Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][ML2] Modular L2 agent architecture

- Original Message - What's the progress by Terry Wilson? If not much, I'm willing to file blueprint/spec and drive it. thanks, I've been working on some proof-of-concept code to help flesh out ideas for writing the spec. I'd talked to Maru and he mentioned that he didn't think

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] bug/129135 VXLAN kernel version checking

A question about the fix from https://review.openstack.org/#/c/82931 Also, how does this work for RHEL-based distros where they tend to backport new kernel features? For instance vxlan support was added in the kernel for RHEL6.5 which is 2.6.32-based... That changeset looks like it breaks

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] release request for python-novaclient

Sorry, I dropped the ball here. This is now released. Unfortunately, the new novaclient release ended up completely breaking the neutron gate. The v1_1 deprecation broke our (voting) pylint test: https://jenkins04.openstack.org/job/gate-neutron-pylint/1383/console 2015-02-19 18:37:06.932 |

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] release request for python-novaclient

- Original Message - On Feb 19, 2015, at 11:52, Terry Wilson twil...@redhat.com wrote: Unfortunately, the new novaclient release ended up completely breaking the neutron gate. The v1_1 deprecation broke our (voting) pylint test: https://jenkins04.openstack.org/job/gate-neutron

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Mechanism drivers and Neutron server forking?

Right now I'm leaning toward parent always does nothing + PluginWorker. Everything is forked, no special case for workers==0, and explicit designation of the only one case. Of course, it's still early in the day and I haven't had any coffee. I have updated the patch

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Mechanism drivers and Neutron server forking?

There are two classes of behavior that need to be handled: 1) There are things that can only be done after forking like setting up connections or spawning threads. 2) Some things should only be done once regardless of number of forks, like syncing. Even when you just want something to happen

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ovs] The way we deal with MTU

> So basically, as long as we try to plug ports with different MTUs into the > same bridge, we are utilizing a bug in Open vSwitch, that may break us any > time. > > I guess our alternatives are: > - either redesign bridge setup for openvswitch to e.g. maintain a bridge per > network; > - or

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Proposing Jakub Libosvar for testing core

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Jakub Libosvar wrote: > On 26/07/16 16:56, Assaf Muller wrote: >> >> We've hit critical mass from cores interesting in the testing area. >> >> Welcome Jakub to the core reviewer team. May you enjoy staring at the >> Gerrit interface and

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - Neutron team social in Atlanta on Thursday

+1 On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Lihi Wish wrote: > +1 > > On Feb 20, 2017 1:13 PM, "Omer Anson" wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> On 20 February 2017 at 19:34, Bhatia, Manjeet S >> wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Kevin Benton

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - Neutron team social in Atlanta on Thursday

+1 On Feb 17, 2017 1:22 PM, "Kevin Benton" wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm organizing a Neutron social event for Thursday evening in Atlanta > somewhere near the venue for dinner/drinks. If you're interested, please > reply to this email with a "+1" so I can get a general count for a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][python3] use of six.iteritems()

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:41 AM, Robert Collins wrote: > On 10 June 2015 at 21:30, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> On 06/10/2015 02:15 AM, Robert Collins wrote: >>> I'm very glad folk are working

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][python3] use of six.iteritems()

On Sep 13, 2016 10:42 PM, "Kevin Benton" wrote: > > >All performance matters. All memory consumption matters. Being wasteful over a purely aesthetic few extra characters of code is silly. > > Isn't the logical conclusion of this to write everything in a different language? :)

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][python3] use of six.iteritems()

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 06/11/2015 09:02 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: >> On 06/11/2015 01:16 AM, Robert Collins wrote: >>> But again - where in OpenStack does this matter the slightest? >> >> Precisely. I can't think of a single case where we are iterating

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][python3] use of six.iteritems()

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 09/13/2016 01:40 PM, Terry Wilson wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote: >>> >>> On 06/11/2015 09:02 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: >>&

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Denver Team Dinner

+1 On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 6:23 PM, Miguel Lavalle wrote: > Dear Neutrinos, > > Our social event will take place on Thursday September 12th at 7:30pm. The > venue is going to be https://www.famousdaves.com/Denver-Stapleton. It is > located 0.4 miles from the Renaissance

[openstack-dev] [release][requirements][FFE] Release ovsdbapp 0.9.1

ovsdbapp 0.9.1 (review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/539489/) has a gate-fixing one-line fix (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/537241). Can I get a FFE for bumping the requirements to ovsdbapp 0.9.1 once the package is built? Terry

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][requirements][FFE] Release ovsdbapp 0.9.1

On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 4:30 PM, Matthew Thode <prometheanf...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 18-02-02 15:59:42, Terry Wilson wrote: >> ovsdbapp 0.9.1 (review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/539489/) has a >> gate-fixing one-line fix (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/537241