Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Change of meeting time

2014-08-21 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 08/20/2014 11:30 AM, Dougal Matthews wrote: - Original Message - From: Derek Higgins der...@redhat.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Wednesday, 20 August, 2014 10:15:51 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Propose adding StevenK to core reviewers

2014-09-10 Thread Ladislav Smola
+1 On 09/09/2014 08:32 PM, Gregory Haynes wrote: Hello everyone! I have been working on a meta-review of StevenK's reviews and I would like to propose him as a new member of our core team. As I'm sure many have noticed, he has been above our stats requirements for several months now. More

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Nominations to Horizon Core

2013-12-11 Thread Ladislav Smola
+1 for Tatiana Mazur to Horizon Core not sure if only cores should do the vote, but Tatiana has been very active, so it will be well deserved. :-) On 12/11/2013 01:09 PM, Jiri Tomasek wrote: +1 for Tatiana Mazur to Horizon Core On 12/10/2013 09:24 PM, Lyle, David wrote: I would like to

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Tuskar CLI after architecture changes

2013-12-11 Thread Ladislav Smola
Hi, thanks for starting this conversation. I will take it little side ways. I think we should be asking why have we needed the tuskar-api. It has done some more complex logic (e.g. building a heat template) or storing additional info, not supported by the services we use (like rack

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Tuskar CLI after architecture changes

2013-12-11 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 12/11/2013 04:35 PM, James Slagle wrote: On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Jiří Stránský ji...@redhat.com wrote: Hi all, TL;DR: I believe that As an infrastructure administrator, Anna wants a CLI for managing the deployment providing the same fundamental features as UI. With the planned

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Terminology

2013-12-12 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 12/11/2013 08:59 PM, James Slagle wrote: This is really helpful, thanks for pulling it together. comment inline... On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Tzu-Mainn Chen tzuma...@redhat.com wrote: * NODE a physical general purpose machine capable of running in many roles. Some nodes may have

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Tuskar CLI after architecture changes

2013-12-12 Thread Ladislav Smola
Agree with this. Though I am an optimist, I believe that this time, we can avoid calling multiple services in one request that depend on each other. About the multiple users at once, this should be solved inside the API calls of the services. So I think we should forbid building these

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Horizon] [Tuskar] [UI] Horizon and Tuskar-UI merge

2013-12-13 Thread Ladislav Smola
Horizoners, As discussed in TripleO and Horizon meetings, we are proposing to move Tuskar UI under the Horizon umbrella. Since we are building our UI solution on top of Horizon, we think this is a good fit. It will allow us to get feedback and reviews from the appropriate group of developers.

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] UI Wireframes for Resource Management - ready for implementation

2013-12-17 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 12/16/2013 08:48 PM, Jay Dobies wrote: On 12/13/2013 01:53 PM, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: On 2013/13/12 11:20, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: These look good! Quick question - can you explain the purpose of Node Tags? Are they an additional way to filter nodes through nova-scheduler (is that even

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Horizon] [Tuskar] [UI] Horizon and Tuskar-UI codebase merge

2013-12-17 Thread Ladislav Smola
Horizoners, As an alternative merge option, we could merge directly to Horizon code base. After some conversation, we have realized that it is possible to mix codebase of incubated and integrated projects, as Trove showed us. Contrary to what was said in the last meeting, we do not require

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Terminology

2013-12-18 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 12/17/2013 04:20 PM, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: On 2013/13/12 23:11, Jordan OMara wrote: On 13/12/13 16:20 +1300, Robert Collins wrote: However, on instance - 'instance' is a very well defined term in Nova and thus OpenStack: Nova boot gets you an instance, nova delete gets rid of an instance,

Re: [openstack-dev] Horizon and Tuskar-UI codebase merge

2013-12-20 Thread Ladislav Smola
and +1 also from me :-) Seems like this the way we want to go. So, what will be the next steps? Seems like this have to be done by cooperation of PTL's of Horizon and TripleO and ttx probably? Thank you, Ladislav On 12/19/2013 05:29 PM, Lyle, David wrote: So after a lot of consideration,

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Tuskar CLI after architecture changes

2013-12-20 Thread Ladislav Smola
May I propose we keep the conversation Icehouse related. I don't think we can make any sort of locking mechanism in I. Though it would be worth of creating some WikiPage that would present it whole in some consistent manner. I am kind of lost in these emails. :-) So, what do you thing are

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Tuskar CLI after architecture changes

2013-12-20 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 12/20/2013 01:04 PM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote: On 20/12/13 12:25, Ladislav Smola wrote: May I propose we keep the conversation Icehouse related. I don't think we can make any sort of locking mechanism in I. By getting rid of tuskar-api and putting all the logic higher up, we are forfeiting

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Tuskar CLI after architecture changes

2013-12-20 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 12/20/2013 02:06 PM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote: On 20/12/13 13:04, Radomir Dopieralski wrote: [snip] I have just learned that tuskar-api stays, so my whole ranting is just a waste of all our time. Sorry about that. Hehe. :-) Ok after the last meeting we are ready to say what goes to

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Tuskar CLI after architecture changes

2013-12-20 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 12/20/2013 02:37 PM, Imre Farkas wrote: On 12/20/2013 12:25 PM, Ladislav Smola wrote: 2. Heat stack create, update This is locked in the process of the operation, so nobody can mess with it while it is updating or creating. Once we will pack all operations that are now aside in this, we

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Tuskar CLI after architecture changes

2014-01-06 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 12/20/2013 05:51 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Ladislav Smola's message of 2013-12-20 05:48:40 -0800: On 12/20/2013 02:37 PM, Imre Farkas wrote: On 12/20/2013 12:25 PM, Ladislav Smola wrote: 2. Heat stack create, update This is locked in the process of the operation, so nobody can

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Deployment Management section - Wireframes

2014-01-13 Thread Ladislav Smola
Hello, some answers below: On 01/10/2014 05:18 PM, Jay Dobies wrote: Thanks for recording this. A few questions: - I'm guessing the capacity metrics will come from Ceilometer. Will Ceilometer provide the averages for the role or is that calculated by Tuskar? Definitely Ceilometer, though

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Deployment Management section - Wireframes

2014-01-13 Thread Ladislav Smola
Hi, some answers inline: On 01/13/2014 10:47 AM, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hi Jay, thanks for your questions, they are great. I am going to answer inline: On 2014/10/01 17:18, Jay Dobies wrote: Thanks for recording this. A few questions: - I'm guessing the capacity metrics will come from

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Deployment Management section - Wireframes

2014-01-15 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 01/15/2014 10:53 AM, Jaromir Coufal wrote: On 2014/13/01 13:15, Ladislav Smola wrote: The usage of roles is new metric which doesn't exist. It is the most consumed HW resource (which means if CPU is consumed by 60 % and RAM or disk are less, then the role usage is 60 %). It would be great

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Blueprint decrypt-and-display-vm-generated-password

2014-01-23 Thread Ladislav Smola
Hello, seems like there is no pushback against decrypting in Javascript. So unless somebody has something against, I guess it is fine. I would say that it can be the best, to have both client side decrypting using JS and server side using Nova. We can let the user decide what to use.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] [TripleO] adding process/service monitoring

2014-01-28 Thread Ladislav Smola
Hello, excellent, this is exactly what we need in Tuskar. :-) Might be good to monitor it via SNMPD. As this daemon will be already running on each node. And I see it should be possible, though not very popular. Then it would be nice to have the data stored in Ceilometer, as it provides

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Roadmap towards heterogenous hardware support

2014-01-30 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 01/30/2014 12:39 PM, Jiří Stránský wrote: On 01/30/2014 11:26 AM, Tomas Sedovic wrote: 1.1 Treat similar hardware configuration as equal The way I understand it is this: we use a scheduler filter that wouldn't do a strict match on the hardware in Ironic. E.g. if our baremetal flavour said

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Roadmap towards heterogenous hardware support

2014-02-04 Thread Ladislav Smola
Hello, +1 to 'let's work towards having a single Node Profile (flavor) associated with each Deployment Role (pages 12 13 of the latest mockups[1])' Good start. We could have also more flavors per role now, user just would have to be advised: You are using one image for multiple hardware,

[openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Dealing with passwords in Tuskar-API

2014-02-19 Thread Ladislav Smola
Hello, I would like to have your opinion about how to deal with passwords in Tuskar-API The background is, that tuskarAPI is storing heat template parameters in its database, it's a preparation for more complex workflows, when we will need to store the data before the actual heat

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Dealing with passwords in Tuskar-API

2014-02-19 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 02/19/2014 08:05 PM, Dougal Matthews wrote: On 19/02/14 18:49, Hugh O. Brock wrote: On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 06:31:47PM +, Dougal Matthews wrote: On 19/02/14 18:29, Jason Rist wrote: Would it be possible to create some token for use throughout? Forgive my naivete. I don't think so,

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Dealing with passwords in Tuskar-API

2014-02-19 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 02/19/2014 06:29 PM, Dougal Matthews wrote: On 19/02/14 17:10, Ladislav Smola wrote: Hello, I would like to have your opinion about how to deal with passwords in Tuskar-API The background is, that tuskarAPI is storing heat template parameters in its database, it's a preparation for more

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Dealing with passwords in Tuskar-API

2014-02-24 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 02/23/2014 01:16 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Imre Farkas's message of 2014-02-20 15:24:17 +: On 02/20/2014 03:57 PM, Tomas Sedovic wrote: On 20/02/14 15:41, Radomir Dopieralski wrote: On 20/02/14 15:00, Tomas Sedovic wrote: Are we even sure we need to store the passwords in

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Tuskar CLI UX

2014-02-27 Thread Ladislav Smola
Hello, I think if we will use Openstack CLI, it has to be something like this https://github.com/dtroyer/python-oscplugin. Otherwise we are not Openstack on Openstack. Btw. abstracting it all to one big CLI will be just more confusing when people will debug issues. So it would have to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Tuskar CLI UX

2014-02-28 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 02/27/2014 05:02 PM, Ana Krivokapic wrote: On 02/27/2014 04:41 PM, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: Hello, I think if we will use Openstack CLI, it has to be something like this https://github.com/dtroyer/python-oscplugin. Otherwise we are not Openstack on Openstack. Btw. abstracting it all to one

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Tuskar CLI UX

2014-02-28 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 02/27/2014 04:30 PM, Dougal Matthews wrote: On 27/02/14 15:08, Ladislav Smola wrote: Hello, I think if we will use Openstack CLI, it has to be something like this https://github.com/dtroyer/python-oscplugin. Otherwise we are not Openstack on Openstack. Btw. abstracting it all to one big

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Nominating Radomir Dopieralski to Horizon Core

2014-03-05 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 03/06/2014 04:47 AM, Jason Rist wrote: On Wed 05 Mar 2014 03:36:22 PM MST, Lyle, David wrote: I'd like to nominate Radomir Dopieralski to Horizon Core. I find his reviews very insightful and more importantly have come to rely on their quality. He has contributed to several areas in

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] reviewer update march

2014-04-04 Thread Ladislav Smola
+1 On 04/03/2014 01:02 PM, Robert Collins wrote: Getting back in the swing of things... Hi, like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Heat] TripleO Heat Templates and merge.py

2014-04-07 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 04/06/2014 11:27 PM, Steve Baker wrote: On 05/04/14 04:47, Tomas Sedovic wrote: Hi All, I was wondering if the time has come to document what exactly are we doing with tripleo-heat-templates and merge.py[1], figure out what needs to happen to move away and raise the necessary blueprints on

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] reviewer update march [additional cores]

2014-04-08 Thread Ladislav Smola
+1 for the -core changes jdon sounds like a pretty cool Mafia name, +1 for Don Jay On 04/08/2014 09:10 AM, Tomas Sedovic wrote: On 08/04/14 01:50, Robert Collins wrote: tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose: bnemec greghaynes jdon -1, there's a typo in jdob's nick ;-) In all seriousness, I

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] config options, defaults, oh my!

2014-04-08 Thread Ladislav Smola
+1 to this: nova: config: default.compute_manager: ironic.nova.compute.manager.ClusterComputeManager cells.driver: nova.cells.rpc_driver.CellsRPCDriver Adding a generic mechanism like this and having everything configurable seems like a best option to me. On 04/08/2014 01:51

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tuskar][TripleO] Tuskar Planning for Juno

2014-04-08 Thread Ladislav Smola
Thanks Mainn for putting this together, looks like a fairly precise list of things we need to do in J. On 04/07/2014 03:36 PM, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: Hi all, One of the topics of discussion during the TripleO midcycle meetup a few weeks ago was the direction we'd like to take Tuskar during

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Introduction of AngularJS in membership workflow

2013-11-12 Thread Ladislav Smola
+1000 Excellent I am really excited about having a heavily tested proper client-side layer. This is very needed, given that amount of javascript in Horizon is rising. The hacked together libraries in JQuery, that are there now are very hard to orient in and will be hard to maintain in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Ceilometer] get IPMI data for ceilometer

2013-11-20 Thread Ladislav Smola
Ok, I'll try to summarize what will be done in the near future for Undercloud monitoring. 1. There will be Central agent running on the same host(hosts once the central agent horizontal scaling is finished) as Ironic 2. It will have SNMP pollster, SNMP pollster will be able to get list of

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Javascript development improvement

2013-11-21 Thread Ladislav Smola
Hello, as long as node won't be Production dependency, it shouldn't be a problem, right? I give +1 to that Regards Ladislav On 11/20/2013 05:01 PM, Maxime Vidori wrote: Hi all, I know it is pretty annoying but I have to resurrect this subject. With the integration of Angularjs into Horizon

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][horizon]Heat UI related requirements roadmap

2013-11-26 Thread Ladislav Smola
Hello, seems too big to do the inline comments, so just a few notes here: If we truly want to have Templates portable, it would mean to have the 'metadata' somehow standardised, right? Otherwise if every UI will add their own metadata, then I hardly see the templates as portable. I think

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Summit session wrapup

2013-11-28 Thread Ladislav Smola
Hello, just few notes from me: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-feature-map sounds like a great idea, we should go through them one by one maybe on meeting. We should agree on what is doable for I, without violating the Openstack way in some very ugly way. So do we want to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer][horizon] The meaning of Network Duration

2013-11-28 Thread Ladislav Smola
Hello Daisy, the tables were deleted from Horizon, because of that confusion. https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1249279 We are going to clearly document each ceilometer meter first. Then this information will appear again in Horizon. E.g. the duration as stated in doc

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] Core reviewer update Dec

2013-12-05 Thread Ladislav Smola
Hello, +1 to core update. There are still enough Tuskar-UI guys in the core team I think. Ladislav On 12/04/2013 08:12 AM, Robert Collins wrote: Hi, like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over time,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] Core reviewer update Dec

2013-12-05 Thread Ladislav Smola
Hello, so what is the plan? Tuskar-UI stays in tripleo until tripleo is part of the integrated release? Thanks, Ladislav On 12/04/2013 08:44 PM, Lyle, David wrote: On 5 December 2013 12:10, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: -snip- That said, perhaps we should review these

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] Core reviewer update Dec

2013-12-06 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 12/05/2013 03:01 PM, James Slagle wrote: On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: On 5 December 2013 06:55, James Slagle james.sla...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Robert Collins Jan, Jordan, Martyn, Jiri and Jaromir are still

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] Core reviewer update Dec

2013-12-06 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 12/05/2013 11:40 AM, Jan Provaznik wrote: On 12/04/2013 08:12 AM, Robert Collins wrote: And the 90 day not-active-enough status: | jprovazn **| 220 5 10 7 177.3% | 2 ( 9.1%) | |jomara ** | 210 2 4 15 1190.5% | 2 ( 9.5%) | |

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] Core reviewer update Dec

2013-12-06 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 12/06/2013 09:56 AM, Jaromir Coufal wrote: On 2013/04/12 08:12, Robert Collins wrote: Hi, like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] Core reviewer update Dec

2013-12-06 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 12/06/2013 05:36 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 2013-12-06 03:22, Ladislav Smola wrote: On 12/06/2013 09:56 AM, Jaromir Coufal wrote: On 2013/04/12 08:12, Robert Collins wrote: Hi, like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to date: folk who are not regularly reviewing

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Strategy for recovering crashed nodes in the Overcloud?

2014-07-25 Thread Ladislav Smola
Hi, I believe you are looking for stack convergence in Heat. It's not fully implemented yet AFAIK. You can check it out here https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/convergence Hope it will help you. Ladislav On 07/23/2014 12:31 PM, Howley, Tom wrote: (Resending to properly start new

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Strategy for merging Heat HOT port

2014-08-01 Thread Ladislav Smola
Hello, yes, this is a very needed change, so I'd vote for -2 everything unless it's rebased to 105347. Thank you for the patches. Ladislav On 08/01/2014 02:19 AM, Steve Baker wrote: The changes to port tripleo-heat-templates to HOT have been rebased to the current state and are ready to

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [Horizon] Icehouse Release of TripleO UI + Demo

2014-04-11 Thread Ladislav Smola
Hello, we have used this list of steps for the demo on Fedora 20: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Tuskar/Devtest The demo is running on one machine with 24GB RAM and 120GB disk. We are using virtualized baremetals(bm_poseur) for development. KInd Regards, Ladislav On 04/10/2014 07:40 PM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [Horizon] Icehouse Release of TripleO UI + Demo

2014-04-11 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 04/11/2014 01:03 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 04/11/2014 06:05 PM, Jaromir Coufal wrote: On 2014/11/04 10:27, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 04/10/2014 04:32 PM, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Dear Stackers, I am happy to announce that yesterday Tuskar UI (TripleO UI) has tagged branch 0.1.0 for

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Undercloud Ceilometer

2014-04-14 Thread Ladislav Smola
Hello, I am planning to add Ceilometer to Undercloud as default. Since Tuskar-UI uses it as primary source of metering samples and Tuskar should be in Undercloud as default, it made sense to me. So is my assumption correct or there are some reasons not to do this? Here are the reviews, that

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Undercloud Ceilometer

2014-04-16 Thread Ladislav Smola
does it sound? On 04/14/2014 01:31 PM, Ladislav Smola wrote: Hello, I am planning to add Ceilometer to Undercloud as default. Since Tuskar-UI uses it as primary source of metering samples and Tuskar should be in Undercloud as default, it made sense to me. So is my assumption correct

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][design] review based conceptual design process

2014-04-18 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 04/15/2014 08:44 PM, Robert Collins wrote: I've been watching the nova process, and I think its working out well - it certainly addresses: - making design work visible - being able to tell who has had input - and providing clear feedback to the designers I'd like to do the same thing

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Undercloud Ceilometer

2014-04-23 Thread Ladislav Smola
/2014 06:23 PM, Neal, Phil wrote: From: Ladislav Smola [mailto:lsm...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 8:37 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Undercloud Ceilometer No response so far, but -1 on the image element for making Ceilometer

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Feedback on init-keystone spec

2014-04-30 Thread Ladislav Smola
Hello Steve, the spec looks correct to me. Thanks for picking this up, it's very needed, especially for Tuskar. Let me know if you will need some help with testing it, or with anything else. Kind Regards, Ladislav On 04/30/2014 09:02 AM, Steve Kowalik wrote: Hi, I'm looking at

[openstack-dev] [Tripleo] Release report

2014-10-01 Thread Ladislav Smola
1. os-apply-config: release: 0.1.22 -- 0.1.23 --https://pypi.python.org/pypi/os-apply-config/0.1.23 -- http://tarballs.openstack.org/os-apply-config/os-apply-config-0.1.23.tar.gz 2. os-refresh-config: release: 0.1.7 -- 0.1.8

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] os-cloud-config

2014-10-30 Thread Ladislav Smola
Hello, we call it from UI after the deployment https://github.com/openstack/tuskar-ui/blob/master/tuskar_ui/infrastructure/overview/forms.py#L222 . There should be conversation on the summit whether to do the call from somewhere else (tuskar, template..). Kind Regards, Ladislav On

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Add a library js for creating charts

2013-08-27 Thread Ladislav Smola
I have prepared the testing implementation of Rickshaw wrapped into a general linechart and connected it to Ceilometer here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/35590/ (rendering is mostly copied from examples with some parts from Maxime Vidori) Rickshaw really works like a charm. I think it

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Add a library js for creating charts

2013-08-28 Thread Ladislav Smola
The Rickshaw library is in the Master. Building of the reusable charts on top of it is in the progress. On 08/27/2013 02:51 PM, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info writes: It sounds like a good plan to pick Rickshaw. Better building on top of it, contributing back to it,

[openstack-dev] [Tuskar] All needed Tuskar metrics and alerts mapped to what Ceilometer supports

2013-09-16 Thread Ladislav Smola
Hello, this is follow up of T.Sedovic old email, trying to identify all metrics, we will need to track for Tuskar. The Ceilometer API for Horizon is now in progress, so we have time to finish the list of metrics and alarms we need. That may also raise the requests for some Ceilometer API

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tuskar] All needed Tuskar metrics and alerts mapped to what Ceilometer supports

2013-09-17 Thread Ladislav Smola
will be queried from Overcloud Ceilometer Missing metrics * System load -- see /proc/loadavg (percentage) as described here https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+spec/monitoring-physical-devices On 09/16/2013 04:10 PM, Ladislav Smola wrote: Hello, this is follow up

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] Ceilometer Alarm management page

2013-09-19 Thread Ladislav Smola
Hello everyone, I am in the process of implementing Ceilometer Alarm API. Here are the blueprints. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/ceilometer-alarm-api https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/ceilometer-alarm-management-page While I am waiting for some Ceilometer

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tuskar] [TripleO] The vision and looking ahead

2013-09-19 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 09/19/2013 10:08 AM, Tomas Sedovic wrote: Hi everyone, Some of us Tuskar developers have had the chance to meet the TripleO developers face to face and discuss the visions and goals of our projects. Tuskar's ultimate goal is to have to a full OpenStack management solution: letting the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tuskar] [UI] Identifying metrics to show in Tuskar UI detail pages

2013-09-23 Thread Ladislav Smola
Liz, thank you very much for this, I will try to sort this and pick the ones, that will need to be implemented in Ceilometer. Will comment the etherpad. FYI there are only two Agents, that collects Hardware related data now. This one is almost complete:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Ceilometer Alarm management page

2013-09-24 Thread Ladislav Smola
Hello Julien, thank you very much for your response. I have commented it in-line. I have already started working on 1., I will plan the others, depending on the feedback. Ladislav On 09/23/2013 03:33 PM, Julien Danjou wrote: On Thu, Sep 19 2013, Ladislav Smola wrote: Hi Ladislav, Sorry

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Ceilometer Alarm management page

2013-09-24 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 09/24/2013 02:22 PM, Julien Danjou wrote: On Tue, Sep 24 2013, Ladislav Smola wrote: Well for example, if we find metrics, that can be used for measuring health (this is probably more undercloud talking, or hardware metrics in general), we could do something like I want this alarm on all

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Ceilometer Alarm management page

2013-09-25 Thread Ladislav Smola
2013, Ladislav Smola wrote: Yes it would be good if something like this would be supported. - relation of alarm to multiple entities, that are result of sample-api query. Could it be worth creating a BP? Probably indeed. -- Julien Danjou # Free Software hacker # independent consultant # http

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Ceilometer Alarm management page

2013-09-25 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 09/25/2013 01:51 AM, Gabriel Hurley wrote 4. There is a thought about tagging the alarms by user defined tag, so user can easily group alarms together and then watch them together based on their tag. The alarm API don't provide that directly, but you can imagine some sort of filter based on

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Undercloud Ceilometer

2013-10-04 Thread Ladislav Smola
Hello, just a few words about role of Ceilometer in the Undercloud and the work in progress. Why we need Ceilometer in Undercloud: --- In Tuskar-UI, we will display number of statistics, that will show Undercloud metrics. Later also number of

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Undercloud Ceilometer

2013-10-07 Thread Ladislav Smola
Hello Clint, thank you for your feedback. On 10/04/2013 06:08 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Ladislav Smola's message of 2013-10-04 08:28:22 -0700: Hello, just a few words about role of Ceilometer in the Undercloud and the work in progress. Why we need Ceilometer in Undercloud:

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Undercloud Ceilometer

2013-10-07 Thread Ladislav Smola
Hello Chris, That would be much appreciated, thank you. :-) Kind Regards, Ladislav On 10/05/2013 12:12 AM, Chris Jones wrote: Hi On 4 October 2013 16:28, Ladislav Smola lsm...@redhat.com mailto:lsm...@redhat.com wrote: test it. Anybody volunteers for this task? There will be a hard

Re: [openstack-dev] [TRIPLEO] tripleo-core update october

2013-10-08 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 10/08/2013 10:27 AM, Robert Collins wrote: Perhaps the best thing to do here is to get tuskar-ui to be part of the horizon program, and utilise it's review team? This is planned. But it wont happen soon. On 8 October 2013 19:31, Tzu-Mainn Chen tzuma...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, like most

Re: [openstack-dev] [TRIPLEO] tripleo-core update october

2013-10-08 Thread Ladislav Smola
Hi, seems like not all people agrees on what should be the 'metric' of a core reviewer. Also what justify us to give +1 or +2. Could it be a topic on today's meeting? Ladislav On 10/07/2013 09:03 PM, Robert Collins wrote: Hi, like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] nominating James Polley for tripleo-core

2015-01-16 Thread Ladislav Smola
+1 On 01/14/2015 07:34 PM, Robert Collins wrote: +1 On 15 Jan 2015 07:15, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com mailto:cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Hello! It has been a while since we expanded our review team. The numbers aren't easy to read with recent dips caused by the summit and