On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 11:19 +0200, Radomir Dopieralski wrote:
> On 06/05/2014 10:59 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>
> >> If I'm late to the party and the only one that this is news to, that is
> >> fine. Sixteen additional repos seems like a lot of additional reviews
> >> will be needed.
> >
> > One
On 06/05/2014 10:59 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>> If I'm late to the party and the only one that this is news to, that is
>> fine. Sixteen additional repos seems like a lot of additional reviews
>> will be needed.
>
> One slightly odd thing about this is that these repos are managed by
> horizon-
On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 15:29 -0400, Anita Kuno wrote:
> On 05/28/2014 08:54 AM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > we plan to finally do the split in this cycle, and I started some
> > preparations for that. I also started to prepare a detailed plan for the
> > whole operation, as it see
On 05/31/2014 11:13 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2014-05-29 20:55:01 + (+), Lyle, David wrote:
[...]
There are several more xstatic packages that horizon will pull in that are
maintained outside openstack. The packages added are only those that did
not have existing xstatic packages. The
On 05/31/2014 11:13 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2014-05-29 20:55:01 + (+), Lyle, David wrote:
> [...]
>> There are several more xstatic packages that horizon will pull in that are
>> maintained outside openstack. The packages added are only those that did
>> not have existing xstatic pac
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 09:13:35PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> I'll admit that my Web development expertise is probably almost 20
> years stale at this point, so forgive me if this is a silly
> question: what is the reasoning against working with the upstreams
> who do not yet distribute needed
On 2014-05-29 20:55:01 + (+), Lyle, David wrote:
[...]
> There are several more xstatic packages that horizon will pull in that are
> maintained outside openstack. The packages added are only those that did
> not have existing xstatic packages. These packages will be updated very
> sparingl
On 05/29/2014 08:40 PM, Gabriel Hurley wrote:
>> we could have a poll for the name.
>> Gabriel, would you like to run that?
>
> I can run that if you like, though it might be more official coming from the
> PTL. ;-)
I'm sure that David is reading this and that he will tell us when
anything we ar
and tagging from horizon-ptl:
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/95716/4/modules/openstack_project/files/g
>> errit/acls/stackforge/xstatic.config
>>
>> Anita.
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Anita Kuno [mailto:ante...@anteaya.info]
&
/acls/stackforge/xstatic.config
>
>Anita.
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Anita Kuno [mailto:ante...@anteaya.info]
>>> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 12:30 PM
>>> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon]
no [mailto:ante...@anteaya.info]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 12:30 PM
>> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][infra] Plan for the splitting of
>> Horizon
>> into two repositories
>>
>> On 05/28/2014 08:54 AM
uno [mailto:ante...@anteaya.info]
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 12:30 PM
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][infra] Plan for the splitting of
> Horizon
> into two repositories
>
> On 05/28/2014 08:54 AM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote:
> &g
On 05/28/2014 08:54 AM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we plan to finally do the split in this cycle, and I started some
> preparations for that. I also started to prepare a detailed plan for the
> whole operation, as it seems to be a rather big endeavor.
>
> You can view and amend the p
> I didn't realize it would violate Django community's conventions, can you
> point to where they are documented?
There's no single document that says "you must name this way", but if you look
at all the most popular django packages, they all follow a similar trend.
The Django tutorial does actu
On 05/28/2014 10:03 PM, Gabriel Hurley wrote:
> It's sort of a silly point, but as someone who would likely consume the
> split-off package outside of the OpenStack context, please give it a
proper
> name instead of "django_horizon". The module only works in Django, the
name
> adds both clutter and
l Message-
> > From: Radomir Dopieralski [mailto:openst...@sheep.art.pl]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 5:55 AM
> > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Subject: [openstack-dev] [horizon][infra] Plan for the splitting of
> Horizon into
&
the progress as it goes.
All the best,
- Gabriel
> -Original Message-
> From: Radomir Dopieralski [mailto:openst...@sheep.art.pl]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 5:55 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [horizon][in
On 05/28/2014 02:54 PM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote:
Hello,
we plan to finally do the split in this cycle, and I started some
preparations for that. I also started to prepare a detailed plan for the
whole operation, as it seems to be a rather big endeavor.
You can view and amend the plan at the e
Hello,
we plan to finally do the split in this cycle, and I started some
preparations for that. I also started to prepare a detailed plan for the
whole operation, as it seems to be a rather big endeavor.
You can view and amend the plan at the etherpad at:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/horizon-
19 matches
Mail list logo
