Re: [openstack-dev] [all] The future of the integrated release

2014-08-17 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hello all, As a Ceilometer's core, I'd like to add my 0.02$. During previous discussions it was mentioned several projects which were started or continue to be developed after Ceilometer became integrated. The main question I'm thinking of is why it was impossible to contribute into existing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Adding Nejc Saje to ceilometer-core

2014-09-11 Thread Nadya Privalova
I'm in :) +1 On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 4:58 PM, gordon chung g...@live.ca wrote: Nejc has been doing a great work and has been very helpful during the Juno cycle and his help is very valuable. I'd like to propose that we add Nejc Saje to the ceilometer-core group. can we minus because he

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Adding Dina Belova to ceilometer-core

2014-09-11 Thread Nadya Privalova
May I be the first :)? Big +1 from me. Thanks Dina! On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote: Hi, Dina has been doing a great work and has been very helpful during the Juno cycle and her help is very valuable. She's been doing a lot of reviews and has been

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] [Rally] Does Ceilometer affect instance creation?

2013-12-10 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi guys, I decided to forward this message to dev list too. On the previous week I was investigating Ceilometer performance. And this letter is a brief description of my results. Lab description: 3 controllers 187 computes HA: Galera for MySQL memcached is on, RabbitMQ in HA mode Ceilometer

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] [Rally] Does Ceilometer affect instance creation?

2013-12-10 Thread Nadya Privalova
Pavlovic On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote: On Tue, Dec 10 2013, Nadya Privalova wrote: Hi Nadya, Guys, if you have any questions or comments you are welcome! I think that 2x difference between avg time in empty lab and 5 sec polling scenario

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][Glance][Oslo]Notification issue with Glance

2013-12-11 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hello, guys! We faced with Glance notifications issue during Tempest tests for Ceilometer. We tried to send notification by ourselves (during investigation we've found that Glance uses almost the same code): from oslo.config import cfg from oslo import messaging CONF.rabbit_host = 'localhost'

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][ceilometer] Who can be a asked to help review tempest tests?

2013-12-17 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi David, I'm working on tempest tests for Ceilometer too. I think this thread is a good place to make a reminder about our strategy how to avoid duplications in change requests. 1. We have something like a test plan https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ceilometer-test-plan 2. Ceilometer team's

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][Oslo] Consuming Notifications in Batches

2013-12-20 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi John, As for me your ideas look very interesting. As I understood notification messages will be kept in MQ for some time (during batch-basket is being filled), right? I'm concerned about the additional load that will be on MQ (Rabbit). Thanks, Nadya On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Herndon,

[openstack-dev] [QA][Tempest][Ceilometer] Pollster's testing strategy

2013-12-20 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi guys! For QA and Tempest guys brief description of Ceilometer's pollstering. Ceilometer has several agents that once in 'interval' asks Nova, Glance and other services about their metrics. We need to test this functionality, 'Interval' is defined in pipeline.yaml file and is 10 minutes by

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][Tempest][Ceilometer] Pollster's testing strategy

2013-12-20 Thread Nadya Privalova
Thanks, Julien! Will create blueprint on Monday and will start implementation. On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote: On Fri, Dec 20 2013, Nadya Privalova wrote: Hi Nadya, For QA and Tempest guys brief description of Ceilometer's pollstering

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][Tempest]Tracking of blueprints and changes

2013-12-27 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hello guys! I hope all of you are enjoying the holidays! But I'd like to raise a Tempest question. Again. I hope this email will not be lost after vacations :) After the summit we decided to track all tests that are being created for Ceilometer in Tempest here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][Tempest]Tracking of blueprints and changes

2013-12-30 Thread Nadya Privalova
wrote: On 12/27/2013 05:27 AM, Nadya Privalova wrote: Hello guys! I hope all of you are enjoying the holidays! But I'd like to raise a Tempest question. Again. I hope this email will not be lost after vacations :) After the summit we decided to track all tests that are being created

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Aggregation discussion

2014-01-10 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi team, I've decided to move discussion about aggregation in mailing list. Here is a description about my idea and I really need your comments. *Idea:* The goal is to improve performance when user gets statistics for meter. Now we have fixed list of statistics (min, max and so on). During

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Aggregation discussion

2014-01-13 Thread Nadya Privalova
wrote: On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 17:10 +0400, Nadya Privalova wrote: Idea: The goal is to improve performance when user gets statistics for meter. Now we have fixed list of statistics (min, max and so on). During request a user may specify the following params: 1. query 2. group_by 3

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel-dev] [OSTF][Ceilometer] ceilometer meters and samples delete

2014-01-17 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi guys, I would ask in another way. Ceilometer has a mechanism to add a sample through POST. So it looks not consistent not to allow user to delete a sample. IMHO, insertion and deletion through REST looks a little bit hacky: user always has an ability to fake data collected from OpenStack

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer]Collector's performance

2014-03-11 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi team! Last week we were working on notification problem in ceilometer during tempest tests creation. Tests for notification passed successfully on Postgres but failed on MySQL. This made us start investigations and this email contains some results. As it turned out, tempest as it is is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer]Collector's performance

2014-03-11 Thread Nadya Privalova
of both? Best Regards, Ildiko *From:* Nadya Privalova [mailto:nprival...@mirantis.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, March 11, 2014 6:05 PM *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer]Collector's performance Hi team! Last week we were working on notification

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer]Collector's performance

-- Thread Nadya Privalova
> Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer]Collector's performance openstack-dev -- Thread -- -- Date -- [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer]Collector's performance Nadya Privalova Re: [openstack-

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra] Ceilometer tempest testing in gate

2014-03-18 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi folks, I'd like to discuss Ceilometer's tempest situation with you. Now we have several patch sets on review that test core functionality of Ceilometer: notificaton and pollstering (topic

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra] Ceilometer tempest testing in gate

2014-03-19 Thread Nadya Privalova
Ok, so we don't want to switch to UCA, let's consider this variant. What options do we have to make possible to run Ceilometer jobs with Mongo backend? I see only https://review.openstack.org/#/c/81001/ or making Ceilometer able to work with old Mongo. But the last variant looks inappropriate at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra] Ceilometer tempest testing in gate

2014-03-20 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi all, First of all, thanks for your suggestions! To summarize the discussions here: 1. We are not going to install Mongo (because is's wrong ?) 2. Idea about spawning several collectors is suspicious (btw there is a patch that run several collectors: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/79962/.)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra] Ceilometer tempest testing in gate

2014-03-20 Thread Nadya Privalova
Sean, thank for analysis. JFYI, I did some initial profiling, it's described here https://www.mail-archive.com/openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org/msg19030.html. On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 03/20/2014 05:49 AM, Nadya Privalova wrote: Hi all, First

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra] Ceilometer tempest testing in gate

2014-03-20 Thread Nadya Privalova
Tim, yep. If you use one db for Ceilometer and Nova then nova's performance may be affected. I've seen this issue. Will start profiling ASAP. On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote: +1 for performance analysis to understand what needs to be optimised. Metering

Re: [openstack-dev] Dependency freeze exception for happybase (I would like version 0.8)

2014-03-28 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi folks, Running rests against 0.8. Will update you ASAP Thanks, Nadya On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote: Thomas Goirand wrote: I'd like to ask everyone's opinion here. Is it ok to do a freeze exception in this case? If yes (please, everyone,

Re: [openstack-dev] Dependency freeze exception for happybase (I would like version 0.8)

2014-03-28 Thread Nadya Privalova
Today I've tested 0.6 and 0.8. They are acceptable for us. But 0.4 is not. So I'd like to support Thomas's suggestion about freeze exception for happybase. Thanks, Nadya On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Nadya Privalova nprival...@mirantis.comwrote: Hi folks, Running rests against 0.8

Re: [openstack-dev] Dependency freeze exception for happybase (I would like version 0.8)

2014-03-28 Thread Nadya Privalova
Sean, please see my comment in bug regarding 0.7. Unfortunately I have nothing to suggest here. If distributive contains only 0.7 we cannot work with HBase through happybase. And I don't see any solutions. But anyway if you change requirements for happybase (I guess we need to get 0.7 back, no?)

Re: [openstack-dev] Dependency freeze exception for happybase (I would like version 0.8)

2014-03-29 Thread Nadya Privalova
Sean, The problem with 0.4 is a very new one. We had critical bug that was fixed by ConnectionPool usage. This feature is available since 0.5. So we had two options: 1. Go to rc1 with critical bug (not supported HBase in fact) 2. Fix it but have incorrect dependency on 0.4. And we've chosen option

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [qa] Ceilometer ERRORS in normal runs

2013-10-22 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi guys, I can share my experience with devstack+ceilometer. There is certainly a problem with MongoDB, because Ceilometer requires more fresh Mongo than devstack provides. But I didn't experienced problems with SQL. And just a quick question about testing: are there any plans to test Ceilometer

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][qa]Tempest tests for Ceilometer

2013-11-13 Thread Nadya Privalova
into crs. As I see 39237 made a good progress today Thanks, Nadya On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote: On Tue, Nov 12 2013, Nadya Privalova wrote: Hi Nadya, Here is a list of ceilometer-regarding cr in tempest (just a reminder): 1. https

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel-dev] [OSTF][Ceilometer] ceilometerclient proxy issue

2013-11-15 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi guys, I've created the bp https://blueprints.launchpad.net/python-ceilometerclient/+spec/proxy-support. Will start working on this asap. Thanks, Nadya On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.comwrote: Hi Ceilometer team, do you have any plans for http proxy

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] storage driver testing

2013-11-29 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hello Sandy, I'm very interested in performance results for Ceilometer. Now we have successfully installed Ceilometer in the HA-lab with 200 computes and 3 controllers. Now it works pretty good with MySQL. Our next steps are: 1. Configure alarms 2. Try to use Rally for OpenStack performance with

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Tokens in memcache become unauthorized

2013-12-02 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi guys, I've faced with nova+memcache issue on the cluster in HA-mode. Issue is related to nova in case of using REST (that includes Horizon): it's impossible to use auth-token several times because it became unauthorized in cache. Logs: Nov 13 06:58:49 controller-1461 nova

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra][Ceilometer][MagnetoDB] HBase database in devstack

2014-04-08 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi, Yep, it would be great to have HBase installed on gating for Ceilometer. Now we use self-written mocked HBase to test functionality. But HBase backend is becoming more complex and it's really hard to add 'new features' in mocked HBase. Hortonworks is the main and the largest contributor in

Re: [openstack-dev] [savanna-dashboard] version 0.3 - updated UI mockups for EDP workflow

2013-09-10 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi all, I've created a temporary page for UIs mockups. Please take a look: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Savanna/UIMockups/JobCreationProposal Chad, it's just pictures demonstrate how we see dependencies in UI. It's not a final decision. Guys, feel free to comment this. I think it's time to

Re: [openstack-dev] [savanna] swift integration - optional?

2013-09-12 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi Jon, The main reason why this button is on UI is to let user know that Savanna supports swift. If a cluster doesn't have swift at all user may disable swift explicitly, but it's the truth that if he or she doesn't disable swift nothing will be broken. Regards, Nadya On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at

[openstack-dev] [Savanna][EDP] Issues from internal UI demo

2013-09-23 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hello folks, Today I've showed a demo with EDP UI. Here a feedback from our Mirantis-team. Items without NOTEs should be done, I believe. For some of them bugs are already filed: 1. We need URL hints for DataSouce (as it done for JobBinary) 2. DataSource UI should depend on DataSource type (