I agree with your suggestion to stop hitting the service_statuses table
directly and instead hit the instance model. But now I have an observation:
Nova is already being called here as part of the polling done by
FreshInstanceTasks#create_instance
Hi all,
Issue #1: Jobs that need more than one hour
Of the last 30 Trove-Gatehttps://rdjenkins.dyndns.org/job/Trove-Gate/ builds
(spanning three days), 7 have failed due to a Jenkins job-level timeout (not a
proboscis timeout). These jobs had no failed tests when the timeout occurred.
Not
at the moment and am
attempting to ensure that the appropriate fixes are merged so that the
Trove integration gate job is healthy again.
Some of my comments are inline.
Lowery, Mathew writes:
Hi all,
Issue #1: Jobs that need more than one hour
[...]
Suggested action items
We have a need to support multiple versions of a single datastore with a single
set of disk-image-builder elements. Let's take MySQL on Ubuntu as an example.
5.5 is already present in trove-integration. Let's say we want to add 5.6 to
coexist. Let's also assume that simply asking for the
So I submitted this
dochttp://docs-draft.openstack.org/29/70629/3/check/gate-trove-docs/34ceff7/doc/build/html/dev/install_alt.html
(in this patch sethttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/70629/) and Dan Nguyen
(thanks Dan) stated that there were some folks using Vagrant. (My workflow uses
git push
My colleague, Ranjitha Vemula, just submitted a trove-integration patch
set to add a MySQL 5.6 disk-image-builder element. Two major hurdles were
faced with this patch set.
1) The manager
The resulting MySQL 5.6 image can be registered using mysql as the
datastore, mysql as the manager, and
My colleague, Ranjitha Vemula, just submitted a trove-integration patch
set to add a MySQL 5.6 disk-image-builder element. Two major hurdles were
faced with this patch set.
1) The manager
The resulting MySQL 5.6 image can be registered using mysql as the
datastore, mysql as the manager, and
As a non-core, I would like to understand the process by which core prioritizes
Gerrit changes. I'd also like to know any specific criteria used for approval.
If such a process was transparent and followed consistently, wouldn't that
eliminate the need for Hey core, can you review change? in
I just wanted to share a project that I've been working on. It's a
development workflow for OpenStack projects.
I like to code in PyCharm and push my changes to a DevStack VM. I don't
use Vagrant and I don't like manually scp'ing code. So I created
git-push-devstack or gpd:
Gerrit supplies the following shortcuts for any change (in the new screen,
there's a Download drop down in the top right or for the old screen, it's
just under the Patch Set heading):
Checkout git fetch https://review.openstack.org/openstack/trove
refs/changes/09/88709/11 git checkout
Thanks Sean and Jay.
The point in asking was to understand if I was doing something wrong
because the behavior I wanted wasn't in Gerrit UI. Both of you suggested
git review -d which makes sense.
Thanks again.
On 5/12/14, 1:10 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 05/12/2014 01:03 PM, Lowery
Trove-Gate appears to sit idle after the last output from the test run. See the
following samples:
Excerpt from https://rdjenkins.dyndns.org/job/Trove-Gate/3792/console
12:59:47 202.03 proboscis.case.MethodTest
(test_instance_returns_to_active_after_resize)
13:47:06
Just curious if anyone is using containers in their deployments. If so, in what
capacity? What are the advantages, gotchas, and pain points?
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
!
On 9/1/15, 1:47 PM, "Zane Bitter" <zbit...@redhat.com> wrote:
>On 01/09/15 11:41, Lowery, Mathew wrote:
>> This is a Trove question but including Heat as they seem to have solved
>> this problem.
>>
>> Summary: Today, it seems that Trove is not capable
This is a Trove question but including Heat as they seem to have solved this
problem.
Summary: Today, it seems that Trove is not capable of creating a cluster
spanning multiple regions. Is that the case and, if so, are there any plans to
work on that? Also, are we aware of any precedent
15 matches
Mail list logo
