[openstack-dev] 答复: Re: 答复: Re: [neutron][AdvancedServices] Confusion about the solution of the service chaining!
Hi Sumit, About the GBP plugin, I cann't found the implementation of the network_service_policy API in the GBP plugin driver, network_service_policy as I understand it corresponds to the network services( such as FWaas, LBaas) in neutron, I don't konw if I am understanding this right. And do have you some document about how to implement the network_service_policy in GBP, for example, using the neutron network service ? BR Alan 发件人: Sumit Naiksatam 收件人: lv.erc...@zte.com.cn, 抄送: OpenStack Development Mailing List 日期: 2015/01/09 04:08 主题: Re: 答复: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][AdvancedServices] Confusion about the solution of the service chaining! Hi Alan, On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 9:54 PM, wrote: > Hi Sumit, > > thanks for your reply, one more question, > > If I just using the 'group-based-policy-service-chaining' to developing the > service chaining feuture, how to map the network service in the neutron to > the GBP model, because all the network service we implemented are based on > neutron model, but the 'group-based-policy-service-chaining' setup the > service chaining based on GBP model, so how can we setup the service > chaining for network services based the neutron model using the > 'group-based-policy-service-chaining' ? The current model and implementation leverage the Neutron services as is (the model is actually agnostic of the service definition/implementation). Will be happy to further discuss this, feel free to ping on #openstack-gbp. Thanks, ~Sumit. > > BR > Alan > > > > > 发件人: Sumit Naiksatam > 收件人: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > , > 日期: 2015/01/08 10:46 > 主题:Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][AdvancedServices] Confusion about > the solution of the service chaining! > > > > > Hi Alan, > > Responses inline... > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 4:25 AM, wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I want to confirm that how is the project about "Neutron Services >> Insertion, >> Chaining, and Steering" going, I found that all the code implementation >> about service insertion、service chaining and traffic steering list in >> JunoPlan were Abandoned . >> >> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/AdvancedServices/JunoPlan >> >> and I also found that we have a new project about GBP and >> group-based-policy-service-chaining be located at: >> >> >> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/group-based-policy/+spec/group-based-policy-abstraction >> >> >> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/group-based-policy/+spec/group-based-policy-service-chaining >> >> so I'm confused with solution of the service chaining. >> > > Yes, the above two blueprints have been implemented and are available > for consumption today as a part of the Group-based Policy codebase and > release. The GBP model uses a policy trigger to drive the service > composition and can accommodate different rendering policies like > realization using NFV SFC. > >> We are developing the service chaining feature, so we need to know which >> one >> is the neutron's choice. > > It would be great if you can provide feedback on the current > implementation, and perhaps participate and contribute as well. > >> Are the blueprints about the service insertion, >> service chaining and traffic steering list in JunoPlan all Abandoned ? >> > > Some aspects of this are perhaps a good fit in Neutron and others are > not. We are looking forward to continuing the discussion on this topic > on the areas which are potentially a good fit for Neutron (we have had > this discussion before as well). > >> BR >> Alan >> >> >> >> >> ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail >> (and >> any attachment transmitted herewith) is privileged and confidential and is >> intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). If you are not an >> intended recipient, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other >> dissemination or use of the information contained is strictly prohibited. >> If you have received this mail in error, please delete it and notify us >> immediately. >> >> >> >> ___ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail (and > any attachment transmitted herewith) is privileged and confidential and is > intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). If you are not an > intended recipient, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other > dissemination or use of the information contained is strictly
[openstack-dev] 答复: RE: 答复: Re: [neutron][AdvancedServices] Confusion about the solution of the service chaining!
Hi Virkram, Glad to hear that. Have you implemented that? BR Alan 发件人: Vikram Choudhary 收件人: "lv.erc...@zte.com.cn" , 抄送: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" , "sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com" , Dhruv Dhody , "Dongfeng (C)" , Kalyankumar Asangi 日期: 2015/01/12 13:05 主题: RE: [openstack-dev] 答复: Re: [neutron][AdvancedServices] Confusion about the solution of the service chaining! Hi Alan, We have also proposed an idea about SFC. For more details you can refer to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/146315/ Thanks Vikram -Original Message- From: Sumit Naiksatam [mailto:sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com] Sent: 09 January 2015 01:39 To: lv.erc...@zte.com.cn Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] 答复: Re: [neutron][AdvancedServices] Confusion about the solution of the service chaining! Hi Alan, On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 9:54 PM, wrote: > Hi Sumit, > > thanks for your reply, one more question, > > If I just using the 'group-based-policy-service-chaining' to > developing the service chaining feuture, how to map the network > service in the neutron to the GBP model, because all the network > service we implemented are based on neutron model, but the > 'group-based-policy-service-chaining' setup the service chaining based > on GBP model, so how can we setup the service chaining for network > services based the neutron model using the 'group-based-policy-service-chaining' ? The current model and implementation leverage the Neutron services as is (the model is actually agnostic of the service definition/implementation). Will be happy to further discuss this, feel free to ping on #openstack-gbp. Thanks, ~Sumit. > > BR > Alan > > > > > 发件人: Sumit Naiksatam > 收件人: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > , > 日期: 2015/01/08 10:46 > 主题:Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][AdvancedServices] Confusion about > the solution of the service chaining! > > > > > Hi Alan, > > Responses inline... > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 4:25 AM, wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I want to confirm that how is the project about "Neutron Services >> Insertion, Chaining, and Steering" going, I found that all the code >> implementation about service insertion、service chaining and traffic >> steering list in JunoPlan were Abandoned . >> >> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/AdvancedServices/JunoPlan >> >> and I also found that we have a new project about GBP and >> group-based-policy-service-chaining be located at: >> >> >> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/group-based-policy/+spec/group-based >> -policy-abstraction >> >> >> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/group-based-policy/+spec/group-based >> -policy-service-chaining >> >> so I'm confused with solution of the service chaining. >> > > Yes, the above two blueprints have been implemented and are available > for consumption today as a part of the Group-based Policy codebase and > release. The GBP model uses a policy trigger to drive the service > composition and can accommodate different rendering policies like > realization using NFV SFC. > >> We are developing the service chaining feature, so we need to know >> which one is the neutron's choice. > > It would be great if you can provide feedback on the current > implementation, and perhaps participate and contribute as well. > >> Are the blueprints about the service insertion, service chaining and >> traffic steering list in JunoPlan all Abandoned ? >> > > Some aspects of this are perhaps a good fit in Neutron and others are > not. We are looking forward to continuing the discussion on this topic > on the areas which are potentially a good fit for Neutron (we have had > this discussion before as well). > >> BR >> Alan >> >> >> >> >> ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this >> mail (and any attachment transmitted herewith) is privileged and >> confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the >> addressee(s). If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure, >> reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of the >> information contained is strictly prohibited. >> If you have received this mail in error, please delete it and notify >> us immediately. >> >> >> >> ___ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this > mail (and any attachment transmitted herewith) is privileged and > confidential and is
