@lists.openstack.org,
ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 3:05:46 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila
...
Another level of indirection. I really like the approach of filesystem
passthrough ... the only critical question is if virtfs/p9 is still
...@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 3:26:52 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila
Am 04.03.2015 um 15:12 schrieb Csaba Henk:
- Original Message -
From: Danny Al-Gaaf danny.al-g...@bisect.de To: OpenStack
Development Mailing List (not for usage
...@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 3:05:46 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila
...
Another level of indirection. I really like the approach of filesystem
passthrough ... the only critical question is if virtfs/p9 is still
supported in some way
PM Subject: Re:
[openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila
...
For us security is very critical, as the performance is too. The
first solution via ganesha is not what we prefer (to use CephFS
via p9 and NFS would not perform that well I guess). The second
solution, to use
Can
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila
...
Another level of indirection. I really like the approach of filesystem
passthrough ... the only critical question is if virtfs/p9 is still
supported in some way (and the question if not: why?).
That only seems
Am 04.03.2015 um 05:19 schrieb Deepak Shetty:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Danny Al-Gaaf
danny.al-g...@bisect.de wrote:
Am 03.03.2015 um 19:31 schrieb Deepak Shetty: [...]
[...]
I was curious to understand. IIUC Neutron provides private and
public networks and for VMs to access external
Hi Danny,
- Original Message -
From: Danny Al-Gaaf danny.al-g...@bisect.de
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2015 3:07:36 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2015 9:07:36 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila
Am 27.02.2015 um 01:04 schrieb Sage Weil:
[sorry for ceph-devel
Am 03.03.2015 um 19:31 schrieb Deepak Shetty:
[...]
For us security is very critical, as the performance is too. The
first solution via ganesha is not what we prefer (to use CephFS
via p9 and NFS would not perform that well I guess). The second
solution, to use CephFS directly to the VM would
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Danny Al-Gaaf danny.al-g...@bisect.de
wrote:
Am 03.03.2015 um 19:31 schrieb Deepak Shetty:
[...]
For us security is very critical, as the performance is too. The
first solution via ganesha is not what we prefer (to use CephFS
via p9 and NFS would not
...@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2015 9:07:36 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila
Am 27.02.2015 um 01:04 schrieb Sage Weil:
[sorry for ceph-devel double-post, forgot to include
openstack-dev]
Hi everyone,
The online Ceph Developer Summit is next week[1
Am 27.02.2015 um 01:04 schrieb Sage Weil:
[sorry for ceph-devel double-post, forgot to include
openstack-dev]
Hi everyone,
The online Ceph Developer Summit is next week[1] and among other
things we'll be talking about how to support CephFS in Manila. At
a high level, there are basically
[sorry for ceph-devel double-post, forgot to include openstack-dev]
Hi everyone,
The online Ceph Developer Summit is next week[1] and among other things
we'll be talking about how to support CephFS in Manila. At a high level,
there are basically two paths:
1) Ganesha + the CephFS FSAL driver
13 matches
Mail list logo
