Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Proposing YAMAMOTO Takashi for the Control Plane core team

2015-06-21 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
thank you all. On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Edgar Magana edgar.mag...@workday.com wrote: Congratulations and welcome to the team! Edgar From: Kevin Benton Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: Thursday, June 18, 2015 at 3:22 PM To: OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Networking-foo projects and release management in the Neutron Stadium

2015-07-06 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 2:20 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote: The tl;dr for this email is that the patch referenced here [1] is moving release management tasks for the networking-foo projects into alignment with other Neutron libraries. There is value in having this consolidated

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Networking-foo projects and release management in the Neutron Stadium

2015-07-06 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Takashi Yamamoto yamam...@midokura.com wrote: hi, On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 2:20 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote: The tl;dr for this email is that the patch referenced here [1

[openstack-dev] version cap on libs

2015-07-13 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, what's the status of patches like this? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/173834/ we still haven't decided how to handle that? __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron Social Meetup in Tokyo

2015-10-27 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Sukhdev Kapur wrote: > Hey Akihiro, > > Thanks for arranging this. I did not see any link to RSVP. > I would love to attend this event - please add me to the list. at this point just go to the venue is fine. here's a RSVP link in

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][tap-as-a-service] weekly meeting

2015-11-11 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote: > hi, > > i have no idea why the link is broken. probabaly meeting_id given to #startmeeting was wrong? > > today's meeting log is here: > http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tap_a

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][tap-as-a-service] weekly meeting

2015-11-11 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
teresting! I'd like to look at some past meeting logs (including > from today), but the 'past meetings' link at > http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Tap_as_a_Service_Meeting does not work for me. > > Neil > > -Original Message----- > From: Takashi Yamamoto [mailto:yam

[openstack-dev] [neutron][tap-as-a-service] weekly meeting

2015-11-10 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, tap-as-a-service meeting will be held weekly, starting today. http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Tap_as_a_Service_Meeting anyone interested in the project is welcome. sorry for immediate notice. __ OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [Tempest] where fwaas tempest tests should be?

2015-10-18 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
t the movement can be tested at least. how do you think? [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/236762/ > > German > > On 10/16/15, 1:50 AM, "Takashi Yamamoto" <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote: > >>hi, >> >>On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Matthew Trei

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [Tempest] where fwaas tempest tests should be?

2015-10-18 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Matthew Treinish <mtrein...@kortar.org> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 09:02:22AM -0400, Assaf Muller wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> >> wrote: >> >> > hi, &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [Tempest] where fwaas tempest tests should be?

2015-10-19 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrac...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On 16 Oct 2015, at 10:50, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote: >> >> if i move fwaas tests from neutron to neutron-fwaas, [1] >> is there easy way to run them t

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [Tempest] where fwaas tempest tests should be?

2015-10-19 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote: > hi, > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Matthew Treinish <mtrein...@kortar.org> > wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 09:02:22AM -0400, Assaf Muller wrote: >>> On Thu, Oc

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] [Tempest] where fwaas tempest tests should be?

2015-10-15 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, i'm looking in fwaas tempest tests and have a question about code location. currently, - fwaas api tests and its rest client are in neutron repo - there are no fwaas scenario tests eventually, - fwaas api tests should be moved into neutron-fwaas repo - fwaaa scenario tests should be in

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron Meetup in Tokyo Summit

2015-10-15 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, we are planing to have a social meetup for neutron developers on Thursday evening. anyone who are interested in neutron development are welcome. the place is not fixed yet. we want to estimate how many people want to go. please fill in the following RSVP if you are interested. sooner is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [Tempest] where fwaas tempest tests should be?

2015-10-16 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Matthew Treinish <mtrein...@kortar.org> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:25:40PM +0900, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: >> hi, >> >> i'm looking in fwaas tempest tests and have a question about code location. >> >> currentl

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Do not merge until further notice

2015-10-20 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
i missed the "further notice"? On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:07 AM, Armando M. wrote: > Hi folks, > > We are in the last hours of Liberty, let's pause for a second and consider > merging patches only if absolutely necessary. The gate is getting clogged > and we need to give

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][ThirdPartyCI] Running third party CI on networking-foo projects

2015-11-17 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 2:00 AM, Fawad Khaliq wrote: > Folks, > > What would be the mechanism to enable a third party CI on a Neutron > sub-project? I am not sure if anyone has already tried it. networking-ofagent has its third party CI running. you can ask kakuma for

Re: [openstack-dev] Do not modify (or read) ERROR_ON_CLONE in devstack gate jobs

2015-09-30 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, you removed networking-midonet tempest jobs for the reason. [1] i want to revive them. but i'm not sure what methods are acceptable or not. can you explain a little? i did some research of other repos. - networking-ovn seems to use a raw "git clone" command to fetch openvswitch repo -

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] AZ Support

2015-10-06 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: >> On 05 Oct 2015, at 15:32, Gary Kotton wrote: >> >> >> >> On 10/5/15, 3:21 AM, "Ihar Hrachyshka" wrote: >> On 04 Oct 2015, at 19:21, Gary Kotton

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][taas] neutron ovs-agent deletes taas flows

2015-12-08 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Soichi Shigeta wrote: > > Hi, > > We find a problem that neutron ovs-agent deletes taas flows. > > o) Problem description: > > Background: > At Liberty, a bug fix to drop only old flows was merged > to

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][midonet] networking-midonet weekly irc meeting

2015-12-02 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote: > hi, > > we are going to migrate networking-midonet meeting from slack to irc. > the plan is to have it 7:00 UTC on every Tuesdays. > if you are interested but have a different time preferen

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Scaling our testing needs

2015-12-02 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Armando M. wrote: > Hi Neutrinos, > > I would like to share a proposal with you on how we could scale our > ever-growing testing needs, and at the same time, provide guidance to the > developers who care about the quality of the work they

Re: [openstack-dev] [midonet] What repos to migrate to OpenStack infrastructure

2015-12-03 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Sandro Mathys wrote: > Hi all, > > Trying to prepare moving our repos to the OpenStack infrastructure, I > got reminded just how many repos we have in our GitHub organization > [1] - and how many of those seem to be deprecated or

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [Tempest] where fwaas tempest tests should be?

2015-12-08 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Doug Wiegley <doug...@parksidesoftware.com> wrote: > >> On Oct 19, 2015, at 5:33 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrac...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> On 16 Oct 2015, at 10:50, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [midonet] Split up python-midonetclient

2015-12-09 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Galo Navarro wrote: > Hi, > >> I think the goal of this split is well explained by Sandro in the first >> mails of the chain: >> >> 1. Downstream packaging >> 2. Tagging the delivery properly as a library >> 3. Adding as a project on pypi > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [midonet] Split up python-midonetclient

2015-12-09 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Guillermo Ontañón <guille...@midokura.com> wrote: > Hi Sandro, > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 7:31 AM, Sandro Mathys <san...@midokura.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As Takashi Yamamoto raised in another thread [0], python-midonetclient &

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] How could an L2 agent extension access agent methods ?

2015-12-15 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 12:46 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Hi, > > Small update on the RFE. It was approved for Mitaka, assuming we come up > with proper details upfront thru neutron-specs process. > > In the meantime, we have found more use cases for flow management

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][tap-as-a-service] Tap-as-a-service API

2015-12-10 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
ad and take a stab at > reviving it [1] and then we can iterate over and improve. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/256210/ > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96149/ > > Thanks, > Fawad Khaliq > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.co

[openstack-dev] [neutron][midonet] networking-midonet weekly irc meeting

2015-11-29 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, we are going to migrate networking-midonet meeting from slack to irc. the plan is to have it 7:00 UTC on every Tuesdays. if you are interested but have a different time preference, please speak up. thank you. __

Re: [openstack-dev] [midonet] IRC: ditch #midonet-dev?

2015-12-01 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote: >> >> +1 for #2 > > > PS: Beware of the top-posting! It makes vote counting harder ;-) > >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:57

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][tap-as-a-service] Tap-as-a-service API

2015-11-29 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Fawad Khaliq wrote: > Folks, > > Any plan to revive this [1] so we can discuss and finalize the use cases and > APIs. > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96149/ i think Anil will explain the history of the project. i suspect

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][ThirdPartyCI] Running third party CI on networking-foo projects

2015-11-19 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
ny help. > > [1] http://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/third_party.html > > Fawad Khaliq here's an instruction in case you can read japanese. :-) https://github.com/osrg/ryu-neutron-zuul-ci/blob/master/doc/install.ja.txt > > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Takash

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][tap-as-a-service] weekly meeting

2015-11-17 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
Thanks! > > > Regards, > Vikram Hosakote > vhosa...@cisco.com > Software Engineer > Cloud and Virtualization Group (CVG) > Cisco Systems > Boxborough MA USA > > From: Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Maili

[openstack-dev] [neutron][taas] making a taas release for mitaka or not

2016-06-20 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, we tap-as-a-service project had a plan to make a release compatible with mitaka. however, - it's a bit late for mitaka already - the reference implementation needs to be adapted to l2 agent extension but no much progress yet so, a question is, if we still want to make a release for mitaka,

[openstack-dev] [neutron][fwaas] how a disabled firewall should behave

2016-01-26 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, what a firewall with admin_state_up=False should do? my intuition says such a firewall should pass all traffic. (same as no firewall) but the reference implementation seems to block everything. (same as a firewall without any rules) i wrote a tempest test case (test_firewall_disable_rule)

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][fwaas] how a disabled firewall should behave

2016-01-26 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hat [1] which u have probab already > checked. > > [1] > https://github.com/openstack/neutron-fwaas/blob/master/neutron_fwaas/servic > es/firewall/drivers/linux/iptables_fwaas.py#L120 > > Thanks > > Sridar > > > On 1/26/16, 2:15 AM, "Takashi Y

[openstack-dev] [taas] gate failure fixes

2016-03-10 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, currently our gate is suffering from multiple issues. the following steps are necessary to fix them without disabling gate jobs: 1. merge this: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/290946/ 2. wait for a fwaas fix being merged: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/290983/ (or bug 124 fixed in

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Last chance to finish changes affecting DB schema for Mitaka

2016-03-08 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
Henry, i think it's better to fix model vs migration mismatch issues [1] before tagging. how do you think? [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/287016/ On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 11:52 PM, Henry Gessau wrote: > By tomorrow we intend to tag the heads of all the neutron alembic

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Last chance to finish changes affecting DB schema for Mitaka

2016-03-09 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Henry Gessau <hen...@gessau.net> wrote: > Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote: >> Henry, >> >> i think it's better to fix model vs migration mismatch issues [1] >> before tagging. >> how do you think? >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Proposing Hirofumi Ichihara to Neutron Core Reviewer Team

2016-04-08 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
+1 On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: > Hi Neutrinos, > > As the API Lieutenant of Neutron team, > I would like to propose Hirofumi Ichihara (irc: hichihara) as a member of > Neutron core reviewer team mainly focuing on the API/DB area. > > Hirofumi has been

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][taas] start time of weekly TaaS IRC meeting

2016-04-11 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
it's my understanding too. i submitted the change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/304383/ please +1 if you are ok. On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Soichi Shigeta wrote: > > Hi Anil, Vinay, and folks, > > I'd like to confirm the start time of weekly TaaS IRC

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][heat] Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?

2016-03-23 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 6:17 AM, Doug Wiegley wrote: > Migration script has been submitted, v1 is not going anywhere from > stable/liberty or stable/mitaka, so it’s about to disappear from master. > > I’m thinking in this order: > > - remove jenkins jobs > - wait

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][oslo] pbr 1.9.0 release

2016-04-14 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
ee the following: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/305604/ > > Does that include a fix for your issue? it includes Ic3046817b6c5808c61c4a3bc3d912501e6a52274 , which might fix my issue. > > -Josh > > > Takashi Yamamoto wrote: >> >> hi, >> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] work on Common Flow Classifier and OVS Agent extension for Newton cycle

2016-05-23 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
majop...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> I agree, let's try to find a timeslot that works. >>> >>> using #openstack-neutron with the meetbot works, but it's going to >>> generate a lot of noise. >>> >>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Ihar Hrach

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] work on Common Flow Classifier and OVS Agent extension for Newton cycle

2016-05-16 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
d for everyone around >> the globe:-) >> The first meeting will still be UTC 1700 ~ UTC 1800 May 17 on Neutron >> channel. >> In the meeting, we can see if we can reach consensus on a new meeting time. >> >> Cathy >> >> -Original Message---

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] work on Common Flow Classifier and OVS Agent extension for Newton cycle

2016-05-16 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote: > hi, > > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrac...@redhat.com> wrote: >> +1 for earlier time. But also, have we booked any channel for the meeting? >> Hijacking #op

[openstack-dev] [neutron][taas] cancel meeting

2016-05-03 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
considering trip recovery and japanese holiday, this week's taas meeting is cancelled. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] work on Common Flow Classifier and OVS Agent extension for Newton cycle

2016-05-10 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:41 AM, wrote: > Hi Cathy, > > Cathy Zhang: >> >> I will tentatively set the meeting time to UTC 1700 ~ UTC 1800 Tuesday. >> Hope this time is good for all people who have interest and like to >> contribute to this work. We plan to start the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Proposing Hirofumi Ichihara to Neutron Core Reviewer Team

2016-04-14 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
welcome, hirofumi! On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: > It's been over a week. > I'd like to welcome Hirofumi to the neutron core reviewer team! > > Akihiro > > 2016-04-08 13:34 GMT+09:00 Akihiro Motoki : >> Hi Neutrinos, >> >> As the

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][taas] start time of weekly TaaS IRC meeting

2016-04-18 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
reminder: the patch has been merged and we'll use the new time slot from this week. On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote: > it's my understanding too. > i submitted the change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/304383/ > please +

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][oslo] pbr 1.9.0 release

2016-04-13 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, this version broke networking-midonet gate jobs. bug 1569680 bug 1570145 is there any chance to make another release with fixes? On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:46 PM, wrote: > We are satisfied to announce the release of: > > pbr 1.9.0: Python Build Reasonableness > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [vpnaas] vpnaas no longer part of the neutron governance

2017-01-31 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
t; Excerpts from Dariusz Śmigiel's message of 2017-01-13 09:11:01 -0600: >> >> 2017-01-12 21:43 GMT-06:00 Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com>: >> >> > hi, >> >> > >> >> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Armando M. <arma.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [vpnaas] vpnaas no longer part of the neutron governance

2017-01-31 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, >> That's great to hear Yamamoto. Since you are already a neutron-core I assume >> you are already intimate with the work required to strengthen the VPNaaS >> project. I have added you to [4] and you can lean on me for any changes that >> needs reviewing. i wrote a scenario test.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [vpnaas] vpnaas no longer part of the neutron governance

2017-02-06 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote: > hi, > >>> That's great to hear Yamamoto. Since you are already a neutron-core I assume >>> you are already intimate with the work required to strengthen the VPNaaS >>> proje

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [stadium] subprojects on independent release cycle

2017-02-08 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
i plan to cut a release for networking-midonet once relevant projects get ready. ie. neutron-vpnaas, tap-as-a-service On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Armando M. wrote: > > > On 2 February 2017 at 16:09, Armando M. wrote: >> >> Hi neutrinos, >> >> I have put

[openstack-dev] [neutron][taas] ocata

2017-02-05 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
tap-as-a-service folks, unless anyone objects, i'll make a ocata release and thus stable branch this week. (otherwise the CI of consuming subprojects will break) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-l2gw] ocata release?

2017-02-05 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
thank you. On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Gary Kotton <gkot...@vmware.com> wrote: > Hi, > Yes, I will go and do this. > Thanks > Gary > > On 2/6/17, 4:05 AM, "Takashi Yamamoto" <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote: > > hi, > > is anyone g

[openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-l2gw] ocata release?

2017-02-05 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, is anyone going to cut ocata release/branch for networking-l2gw? __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [vpnaas] vpnaas no longer part of the neutron governance

2017-02-05 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote: > hi, > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Doug Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com> wrote: >> Excerpts from Takashi Yamamoto's message of 2017-01-26 11:42:48 +0900: >>> hi, >>&

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [vpnaas] vpnaas no longer part of the neutron governance

2017-01-25 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 2:17 AM, Doug Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com> wrote: > Excerpts from Dariusz Śmigiel's message of 2017-01-13 09:11:01 -0600: >> 2017-01-12 21:43 GMT-06:00 Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com>: >> > hi, >> > >> > On

[openstack-dev] [neutron] vpnaas driver maintainers

2017-02-20 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, i want to document who cares which drivers. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/436081/ please comment on the review if you know an appropriate contact person for each drivers. btw, is the following a driver for neutron-vpnaas? i couldn't find documentation.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - Neutron team social in Atlanta on Thursday

2017-02-18 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
+1 2017/02/18 4:21 "Kevin Benton" : Hi all, I'm organizing a Neutron social event for Thursday evening in Atlanta somewhere near the venue for dinner/drinks. If you're interested, please reply to this email with a "+1" so I can get a general count for a reservation. Cheers,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [vpnaas] vpnaas no longer part of the neutron governance

2017-02-13 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 1:54 AM, Doug Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com> wrote: > Excerpts from Takashi Yamamoto's message of 2017-02-06 10:32:10 +0900: >> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> >> wrote: >> > hi, >&

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [stadium] subprojects on independent release cycle

2017-02-13 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote: > i plan to cut a release for networking-midonet once relevant projects get > ready. > ie. neutron-vpnaas, tap-as-a-service https://review.openstack.org/#/c/429437/ > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [vpnaas] vpnaas no longer part of the neutron governance

2017-02-13 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
from Takashi Yamamoto's message of 2017-02-06 10:32:10 +0900: >> >> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> > hi, >> >> > >> >> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Doug Hell

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][taas] ocata

2017-02-09 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
done. vinay or anil, can you update launchpad? i don't have permission. On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Soichi Shigeta wrote: > > Hi Yamamoto, > >We discussed this on today's IRC and agreed to make an ocata release. > >Best regards, >Soichi > > > >>

Re: [openstack-dev] Problem in visualizing port-mirroring information

2017-02-28 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Manik Bindlish wrote: > Hi All, > > > > I am facing an issue in visualizing port-mirroring information. > > > > 1.)Created 2 VMs: > > VM1: ubuntu3(10.0.0.3, floating IP: 192.168.200.252) – Tap service created > > VM2:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][taas] On TaaS not capturing some packets between two VMs on the same host

2016-09-06 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 7:32 AM, Anil Rao wrote: > Hello, > > Here is an update on the issue of not being able to capture packets flowing > between two VMs on the same host. it it about bug 1529595 ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/tap-as-a-service/+bug/1529595 > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stadium] Query regarding procedure for inclusion in Neutron Stadium

2016-09-24 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Armando M. <arma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 22 September 2016 at 22:36, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> > wrote: >> >> hi, >> >> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:20 AM, Armando M. <arma...@gmail.com&g

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stadium] Query regarding procedure for inclusion in Neutron Stadium

2016-09-22 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:20 AM, Armando M. wrote: > > > On 22 September 2016 at 00:46, reedip banerjee wrote: >> >> Dear Neutron Core members, >> >> I have a query regarding the procedure for inclusion in the Neutron >> Stadium. >> I wanted to know if

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron team social event in Barcelona

2016-10-17 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
+1 On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 3:30 AM, Miguel Lavalle wrote: > Dear Neutrinos, > > I am organizing a social event for the team on Thursday 27th at 19:30. After > doing some Google research, I am proposing Raco de la Vila, which is located > in Poblenou:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-midonet] [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/networking-midonet failed

2016-11-25 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrac...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On 25 Nov 2016, at 11:02, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrac...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] stable/newton 'broken'

2016-11-24 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
can you give me an example of breakage? On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > > The change https://review.openstack.org/#/c/386845/ that landed yesterday > has caused a breakage in stable/newton. This is due to the fact that the > following projects do

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [tap-as-a-service] stable/newton 'broken'

2016-11-24 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
iew or whatever. how do you think? > > On 11/24/16, 10:00 AM, "Takashi Yamamoto" <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote: > > can you give me an example of breakage? > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Gary Kotton <gkot...@vmware.com> wrote: > > Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-midonet] Fwd: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/networking-midonet failed

2016-11-24 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, networking-midonet doesn't have stable/newton branch yet. newton jobs failures are false alarms. branching has been delayed because development of some futures planned for newton has not been completed yet. the plan is to revert ocata-specific changes after branching newton. On Fri, Nov

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-midonet] Fwd: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/networking-midonet failed

2016-11-24 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Andreas Jaeger <a...@suse.com> wrote: >> On 11/25/2016 05:26 AM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: >>> networking-midonet doesn't have stable/newton branch

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-midonet] [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/networking-midonet failed

2016-11-25 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrac...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On 25 Nov 2016, at 05:26, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote: >> >> hi, >> >> networking-midonet doesn't have stable/newton branch yet. >> newton jobs

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-midonet] Fwd: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/networking-midonet failed

2016-11-24 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Andreas Jaeger <a...@suse.com> wrote: > On 11/25/2016 05:26 AM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: >> networking-midonet doesn't have stable/newton branch yet. >> newton jobs failures are false alarms. > > Then let's remove these jobs, sure. i'll s

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-midonet] [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/networking-midonet failed

2016-11-25 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrac...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On 25 Nov 2016, at 09:25, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrac...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [tap-as-a-service] stable/newton 'broken'

2016-11-28 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
Anil, do you have any opinion? i'm thinking to branch stable/newton at around 675af77205d4e404bc7c185c13ab6d86f300d185 On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote: > hi, > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Gary Kotton <gkot...@vmware.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Re: [neutron][networking-midonet] [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/networking-midonet failed

2016-11-28 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
, ...) On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:32 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrac...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On 25 Nov 2016, at 15:23, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrac...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >&g

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [vpnaas] vpnaas no longer part of the neutron governance

2016-11-27 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Armando M. wrote: > Hi > > As of today, the project neutron-vpnaas is no longer part of the neutron > governance. This was a decision reached after the project saw a dramatic > drop in active development over a prolonged period of time. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][neutron][midonet] midonet liberty gate failure

2016-11-02 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Hi YAMAMOTO (and other midokura folks), > > I spotted unit tests in the branch are failing due to upper constraints not > applied. So I backported the fix as: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/392698/ Sadly, it

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [vpnaas] vpnaas no longer part of the neutron governance

2016-12-13 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
driver are you using? > > > Cheers, > Lingxian Kong (Larry) > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Armando M. <arma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hi >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [vpnaas] vpnaas no longer part of the neutron governance

2017-01-12 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Armando M. wrote: > Hi > > As of today, the project neutron-vpnaas is no longer part of the neutron > governance. This was a decision reached after the project saw a dramatic > drop in active development over a prolonged period of time. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [vpnaas] vpnaas no longer part of the neutron governance

2017-01-12 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 1:02 AM, Armando M. <arma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 27 November 2016 at 20:50, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Armando M. <arma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > H

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [vpnaas] vpnaas no longer part of the neutron governance

2016-12-03 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
u! it's great to hear the project has more demands. > > > Cheers, > Lingxian Kong (Larry) > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Armando M. <arma...@gmail.com>

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Re: [neutron][networking-midonet] [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/networking-midonet failed

2016-12-02 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote: > release team, > > can we (networking-midonet) branch stable/newton from a past commit > with a RC tag, backport some changes [1], and then cut the first release > on the branch? to answ

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [vpnaas] vpnaas no longer part of the neutron governance

2016-12-01 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 1:02 AM, Armando M. <arma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 27 November 2016 at 20:50, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Armando M. <arma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > H

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [tap-as-a-service] stable/newton 'broken'

2016-12-01 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote: > Anil, > > do you have any opinion? > > i'm thinking to branch stable/newton at around > 675af77205d4e404bc7c185c13ab6d86f300d185 after taas meeting, i went ahead and create the branch.

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][neutron-fwaas][networking-bgpvpn][nova-lxd] Removing old data_utils from Tempest

2017-03-14 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
thank you for heads up. On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 2:18 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: > Hi, > > Many projects are using data_utils library which is provided by > Tempest for creating test resources with random resource names. > Now the library is provided as stable interface

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Engine facade

2017-04-05 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > > The problem that we have is that any foreign key usage under transactions is > now broken. An example of an exception that is raised is: > > > > DBReferenceError: (sqlite3.IntegrityError) FOREIGN KEY

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] uwsgi for API services

2017-04-20 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > One of the many reasons for getting all our API services running wsgi > under a real webserver is to get out of the custom ports for all > services game. However, because of some of the limits of apache > mod_wsgi, we really

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][blazar][ceilometer][congress][intel-nfv-ci-tests][ironic][manila][networking-bgpvpn][networking-fortinet][networking-sfc][neutron][neutron-fwaas][neutron-lbaas][nova-lxd][octa

2017-02-28 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Andrea Frittoli wrote: > Hello folks, > > TL;DR: if today you import manager,py from tempest.scenario please maintain > a copy of [0] in tree until further notice. > > Full message: > -- > > One of the priorities for

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] FFE for midonet v2 plugin removal

2017-08-01 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote: > hi, > > I'm not sure if changes like this requires an FFE, but just in case. > I'd like to request an FFE for midonet v2 plugin removal. > > - patches are ready for review: https://review.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][tap-as-a-service] pike branch/release

2017-08-10 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
done. http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/tap-as-a-service/tag/?h=2.0.0 https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/tap-as-a-service+branch:stable/pike+topic:create-pike On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:07 PM, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote: > hi, > &

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas] pike rc

2017-08-10 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
done http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/tag/?h=11.0.0.0rc1 https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/neutron-vpnaas+branch:stable/pike+topic:create-pike On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote: > hi, >

[openstack-dev] [neutron] out-of-tree l3 service providers

2017-07-13 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, today i managed to play with l3 flavors. i wrote a crude patch to implement midonet flavor. [1] [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/483174/ a good news is it's somehow working. a bad news is it has a lot of issues, as you can see in TODO comments in the patch. given these issues, now i

[openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas] driver removal

2017-07-27 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, some of drivers in neutron-vpnaas don't have maintainers. [1] unless someone steps up, we might end up with removing those drivers. especially, VyattaIPsecDriver will likely be removed in near future, as it requires a special agent [2] which is difficult to maintain for those who are not

[openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-midonet] networking-midonet core reviewer proposal

2017-04-25 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
unless anyone objects, i'll add the following people to networking-midonet project's core reviewers. - Antonio Ojea - Brandon Berg - Xavi León http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/networking-midonet/30 http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/networking-midonet/90

  1   2   >