Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Let's remove fuelweb from repo paths

2014-10-13 Thread Igor Kalnitsky
Hi folks, I want to bring this topic up again. We had a blocker in Fuel-Web project - Evgeniy L found a bug for old releases, so I had to add data migration. Today I built a new ISO and it successfully passed BVT tests. So I would ask you to merge this patches if there are no objections.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Let's remove fuelweb from repo paths

2014-10-10 Thread Vladimir Kuklin
I do not have any objections about removing legacy fuelweb suffix from our repo URLs. So I am +1 here. On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Igor Kalnitsky ikalnit...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi fuelers, I'm going to propose you remove fuelweb word from repos' paths. What am I talking about? Let me

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Let's remove fuelweb from repo paths

2014-10-10 Thread Matthew Mosesohn
+1. It was a legacy item and it should go away. I'll review the patches. On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Igor Kalnitsky ikalnit...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi fuelers, I'm going to propose you remove fuelweb word from repos' paths. What am I talking about? Let me show you. Currently we have the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Let's remove fuelweb from repo paths

2014-10-10 Thread Mike Scherbakov
I have no objections, and essentially I'm for such initiatives at the beginning of development cycle, when risks are lower. If we ensure tests coverage, and do it carefully (for instance, building custom ISO with changes and making sure it passes BVTs), then let's do it. On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Let's remove fuelweb from repo paths

2014-10-10 Thread Igor Kalnitsky
As I mentioned early, I already have an ISO with patches and it works fine in my own deployment. However, I ran the BVT tests on centos [1] and ubuntu [2]. [1]: http://jenkins-product.srt.mirantis.net:8080/view/custom_iso/job/custom.centos.bvt_1/198/ [2]:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Let's remove fuelweb from repo paths

2014-10-10 Thread Igor Kalnitsky
Folks, BVT tests are passed successfully. What about merging? Thanks, Igor On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Igor Kalnitsky ikalnit...@mirantis.com wrote: As I mentioned early, I already have an ISO with patches and it works fine in my own deployment. However, I ran the BVT tests on centos

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Let's remove fuelweb from repo paths

2014-10-08 Thread Igor Kalnitsky
Hi fuelers, I'm going to propose you remove fuelweb word from repos' paths. What am I talking about? Let me show you. Currently we have the following paths to repos: /var/www/nailgun/2014.2-6.0/centos/fuelweb/x86_64/ /var/www/nailgun/2014.2-6.0/ubuntu/fuelweb/x86_64/ Obviously, the