[openstack-dev] What's happening with stable release management?

2014-08-08 Thread Thomas Goirand
conservative attitude. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] What's happening with stable release management?

2014-08-08 Thread Thomas Goirand
we fixed it while we didn't. keystone 2014.1.2.1 was just uploaded to fix that. I'm sorry for the inconvenience this has caused. No worries Thierry, mistakes do happen. Though I've already upgraded oslo.config, oslo.messaging, and pycadf. I hope that's not an issue. Cheers, Thomas Goirand

[openstack-dev] Python3 search path order when building Debian package

2014-08-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
, comment or whatever that may help would be appreciated. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) P.S: By the way, there's issues with python-oslo.utils with Python 3.4, after solving the above problem... ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Using xstatic-bootstrap-scss version 2, and not 3

2014-08-17 Thread Thomas Goirand
of compass-bootstrap-sass-plugin within Horizon. Thoughts anyone? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] China blocking access to OpenStack git review push

2014-09-08 Thread Thomas Goirand
recently too, as it became a way too aggressive. I very much prefer to use my laptop to use git review than having to bounce around servers. :( Are their alternative IPs that I could use for review.openstack.org? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) P.S: If a Chinese official read this, an easy way

Re: [openstack-dev] global-reqs on tooz pulls in worrisome transitive dep

2014-09-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
Julien on that one. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) P.S: It's to be noted that python-memcached is called python-memcache in Debian, because that's the name of the module when doing imports... ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

[openstack-dev] Fwd: [Horizon] Last remaining Django 1.7 issue in Horizon (and other OpenStack packages)

2014-09-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
, Thomas Goirand (zigo) Original Message Subject: [PKG-Openstack-devel] Bug#755651: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Support for Django 1.7: there's a bit of work, though it looks fixable to me... Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 20:45:23 + Resent-From: Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org

[openstack-dev] All Juno dependencies uploaded to Debian

2014-09-15 Thread Thomas Goirand
... Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] Please do *NOT* use vendorized versions of anything (here: glanceclient using requests.packages.urllib3)

2014-09-17 Thread Thomas Goirand
all of OpenStack to do it there as well. And no, there's no good excuse here... Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Please do *NOT* use vendorized versions of anything (here: glanceclient using requests.packages.urllib3)

2014-09-17 Thread Thomas Goirand
they have tons of wrong reasons. If they don't want to change anything, then we can only try to work around the issue, and never use the embedded version. Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http

Re: [openstack-dev] Please do *NOT* use vendorized versions of anything (here: glanceclient using requests.packages.urllib3)

2014-09-18 Thread Thomas Goirand
not interesting for the OpenStack project. Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Please do *NOT* use vendorized versions of anything (here: glanceclient using requests.packages.urllib3)

2014-09-18 Thread Thomas Goirand
in the future. Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Oslo final releases ready

2014-09-18 Thread Thomas Goirand
of 1.4.0, so that it is greater than 1.4.0.0~a5 (to avoid adding an EPOC, which is ugly and annoying to maintain). It's going to be the same version though, I just need to add a new tag, which isn't much of a problem for me (since I use a git based workflow). The 1.4.0.0a5 is confusing... :( Thomas

[openstack-dev] Requirements freeze exception: urllib3

2014-09-21 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi, Please see this: https://review.openstack.org/122993 Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Please do *NOT* use vendorized versions of anything (here: glanceclient using requests.packages.urllib3)

2014-09-21 Thread Thomas Goirand
. That's very good, thanks for taking care of this. However, there's nothing extraordinarily here. Think about this fact: the Linux kernel is *always* backward compatible. I don't think you'll argue that requests is more complex than the kernel. On 09/18/2014 10:20 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: Thomas Goirand

Re: [openstack-dev] Please do *NOT* use vendorized versions of anything (here: glanceclient using requests.packages.urllib3)

2014-09-21 Thread Thomas Goirand
. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Please do *NOT* use vendorized versions of anything (here: glanceclient using requests.packages.urllib3)

2014-09-22 Thread Thomas Goirand
, Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Could we please use 1.4.1 for oslo.messaging *now*? (was: Oslo final releases ready)

2014-09-23 Thread Thomas Goirand
and added work. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Less compiler dependency

2013-12-10 Thread Thomas Goirand
directly go back to the idea of using NodeJS then, because that would be exactly the same. I much prefer option 1/ where lesscpy gets better and does what's needed for the project. :) Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Horizon] [Tuskar] [UI] Horizon and Tuskar-UI merge

2013-12-17 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 12/16/2013 10:32 PM, Jaromir Coufal wrote: This is important note. From information architecture and user interaction point of view, I don't think it makes sense to keep all the three tabs visible together (Project, Admin, Infrastructure). There are lot of reasons, but main points: *

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] Support for Django 1.6

2013-12-19 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi, Sid has Django 1.6. Is it planned to add support for it? I currently don't know what to do with the Horizon package, as it's currently broken... :( Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Support for Django 1.6

2013-12-23 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 12/20/2013 04:39 PM, Matthias Runge wrote: On 12/19/2013 04:45 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, Sid has Django 1.6. Is it planned to add support for it? I currently don't know what to do with the Horizon package, as it's currently broken... :( Thomas Yes, there are two patches available

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Support for Django 1.6

2013-12-23 Thread Thomas Goirand
/#django-conf-urls-defaul ts -Tim Indeed, this was the problem. Thanks Tim, I have been able to upload the package to Sid, without breaking Wheezy backport, thanks to this. \o/ Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Devstack Ceph

2013-12-25 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 12/24/2013 07:49 PM, Sebastien Han wrote: Hello everyone, I’ve been working on a new feature for Devstack that includes a native support for Ceph. The patch includes the following: * Ceph installation (using the ceph.com repo) * Glance integration * Cinder integration (+ nova virsh

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack][qa][Tempest][Network] Test for external connectivity

2013-12-25 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 11/18/2013 08:19 PM, Salvatore Orlando wrote: Basically I think we can assume test machines have access to the Internet IMO, we should assume test machines doesn't. It's a too dangerous assumption to make. I assume you want to check servers such as www.google.com http://www.google.com are

[openstack-dev] Fwd: python-django-bootstrap-form_3.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2013-12-27 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi, bootstrap-form was rejected by the Debian FTP masters, and I have no reply from upstream to fix the licensing. I'm not sure what to do next. Any advice? Could we just stop using bootstrap-form? Thomas Goirand (zigo) P.S: Below is the reject message from the FTP masters, and my follow-up

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: python-django-bootstrap-form_3.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2013-12-27 Thread Thomas Goirand
the latest release of bootstrap-form. I would very much have preferred to have a responsive upstream and/or an upstream that does things correctly... :( Anyway, thanks Carl for the pointer. That's really helpful! Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) On 12/27/2013 04:43 PM, Carl Perry wrote: The github repo has

[openstack-dev] django-bootstrap-form django 1.4 / 1.5

2013-12-29 Thread Thomas Goirand
with Django 1.4 1.5 (which would be the best way forward for me...)? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] minimum review period for functional changes that break backwards compatibility

2013-12-30 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 12/30/2013 06:02 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 30 December 2013 22:51, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: IMO, switching to ext4 is a very bad idea, because ext4 doesn't support online resize2fs, while ext3 does, so switching to ext4 is breaking cloud-init!!! It supports it just fine

[openstack-dev] Novnc switch to sockjs-client instead of websockify

2013-12-31 Thread Thomas Goirand
licensing. Thoughts welcome! Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Novnc switch to sockjs-client instead of websockify

2014-01-03 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/03/2014 01:03 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 2014-01-01 00:33, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, I was wondering if it would be possible for NoVNC to switch from websockify to sockjs-client, which is available here: https://github.com/sockjs/sockjs-client This has the advantage of not using flash

Re: [openstack-dev] django-bootstrap-form django 1.4 / 1.5

2014-01-03 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/02/2014 03:33 PM, Matthias Runge wrote: On 12/30/2013 08:31 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, Currently, in the global-requirements.txt, we have: Django=1.4,1.6 django-bootstrap-form However, django-bootstrap-form fail in both Django 1.4 and Django 1.6. What's the way forward? Would

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] - taskflow preventing sqla 0.8 upgrade

2014-01-04 Thread Thomas Goirand
with concurrent.futures (they would share the same files). I'd be very happy to have upstream point of view, and probably some help. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] - taskflow preventing sqla 0.8 upgrade

2014-01-04 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/04/2014 07:53 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: So another idea that was talked about on IRC. Taskflow exposes entrypoints for these storage backends (like your storage callback/interface idea). It currently provides 3 such 'default' backends [sqlalchemy, file/dir based, in-memory -- mainly

Re: [openstack-dev] Novnc switch to sockjs-client instead of websockify

2014-01-08 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/08/2014 07:43 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 02:33:09PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, I was wondering if it would be possible for NoVNC to switch from websockify to sockjs-client, which is available here: https://github.com/sockjs/sockjs-client This has

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [rfc] drop XML from v3 API entirely

2014-01-14 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/13/2014 10:38 PM, Sean Dague wrote: I know we've been here before, but I want to raise this again while there is still time left in icehouse. I would like to propose that the Nova v3 API removes the XML payload entirely. It adds complexity to the Nova code, and it requires duplicating

[openstack-dev] Supporting WebOb 1.3

2014-02-03 Thread Thomas Goirand
1.3? I haven't seen issues building (most of not all) core packages using WebOb 1.3. Did I miss the obvious? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo

Re: [openstack-dev] Supporting WebOb 1.3

2014-02-03 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 02/03/2014 11:31 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com mailto:mord...@inaugust.com wrote: On 02/03/2014 11:45 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, Sorry if this has been already discussed (traffic is high

[openstack-dev] XenAPI / XCP going away from Debian Ubuntu

2014-02-10 Thread Thomas Goirand
will work on Debian support in xenserver-core. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) For reference, see http://bugs.debian.org/738322 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1278352 ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http

Re: [openstack-dev] XenAPI / XCP going away from Debian Ubuntu

2014-02-10 Thread Thomas Goirand
about this situation, and hope it can be solved. I warmly welcome Citrix to work with me (again) to fix this quickly. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Fixes for the alembic migration (sqlite + postgress) aren't being reviewed

2014-02-19 Thread Thomas Goirand
have a *serious* look at this patch, and explain why it's not ok for it to be approved? If nobody says why, then could this be approved, so we can move on? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=openstack/neutron.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/fix-alembic-migration

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Fixes for the alembic migration (sqlite + postgress) aren't being reviewed

2014-02-20 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 02/21/2014 06:13 AM, Vincent Untz wrote: Le jeudi 20 février 2014, à 12:02 -0800, Armando M. a écrit : No action on a negative review means automatic expiration, if you lose interest in something you care about whose fault is that? I beg to disagree. If we let patches go to automatic

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Use unminified javascript files patch needs review

2014-02-27 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi, It's been now more than 40 days that this patch needs review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/67096/ Could some core reviewers have a look, and eventually approve the patch? It's very important to me, since Horizon is currently considered non-free in Debian, due to the minified javascript

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Use unminified javascript files patch needs review

2014-02-27 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 02/28/2014 01:18 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, It's been now more than 40 days that this patch needs review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/67096/ Could some core reviewers have a look, and eventually approve the patch? It's very important to me, since Horizon is currently considered

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Use unminified javascript files patch needs review

2014-02-27 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 02/28/2014 03:10 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 02/28/2014 01:18 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, It's been now more than 40 days that this patch needs review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/67096/ Could some core reviewers have a look, and eventually approve the patch? It's very important

[openstack-dev] Toward SQLAlchemy 0.9.x compatibility everywhere for Icehouse

2014-03-01 Thread Thomas Goirand
welcome, Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Toward SQLAlchemy 0.9.x compatibility everywhere for Icehouse

2014-03-02 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 03/02/2014 12:03 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, About a week ago, the maintainer of SQLAlchemy uploaded version 0.9.3 in Debian Sid. This of course broke a lot of OpenStack packages, including python-migrate. I do not intend to let this continue on for 7 months like it happened

Re: [openstack-dev] Toward SQLAlchemy 0.9.x compatibility everywhere for Icehouse

2014-03-02 Thread Thomas Goirand
, fearing to break something. Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Toward SQLAlchemy 0.9.x compatibility everywhere for Icehouse

2014-03-02 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 03/03/2014 11:24 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: It looks like my patch fixes the first unit test failure. Though we still need a fix for the 2nd problem: AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'AbstractType' Replying to myself... It looks like AbstractType is not needed except

Re: [openstack-dev] Toward SQLAlchemy 0.9.x compatibility everywhere for Icehouse

2014-03-03 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 03/03/2014 01:14 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 03/03/2014 11:24 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: It looks like my patch fixes the first unit test failure. Though we still need a fix for the 2nd problem: AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'AbstractType' Replying to myself

Re: [openstack-dev] Toward SQLAlchemy 0.9.x compatibility everywhere for Icehouse

2014-03-03 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 03/03/2014 11:17 PM, David Ripton wrote: On 03/02/2014 03:12 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 03/02/2014 12:03 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: I hope to get support from core reviewers here, so that we can fix-up the SQLA 0.9.x compat ASAP, preferably before b3. Of course, I'll make sure all we do

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal to move from Freenode to OFTC

2014-03-04 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 03/04/2014 06:13 PM, Julien Danjou wrote: On Tue, Mar 04 2014, James E. Blair wrote: If there aren't objections to this plan, I think we can propose a motion to the TC with a date and move forward with it fairly soon. That plan LGTM, and +1 for OFTC. :) Same over here, +1 for OFTC.

[openstack-dev] OpenStack now compatible with SQLA 0.9?

2014-03-08 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi, I just tried this: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/79129/ and it seems everything works. \o/ Shall we lift the SQLA cap right away? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http

[openstack-dev] [keystone] 5 unicode unit test failures when building Debian package

2014-03-12 Thread Thomas Goirand
solve these. Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] 5 unicode unit test failures when building Debian package

2014-03-13 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 03/14/2014 05:20 AM, John Dennis wrote: On 03/13/2014 12:31 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, Since Havana, I've been ignoring the 5 unit test failures that I always get. Though I think it'd be nice to have them fixed. The log file is available over here: https://icehouse.dev

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack vs. SQLA 0.9

2014-03-13 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 03/14/2014 02:06 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 03/13/2014 12:31 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 03/12/2014 07:07 PM, Sean Dague wrote: Because of where we are in the freeze, I think this should wait until Juno opens to fix. Icehouse will only be compatible with SQLA 0.8, which I think is fine. I

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Selenium (which is non-free) is back again in Horizon (Icehouse Beta 3)

2014-03-14 Thread Thomas Goirand
, and I get some unit tests errors (see below). Guys, could we stop having this kind of regressions, and make Selenium tests not mandatory? They aren't runnable in Debian. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) == ERROR: Failure

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Selenium (which is non-free) is back again in Horizon (Icehouse Beta 3)

2014-03-14 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 03/14/2014 09:11 PM, Julie Pichon wrote: On 14/03/14 11:31, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, A few months ago, I raised the fact that Selenium *CANNOT* be a hard test-requirements.txt build-dependency of Horizon, because it is non-free (because of binaries like the browser plug-ins not being

[openstack-dev] Icehouse dependency freeze

2014-03-18 Thread Thomas Goirand
in time for new packages. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Icehouse dependency freeze

2014-03-18 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 03/18/2014 02:51 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: On 03/18/2014 07:14 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, We're now 1 month away from the scheduled release date. It is my strong opinion (as the main Debian OpenStack package maintainer) that for the last Havana release, the freeze of dependency

Re: [openstack-dev] Icehouse dependency freeze

2014-03-18 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 03/18/2014 06:12 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Thomas Goirand wrote: We're now 1 month away from the scheduled release date. It is my strong opinion (as the main Debian OpenStack package maintainer) that for the last Havana release, the freeze of dependency happened really too late, creating

Re: [openstack-dev] Icehouse dependency freeze

2014-03-18 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 03/19/2014 02:42 AM, Nikhil Manchanda wrote: Thomas Goirand writes: On 03/18/2014 06:12 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Thomas Goirand wrote: [...] Trove turned out to not be participating in global requirements, and has 3 items outside of requirements. Could you list them? Hi Thomas

Re: [openstack-dev] WSGI and Python paste

2014-03-19 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 03/19/2014 09:25 PM, victor stinner wrote: Hi, According to the following table, paste is blocking many OpenStack servers to be ported to Python 3: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Python3 I had a look to this, and found it weird that ironicclient is marked as supporting Python3,

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] python-keystoneclient unit tests only if python-memcache is installed

2014-03-20 Thread Thomas Goirand
assumption, so the test failures aren't particularly helpful. Oh, ok, thanks! I've added python-memcache *AND* memcached as build-dependency, then everything is back to working! :) Thanks again for the above help, Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo

[openstack-dev] We need a new version of hacking for Icehouse, or provide compatibility with oslo.sphinx in oslosphinx

2014-03-21 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi, The current version of python-hacking wants python-oslo.sphinx, but we're moving to python-oslosphinx. In Debian, I made python-oslo.sphinx as a transition empty package that only depends on python-oslosphinx. As a consequence, python-hacking needs to be updated to use python-oslosphinx,

Re: [openstack-dev] We need a new version of hacking for Icehouse, or provide compatibility with oslo.sphinx in oslosphinx

2014-03-22 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 03/22/2014 12:58 AM, Joe Gordon wrote: So it sounds like we need: * Hacking 0.8.1 to fix the oslo.sphinx oslosphinx issue for Icehouse. Since we cap hacking versions at 0.9 [1] this will get used in icehouse. * Hacking 0.9 to release all the new hacking goodness. This will be

Re: [openstack-dev] Preparing for 2013.2.3 -- branches freeze March 27th

2014-03-22 Thread Thomas Goirand
: https://review.openstack.org/82298 I'd really like to have it included in the next stable release of Horizon. I don't think this one is hard to deal with, and I hope it will go through even with the lack of time. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) P.S: I'm not registered to the openstack-stable-maint

[openstack-dev] Dependency freeze exception for happybase (I would like version 0.8)

2014-03-27 Thread Thomas Goirand
! :) ), then would =0.8 or =0.4,!=0.6,!=0.7 be better? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Dependency freeze exception for happybase (I would like version 0.8)

2014-03-29 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 03/29/2014 01:07 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 03/28/2014 12:50 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Thierry Carrez wrote: Julien Danjou wrote: On Thu, Mar 27 2014, Thomas Goirand wrote: -happybase=0.4,=0.6 +happybase=0.8 Good for me, and Ceilometer is the only one using happybase as far as I know

Re: [openstack-dev] PGP keysigning party for Juno summit in Atlanta?

2014-03-30 Thread Thomas Goirand
yourself. We'll see if I can make it to Atlanta, and organize something later on. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] PGP keysigning party for Juno summit in Atlanta?

2014-04-01 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 04/01/2014 04:03 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2014-03-31 10:55:06 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote: No miracle here... All slots are pretty full as expected. I think our best bet is still the 30-min morning break on Wednesday or Thursday at 10:30am. Would finding an available room for

[openstack-dev] Missleading and hardly parseable default neutron config files

2014-04-02 Thread Thomas Goirand
something like this instead? -# Example: -# connection = mysql://root:pass@127.0.0.1:3306/neutron +# Example: connection = mysql://root:pass@127.0.0.1:3306/neutron It'd be nice if these changes could make it to the Icehouse release. Thoughts anyone? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo

Re: [openstack-dev] Missleading and hardly parseable default neutron config files

2014-04-02 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 04/02/2014 11:01 PM, Solly Ross wrote: IMHO, having Example: on a separate line from the actual option is a lot easier for humans: you just delete a single character or use your editor-of-choice's uncomment macro to activate a line. Please re-read what I wrote. There's things like: #

Re: [openstack-dev] Missleading and hardly parseable default neutron config files

2014-04-02 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 04/02/2014 06:38 PM, Salvatore Orlando wrote: Hi Thomas, it probably won't be a bad idea if you can share the patches you're applying to the default configuration files. I think all distros are patching them anyway, so this might allow us to provide mostly ready to use config files.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [IPv6] Ubuntu PPA with IPv6 enabled, need help to achieve it

2014-04-05 Thread Thomas Goirand
need my help. Could you please point to me to the list of needed patches? I would need to keep them separated, in debian/patches, rather than pulling from a different git repository. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Documenting supported platforms

2014-04-05 Thread Thomas Goirand
on, on Debian Wheezy (backports) and in Debian Sid [1]. Currently all of TripleO but tripleo-image-elements is uploaded to Debian Experimental. I also have Trusty packages (it's part of my build process). If all, I need feedback. I'm quick to fix things if reported correctly. Cheers, Thomas Goirand

[openstack-dev] OpenStack Havana RC1 RC2 available in Debian Experimental

2013-10-13 Thread Thomas Goirand
archive, the plan is still to use [1] Debian PPAMAIN when this will be available (please do not confuse with Ubuntu PPA, this is a very different concept), and to keep maintaining the above non-official repositories until then. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel

[openstack-dev] Debian Jessie freeze date announced: 5th of November 2014

2013-10-13 Thread Thomas Goirand
). I haven't made up my mind yet if we should release Debian Jessie with OpenStack Icehouse (to have the same release as the Ubuntu LTS), or with the J release. I'd be happy to gather comments and suggestions about it, and discuss about it at the HK summit. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo

[openstack-dev] Python-coverage: path change from /usr/bin/coverage to /usr/bin/python-coverage

2013-10-16 Thread Thomas Goirand
in debian/patches whenever possible, because this is a major pain. Your thoughts? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Building on Debian: Havana unit tests at build time report

2013-10-17 Thread Thomas Goirand
did in the packaging, and I wanted to avoid reporting some false positive. On 17 October 2013 20:16, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: Hi, ... These appear in both Sid and Wheezy backports. * Nova == Only a single: FAIL

Re: [openstack-dev] Building on Debian: Havana unit tests at build time report

2013-10-17 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/17/2013 09:11 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: I understand what you are saying and I also understand your frustration. However, OpenStack does not, as of yet, support SQLAlchemy 0.8, and as you can see, the requirements file does, in fact, communicate reality, we depend on 0.8. It does, at the

Re: [openstack-dev] RFC: Freeze deps versions in requirements (was [tripleo], but that's a general topic)

2013-10-17 Thread Thomas Goirand
to not miss that one. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Building on Debian: Havana unit tests at build time report

2013-10-17 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/18/2013 12:05 AM, Roman Podolyaka wrote: 4. Everyone's life would be much easier, if we dropped migrations support for SQLite. Alembic doesn't support ALTER for SQLite at all on purpose. And I would really like us to switch to using of Alembic in the following releases. Except that if

[openstack-dev] OpenStack Havana 2013.2 Debian packages available in Sid

2013-10-17 Thread Thomas Goirand
, Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] RFC: Freeze deps versions in requirements (was [tripleo], but that's a general topic)

2013-10-17 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/18/2013 03:35 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2013-10-17 08:33:44 -0700: See above. Also, remember that package maintainers are a few (me alone for Debian, maybe 5 people in Ubuntu/Canonical) fighting hundreds of developers who wish not to be disturbed.

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] django-openstack-auth with Django 1.6

2013-10-17 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/18/2013 02:05 AM, Cristian Tomoiaga wrote: Hello, It seems Django 1.6 switched from Pickle to Json for session serialization. https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.6/topics/http/sessions/#session-serialization For anyone getting the error about Token not being serializable, just add

Re: [openstack-dev] Building on Debian: Havana unit tests at build time report

2013-10-18 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/18/2013 02:06 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: A link to instructions on setting up a wheezy box for this testing would be helpful. Just install a minimal Wheezy machine, add my repositories (using the Jenkins one at *.pkgs.enovance.com), then do apt-get install openstack-toaster. I'll be trying to

[openstack-dev] Call for a clear COPYRIGHT-HOLDERS file in all OpenStack projects (and [trove] python-troveclient_0.1.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

2013-10-19 Thread Thomas Goirand
. Though that's of course not enough for the Debian FTP masters. Your thoughts? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) Original Message Subject: [Openstack-devel] python-troveclient_0.1.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 04:00:19 + From: Luke Faraone ftpmas...@ftp

Re: [openstack-dev] Call for a clear COPYRIGHT-HOLDERS file in all OpenStack projects (and [trove] python-troveclient_0.1.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

2013-10-19 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/19/2013 08:24 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 10/19/2013 05:49 AM, Michael Still wrote: On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: I suggest that we just put Copyright headers back in the source files. That will make Debian's licensecheck work fairly

Re: [openstack-dev] Call for a clear COPYRIGHT-HOLDERS file in all OpenStack projects (and [trove] python-troveclient_0.1.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

2013-10-20 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/19/2013 11:50 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2013-10-19 23:29:28 +0800 (+0800), Thomas Goirand wrote: Though the Debian FTP masters seems to insist on having correct copyright holders in debian/copyright, and I am a bit lost after the 2 rejects I just had. Well, this is still a fuzzy

Re: [openstack-dev] Call for a clear COPYRIGHT-HOLDERS file in all OpenStack projects (and [trove] python-troveclient_0.1.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

2013-10-20 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/20/2013 05:41 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: http://ftp-master.metadata.debian.org/changelogs//main/l/linux/linux_3.11.5-1_copyright Not even the kernel itself has a complete list of all the copyright owners. best, Joe Well, good luck finding all the copyright holders for such a large and

Re: [openstack-dev] Call for a clear COPYRIGHT-HOLDERS file in all OpenStack projects (and [trove] python-troveclient_0.1.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

2013-10-21 Thread Thomas Goirand
to be a bit more accurate than second-guessing through git log or reading a few source code files which represent a wrong view of the reality. Any thoughts? Thomas Goirand (zigo) P.S: I asked the FTP masters to write in this thread, though it seems nobody had time to do so

Re: [openstack-dev] Call for a clear COPYRIGHT-HOLDERS file in all OpenStack projects (and [trove] python-troveclient_0.1.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

2013-10-21 Thread Thomas Goirand
to be fixed. A copyright-holder.txt file would fix it, and I'm guessing that it's existence only would push companies to add themselves in... Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] Call for a clear COPYRIGHT-HOLDERS file in all OpenStack projects (and [trove] python-troveclient_0.1.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

2013-10-21 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/21/2013 09:28 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: In other words, what exactly is a list of copyright holders good for? At least avoid pain and reject when uploading to the Debian NEW queue... Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

Re: [openstack-dev] Call for a clear COPYRIGHT-HOLDERS file in all OpenStack projects (and [trove] python-troveclient_0.1.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

2013-10-22 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/22/2013 04:55 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: Talk to the Trove developers and politely ask them whether the copyright notices in their code reflects what they see as the reality. I'm sure it would help them if you pointed out to them some significant chunks of code from the commit history

Re: [openstack-dev] Call for a clear COPYRIGHT-HOLDERS file in all OpenStack projects (and [trove] python-troveclient_0.1.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

2013-10-22 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/22/2013 05:06 AM, Michael Basnight wrote: so if this is sufficient, ill fix the copyright headers. Please do (and backport that to 2013.2...)! :) Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] Call for a clear COPYRIGHT-HOLDERS file in all OpenStack projects (and [trove] python-troveclient_0.1.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

2013-10-22 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/22/2013 04:48 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 01:55 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 10/21/2013 09:28 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: In other words, what exactly is a list of copyright holders good for? At least avoid pain and reject when uploading to the Debian NEW queue

Re: [openstack-dev] Call for a clear COPYRIGHT-HOLDERS file in all OpenStack projects (and [trove] python-troveclient_0.1.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

2013-10-22 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/22/2013 08:09 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: b) Thomas should put in debian/copyright what is in our headers, and should consider them, as they are in our source tarballs, to be correct c) If Thomas, or anyone else, considers our header attribution to be incorrect, he or she should submit a

Re: [openstack-dev] Call for a clear COPYRIGHT-HOLDERS file in all OpenStack projects (and [trove] python-troveclient_0.1.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

2013-10-22 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/22/2013 04:45 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: By improve clarity, you mean compile an accurate list of all copyright holders? Why is this useful information? Sure, we could also improve clarity by compiling a list of all the cities in the world where some OpenStack code has been authored

Re: [openstack-dev] Call for a clear COPYRIGHT-HOLDERS file in all OpenStack projects (and [trove] python-troveclient_0.1.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

2013-10-22 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/22/2013 02:12 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2013-10-22 01:45:13 +0800 (+0800), Thomas Goirand wrote: [...] The main problem I was facing was that troveclient has a few files stating that HP was the sole copyright holder, when it clearly was not (since I have discussed a bit with some

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >