On Mon, Aug 11 2014, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Sounds great, I've been wondering why
https://github.com/stackforge/tooz/commit/f3e11e40f9871f8328 happened/merged
(maybe it should be changed?).
For the simple reason that there's people wanting to use a lock
distributed against several processes
Sure, thats great as to why a feature like it might exist (and I think
such a feature is great to have, for cases when a bigger *distributed*
system isn't desired).
Just the one there taken from lockutils has some issues that IMHO I
think tooz would be better to avoid for the time-being
On Tue, Aug 12 2014, Joshua Harlow wrote:
[…]
What do u think about waiting until pylockfile is ready and avoiding 1-4
from above? At least if taskflow uses tooz I surely don't want taskflow to
have to deal with #1-4 (which it will inherit from tooz if taskflow starts
to use tooz by the very
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
One question from me:
Will there be later fixes to remove oslo.config dependency/usage from
oslo.concurrency?
I still don't understand how oslo.concurrency can be used as a library
with the configuration being set
On 08/11/2014 01:02 PM, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
One question from me:
Will there be later fixes to remove oslo.config dependency/usage from
oslo.concurrency?
I still don't understand how oslo.concurrency can be used
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com
wrote:
On 08/11/2014 01:02 PM, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Joshua Harlow
harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
One question from me:
Will there be later fixes to remove oslo.config dependency/usage
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Yuriy Taraday yorik@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com
wrote:
One question from me:
Will there be later fixes to remove oslo.config dependency/usage
from oslo.concurrency?
I still don't understand how
On Aug 11, 2014, at 3:26 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Yuriy Taraday yorik@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
One question from me:
Will there be later fixes to remove
On 08/11/2014 02:20 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com
wrote:
On 08/11/2014 01:02 PM, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Joshua Harlow
harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
One question from me:
Will there be
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
On Aug 11, 2014, at 3:26 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Yuriy Taraday
yorik@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Joshua Harlow
One question from me:
Will there be later fixes to remove oslo.config dependency/usage from
oslo.concurrency?
I still don't understand how oslo.concurrency can be used as a library
with the configuration being set in a static manner via oslo.config
(let's use the example of `lock_path` @
Hello, oslo cores.
I've finished polishing up oslo.concurrency repo at [0] - please take a
look at it. I used my new version of graduate.sh [1] to generate it, so
history looks a bit different from what you might be used to.
I've made as little changes as possible, so there're still some steps
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Yuriy Taraday yorik@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, oslo cores.
I've finished polishing up oslo.concurrency repo at [0] - please take a
look at it. I used my new version of graduate.sh [1] to generate it, so
history looks a bit different from what you might be
LGTM. Plenty of things I could add to your list, but they're all
post-import. :-)
-Ben
On 08/07/2014 01:58 PM, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
Hello, oslo cores.
I've finished polishing up oslo.concurrency repo at [0] - please take a
look at it. I used my new version of graduate.sh [1] to generate
14 matches
Mail list logo
