Re: [openstack-dev] [stable-maint] acceptable changes for stable/icehouse

2015-01-06 Thread Thierry Carrez
John Griffith wrote:
 On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Jay S. Bryant
 jsbry...@electronicjungle.net wrote:
 All,

 We have been getting a number of non-security patches proposed to
 stable/icehouse for Cinder.  The cores were discussing what was ok to put
 into icehouse at this point in time and couldn't agree as to whether we were
 at the point of only accepting security changes.

 Appreciate advice on this topic.

 
 Hey Jay,
 
 Thanks for raising this, my understanding was that we were in fact
 security only mode now for Icehouse.  That being said I completely
 forgot that it's been that long already and I let some reviews slip
 myself just today in fact.  Thanks for pointing it out.

Icehouse is now 9-month old, so it is in phase II support (only
critical bugfixes and security patches are acceptable).

Reference: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StableBranch#Support_phases

In case of doubt, you can ask stable-maint-core people for advice:
https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/530,members

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [stable-maint] acceptable changes for stable/icehouse

2015-01-05 Thread Jay S. Bryant

All,

We have been getting a number of non-security patches proposed to 
stable/icehouse for Cinder.  The cores were discussing what was ok to 
put into icehouse at this point in time and couldn't agree as to whether 
we were at the point of only accepting security changes.


Appreciate advice on this topic.

Jay

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [stable-maint] acceptable changes for stable/icehouse

2015-01-05 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Jay S. Bryant
jsbry...@electronicjungle.net wrote:
 All,

 We have been getting a number of non-security patches proposed to
 stable/icehouse for Cinder.  The cores were discussing what was ok to put
 into icehouse at this point in time and couldn't agree as to whether we were
 at the point of only accepting security changes.

 Appreciate advice on this topic.

 Jay

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Hey Jay,

Thanks for raising this, my understanding was that we were in fact
security only mode now for Icehouse.  That being said I completely
forgot that it's been that long already and I let some reviews slip
myself just today in fact.  Thanks for pointing it out.

John

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev