Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Timeline for the rest of the Juno release

2014-06-25 Thread John Garbutt
Seems like we all agree on the basic idea here, which is great. I think just not concentrating on nova-spec reviews is fine, at least, it is the simplest way to implement the freeze (as Russell pointed out). I so worry about setting the right expectations for the poor souls who's specs might

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Timeline for the rest of the Juno release

2014-06-25 Thread Day, Phil
Discussing at the meet-up if fine with me -Original Message- From: Michael Still [mailto:mi...@stillhq.com] Sent: 25 June 2014 00:48 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Timeline for the rest of the Juno release Your

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Timeline for the rest of the Juno release

2014-06-24 Thread Day, Phil
Hi Michael, Not sure I understand the need for a gap between Juno Spec approval freeze (Jul 10th) and K opens for spec proposals (Sep 4th).I can understand that K specs won't get approved in that period, and may not get much feedback from the cores - but I don't see the harm in letting

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Timeline for the rest of the Juno release

2014-06-24 Thread Michael Still
Phil -- I really want people to focus their efforts on fixing bugs in that period was the main thing. The theory was if we encouraged people to work on specs for the next release, then they'd be distracted from fixing the bugs we need fixed in J. Cheers, Michael On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:08 PM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Timeline for the rest of the Juno release

2014-06-24 Thread Russell Bryant
On 06/24/2014 07:35 AM, Michael Still wrote: Phil -- I really want people to focus their efforts on fixing bugs in that period was the main thing. The theory was if we encouraged people to work on specs for the next release, then they'd be distracted from fixing the bugs we need fixed in J.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Timeline for the rest of the Juno release

2014-06-24 Thread Anne Gentle
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 06/24/2014 07:35 AM, Michael Still wrote: Phil -- I really want people to focus their efforts on fixing bugs in that period was the main thing. The theory was if we encouraged people to work on specs for the next

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Timeline for the rest of the Juno release

2014-06-24 Thread Russell Bryant
On 06/24/2014 08:56 AM, Anne Gentle wrote: On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com mailto:rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 06/24/2014 07:35 AM, Michael Still wrote: Phil -- I really want people to focus their efforts on fixing bugs in that period

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Timeline for the rest of the Juno release

2014-06-24 Thread Day, Phil
-Original Message- From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com] Sent: 24 June 2014 13:08 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Timeline for the rest of the Juno release On 06/24/2014 07:35 AM, Michael Still wrote: Phil -- I really want

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Timeline for the rest of the Juno release

2014-06-24 Thread Michael Still
Your comments are fair. I think perhaps at this point we should defer discussion of the further away deadlines until the mid cycle meetup -- that will give us a chance to whiteboard the flow for that period of the release. Or do you really want to lock this down now? Michael On Wed, Jun 25,