icehouse

2014-01-24 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/23/2014 08:31 PM, Michael Basnight wrote: On Jan 23, 2014, at 5:10 PM, Mark McClain wrote: On Jan 23, 2014, at 5:02 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate Status - Friday Edition

2014-01-24 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Clay Gerrard clay.gerr...@gmail.com wrote: That's a pretty high rate of failure, and really needs investigation. That's a great point, did you look into the logs of any of those jobs? Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I saw a few swift tests that

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposed Logging Standards

2014-01-27 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 6:07 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: Back at the beginning of the cycle, I pushed for the idea of doing some log harmonization, so that the OpenStack logs, across services, made sense. I've pushed a proposed changes to Nova and Keystone over the past couple of

Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder + taskflow

2014-02-03 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: Hi all, After talking with john g. about taskflow in cinder and seeing more and more reviews showing up I wanted to start a thread to gather all our lessons learned and how we can improve a little before continuing to

Re: [openstack-dev] Grizzly volume quotas

2014-02-05 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Jay S Bryant jsbry...@us.ibm.com wrote: Joe, Ah! So, those aren't for Cinder Volume but for nova-volume. Ok, so there isn't really a bug then. Yep, this is left over from when volumes were in nova. Sorry for speaking too quickly. Thanks for the info!

Re: [openstack-dev] [PTL] Designating required use upstream code

2014-02-05 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Rochelle.RochelleGrober rochelle.gro...@huawei.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 02/05/2014 11:22 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: (This email is mostly directed to PTLs for programs that include one integrated

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] [Cinder] Cinder driver verification

2014-02-12 Thread John Griffith
Hey, So we've talked about this a bit and had a number of ideas regarding how to test and show compatibility for third-party drivers in Cinder. This has been an eye opening experience (the number of folks that have NEVER run tempest before, as well as the problems uncovered now that they're

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] [Cinder] Cinder driver verification

2014-02-13 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Walter A. Boring IV walter.bor...@hp.com wrote: On 02/13/2014 02:51 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: John Griffith wrote: So we've talked about this a bit and had a number of ideas regarding how to test and show compatibility for third-party drivers in Cinder

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] [Cinder] Cinder driver verification

2014-02-13 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: John Griffith wrote: To add some controversy and keep the original intent of having only known tested and working drivers in the Cinder

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Unit test cases failing with error 'cannot import rpcapi'

2014-02-18 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 1:21 PM, iKhan ik.ibadk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, All cinder test cases are failing with error 'cannot import rpcapi', though same files work fine in live cinder setup. I wonder what's going wrong when unit testing is triggered. Can any one help me out here? --

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] [Cinder] Open Source and community working together

2014-03-01 Thread John Griffith
Hey, I just wanted to send out a quick note on a topic that came up recently. Unfortunately the folks that I'd like to read this most; don't participate on the ML typically, but I'd at least like to raise some community awareness. We all know OpenStack is growing at a rapid pace and has a lot

Re: [openstack-dev] WARNING: ... This application has not enabled MySQL traditional mode, which means silent data corruption may occur - real issue?

2014-03-02 Thread John Griffith
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: Coming in at slightly less than 1 million log lines in the last 7 days:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Do you think we should introduce the online-extend feature to cinder ?

2014-03-03 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Zhangleiqiang zhangleiqi...@huawei.comwrote: Hi, stackers: Libvirt/qemu have supported online-extend for multiple disk formats, including qcow2, sparse, etc. But Cinder only support offline-extend volumes currently. Offline-extend volume will

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] [Cinder] Open Source and community working together

2014-03-03 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote: Luke Gorrie wrote: That's a really harsh threat being made against a really vaguely defined group. I don't want to have to read between the lines on threats posted to openstack-dev to see if my reputation will

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection

2014-03-06 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:13 PM, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote: On 6 March 2014 08:50, zhangyu (AI) zhangy...@huawei.com wrote: It seems to be an interesting idea. In fact, a China-based public IaaS, QingCloud, has provided a similar feature to their virtual servers. Within 2 hours

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] FFE for vmdk-storage-policy-volume-type

2014-03-07 Thread John Griffith
Shouldn't be a problem, I'll sort through the items but I was looking earlier and didn't see anything concerning. All of them have been in process for some time so I think an exception is fair. On Mar 6, 2014 10:40 AM, Subramanian subramanian.neelakan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi,

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Refresher on OSLO-Incubator

2014-03-11 Thread John Griffith
Hey Everyone, I wanted to send an email out to point out something that we ran across in Cinder yesterday. First I want to review my understanding of how OSLO-Incubator is intended to work: The idea behind having the OSLO repository is to consolidate the various modules and such that all of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Refresher on OSLO-Incubator

2014-03-11 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:07 PM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.comwrote: Hey Everyone, I wanted to send an email out to point out something that we ran across in Cinder yesterday. First I want to review my understanding of how OSLO-Incubator is intended to work: The idea behind

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] non-persistent storage(after stopping VM, data will be rollback automatically), do you think we shoud introduce this feature?

2014-03-21 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Zhangleiqiang (Trump) zhangleiqi...@huawei.com wrote: From: Vishvananda Ishaya [mailto:vishvana...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 2:28 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] Multiple patches in one review

2014-03-24 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:31 AM, John Dennis jden...@redhat.com wrote: When a change is complex good practice is to break the change into a series of smaller individual patches that show the individual incremental steps needed to get to the final goal. When partitioned into small steps each

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] [Cinder FFE] Request for HDS FFE

2014-03-25 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/25/2014 10:42 AM, Steven Sonnenberg wrote: I just want to point out, there were no changes required to pass the tests. We were running those tests in Brazil and tunneling NFS and iSCSI across the Internet which

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Refactor ISCSIDriver to support other iSCSI transports besides TCP

2014-03-26 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Eric Harney ehar...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/25/2014 11:07 AM, Shlomi Sasson wrote: I am not sure what will be the right approach to handle this, I already have the code, should I open a bug or blueprint to track this issue? Best Regards, Shlomi A

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Cinder PTL Candidacy

2014-04-01 Thread John Griffith
I'd like to announce my candidacy for the Block Storage (Cinder) PTL position. I've been involved with OpenStack for about two and a half years now, starting out by trying to help with some things in Nova-Volumes and then with the help of a lot of great folks creating Cinder. I have been the

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] dd performance for wipe in cinder

2013-10-11 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@us.ibm.com wrote: Have you looked at the volume_clear and volume_clear_size options in cinder.conf? * https://github.com/openstack/cinder/blob/2013.2.rc1/etc/cinder/cinder.conf.sample#L1073

Re: [openstack-dev] [Hyper-V] Havana status

2013-10-11 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Bob Ball bob.b...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com] Sent: 11 October 2013 15:18 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Hyper-V] Havana status As a practical

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] dd performance for wipe in cinder

2013-10-11 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2013-10-11 10:50:33 -0600 (-0600), Chris Friesen wrote: Sounds like we could use some kind of layer that will zero out blocks on read if they haven't been written by that user. [...] You've mostly just described

Re: [openstack-dev] [Hyper-V] Havana status

2013-10-11 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:43 PM, David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com wrote: On 10/11/2013 02:03 PM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote: On Oct 11, 2013, at 19:29 , Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 10/11/2013 12:04 PM, John Griffith wrote: Umm... just to clarify the section below

Re: [openstack-dev] Announce of Rally - benchmarking system for OpenStack

2013-10-17 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 10/17/2013 03:32 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: Jay, Or, alternately, just have Rally as part of Tempest. Actually, tempest is used only to verify that cloud works properly. And verification is only small part of the

Re: [openstack-dev] Announce of Rally - benchmarking system for OpenStack

2013-10-18 Thread John Griffith
into Cinder =) Also putting Tempest into Rally is not a good idea. (same as putting Cinder back to Nova). Best regards, Boris Pavlovic --- Mirantis Inc. On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:56 PM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [qa] Ceilometer ERRORS in normal runs

2013-10-23 Thread John Griffith
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: Dave Kranz has been building a system so that we can ensure that during a Tempest run services don't spew ERRORs in the logs. Eventually, we're going to gate on this, because there is nothing that Tempest does to the system

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [qa] Ceilometer ERRORS in normal runs

2013-10-23 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 10/23/2013 10:40 AM, John Griffith wrote: On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net mailto:s...@dague.net wrote: Dave Kranz has been building a system so that we can ensure that during

Re: [openstack-dev] RFC - Icehouse logging harmonization

2013-10-23 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Clark Boylan clark.boy...@gmail.comwrote: On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: One of the efforts that we're working on from the QA team is tooling that ensures we aren't stack tracing into our test logs during normal tempest

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Preserving ephemeral block device on rebuild?

2013-10-28 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 4:49 AM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.netwrote: On 28 October 2013 23:17, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote: Is there a reason why you could not just use a Cinder Volume for your data, in this case? Because this is at the baremetal layer; we want local

Re: [openstack-dev] Stable backports

2013-10-28 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 10/27/2013 07:07 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, In the case of stable back ports which have Fixes bug: #XYZ we will have to change this to the new format Closes-bug: #XYZ. Any thoughts on this? It doesn't have to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Propose Jay Bryant for core

2013-10-29 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:54 PM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote: Hey, I wanted to propose Jay Bryant (AKA jsbryant, AKA jungleboy, AKA :) ) for core membership on the Cinder team. Jay has been working on Cinder for a while now and has really shown some dedication

Re: [openstack-dev] How to skip certain unit tests?

2013-10-30 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Vijay B os.v...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, How can we skip certain unit tests when running run_tests.sh? I'm looking at the Openstack unit test page at http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/devref/unit_tests.html but I cannot find info on how to do this. Any

Re: [openstack-dev] Migrating to newer full projects from what used to be part of nova

2013-10-31 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Jesse Pretorius jesse.pretor...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone, Migrations from Essex to Grizzly/Havana are starting to hit my radar of responsible tasks and I'm disappointed that beyond this old wiki note [1] Is your disappointment that there isn't a path from

Re: [openstack-dev] Improvement of Cinder API wrt https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1213953

2013-11-04 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:27 AM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com wrote: On 11/04/2013 03:49 PM, Solly Ross wrote: So, There's currently an outstanding issue with regards to a Nova shortcut command

Re: [openstack-dev] Improvement of Cinder API wrt https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1213953

2013-11-05 Thread John Griffith
' or 'error'. Agree Is there a reason why Cinder would legitimately get stuck in 'downloading'? Thanks, Avishay From: John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 11/05

Re: [openstack-dev] cinder metrics with nova-scheduler

2013-11-08 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Abbass MAROUNI abbass.maro...@virtualscale.fr wrote: Hello, We want to be able to launch a VM with a number of cinder volumes on the same host (the host is a compute and a storage node). We're looking for a way to tell nova-scheduler to work with

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Policy on spelling and grammar

2013-11-11 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:49 AM, James Slagle james.sla...@gmail.com wrote: -1 from me as well. When I first started with OpenStack, I probably would have agreed with letting small grammar mistakes and typos slide by. However, I now feel that getting commit messages right is more important.

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

2013-11-11 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 03:20:20PM +0100, Nicolas Barcet wrote: Dear TC members, Our companies are actively encouraging our respective customers to have the patches they mission us to make be contributed back

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Propose Jay Bryant for core

2013-11-11 Thread John Griffith
...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On 29 October 2013 20:54, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote: Hey, I wanted to propose Jay Bryant (AKA jsbryant, AKA jungleboy, AKA :) ) for core membership on the Cinder team. Jay has been working on Cinder for a while now and has really

Re: [openstack-dev] Improvement of Cinder API wrt https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1213953

2013-11-12 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Solly Ross sr...@redhat.com wrote: I'd like to get some sort of consensus on this before I start working on it. Now that people are back from Summit, what would you propose? Best Regards, Solly Ross - Original Message - From: Solly Ross

Re: [openstack-dev] Improvement of Cinder API wrt https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1213953

2013-11-12 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Caitlin Bestler caitlin.best...@nexenta.com wrote: On 11/12/2013 8:09 AM, John Griffith wrote: On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Solly Ross sr...@redhat.com wrote: I'd like to get some sort of consensus on this before I start working on it. Now that people

Re: [openstack-dev] [ALL] Removing generate_uuid() from uuidutils

2013-11-13 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Andrew Laski andrew.la...@rackspace.com wrote: On 11/13/13 at 05:48am, Gary Kotton wrote: I recall a few cycles ago having str(uuid.uuid4()) replaced by generate_uuid(). There was actually a helper function in neutron (back when it was called quantum) and it

  1   2   3   4   5   >