Original Message -
>> From: "Pasquale Porreca"
>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>>
>> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 3:24:03 AM
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] [devstack] About _member_ role
>>
- Original Message -
> From: "Pasquale Porreca"
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 3:24:03 AM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] [devstack] About _member_ role
>
>
ale Porreca"
>>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>>>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, 17 February, 2015 9:07:14 PM
>>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] [devstack] About _member_ role
>>>
>>> I proposed a
;
>> Sent: Tuesday, 17 February, 2015 9:07:14 PM
>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] [devstack] About _member_ role
>>
>> I proposed a fix for a bug in devstack
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/156527/ caused by the fact the role
>> _member_ was not an
- Original Message -
> From: "Pasquale Porreca"
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, 17 February, 2015 9:07:14 PM
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] [devstack] About _member_ role
>
&g
I proposed a fix for a bug in devstack
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/156527/ caused by the fact the role
_member_ was not anymore created due to a recent change.
But why is the existence of _member_ role necessary, even if it is not
necessary to be used? Is this a know/wanted feature or a bug b
