Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][CI] Tempest sources for testing tripleo in CI environment

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Sagi Shnaidman wrote: > For making clear all advantages and disadvantages, I've created a doc: > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HmY-I8OzoJt0SzLzs79hCa1smKGltb-byrJOkKKGXII/edit?usp=sharing > > Please comment. > > On Sun, Apr 17, 2016

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] 3rd party CI

Greetings, Just wanted to let folks know we're bringing up two 3rd party gates for TripleO CI atm. 1. The first gate will be for upgrading from mitaka -> newton/master 2. The second gate will be for running TripleO CI on RHEL 7.2 We're working out the logging for #2. ATM we're going to try and

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] 3rd party CI

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Wesley Hayutin <whayu...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > Just wanted to let folks know we're bringing up two 3rd party gates for > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Making TripleO CI easier to consume outside of TripleO CI

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 5:47 PM, James Slagle <james.sla...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Wesley Hayutin <whayu...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:44 PM, James Slagle <james.sla...@gmail.com> >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Attila Darazs for tripleo-quickstart core​

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:32 AM, John Trowbridge wrote: > I would like to add Attila to the tripleo-quickstart core reviewers > group. Much of his work has been on some of the auxillary roles that > quickstart makes use of in RDO CI, however his numbers on quickstart >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] additional git repo(s) for tripleo-quickstart

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Lars Kellogg-Stedman <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 03:26:18PM -0400, Wesley Hayutin wrote: > > I'm proposing the creation of a repo called tripleo-quickstart-extras > that > > would contain some or all of the curren

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] additional git repo(s) for tripleo-quickstart

Greetings, In an effort to make TripleO CI composable and managed and governed by the TripleO project we have found the need to create additional git repos in openstack under the TripleO project. This could also be done outside of the TripleO project, but ideally it's in TripleO. I'm proposing

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Gabriele Cerami for tripleo-quickstart core

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:06 AM, John Trowbridge wrote: > Howdy, > > I would like to propose Gabriele (panda on IRC), for tripleo-quickstart > core. He has worked on some pretty major features for the project > (explicit teardown, devmode), and has a good understanding of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Making TripleO CI easier to consume outside of TripleO CI

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:44 PM, James Slagle wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 3:39 PM, John Trowbridge wrote: > > Howdy folks, > > > > In the TripleO meeting two weeks ago, it came up that tripleo-quickstart > > is being used as a CI tool in RDO. This

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Making TripleO CI easier to consume outside of TripleO CI

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 3:39 PM, John Trowbridge wrote: > Howdy folks, > > In the TripleO meeting two weeks ago, it came up that tripleo-quickstart > is being used as a CI tool in RDO. This came about organically, because > we needed to use RDO CI to self-gate quickstart (it

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Making TripleO CI easier to consume outside of TripleO CI

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Michal Pryc wrote: > John, > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 9:39 PM, John Trowbridge wrote: > >> Howdy folks, >> >> In the TripleO meeting two weeks ago, it came up that tripleo-quickstart >> is being used as a CI tool in RDO. This

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] TripleO CI mentoring

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: > Hi all, > > At last weeks meeting, we discussed the idea of some sort of rotation where > folks would volunteer their time to both help fix CI when it breaks, and > also pass on some of the accrued knowledge within the team

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Progress on overcloud upgrade / update jobs

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 09:46:20PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm currently working by iteration to get a new upstream job

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Sergey (Sagi) Shnaidman for core on tripleo-ci

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Attila Darazs wrote: > On 02/01/2017 08:37 PM, John Trowbridge wrote: > >> >> >> On 01/30/2017 10:56 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> >>> Sagi, you're now core on TripleO CI repo. Thanks for your hard work on >>> tripleo-quickstart transition, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Sergey (Sagi) Shnaidman for core on tripleo-ci

+1 On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Brent Eagles wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Juan Antonio Osorio > wrote: > >> Sagi (sshnaidm on IRC) has done significant work in TripleO CI (both >> on the current CI solution and in getting

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Please review, tripleo ci transition to the quickstart tool set

Greetings, As discussed at the ocata summit, work is being done to update the set of tools used in tripleo ci to tripleo-quickstart and tripleo-quickstart-extras [1-2]. There is work, review, and validation required prior to the transition. A draft of the work items is available [3], please if

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic] introspection and CI

See my response inline. On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:07 AM, Dmitry Tantsur <dtant...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 10/17/2016 11:10 PM, Wesley Hayutin wrote: > >> Greetings, >> >> The RDO CI team is considering adding retries to our calls to >> introspection >>

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] containerized compute CI status

Greetings, I wanted to send a status update on the containerized compute CI, this is still very much a work in progress and is not yet working end to end. I'm hoping by sending this out early in the process we'll all benefit from developing the CI as the feature is developed. Everything you'll

[openstack-dev] [tripleo-ci] tripleo-quickstart-extras and tripleo third party ci

Greetings, Hey everyone, I wanted to post a link to a blueprint I'm interested in discussing at summit with everyone. Please share your thoughts and comments in the spec / gerrit review. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/tripleo-third-party-ci-quickstart Thank you!

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic] introspection and CI

Greetings, The RDO CI team is considering adding retries to our calls to introspection again [1]. This is very handy for bare metal environments where retries may be needed due to random chaos in the environment itself. We're trying to balance two things here.. 1. reduce the number of false

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [ci]

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Wesley Hayutin <whayu...@redhat.com> wrote: > Greetings, > > I wanted to send a status update on the quickstart based containerized > compute ci. > > The work is here: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/393348/ > > I had tw

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] [ci]

Greetings, I wanted to send a status update on the quickstart based containerized compute ci. The work is here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/393348/ I had two passes on the morning of Nov 30 in a row, then later that day the deployment started to fail due the compute node loosing it's

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][ci] TripleO-Quickstart Transition to TripleO-CI Update and Invite:

adding [ci] to the subject. On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Harry Rybacki wrote: > Greetings All, > > Folks have been diligently working on the blueprint[1] to prepare > TripleO-Quickstart (OOOQ)[2] and TripleO-Quickstart-Extras[3] for > their transition into TripleO-CI.

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [ci] TripleO-Quickstart Transition to TripleO-CI Update and Invite:

Greetings Steve On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 4:34 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: > Hi Harry, > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 04:04:51PM -0500, Harry Rybacki wrote: > > Greetings All, > > > > Folks have been diligently working on the blueprint[1] to prepare > > TripleO-Quickstart (OOOQ)[2] and

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [ci]

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 14/12/16 21:44 -0500, Emilien Macchi wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Wesley Hayutin <whayu...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fr

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] container jobs are unstable

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:07:24PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:56:59AM +1300, Steve Baker wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Emilien Macchi > wrote: > > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][tripleo] initial discussion for a new periodic pipeline

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: > On 2017-03-07 10:12:58 -0500 (-0500), Wesley Hayutin wrote: > > The TripleO team would like to initiate a conversation about the > > possibility of creating a new pipeline in Openstack Infra to al

[openstack-dev] [infra][tripleo] initial discussion for a new periodic pipeline

Greetings, The TripleO team would like to initiate a conversation about the possibility of creating a new pipeline in Openstack Infra to allow a set of jobs to run periodically every four hours [2]. The background and context of why such a pipeline is required is as follows. TripleO CI executes

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][tripleo] initial discussion for a new periodic pipeline

> precedence. > >> > > > >> > > Yeah, it makes no sense from an OVB perspective to add these as low > >> > priority > >> > > jobs. Once in a while we've managed to chew through the entire > >> > experimental > >> > > queue during t

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][CI] Bridging the production/CI workflow gap with large periodic CI jobs

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Justin Kilpatrick > wrote: > > Because CI jobs tend to max out about 5 nodes there's a whole class of > > minor bugs that make it into releases. > > > > What

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Bogdan Dobrelya core on TripleO / Containers

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 7:39 AM, Jiří Stránský wrote: > On 21.7.2017 16:55, Emilien Macchi wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Bogdan (bogdando on IRC) has been very active in Containerization of >> TripleO and his quality of review has increased over time. >> I would like to give him core

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] critical situation with CI / upgrade jobs

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > So far, we're having 3 critical issues, that we all need to address as > soon as we can. > > Problem #1: Upgrade jobs timeout from Newton to Ocata > https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1702955 > Today I spent an

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][ci] decreased coverage for telemetry

Greetings, I was looking through the mailing list and I did not see any emails explicitly calling out the decreased coverage for telemetry in tripleo due to [1]. A series of changes went into the CI system to disable telemetry [2]. There is work being done to restore more coverage for telemetry

[openstack-dev] index_footer in openstack logs

posting to openstack-dev On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Wesley Hayutin <whayu...@redhat.com> wrote: > Greetings Andreas, Paul > > I'm looking for some pointers on how to include some instructions in our > openstack logs in the same way the devstack gate works [1] and I'm n

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Forming our plans around Ansible

On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 6:20 PM, James Slagle wrote: > On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 5:31 PM, David Moreau Simard > wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 1:50 PM, James Slagle > wrote: > >> (0) tripleo-quickstart which follows the common and

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] proposing Alex Schultz tripleo-core in all projects

+1 On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Pradeep Kilambi wrote: > +1 to Alex > > On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Juan Antonio Osorio > wrote: > > +1 > > > > He's a great reviewer > > > > On 7 Jul 2017 8:40 pm, "Emilien Macchi" wrote: > >> >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ci] decreased coverage for telemetry

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Pradeep Kilambi <p...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Wesley Hayutin <whayu...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:04 PM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> > wrot

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ci] decreased coverage for telemetry

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:04 PM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Pradeep Kilambi <p...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Wesley Hayutin <whayu...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> Greetings, >

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI Squad Meeting Summary (week 27)

Greetings, Apologies for the delayed notes with regards to the last tripleo-ci-squad meeting. Highlights: * Tempest * master/pike is down to 2 tempest failures [1] out of 1,337 tests executed. * stable/ocata is a full pass on tempest * proposed tempest test to replace the tripleo ping

Re: [openstack-dev] index_footer in openstack logs

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 2:24 AM, Andreas Jaeger <a...@suse.com> wrote: > On 2017-07-10 05:03, Wesley Hayutin wrote: > > posting to openstack-dev > > > > On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Wesley Hayutin <whayu...@redhat.com > > <mailto:whayu...@redhat.com

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI Squad Meeting Summary (week 29)

If the topics below interest you and you want to contribute to the discussion, feel free to join the next meeting: Time: Thursdays, 14:30-15:30 UTC Place: https://bluejeans.com/4113567798/ Full minutes: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-ci-squad-meeting = Demo = * Tempest in gate jobs

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][ci] looking for doc reviews with regards to adding ooo check gates

Greetings, I thought it may be helpful if we wrote some instructions for other OpenStack projects with how to add a TripleO job to their projects check gate in a nonvoting or voting capacity. I'm not 100% sure if I'm accurate in my steps or if I'm missing something someone may want to add.

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ci] decreased coverage for telemetry

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Pradeep Kilambi <p...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Wesley Hayutin <whayu...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I was looking through the mailing list and I did not see any emails > > exp

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ci] Upgrade CI job for O->P (containerization)

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Jiří Stránský wrote: > Hi all, > > the upgrade job which tests Ocata -> Pike/master upgrade (from bare-metal > to containers) just got a green flag from the CI [1]. > > I've listed the remaining patches we need to land at the very top of the >

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][ci] tripleo periodic jobs moving to RDO's software factory and RDO Cloud

Greetings, I wanted to send out a summary email regarding some work that is still developing and being planned to give interested parties time to comment and prepare for change. Project: Move tripleo periodic promotion jobs Goal: Increase the cadence of tripleo-ci periodic promotion

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ci] where to find the CI backlog and issues we're tracking

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Wesley Hayutin <whayu...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > It's become apparent that everyone in the tripleo community may not be &

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][ci] where to find the CI backlog and issues we're tracking

Greetings, It's become apparent that everyone in the tripleo community may not be aware of where CI specific work is tracked. To find out which CI related features or bug fixes are in progress or to see the backlog please consult [1]. To find out what issues have been found in OpenStack via CI

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] rh1 issues post-mortem

On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > > > On 03/28/2017 05:01 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > >> Final (hopefully) update: >> >> All active compute nodes have been rebooted and things seem to be stable >> again. Jobs are even running a little faster, so I'm thinking

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] rdo and tripleo container builds and CI

On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Attila Darazs wrote: > If the topics below interest you and you want to contribute to the > discussion, feel free to join the next meeting: > > Time: Thursdays, 14:30-15:30 UTC > Place: https://bluejeans.com/4113567798/ > > Full minutes:

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] RFC, be more prescriptive in our log collection in CI

Greetings, The upstream log server is overloaded a bit, I think we can help their cause. Please review and add comments to this bug [1] Yesterday the following two related patches landed [2], [3] Thank you! [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1723182 [2]

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] plans on testing minor updates?

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 3:23 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Marios Andreou > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 9:50 AM, mathieu bultel > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> > >> On 09/28/2017 05:05 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] plans on testing minor updates?

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Wesley Hayutin <whayu...@redhat.com> > wrote: > [...] > > OK.. I think the solution is to start migrating these jobs to RDO > Software > > Facto

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] add mistral to the auto-update package list for TripleO CI

Greetings, I'd like to propose that the mistral project be added to the list of projects where in CI the very latest built packages are added to each CI run [1]. This will help get patches that depend on mistral patches to more quickly be tested and merged. For example Honza's patch [2] depends

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] CI design session at the PTG

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 09:42:45AM -0400, David Moreau Simard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > (cc whom I would at least like to attend) > > > > The PTG would be a great opportunity to talk about CI design/layout > > and how

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] containerized undercloud update

Greetings, Just wanted to share some progress with the containerized undercloud work. Ian pushed some of the patches along and we now have a successful undercloud install with containers. The initial undercloud install works [1] The idempotency check failed where we reinstall the undercloud [2]

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Ronelle Landy for Tripleo-Quickstart/Extras/CI core

+1 woot On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:34 PM, John Trowbridge > wrote: > > I would like to propose Ronelle be given +2 for the above repos. She has > > been a solid contributor to

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Wesley Hayutin <whayu...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Alex Schultz <aschu...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >>

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][ci] log collection in upstream jobs

Greetings, Infra asked the tripleo team to cut down on the logs we're producing upstream. We are using a lot of space on their servers and also it's taking too long to collect the logs themselves. We need to compromise and be flexible here, so I'd like the tripleo-ci and tripleo core to take

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Please do not approve or recheck anything not related to CI alert bugs

On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > Ok so here's the current status of things. I've gone through some of > the pending patches and sent them to the gate over the weekend since > the gate was empty (yay!). We've managed to land a bunch of patches. > That

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] New hash for master promoted

On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 5:52 AM, Gabriele Cerami wrote: > Hi, > > since the failures in Tuesday's tests were caused by infra problems, we > believed a specific hash involved in the failures to remain the best > candidate for a promotion. > So we pinned it in our promotion

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] New hash for master promoted

On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Adriano Petrich wrote: > Amazing! Thanks for the effort that took to get the promotion fixed! > > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Jason E. Rist wrote: > >> On 11/03/2017 03:52 AM, Gabriele Cerami wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Dan Prince wrote: > [...] > > > -CI resources: better use of CI resources. At the PTG we received > > feedback from the OpenStack infrastructure team that our

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 7:35 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: > On 11/6/17 1:01 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Dan Prince wrote: >> [...] >> >> -CI resources: better use of CI resources. At the PTG we received >>> feedback from

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-containers job needs attention

Greetings, We noticed the job legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-containers failing in the gate in the following patches [1], [2]. The job was voting in the review here [3]. ATM the job is non-voting in check and voting in the gate. This is a dangerous combination where the job can fail in

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo]

On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Wesley Hayutin <whayu...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I'd like to propose we remove the upgrade jobs that are consistently > faili

[openstack-dev] [tripleo]

Greetings, I'd like to propose we remove the upgrade jobs that are consistently failing from the upstream infrastructure and instead focus our efforts in RDO Software Factory. The jobs listed in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/518405/ are consistently failing after being reviewed by myself and

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:07 PM, James Slagle wrote: > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > Yes. Thanks for reformulate with better words. > > Just to be clear, I want to transform the scenarios into single-node > > jobs that

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 3:30 AM, James Slagle > wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Emilien Macchi

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [upgrade] CI status and Current effort.

On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 4:32 AM, Sofer Athlan-Guyot wrote: > Hi, > > We (Upgrade Squad) have eventually save some time for fixing/creating > the needed upgrade/update jobs. > > We have made an inventory of what currently exists there[1] and what is > missing in the same

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [upgrade] CI status and Current effort.

On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 5:39 AM, Wesley Hayutin <whayu...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > [...] >

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] latest centos iptables rpm broke tripleo ci

Greetings, TripleO CI started to hit errors in any of the multinode node pool jobs last Friday afternoon. Please review the bug and patch to bring CI back online [1-2] More work needs to be done to discover exactly why the latest rpm breaks the vxlan network link between nodes. It's also a good

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo upstream gate outtage, was: -> gate jobs impacted RAX yum mirror

On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 11:30 PM Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: > On 2018-05-13 20:44:25 -0600 (-0600), Wesley Hayutin wrote: > [...] > > I do think it would be helpful to say have a one week change > > window where folks are given the opportunity to preflig

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo upstream gate outtage, was: -> gate jobs impacted RAX yum mirror

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:36 AM Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: > On 2018-05-14 07:07:03 -0600 (-0600), Wesley Hayutin wrote: > [...] > > I think you may be conflating the notion that ubuntu or rhel/cent > > can be updated w/o any issues to ap

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo upstream gate outtage, was: -> gate jobs impacted RAX yum mirror

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:37 PM Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: > On 2018-05-14 09:57:17 -0600 (-0600), Wesley Hayutin wrote: > > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:36 AM Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> > wrote: > [...] > > > Couldn't a significant

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo upstream gate outtage, was: -> gate jobs impacted RAX yum mirror

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:08 PM Clark Boylan <cboy...@sapwetik.org> wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2018, at 8:57 AM, Wesley Hayutin wrote: > > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:36 AM Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> > wrote: > > > > > On 2018-05-14 07:07

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo upstream gate outtage, was: -> gate jobs impacted RAX yum mirror

On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 11:50 PM Tristan Cacqueray <tdeca...@redhat.com> wrote: > On May 14, 2018 2:44 am, Wesley Hayutin wrote: > [snip] > > I do think it would be helpful to say have a one week change window where > > folks are given the opportunity to pre

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Zuul repo insertion in update/upgrade CI

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:36 AM Jiří Stránský wrote: > Hi, > > this is mainly for CI folks and whom-it-may-concern. > > Recently we came across the topic of how to enable/disable zuul repos at > various places in the CI jobs. For normal deploy jobs there's no need to >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Migration to Storyboard

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 3:25 PM Alex Schultz wrote: > Hello tripleo folks, > > So we've been experimenting with migrating some squads over to > storyboard[0] but this seems to be causing more issues than perhaps > it's worth. Since the upstream community would like to

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] gate jobs impacted RAX yum mirror

FYI.. https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1770298 I'm on #openstack-infra chatting w/ Ian atm. Thanks __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo upstream gate outtage, was: -> gate jobs impacted RAX yum mirror

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:43 PM Wesley Hayutin <whayu...@redhat.com> wrote: > FYI.. https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1770298 > > I'm on #openstack-infra chatting w/ Ian atm. > Thanks > > Greetings, I wanted to update everyone on the status of the upstream tri

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo upstream gate outtage, was: -> gate jobs impacted RAX yum mirror

On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 11:45 PM Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Wesley Hayutin <whayu...@redhat.com> > wrote: >> >> 2. Shortly after #1 was resolved CentOS released 7.5 which comes directly >> into the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo upstream gate outtage, was: -> gate jobs impacted RAX yum mirror

On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 11:25 AM Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: > On 2018-05-13 08:25:25 -0600 (-0600), Wesley Hayutin wrote: > [...] > > We need to in coordination with the infra team be able to pin / lock > > content for production check and gate jobs whi

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Automating documentation the tripleo way?

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 10:22 AM Petr Kovar <pko...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, 16 May 2018 13:26:46 -0600 > Wesley Hayutin <whayu...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 3:05 PM Doug Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com> > wrote: > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Automating documentation the tripleo way?

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 2:41 PM Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Petr Kovar's message of 2018-05-16 17:39:14 +0200: > > Hi all, > > > > In the past few years, we've seen several efforts aimed at automating > > procedural documentation, mostly centered around the

Re: [openstack-dev] [ci][infra][tripleo] Multi-staged check pipelines for Zuul v3 proposal

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 1:29 PM James E. Blair wrote: > Jeremy Stanley writes: > > > On 2018-05-15 09:40:28 -0700 (-0700), James E. Blair wrote: > > [...] > >> We're also talking about making a new kind of job which can continue to > >> run after it's

Re: [openstack-dev] [ci][infra][tripleo] Multi-staged check pipelines for Zuul v3 proposal

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:42 AM Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2018-05-15 17:31:07 +0200 (+0200), Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: > [...] > > * upload into a swift container, with an automatic expiration set, the > > de-duplicated and compressed tarball created with something like: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ci][infra][tripleo] Multi-staged check pipelines for Zuul v3 proposal

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 3:16 PM Sagi Shnaidman wrote: > Hi, Bogdan > > I like the idea with undercloud job. Actually if undercloud fails, I'd > stop all other jobs, because it doens't make sense to run them. Seeing the > same failure in 10 jobs doesn't add too much. So maybe

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Automating documentation the tripleo way?

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 3:05 PM Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Wesley Hayutin's message of 2018-05-16 12:51:25 -0600: > > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 2:41 PM Doug Hellmann > wrote: > > > > > Excerpts from Petr Kovar's message of 2018-05-16

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo gate is blocked - please read

On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 10:21 AM Paul Belanger wrote: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 12:47:10PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > On 2018-06-15 23:15:01 -0700 (-0700), Emilien Macchi wrote: > > [...] > > > ## Dockerhub proxy issue > > > Infra using wrong image layer object storage proxy for Dockerhub:

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades

Greetings, I wanted to let everyone know that we have a keystone only deployment and upgrade job in check non-voting. I'm asking everyone in TripleO to be mindful of this job and to help make sure it continues to pass as we move it from non-voting check to check and eventually gating. Upgrade

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI is down stop workflowing

Check and gate jobs look clear. More details on a bit. Thanks Sent from my mobile On Tue, Jun 19, 2018, 07:33 Felix Enrique Llorente Pastora < ellor...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > >We have the following bugs with fixes that need to land to unblock > check/gate jobs: > >

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] zuul change gating repo name change

Greetings, Please be aware the yum repo created in tripleo ci jobs is going to change names to include the release [1]. This is done to ensure that only the appropriate patches are installed when patches from multiple branches are in play. This is especially important to upgrade jobs. If you

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:21 AM James Slagle wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:03 AM, Jiří Stránský wrote: > > On 12.6.2018 15:06, James Slagle wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 3:34 PM, Wesley Hayutin > >> wrote: > >>> > >&

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Status of Standalone installer (aka All-In-One)

On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 3:31 AM Raoul Scarazzini wrote: > On 05/06/2018 02:26, Emilien Macchi wrote: > [...] > > I hope this update was useful, feel free to give feedback or ask any > > questions, > [...] > > I'm no prophet here, but I see a bright future for this approach. I can > imagine how

Re: [openstack-dev] Overriding project-templates in Zuul

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 1:23 PM Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 10:02 AM, James E. Blair > wrote: > [...] > > Okay, let's summarize: >> >> Proposal 1: All project-template and project-local job variants matching >> the item's branch must

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] TripleO Tempest squad status 07/03/2018

Greetings, The TripleO Tempest squad has just completed Sprint 15 (6-15 - 7/03). The following is a summary of activities during this sprint. Epic: # Sprint 15 Epic ( Tempest Squad): Finish the refactoring of the core OpenStack services in python-tempestconf, refstack certification tests, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] TripleO CI squad status 7/03/2018

Apologies, The dark theme in my browser changed the font color of the text. The email is available at http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-July/131984.html Thank you! On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 7:13 PM Wesley Hayutin wrote: > Greetings > > The TripleO squad has just

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] TripleO CI squad status 7/03/2018

Greetings The TripleO squad has just completed Sprint 15 (6-15 - 7/03). The following is a summary of activities during this sprint. Epic: # Sprint 15 Epic (CI Squad): Begin migration of upstream jobs to native zuulv3. For a list of the completed and remaining items for the sprint please refer

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo-upgrade pike branch

Thanks Marius for sending this out and kicking off a conversation. On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Marius Cornea wrote: > Hi everyone and Happy New Year! > > As the migration of tripleo-upgrade repo to the openstack namespace is > now complete I think it's the time to

Re: [openstack-dev] Many timeouts in zuul gates for TripleO

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 12:23 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > > > On 01/18/2018 09:45 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 6:34 AM, Or Idgar wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> we're encountering many timeouts for zuul gates in TripleO. >>> For example, see

  1   2   >