[openstack-dev] [kolla] Request for changing the meeting time to 1600 UTC for all meetings

Dear Kollagues, Some time ago we discussed the requirement of alternating meeting times for Kolla weekly meeting due to major contributors from kolla-mesos were not able to attend weekly meeting at UTC 1600 and we implemented alternate US/APAC meeting times. With kolla-mesos not active anymore

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Request for changing the meeting time to 1600 UTC for all meetings

of the CR team. Note in the future I think we may > need to consider having split meetings again, if our community makeup > changes. Steve, yes I understand. > > I have submitted a review to make the change official: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/327845/1 > > > Regards > -s

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] stepping down from core

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 1:06 AM, Jeff Peeler wrote: > Hi all, > > This is my official announcement to leave core on Kolla / > Kolla-Kubernetes. I've enjoyed working with all of you and hopefully > we'll cross paths again! > > Jeff > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Cross project spec liason

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > Fellow core reviewers, > > I have a lot of liasing to do as a PTL and would like to offload some of > it so I can get some actual sleep :) Are there any takers on Mike's > requirement for a cross-project liason for

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] prototype of a DSL for generating Dockerfiles

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > Hey folks, > > While Swapnil has been busy churning the dockerfile.j2 files to all match > the same style, and we also had summit where we declared we would solve the > plugin problem, I have decided to begin work on

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][packaging] Normalizing requirements file

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Haïkel wrote: > Hi, > > as a packager, I spend a lot of time to scrutinize the requirements > repo, and I find it easier to read if specifiers are ordered. > So in a quick glance, you can check which is the min version required > and

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][all] VOTE to expand the Requirements Team

t; getting familiar with the issues/problems/tasks (see [1] and [2]) and >>> help with the day to day work. >>> >>> Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) >>> Dirk Mueller (dirk) >>> Swapnil Kulkarni (coolsvap) >>> Tony Breeds (tonyb) >>> Thomas

[openstack-dev] [kolla] Binary containers with pip install?

Dear Kollagues, There has been a detailed conversation between me and Prithiv related to [1] and allowing pip install in binary containers. Till now we have simply skipped the binary containers till we have official packages in respective distro repositories. I strongly feel we should be

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][nova][infra] Voting gates

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > Hey folks, > > At the midcycle, we had a session on gating. > > Out of that session came the decision to make the build gates voting as soon > as the mirroring is finished for ubuntu first (because that is closer for

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] persistently single-vendor projects

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: >> On 7/31/16, 11:29 AM, "Doug Hellmann" wrote: >>> [...] >>> To be clear, I'm suggesting that projects with team:single-vendor be >>> given enough time to lose that

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][requirements] nomination period started

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: > We've started a period of self nomination in preparation for the > requirements project fully moving into project (as it's still under Doug > Hellmann). > > We are gathering the self nominations here before we vote

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] Applying for stable-follows tag

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 6:23 PM, Paul Bourke wrote: > Hi Steve, > > +1 to applying. I'll volunteer for the backport team also. > > -Paul > > > On 18/07/16 13:07, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: >> >> Hey Koalians, >> >> I'd like us to consider applying for the stable follows

Re: [openstack-dev] [PyCharm] [all] Revoking pycharm licences for non-active users

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Swapnil Kulkarni wrote: > Hello All, > > As part of the JetBrains Community support OpenStack (active) > developers get access to community edition of PyCharm tool. From the > management perspective I am facing issue to allocate licences to new

[openstack-dev] [requirements] Project Mascot

Hello, We had a discussion about project mascot for requirements team today at the team meeting. Some of the options mentioned are added to [1]. If you have any option, please add to the list. Also do not forget to provide preference. We will finalize the mascot on Monday July 25. [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] our mascot - input needed

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 1:38 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > Hey folks, > > The OpenStack foundation is putting together mascots for every project with > a proper artist doing the work. The cool thing about this is we a) get > stickers b) have consistent look and feel among

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] New specs process - a dicussion

On Jul 12, 2016 8:04 PM, "Michał Jastrzębski" wrote: > > Hey guys, > > Since our project matured, we decided that we should have a discussion > regarding our spec process. > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kolla-N-midcycle-specs > > Currently we do specs for most critical

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] Apply for release:managed tag

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:26 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > Hey folks, > > I'd like the release management team to take on releases of Kolla. This > means applying for the release:managed[1] tag. Please vote +1 if you wish > to proceed, or –1 if you don’t wish to proceed.

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] TripleO deep dive hour?

On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 3:30 AM, James Slagle wrote: > We've got some new contributors around TripleO recently, and I'd like > to offer up a "TripleO deep dive hour". > > The idea is to spend 1 hour a week in a high bandwidth environment > (Google Hangouts / Bluejeans /

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] TripleO deep dive hour?

On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Swapnil Kulkarni (coolsvap) <m...@coolsvap.net> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 3:30 AM, James Slagle <james.sla...@gmail.com> wrote: >> We've got some new contributors around TripleO recently, and I'd like >> to offer up a "TripleO

[openstack-dev] [kolla][documentation] Docimpact bugs

Hello, We have around 13 doc bugs [1] created for features which required documentation. Most of the bugs are not attended after the feature got merged. I have moved all the bugs to o-1. If you think any of this can be completed within rc1 timeframe, feel free to move it back to the current

[openstack-dev] [PyCharm] Renewal of Licence

The annual renewal process of pycharm licences has been completed. As part of this, the licences ar now renewed till Sep 4, 2017. -- Best Regards, Swapnil Kulkarni irc : coolsvap __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not

[openstack-dev] [requirements][FFE] block graphviz 0.5.0

Currently kolla gate jobs are failing due to issues in graphviz 0.5.0. [1] We need to unblock the gates by blocking graphviz===0.5.0. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/367416/ -- Best Regards, Swapnil Kulkarni irc : coolsvap

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][FFE] block graphviz 0.5.0

On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Dirk Müller wrote: > Hi Tony, > > 2016-09-09 9:42 GMT+02:00 Tony Breeds : > >> Has some impact on octavia (doc-requirements) and rpm-packaging (internal >> global-requirements.txt) > > Yeah, rpm-packaging shouldn't be a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release] [FFE] two xstatic packages to be bumped in upper-constraints, please

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 6:09 AM, Richard Jones wrote: > Hi folks, > > We have two patches to upper-constraints up that we'd like to see merged for > Newton. The package updates in question only changed meta-data, but they did > so in a way that fixes issues for downstream,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kolla] Deprecation Policies (related to Heka)

On Sep 29, 2016 3:06 PM, "Christian Berendt" wrote: > > > On 29 Sep 2016, at 06:26, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > > > > If you have a different parsing of the deprecation policy, feel free to chime in. > > Heka is only used as an internal

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]

Glad to see you here sir :) Best Regards, Swapnil On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Chandrakant Bagade wrote: > Hello , > > > > Myself Chandrakant Bagade , working at Persistent System Ltd. > > I was trying Tricircle with devstack and found it , a very helpful

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election] Question for the candidates

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Clay Gerrard wrote: > I like a representative democracy. It mostly means I get a say in which > other people I have to trust to think deeply about issues which effect me > and make decisions which I agree (more or less) are of benefit to

[openstack-dev] [tc] [kolla] [PTL] who can start the official meeting?

I was attending the weekly requirements meeting when I noticed someone started the kolla meeting [1] on openstack-meeting-4 channel. I thought we had the restrictions on the chairs, but apparently there's not. Can we think about having one such restriction? [1]

[openstack-dev] [all] Pycharm professional for OpenStack developers

Greetings, As many of you are aware, OpenStack community developers get access to PyCharm professional edition licence to contribute to OpenStack. I am maintaining the licence allocation. We have limited number of licences to allocate and it is essential that people who are contributing to

[openstack-dev] [election][tc] TC Candidacy - Swapnil Kulkarni (coolsvap)

OpenStackers, I am Swapnil Kulkarni(coolsvap), I have been a ATC since Icehouse and I wish take this opportunity to throw my hat for election to the OpenStack Technical Committee this election cycle. I started contributing to OpenStack with introduction at a community event and since then I have