Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Juno priorities and spec review timeline

2014-07-01 Thread Shivanand Tendulker
, if we can re-prioritize this for Juno release. Thanks and Regards Shiv On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Shivanand Tendulker stendul...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Devananda Design spec for the remote firmware setting feature is under review ( https://review.openstack.org/#/c/101122 ). Have received

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Do we need an IntrospectionInterface?

2014-11-30 Thread Shivanand Tendulker
+1 for separate interface. --Shivanand On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Lucas Alvares Gomes lucasago...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Thanks for putting it up Dmitry. I think the idea is fine too, I understand that people may want to use in-band discovery for drivers like iLO or DRAC and having

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Nominating Julia Kreger for core reviewer

2016-03-27 Thread Shivanand Tendulker
Congratulations Julia !! On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 12:03:34PM -0400, Julia Kreger wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Jim Rollenhagen > > > wrote: > > > > > I'm nominating Julia

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] usage of ironic-lib

2016-05-16 Thread Shivanand Tendulker
I tend to agree with Lucas. I think ironic-lib was designed to have common code to be used primarily into ironic and IPA. It was not intended to be used in other projects. We tend to add methods in the ironic-lib with Ironic and IPA in mind and never thought of it could be used by out of tree

[openstack-dev] [Ironic] Regarding where to host Redfish vendor extensions code for Ironic

2017-05-22 Thread Shivanand Tendulker
Hi All This is wrt discussion we had about where to host the Redfish vendor vendor extensions. Should it be sub-module within sushy-tree or separate vendor project(s). The following were the opinions:- In favor of Sushy sub-module:- 1. People see "vendor specific" repo's as owned by the vendor

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Proposing Shivanand Tendulker for ironic-core

2017-10-09 Thread Shivanand Tendulker
with you. > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > Tuan > > > > > > > > *From:*Nisha Agarwal [mailto:agarwalnisha1...@gmail.com > > <mailto:agarwalnisha1...@gmail.co

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] inclusion of openstack/networking-generic-switch project under OpenStack baremetal program

2017-11-15 Thread Shivanand Tendulker
Thank you. I too vote for 'Option 1'. Thanks and Regards Shiv On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Villalovos, John L < john.l.villalo...@intel.com> wrote: > Thanks for sending this out. > > > > I would vote for Option 1. > > > > Thanks, > > John > > > > *From:* Pavlo Shchelokovskyy

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposing Mark Goddard to ironic-core

2018-05-23 Thread Shivanand Tendulker
+1 from me. On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 8:15 PM, Julia Kreger wrote: > Greetings everyone! > > I would like to propose Mark Goddard to ironic-core. I am aware he > recently joined kolla-core, but his contributions in ironic have been > insightful and valuable. The

[openstack-dev] [ironic] FFE request for node rescue feature

2018-01-22 Thread Shivanand Tendulker
Hi The rescue feature [1] is an high priority for ironic in Queens. The spec for the same was merged in Newton. This feature is necessary for users that lose regular access to their machine (e.g. lost passwords). Landing node rescue feature late in the cycle will lead to less time being

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Nominating Hironori Shiina for ironic-core

2018-02-08 Thread Shivanand Tendulker
+1 On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 11:53 AM, John Villalovos wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 10:12 AM, Julia Kreger > wrote: > >> I would like to nominate Hironori Shiina to ironic-core. He has been >> working in the ironic community for

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][bifrost][sushy][ironic-inspector][ironic-ui][virtualbmc] sub-project/repository core reviewer changes

2018-08-25 Thread Shivanand Tendulker
+1 to all proposed changes. Thanks and Regards Shivanand On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:54 PM, Julia Kreger wrote: > Greetings everyone! > > In our team meeting this week we stumbled across the subject of > promoting contributors to be sub-project's core reviewers. > Traditionally it is something