On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
On 9/16/2014 1:01 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Sep 15, 2014 8:31 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/15/2014 08:07 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2014-09-15 17:59:10
On 9/16/2014 1:01 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Sep 15, 2014 8:31 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/15/2014 08:07 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2014-09-15 17:59:10 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote:
[...]
Sometimes it's pretty hard to determine
And if u can also prove NP = P u get 1 million dollars[1, 2]
Let me know when u got the proof,
Thanks much,
[1] http://www.claymath.org/millenium-problems/p-vs-np-problem
[2]
http://www.claymath.org/millennium-problems/millennium-prize-problems
-Josh
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Jeremy
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 07:30:26AM +1000, Michael Still wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/15/2014 05:42 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 07:07:13AM +1000, Michael Still wrote:
Just an observation from the last week
I think bug days are a good idea. We've had them sporadically in the
past, but never weekly. We stopped mostly because people stopped
showing up.
If we think we have critical mass again, or if it makes more sense to
run one during the RC period, then let's do it.
So... Who would show up for a
On 9/16/14, 11:12 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 07:30:26AM +1000, Michael Still wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 09/15/2014 05:42 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 07:07:13AM
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 06:29:53PM +1000, Michael Still wrote:
I think bug days are a good idea. We've had them sporadically in the
past, but never weekly. We stopped mostly because people stopped
showing up.
If we think we have critical mass again, or if it makes more sense to
run one
Michael Still wrote:
Yes, that was my point. I don't mind us debating how to rearrange
hypervisor drivers. However, if we think that will solve all our
problems we are confused.
So, how do we get people to start taking bugs / gate failures more seriously?
I think we need to build a
On 09/16/2014 05:44 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Michael Still wrote:
Yes, that was my point. I don't mind us debating how to rearrange
hypervisor drivers. However, if we think that will solve all our
problems we are confused.
So, how do we get people to start taking bugs / gate failures more
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 06:29:53PM +1000, Michael Still wrote:
I think bug days are a good idea. We've had them sporadically in the
past, but never weekly. We stopped mostly because people stopped
showing up.
If we think we have critical mass again, or if it makes more sense to
run one
On 09/16/2014 04:29 AM, Michael Still wrote:
I think bug days are a good idea. We've had them sporadically in the
past, but never weekly. We stopped mostly because people stopped
showing up.
If we think we have critical mass again, or if it makes more sense to
run one during the RC period, then
On 09/16/2014 04:12 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 07:30:26AM +1000, Michael Still wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/15/2014 05:42 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 07:07:13AM +1000, Michael Still
On 09/16/2014 09:39 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 09/16/2014 04:12 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 07:30:26AM +1000, Michael Still wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 09/15/2014 05:42 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sun, Sep
On Sep 15, 2014 8:31 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/15/2014 08:07 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2014-09-15 17:59:10 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote:
[...]
Sometimes it's pretty hard to determine whether something in the
E-R check page is due to something in the infra scripts,
On 09/13/2014 11:07 PM, Michael Still wrote:
Just an observation from the last week or so...
The biggest problem nova faces at the moment isn't code review latency.
Our biggest problem is failing to fix our bugs so that the gate is
reliable. The number of rechecks we've done in the last week
On 09/14/2014 12:27 AM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
Michael,
I am so glad that you started this topic.
I really like idea of of taking a pause with features and concentrating
on improvement of current code base.
Even if the 1 k open bugs https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova are vital
issue,
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 07:07:13AM +1000, Michael Still wrote:
Just an observation from the last week or so...
The biggest problem nova faces at the moment isn't code review latency. Our
biggest problem is failing to fix our bugs so that the gate is reliable.
The number of rechecks we've
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
Unfortunately the reliability of the gate systems has the highest negative
impact on productivity right at the point in the dev cycle where we need
it to have the least impact too.
Agreed.
However, my instinct is
On 09/15/2014 05:42 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 07:07:13AM +1000, Michael Still wrote:
Just an observation from the last week or so...
The biggest problem nova faces at the moment isn't code review latency. Our
biggest problem is failing to fix our bugs so that the
On 09/15/2014 05:42 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 07:07:13AM +1000, Michael Still wrote:
Just an observation from the last week or so...
The biggest problem nova faces at the moment isn't code review latency. Our
biggest problem is failing to fix our bugs so that the
On 09/15/2014 04:01 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
On 09/13/2014 11:07 PM, Michael Still wrote:
Just an observation from the last week or so...
The biggest problem nova faces at the moment isn't code review latency.
Our biggest problem is failing to fix our bugs so that the gate is
reliable. The
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/15/2014 05:42 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 07:07:13AM +1000, Michael Still wrote:
Just an observation from the last week or so...
The biggest problem nova faces at the moment isn't code
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 09/15/2014 05:42 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 07:07:13AM +1000, Michael Still wrote:
Just an observation from the
On 09/15/2014 05:52 PM, Brant Knudson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com
mailto:mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
mailto:rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/15/2014 05:42 AM, Daniel
On 09/15/2014 05:30 PM, Michael Still wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/15/2014 05:42 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 07:07:13AM +1000, Michael Still wrote:
Just an observation from the last week or so...
The biggest
Sean,
I have tabs opened to:
http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/gate.html
http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/data/uncategorized.html
and periodically catch up on openstack-qa on IRC as well, i just did
not realize this wsgi gate bug was hurting the gate this much.
So, could we
On 2014-09-15 17:59:10 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote:
[...]
Sometimes it's pretty hard to determine whether something in the
E-R check page is due to something in the infra scripts, some
transient issue in the upstream CI platform (or part of it), or
actually a bug in one or more of the
On 09/15/2014 08:07 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2014-09-15 17:59:10 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote:
[...]
Sometimes it's pretty hard to determine whether something in the
E-R check page is due to something in the infra scripts, some
transient issue in the upstream CI platform (or part of it),
Just an observation from the last week or so...
The biggest problem nova faces at the moment isn't code review latency. Our
biggest problem is failing to fix our bugs so that the gate is reliable.
The number of rechecks we've done in the last week to try and land code is
truly startling.
I know
Michael,
I am so glad that you started this topic.
I really like idea of of taking a pause with features and concentrating on
improvement of current code base.
Even if the 1 k open bugs https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova are vital issue,
there are other things that could be addressed to improve
30 matches
Mail list logo
