Hi,
The general discussion is going in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/148318/.
My opinions on the following specific topics inline.
2015-02-18 0:04 GMT+09:00 Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
response was huge so far :) so to add more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/17/2015 04:19 PM, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
My opinions inline.
On 17 February 2015 at 16:04, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com
mailto:ihrac...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
response was huge so far :) so to add more traction, I have a
My opinions inline.
On 17 February 2015 at 16:04, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
response was huge so far :) so to add more traction, I have a question
for everyone. Let's assume we want to move entry points for all
services
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
response was huge so far :) so to add more traction, I have a question
for everyone. Let's assume we want to move entry points for all
services and agents into neutron/cmd/... If so,
- - Do we want all existing tools stored in the path to be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/13/2015 02:33 AM, Kevin Benton wrote:
Why did the services fail with the stdlib patched? Are they
incompatible with eventlet?
It's not like *service entry points* are not ready for neutron.* to be
monkey patched, but tools around it (flake8
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
there were some moves recently to make monkey patching strategy sane
in neutron.
This was triggered by some bugs found when interacting with external
oslo libraries [1], and a cross project spec to make eventlet usage
sane throughout the
Why did the services fail with the stdlib patched? Are they incompatible
with eventlet?
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
there were some moves recently to make monkey patching strategy sane
