Hi, Boris and all other guys:
I have found a BP about USB device passthrough in
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/host-usb-passthrough.
I have also read the latest nova code and make sure it doesn't support USB
passthrough by now.
Are there any progress or plan for USB passthrough?
(not for usage questions)
Cc: bpavlo...@mirantis.com; Luohao (brian); Yuanjing (D)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Question about USB passthrough
On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 03:05 +, Liuji (Jeremy) wrote:
Now that USB devices are used so widely in private/hybrid cloud like
used as USB key
Hi, Mistral members
I am very interesting in the project Mistral.
About the wiki of the Mistral, I have a question about the use case description
as the follow.
Live migration
A user specifies tasks for VM live migration triggered upon an event from
Ceilometer (CPU consumption 100%).
Is
like Ceilometer alarms, timer
or anything else.
Feel free to ask any questions, thanks!
Renat Akhmerov
@ Mirantis Inc.
On 27 Feb 2014, at 15:08, Liuji (Jeremy) jeremy@huawei.com wrote:
Hi, Mistral members
I am very interesting in the project Mistral.
About the wiki
Hi, all
I find a problem about pci-passthrough.
Test scenario:
1)There are two compute nodes in the environment named A and B. A has two NICs
of vendor_id='8086' and product_id='105e', B has two NICs of vendor_id='8086'
and product_id='10c9'.
2)I configured pci_alias={vendor_id:8086,
Hi, all
I search the current blueprints and old mails in the mail list, but find
nothing about Guest NUMA and setting memory binding policies.
I just find a blueprint about vcpu topology and a blueprint about CPU binding.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/support-libvirt-vcpu-topology
: [openstack-dev] [nova] A problem about pci-passthrough
On 2014年03月03日 22:21, Alexis Lee wrote:
Liuji (Jeremy) said on Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 08:06:57AM +:
Test scenario:
1)There are two compute nodes in the environment named A and B. A has
two NICs of vendor_id='8086' and product_id='105e
Hi Steve,
Thanks for your reply.
I didn't know why the blueprint numa-aware-cpu-binding seems to have no more
progress until read the two mails mentioned in your mail.
The use case analysis in the mails are very clear, they are also what I concern
about.
I agree that we shouldn't provide
Hi, all
Current openstack seems not support to snapshot instance with memory and dev
states.
I searched the blueprint and found two relational blueprint like below.
But these blueprint failed to get in the branch.
[1]: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/live-snapshots
[2]:
+1
Agree with you. I like this idea so much.
It makes the blueprint review/discuss better tracked and recorded.
It's convenient for the people joining later to know the design's history.
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 2:05 AM
Hi,
I have written a wiki about usb controller and usb-passthrough in
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/proposal_about_usb_passthrough.
Hope I can get your good advices.
Thanks,
Jeremy Liu
-Original Message-
From: Liuji (Jeremy) [mailto:jeremy@huawei.com]
Sent: Thursday
11 matches
Mail list logo