Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Zaqar and SQS Properties of Distributed Queues

2014-09-18 Thread Steve Lewis
On September 18, 2014 7:45 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 09/18/2014 04:09 PM, Gordon Sim wrote: However, as far as consuming messages is concerned, it can guarantee once-and-only-once and/or at-least-once delivery depending on the message pattern used to consume messages. Using pop or claims

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Proposal to change Glance meeting time.

2015-03-13 Thread Steve Lewis
+1 consistent time +1 for 1500 UTC since that has come up. On 09/03/15 09:07, Nikhil Komawar wrote: So, the new proposal is: Glance meetings [1] to be conducted weekly on Thursdays at 1400UTC [2] on #openstack-meeting-4 __

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Keystone] Glance and trusts

2015-06-08 Thread Steve Lewis
Monday, June 8, 2015 07:10, Adam Young wrote: 2. Delegation are long lived affairs. If anything is going to take longer than the duration of the token, it should be in the context of a delegation, and the user should re-authenticate to prove identity. Requiring re-authenticating to perform

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] Liberty summit: Updates in Glance

2015-06-01 Thread Steve Lewis
On Monday, June 1, 2015 05:30, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote: On 1 June 2015 at 13:10, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: AFAIK, the biggest issue right now is changed-since which is something Glance doesn't have in v2 but it's exposed throught Nova's image API. Thats the big

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] allow a ranking mechanism for glance-api to order image locations

2016-01-18 Thread Steve Lewis
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Jake Yip wrote: > > I am wondering anyone else have solved this before? I would like to hear > your opinions on how we can achieve this, and whether ranking it by > metadata is the way to go. > I spoke with an operator in Vancouver

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Nominating Jean-Philippe Evrard for core in openstack-ansible and all openstack-ansible-* roles

2016-07-13 Thread Steve Lewis
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Truman, Travis wrote: > In short, just the kind of contribution our community desires from core > reviewers. > I'm happy to add my +1. -- SteveL __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Project Mascot

2016-07-15 Thread Steve Lewis
I am happy to support the Cape Buffalo mascot. On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Truman, Travis wrote: > I like the bull, cape buffalo and oxen ideas. Any would work well for us. > > From: Matt Thompson > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Propose Marc Gariepy as core reviewer

2017-02-03 Thread Steve Lewis
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Jesse Pretorius < jesse.pretor...@rackspace.co.uk> wrote: > I’d like to propose Marc Gariepy [1] as a core reviewer for > OpenStack-Ansible. > +1. -- SteveL __ OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Propose Dharini Chandrasekar for Glance core

2017-01-24 Thread Steve Lewis
Dharini has tackled sticky bugs and complex feature work with good judgement, patience, and agility. Her work is highly valuable to the project and community. I'm happy to offer a vote in favor. On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 5:36 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > I'd like to

[openstack-dev] [glance] FFE Request

2017-01-26 Thread Steve Lewis
I'm requesting a FFE to enable us to complete the work described as the "Rolling Upgrades" priority [0]. [0] http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/glance-specs/priorities/ocata-priorities.html -- SteveL __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][VMT][Security] Glance coresec reorg

2016-10-20 Thread Steve Lewis
I'm not voicing as a core here, but in the course of several cycles I have seen Erno and Ian each providing the care and insight needed by this role and trust them to do the job well. On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-10-18 22:22:28 +

[openstack-dev] [glance][openstack-ansible] Moving on

2017-05-18 Thread Steve Lewis
It is clear to me now that I won't be able to work on OpenStack as a part of my next day job, wherever that ends up being. As such, I’ll no longer be able to invest the time and energy required to maintain my involvement in the community. It's time to resign my role as a core reviewer, effective