Re: [openstack-dev] [zaqar] [marconi] Juno Performance Testing (Round 1)

2014-09-02 Thread Kurt Griffiths
Sure thing, I’ll add that to my list of things to try in “Round 2” (coming later this week). On 8/28/14, 9:05 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/26/2014 05:41 PM, Kurt Griffiths wrote: * uWSGI + gevent * config: http://paste.openstack.org/show/100592/

Re: [openstack-dev] [zaqar] [marconi] Juno Performance Testing (Round 1)

2014-08-28 Thread Jay Pipes
On 08/26/2014 05:41 PM, Kurt Griffiths wrote: * uWSGI + gevent * config: http://paste.openstack.org/show/100592/ * app.py: http://paste.openstack.org/show/100593/ Hi Kurt! Thanks for posting the benchmark configuration and results. Good stuff :) I'm curious

Re: [openstack-dev] [zaqar] [marconi] Juno Performance Testing (Round 1)

2014-08-27 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 08/26/2014 11:41 PM, Kurt Griffiths wrote: Hi folks, I ran some rough benchmarks to get an idea of where Zaqar currently stands re latency and throughput for Juno. These results are by no means conclusive, but I wanted to publish what I had so far for the sake of discussion. Note that

[openstack-dev] [zaqar] [marconi] Juno Performance Testing (Round 1)

2014-08-26 Thread Kurt Griffiths
Hi folks, I ran some rough benchmarks to get an idea of where Zaqar currently stands re latency and throughput for Juno. These results are by no means conclusive, but I wanted to publish what I had so far for the sake of discussion. Note that these tests do not include results for our new Redis

Re: [openstack-dev] [zaqar] [marconi] Juno Performance Testing (Round 1)

2014-08-26 Thread Kurt Griffiths
Correction: there were 25 workers per producer process, not 10. On 8/26/14, 4:41 PM, Kurt Griffiths kurt.griffi...@rackspace.com wrote: ### Event Broadcasting (Balanced) ### This test uses the same number of producers and consumers, but note that the observers are still listing (up to) 5