On 31 January 2015 at 10:25, Gregory Haynes wrote:
> Excerpts from Gregory Haynes's message of 2015-01-30 18:28:19 +:
>> Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message of 2015-01-30 10:29:05 +:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I've had a couple of discussions lately causing me to question $subject,
>> > and i
Excerpts from Gregory Haynes's message of 2015-01-30 18:28:19 +:
> Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message of 2015-01-30 10:29:05 +:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've had a couple of discussions lately causing me to question $subject,
> > and in particular what our expectations are around tripleo-heat
Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message of 2015-01-30 10:29:05 +:
> Hi all,
>
> I've had a couple of discussions lately causing me to question $subject,
> and in particular what our expectations are around tripleo-heat-templates
> working with older (e.g non trunk) versions of Heat in the undercl
Hi all,
I've had a couple of discussions lately causing me to question $subject,
and in particular what our expectations are around tripleo-heat-templates
working with older (e.g non trunk) versions of Heat in the undercloud.
For example, in [1], we're discussing merging a template-level workarou
