Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Two nominations for Manila Core Reviewer Team

+1 Clinton Knight From: Ben Swartzlander b...@swartzlander.orgmailto:b...@swartzlander.org Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 at 2:23 PM To: OpenStack

[openstack-dev] [Manila] Mount automation using Zeroconf

Hello, Manila-philes. Back in Paris we started talking about Manila mount automation, whereby file shares could be automatically mounted on clients, and this will likely be a topic in Vancouver. So in order to have an informed discussion at the summit, I'd like to explore a few things

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Mount automation using Zeroconf

Thanks, Luis, I agree with your assessment that one good way to solve this issue is a publisher-subscriber model. The publisher would be Manila, using zeroconf or AMQP or Zaqar (the one I¹m investigating now). The subscriber would be a lightweight agent running on the client that listens for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Question to driver maintainers

Hi, Igor. The NetApp cDOT driver can handle share extend/shrink without disruption. Clinton From: Igor Malinovskiy imalinovs...@mirantis.commailto:imalinovs...@mirantis.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Implementation of ABC MetaClasses

Funny you should mention needing all of the CG methods... A VD group (ConsistencyGroupVD) was added to contain the 4 CG methods from Juno. Then more CG methods were added to VolumeDriver in Kilo, but they weren’t added to ConsistencyGroupVD. But you *can’t* add them to ConsistencyGroupVD

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] CephFS native driver

Hi, John. If you want to discuss this in Tokyo, I suggest you add it to the etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/manila-mitaka-summit-topics I look forward to meeting you at the Summit. It¹d be great to see a demo of your Ceph driver. Clinton On 10/7/15, 6:56 AM, "John Spray"

[openstack-dev] [Manila] Generic share groups

Hello, Manila-philes. In last week's Manila IRC meeting, I briefly outlined a proposal for a generic share grouping facility in Manila. It is on the agenda for tomorrow (17 Dec), and I've described the ideas more fully on the Manila wiki. We think this would benefit every driver, improve the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev][Manila] running tox py27 - unit tests - very slow - can i run it in parts?

@Matt: The Manila team is writing new 1st-party drivers that should be much faster & more reliable in the gate. @Nidhi: Here are a couple more suggestions for working with unit tests more efficiently: 1. Use PyCharm. You can set up test configurations to run unit tests on a single file or a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Midcycle meetup

https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/manila-mitaka-midcycle Clinton On 1/13/16, 9:51 AM, "Luis Pabon" wrote: >Is there a link to the topics or schedule? > >- Luis > >- Original Message - >From: "Ben Swartzlander" >To: "OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] ALLOWED_EXTRA_MISSING is cover.sh

Hi, John. This is but one reason the coverage job doesn¹t vote; it has other known issues. It is primarily a convenience tool that lets core reviewers know if they should look more deeply into unit test coverage. For a new driver such as yours, I typically pull the code and check coverage for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Nominate Rodrigo Barbieri for core reviewer team

+1 Great addition. Welcome, Rodrigo! Clinton On 2/2/16, 12:30 PM, "Ben Swartzlander" wrote: >Rodrigo (ganso on IRC) joined the Manila project back in the Kilo >release and has been working on share migration (an important core >feature) for the last 2 releases. Since

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] adding a new /v3 endpoint for api-microversions

On 2/22/16, 9:33 AM, "Sean McGinnis" wrote: >On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 07:59:17PM +0200, Duncan Thomas wrote: >> >> So we can't get users to change endpoints, or write our libraries to >>have >> sensible defaults, but we're somehow going to magically get consumers >>to do

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposal: changes to our current testing process

On 3/7/16, 10:45 AM, "Eric Harney" wrote: >On 03/06/2016 09:35 PM, John Griffith wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Jay S. Bryant >>>> wrote: >> >>> Ivan, >>> >>> I agree that our testing needs improvement. Thanks for starting this

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Any updates on share groups?

Hi, John. In the Friday session, the community agreed that groups would support multiple share types in the same group, that they would be called ‘share groups’, and that a higher-level, multi-backend grouping construct to be discussed later would be more flexible if based on something like

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Volume Drivers unit tests

Nate, you have to press Ctrl-C to see the in-progress test, that’s why you don’t see it in the logs. The bug report shows this and points to the patch where it appeared to begin. https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1578986 Clinton From: "Potter, Nathaniel"

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Nominate Tom Barron for core reviewer team

+1 Tom will be a great asset for Manila. Clinton _ From: Ravi, Goutham > Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 3:01 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Nominate Tom Barron for core reviewer team To: OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [manila] propose adding gouthamr to manila core

+2 Well earned. From: Rodrigo Barbieri Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 8:41 AM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"