Hi,
On 21 Feb 2014, at 20:34, Aaron Rosen
mailto:aaronoro...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday, I pushed a patch to review and was surprised that several of the
third party CI systems reported back that the patch-set worked where it
definitely shouldn't have. Anyways, I tested out my theory a
Hi all,
We have experienced a severe hardware failure and the storage for the logs of
the CI runs was also being affected. We have recovered all that could be saved
on the new dedicated server.
If you find any patchset that has the logs missing, please issue a “check
hyper-v” command to gener
se latest successful results.
>
>Sincerely
>
>Hashir Abdi
>
>Principal Software Engineering Manager
>Microsoft
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Mike Perez [mailto:thin...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 8:39 PM
>To: OpenS
.
Thank you,
Octavian.
[1]: http://paste.openstack.org/show/437509/
On 24/8/15 20:19, "Octavian Ciuhandu" wrote:
>Hi Mike,
>
>We have stabilised the Microsoft Cinder CI and ensured dry-runs testing over
>the past days.
>
>The reason why we didnt report earlier o
cinder] Microsoft CI Still Disabled
Mike is on vacation at the moment, somebody else will evaluate in his stead as
reply here shortly
On 1 September 2015 at 14:20, Octavian Ciuhandu
mailto:ociuha...@cloudbasesolutions.com>>
wrote:
Hi Mike,
I think the first mail was sent only on openstac
Hello Cinder team,
Please find below CI reports for the Microsoft iSCSI CI. It executes 304 tests,
out if which 9 are skipped and 295 successful.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/144409/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/144739/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/154350/
https://review.openstack.or
