Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Comments on the concerns arose during the TC meeting

On 9/9/14, 12:03 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 09/04/2014 01:30 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2014-09-04 00:08:47 -0700: Greetings, Last Tuesday the TC held the first graduation review for Zaqar. During the meeting some concerns arose. I've listed those

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Comments on the concerns arose during the TC meeting

On 9/9/14, 4:47 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote: On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Samuel Merritt s...@swiftstack.com wrote: On 9/9/14, 12:03 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: [snip] So which is it? Because it sounds like to me it's a thing that actually does NOT need to diverge in technology in any way

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Bogus -1 scores from turbo hipster

On 1/7/14 2:53 PM, Michael Still wrote: Hi. Thanks for reaching out about this. It seems this patch has now passed turbo hipster, so I am going to treat this as a more theoretical question than perhaps you intended. I should note though that Joshua Hesketh and I have been trying to read /

Re: [openstack-dev] [Swift] domain-level quotas

On 1/23/14 1:46 AM, Matthieu Huin wrote: Hello Christian, - Original Message - From: Christian Schwede christian.schw...@enovance.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Matthieu Huin matthieu.h...@enovance.com Sent:

Re: [openstack-dev] [swift] what does swift do if the auditor find that all 3 replicas are corrupt?

On 11/6/13 7:12 AM, Daniel Li wrote: Hi, I have a question about swift: what does swift do if the auditor find that all 3 replicas are corrupt? will it notify the owner of the object(email to the account owner)? what will happen if the GET request to the corrupted object? will it return a

Re: [openstack-dev] [swift] what does swift do if the auditor find that all 3 replicas are corrupt?

On 11/7/13 5:59 AM, Daniel Li wrote: Thanks very much for your help, and please see my inline comments/questions. On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:30 AM, Samuel Merritt s...@swiftstack.com mailto:s...@swiftstack.com wrote: On 11/6/13 7:12 AM, Daniel Li wrote: Hi, I have

Re: [openstack-dev] [gate] The gate: a failure analysis

On 7/21/14, 3:38 AM, Matthew Booth wrote: [snip] I would like to make the radical proposal that we stop gating on CI failures. We will continue to run them on every change, but only after the change has been successfully merged. Benefits: * Without rechecks, the gate will use 8 times fewer

Re: [openstack-dev] [swift] - question about statsd messages and 404 errors

On 7/25/14, 4:58 AM, Seger, Mark (Cloud Services) wrote: I’m trying to track object server GET errors using statsd and I’m not seeing them. The test I’m doing is to simply do a GET on an non-existent object. As expected, a 404 is returned and the object server log records it. However, statsd

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [swift] Improving ceilometer.objectstore.swift_middleware

On 7/30/14, 8:06 AM, Chris Dent wrote: ceilometer/objectstore/swift_middleware.py[1] counts the size of web request and reponse bodies through the swift proxy server and publishes metrics of the size of the request and response and that a request happened at all. There are (at least) two bug

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [swift] Improving ceilometer.objectstore.swift_middleware

On 7/31/14, 1:06 AM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: Swift is already emitting those numbers[1] in statsd format; could ceilometer consume those metrics and convert them to whatever notification format it uses? The problem with that approach, IIUC, is that the statsd metrics provide insufficient

Re: [openstack-dev] Cross distribution talks on Friday

On 11/1/14, 3:51 PM, Alan Pevec wrote: %install export OSLO_PACKAGE_VERSION=%{version} %{__python} setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root %{buildroot} Then everything should be ok and PBR will become your friend. Still not my friend because I don't want a _build_ tool as runtime dependency

Re: [openstack-dev] LTFS integration with OpenStack Swift for scenario like - Data Archival as a Service .

On 11/13/14, 10:19 PM, Sachin Goswami wrote: In OpenStack Swift - xfs file system is integrated which provides a maximum file system size of 8 exbibytes minus one byte (263-1 bytes). Not exactly. The Swift storage nodes keep their data on POSIX filesystems with support for extended

Re: [openstack-dev] Defining API Success in OpenStack APIs (specifically Swift)

On 6/20/13 4:21 AM, Sean Dague wrote: The following patch review came into Tempest yesterday to stop checking for specific 20x codes on a number of Swift API - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/33689/ The official documentation for these APIs says the following -

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] SPFE: Authenticated Encryption (AE) Tokens

On 2/14/15 9:49 PM, Adam Young wrote: On 02/13/2015 04:19 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: On February 13, 2015 at 11:51:10 AM, Lance Bragstad (lbrags...@gmail.com mailto:lbrags...@gmail.com) wrote: Hello all, I'm proposing the Authenticated Encryption (AE) Token specification [1] as an SPFE. AE

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] SPFE: Authenticated Encryption (AE) Tokens

On 2/16/15 11:48 AM, Lance Bragstad wrote: On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Samuel Merritt s...@swiftstack.com mailto:s...@swiftstack.com wrote: On 2/14/15 9:49 PM, Adam Young wrote: On 02/13/2015 04:19 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: On February 13, 2015 at 11:51:10 AM

Re: [openstack-dev] Reasoning behind my vote on the Go topic

On 6/7/16 12:00 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: [snip] > I'd rather see us focus energy on Python3, asyncio and its pluggable event loops. The work in: http://magic.io/blog/uvloop-blazing-fast-python-networking/ is a great indication in an actual apples-to-apples comparison of what can be

Re: [openstack-dev] [swift] Can swift identify user agent come from chrome browser?

On 3/17/16 1:53 AM, Linpeimin wrote: Hello, everyone. I have config a web server (tengine) as a proxy server for swift, and sent a GET request via a chrome browser in order to access swift container. From the log file, it can be seen that web server has pass the request to swift, but swift

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

On 5/9/16 5:21 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 10 May 2016 at 10:54, John Dickinson wrote: On 9 May 2016, at 13:16, Gregory Haynes wrote: This is a bit of an aside but I am sure others are wondering the same thing - Is there some info (specs/etherpad/ML thread/etc) that has more

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

On 5/11/16 7:09 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 05/10/2016 09:56 PM, Samuel Merritt wrote: On 5/9/16 5:21 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 10 May 2016 at 10:54, John Dickinson <m...@not.mn> wrote: On 9 May 2016, at 13:16, Gregory Haynes wrote: This is a bit of an aside but I am sure