[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Change I5b2313ff: Create a new attribute for subnets, to store v6 dhcp options

2013-12-17 Thread Shixiong Shang
Hi, guys: I am reading the code in “constants.py” file as part of Change I5b2313ff: Create a new attribute for subnets, to store v6 dhcp options”. One thing captured my eyes is the definition of “RA_MODES”, which excluded “slaac” mode. If my understanding of “RA_MODES” is correct, i.e. the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Change I5b2313ff: Create a new attribute for subnets, to store v6 dhcp options

2013-12-17 Thread Shixiong Shang
at 8:27 PM, Shixiong Shang sparkofwisdom.cl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, guys: I am reading the code in “constants.py” file as part of Change I5b2313ff: Create a new attribute for subnets, to store v6 dhcp options”. One thing captured my eyes is the definition of “RA_MODES”, which excluded “slaac

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Three SLAAC and DHCPv6 related blueprints

2013-12-17 Thread Shixiong Shang
Hi, team: I created a new blueprint to reflect the work we accomplished in the previous POC to enable dnsmasq in SLAAC mode. In addition, I took the action item two weeks ago from weekly sub-team meeting to explore DHCPv6 options. The goal was to run dnsmasq as DHCPv6 server and provide both

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Three SLAAC and DHCPv6 related blueprints

2013-12-18 Thread Shixiong Shang
: Great Shixiong. I can see that we have BPs from Sean / Da Zhao for providing the modes via the neutron client cli, but have we seen how those modes are provided through the dashboard? Randy Sent from my iPhone On Dec 17, 2013, at 9:07 PM, Shixiong Shang sparkofwisdom.cl...@gmail.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Three SLAAC and DHCPv6 related blueprints

2013-12-18 Thread Shixiong Shang
a separate meeting to invite key placeholders so we have a chance to sort it out. Shixiong On Dec 18, 2013, at 8:25 AM, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote: On 18 December 2013 14:10, Shixiong Shang sparkofwisdom.cl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Ian: I won’t say the intent here

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Three SLAAC and DHCPv6 related blueprints

2013-12-18 Thread Shixiong Shang
very much. Any chance to rotate the time so we can comment? Thanks, Xuhan On Thursday, December 19, 2013, Shixiong Shang wrote: Hi, Ian: I agree with you on the point that the way we implement it should be app agnostic. In addition, it should cover both CLI and Dashboard, so the system

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Blueprint Bind dnsmasq in qrouter- namespace

2013-12-19 Thread Shixiong Shang
Hi, Xuhan: Thanks for reaching out to us for questions! Here are the summary of several key points: 1. Currently dnsmasq is bound to the ns- interface within qdhcp- namespace. If we continue to use this model, then the announced RA has to use the ns- interface’s link-local address as source,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Three SLAAC and DHCPv6 related blueprints

2013-12-19 Thread Shixiong Shang
I will surely be there this afternoon, Sean! Look forward to it! On Dec 19, 2013, at 12:22 PM, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote: Perfect! Will you be at the IRC meeting to discuss these? I've added them to the agenda in the hopes that we can discuss -- Sean M. Collins

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Meeting time - change to 1300 UTC or 1500 UTC?

2013-12-19 Thread Shixiong Shang
I cannot do 13:00UTC, but 14:00 or 15:00 UTC should work for me. On Dec 19, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote: Thoughts? I know we have people who are not able to attend at our current time. -- Sean M. Collins

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Blueprint Bind dnsmasq in qrouter- namespace

2013-12-19 Thread Shixiong Shang
Hi, Ian: The use case brought by Comcast team today during the ipv6 sub-team meeting actually proved the point I made here, instead of against it. If I didn’t explain it clearly in my previous email, here it is. I was questioning the design with two namespaces and I believe we can use a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Blueprint Bind dnsmasq in qrouter- namespace

2013-12-19 Thread Shixiong Shang
, Shixiong Shang sparkofwisdom.cl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Ian: The use case brought by Comcast team today during the ipv6 sub-team meeting actually proved the point I made here, instead of against it. If I didn’t explain it clearly in my previous email, here it is. I was questioning the design

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Meeting time - change to 1300 UTC or 1500 UTC?

2014-01-02 Thread Shixiong Shang
Either day works for me. Thanks for setting it up, Sean! On Jan 2, 2014, at 5:08 AM, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote: Looking at the calendar, our options for 1500 UTC require us to change the day that we meet. The following days are available: * Tuesdays * Fridays

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Several topics for tomorrow's meeting

2014-01-06 Thread Shixiong Shang
Hi, Sean: Hope you had a great time with your family and friends during holiday! Tomorrow when we meet in IRC, can we put closure on one pending question on how to pass the “mode” to dnsmasq? If I understand everybody correctly: 1) The mode value should be dnsmasq agnostic 2) The approach

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] A pair of mode keywords

2014-01-21 Thread Shixiong Shang
this before going to bed. Will be back tomorrow and check on other ones' input on this. On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Shixiong Shang sparkofwisdom.cl...@gmail.com wrote: Begin forwarded message: From: Shixiong Shang sparkofwisdom.cl...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Cannot make

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] A pair of mode keywords

2014-01-21 Thread Shixiong Shang
I created a new PDF file to show two parameters (i.e. not referring “enable_dhcp”). Here is the link. I also updated BP too. https://www.dropbox.com/s/rq8xmbruqthef38/IPv6%20Two%20Modes%20v2.0.pdf Shixiong On Jan 21, 2014, at 6:31 PM, Shixiong Shang sparkofwisdom.cl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] A pair of mode keywords

2014-01-22 Thread Shixiong Shang
Sean, I agree with you. I prefer OpenStack as the single source of truth. What end user chooses may be different. But with this pair of keywords, at least we provide comprehensive coverage on all scenarios. For Icehouse, I suggest we only consider the supports for the scenarios that OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] A pair of mode keywords

2014-01-22 Thread Shixiong Shang
That is correct, Xu Han! On Jan 22, 2014, at 11:14 AM, Xuhan Peng pengxu...@gmail.com wrote: Ian, I think the last two attributes PDF from Shixiong's last email is trying to solve the problem you are saying, right? — Xu Han Peng (xuhanp) On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Ian

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] A pair of mode keywords

2014-01-22 Thread Shixiong Shang
Any possibility we can nail the keywords in the next 12 - 24 hrs? So we can decide the scope in Icehouse release and then, discuss who can do what? Shixiong On Jan 22, 2014, at 11:20 AM, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote: I don't know if it's reasonable to expect a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] A pair of mode keywords

2014-01-24 Thread Shixiong Shang
, Shixiong Shang sparkofwisdom.cl...@gmail.com wrote: Any possibility we can nail the keywords in the next 12 - 24 hrs? So we can decide the scope in Icehouse release and then, discuss who can do what? Shixiong On Jan 22, 2014, at 11:20 AM, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] A pair of mode keywords

2014-01-27 Thread Shixiong Shang
+1 for the ones “ipv6_” prefix. On Jan 27, 2014, at 1:15 PM, Veiga, Anthony anthony_ve...@cable.comcast.com wrote: I vote address them (ipv6_). There's no guarantee of forward compatibility with a new protocol and this way it can't be confused with a (non-existant) selection method for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] A pair of mode keywords

2014-01-31 Thread Shixiong Shang
Hi, Sean: Thanks a bunch for the new code. I glimpsed it through once and if I understand it correctly, the value of the two parameters are saved as the attributes of a subnet. In other words, I can retrieve the values by: subnet.ipv6_ra_mode subnet.ipv6_address_mode Is that correct? Would

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Private or Public network?

2014-02-01 Thread Shixiong Shang
Hi, Anthony: Thanks a lot for the quick response! I didn't think about the provider network scenarios. I feel grateful you brought it up. I will add provider network to the chart. Here is my understanding: Private network: VM is attached to a subnet with NO default gateway at all, i.e.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] A pair of mode keywords

2014-02-02 Thread Shixiong Shang
Excellent! Thanks for your confirmation, Sean! On Feb 2, 2014, at 12:53 PM, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote: On Sat, Feb 01, 2014 at 01:18:09AM -0500, Shixiong Shang wrote: In other words, I can retrieve the values by: subnet.ipv6_ra_mode subnet.ipv6_address_mode

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] A pair of mode keywords

2014-02-02 Thread Shixiong Shang
in advance! Shixiong On Feb 2, 2014, at 12:53 PM, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote: On Sat, Feb 01, 2014 at 01:18:09AM -0500, Shixiong Shang wrote: In other words, I can retrieve the values by: subnet.ipv6_ra_mode subnet.ipv6_address_mode Is that correct? Would you

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] CLI for the new subnet keywords

2014-02-10 Thread Shixiong Shang
Hi, Abishek: Thank you for taking care of Horizon for IPv6 enhancement. So now we have coverage on both CLI and dashboard side. Very exciting! W.r.t your questions, these two parameters work independently. In other words, Horizon should present both options if the interested subnet is IPv6.

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] tox error

2014-02-24 Thread Shixiong Shang
Hi, guys: I run into this error while running fox…..but it gave me this error…Seems like it is related to Neutron LB. Did you see this issue before? If so, how to fix it? Thanks! Shixiong shshang@net-ubuntu2:~/github/neutron$ tox -v -e py27 ……...

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] tox error (errors4neutron)

2014-02-24 Thread Shixiong Shang
Hi, guys: I run into this error while running tox…..Seems like it is related to Neutron LB. Did you see this issue before? If so, how to fix it? Thanks! Shixiong shshang@net-ubuntu2:~/github/neutron$ tox -v -e py27 ……...

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6]

2014-02-26 Thread Shixiong Shang
Hi, Sean and the team: Do we have a list of code reviews and a list of BPs submitted by Neutron IPv6 sub-team targeting at Icehouse 3? Would appreciate everybody’s help to compose a list so we won’t overlook anything, especially the deadline is next Friday. Thanks! Shixiong Shixiong Shang

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] tox run forever

2014-02-27 Thread Shixiong Shang
Hi, guys: I created a fresh local repository and pulled the most recent Neutron code. Before I put in my own code, I did TOX run. However, seems like it is stuck to the following condition for over a hour and didn’t go any further. Yesterday, the TOX had been running with a fresh copy of

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] tox run forever

2014-02-27 Thread Shixiong Shang
In case you have filter set up on your mail client…….. Begin forwarded message: From: Shixiong Shang sparkofwisdom.cl...@gmail.com Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] tox run forever Date: February 27, 2014 at 7:43:03 PM EST To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] tox error

2014-02-27 Thread Shixiong Shang
Hi, Randy: Try this command to install pyudev library…. sudo pip install pyudev Let me know whether it works or not. Good luck! Shixiong Shixiong Shang !--- Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish ---! On Feb 27, 2014, at 9:09 PM, Randy Tuttle randy.m.tut...@gmail.com wrote: Clark/Sean/Shixiong

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] tox run forever

2014-02-27 Thread Shixiong Shang
a recognized IP subnet cidr, '10.0.2.0/32' is recommended. Thanks again! Shixiong Shixiong Shang !--- Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish ---! On Feb 27, 2014, at 8:28 PM, Clark Boylan clark.boy...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Shixiong Shang sparkofwisdom.cl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi

[openstack-dev] Reply: [Neutron][IPv6] tox run forever

2014-02-28 Thread Shixiong Shang
I started thinking whether passing the test of Mr. Jenkins is a mindless dreaming….:) What does the “TOX” say? :) Shixiong Begin forwarded message: From: Shixiong Shang sparkofwisdom.cl...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] tox run forever Date: February 27, 2014 at 9:41:34

[openstack-dev] [Nuetron][IPv6]

2014-02-28 Thread Shixiong Shang
(non-voting) Shixiong Shang !--- Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish ---! ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][IPv6] Testing functionality of IPv6 modes using Horizon

2014-02-28 Thread Shixiong Shang
Thanks!! ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev Shixiong Shang !--- Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] IRC meeting today?

2014-03-11 Thread Shixiong Shang
Do we have IRC meeting today? Didn’t see anybody in the chat room…..:( Shixiong Shixiong Shang !--- Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish ---!___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] IPv6 sub-team?

2013-11-12 Thread Shixiong Shang
at 01:16:43PM -0500, Shixiong Shang wrote: +1. We have great interest to run OpenStack over IPv6 and would love to be a part of the discussion. Excellent - please see the thread I've made in OpenStack-Dev - we're tossing out times for the IRC meeting, that works for everyone interested

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [ipv6] IPv6 meeting - Thursdays 21:00UTC - #openstack-meeting-alt

2013-11-13 Thread Shixiong Shang
Hi, Sean: Thanks a bunch for finalizing the time! Sorry for my ignorance….how do we usually run the meeting? On Webex or IRC channel? Look forward to it! Shixiong On Nov 13, 2013, at 9:32 AM, Collins, Sean (Contractor) sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote: I haven't heard any negative

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Ceilometer installation problem

2013-11-13 Thread Shixiong Shang
Hi, guys: I am trying to install Ceilometer on Ubuntu 13.10 Cloud version (64-bit) and encounter the following error. Would you please help? Thanks! Shixiong root@net-meter2:/opt/stack/ceilometer# sudo python setup.py install snipped creating build/temp.linux-x86_64-2.7/src creating

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] compute agent cannot start

2013-11-14 Thread Shixiong Shang
Hi, Guys: I am trying to run ceilometer agent on compute node, and it gave me the following traceback. I believe I hit this bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1244055”). However, I would like to know whether there is any workaround? sudo python /usr/local/bin/ceilometer-agent-compute

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] compute agent cannot start

2013-11-14 Thread Shixiong Shang
: Shixiong Shang [mailto:sparkofwisdom.cl...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 10:35 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] compute agent cannot start Hi, Lianhao: I downloaded six package, 1.4.1 from

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Meeting logs from the first IRC meeting

2013-11-24 Thread Shixiong Shang
Hi, guys: I took the action item to submit the code for review based on our discussion during the first IRC meeting. Here is the link: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/58186/ The changes we proposed are based on the POC work my friend (Randy Tuttle) and I did back in June on Grizzly and most

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Stackers Brainstorming session on Neutron IPv6

2013-12-03 Thread Shixiong Shang
Hi, folks: We plan to host a webex meeting tonight at 9pm EST (UTC-5) to have a brainstorming session on Neutron IPv6 readiness. As suggested by Sean Collins, the chair of Neutron IPv6 sub-team, I expand the invitation to this mailer. If you are interested in this topic, please feel free to

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Webex Recording of IPv6 / Neutron Sync-up

2013-12-03 Thread Shixiong Shang
Hi, guys: We had a great discussion tonight with stackers from Comcast, IBM, HP, Cisco and Nephos6! Here is the debrief of what we discussed during this 1-hr session: 1) Sean from Comcast provided clarification of his short-term and mid-term goals in the proposed blueprint. 2) Da Zhao, Yu

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Webex Recording of IPv6 / Neutron Sync-up

2013-12-04 Thread Shixiong Shang
wrote: Shixiong, Thank you for the updates, do you mind to share the slide to the openstack mailing list? Richard On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Shixiong Shang sparkofwisdom.cl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, guys: We had a great discussion tonight with stackers from Comcast, IBM, HP

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Webex Recording of IPv6 / Neutron Sync-up

2013-12-04 Thread Shixiong Shang
amenable time for us Europeans? On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Shixiong Shang sparkofwisdom.cl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, guys: We had a great discussion tonight with stackers from Comcast, IBM, HP, Cisco and Nephos6! Here is the debrief of what we discussed during this 1-hr

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Webex Recording of IPv6 / Neutron Sync-up

2013-12-05 Thread Shixiong Shang
://cisco.webex.com/ciscosales/lsr.php?AT=pbSP=ECrID=73557207rKey=73240b2ec6577fc4 Shixiong On Dec 4, 2013, at 9:54 PM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2013-12-04 21:44:53 -0500 (-0500), Shixiong Shang wrote: [...] I was swamped today to prepare for the presentation that Randy and I

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Two new blueprints

2013-12-06 Thread Shixiong Shang
Hi, stackers: Randy Tuttle created two blueprints as an augment to Sean’s proposal to improve IPv6 readiness. You can find the details here: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/dnsmasq-bind-into-qrouter-namespace

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Cannot make it today

2014-04-29 Thread Shixiong Shang
Hi, guys: For two weeks in the row, I have customer meeting at 10am EDT, which conflicts with our weekly Neutron IPv6 call. I hope this meeting schedule won’t be permanent…Will try my best to avoid it. Sorry for the absence. :( Shixiong Shixiong Shang !--- Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Privacy extension

2014-05-15 Thread Shixiong Shang
for this problem. Thanks! Shixiong Shixiong Shang !--- Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish ---! ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Privacy extension

2014-05-20 Thread Shixiong Shang
in a cloud environment and where the MAC addresses are basically fake. Someone interested in desktop virtualisation with Openstack may wish to contradict me... -- Ian. On 15 May 2014 09:30, Shixiong Shang sparkofwisdom.cl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, guys: Nice to meet with all of you

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Minutes from May 27 2014

2014-05-27 Thread Shixiong Shang
I am reading the meeting minute, and saw the discussion on this BP submitted by xuhanp: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/76125/ I don’t see any reason why we need it….do you? Shixiong On May 27, 2014, at 12:47 PM, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote:

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Issues on dnsmasq

2014-06-04 Thread Shixiong Shang
! Shixiong Shixiong Shang !--- Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish ---! ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] IPv6 team summit meetup

2014-11-07 Thread Shixiong Shang
Hi, guys: Very nice to talk to all of you yesterday. Unfortunately I need to head out to the airport at 1pm, so I won't be able to make it for the lunch. :( Will see you on IRC and keep in touch! Shixiong On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Xuhan Peng pengxu...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, Since