Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas
Thus, it get approved and added to the etherpad of doom. Michael On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > I looked at the Tempest change, it should be landable. I'll sign up for > review on these, as the rest of the patches are pretty straight forward. > > -Sean > > On 09/05/2014 06:32 PM, Michael Still wrote: >> So, this one is looking for one more core. Any takers? >> >> Michael >> >> On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Day, Phil wrote: >>> The corresponding Tempest change is also ready to roll (thanks to >>> Ken'inci): https://review.openstack.org/#/c/112474/1 so its kind of just >>> a question of getting the sequence right. >>> >>> Phil >>> >>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net] >>>> Sent: 05 September 2014 17:05 >>>> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas >>>> >>>> On 09/05/2014 11:28 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: >>>>> 2014-09-05 21:56 GMT+09:00 Day, Phil : >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd like to ask for a FFE for the 3 patchsets that implement quotas for >>>> server groups. >>>>>> >>>>>> Server groups (which landed in Icehouse) provides a really useful anti- >>>> affinity filter for scheduling that a lot of customers woudl like to use, >>>> but >>>> without some form of quota control to limit the amount of anti-affinity its >>>> impossible to enable it as a feature in a public cloud. >>>>>> >>>>>> The code itself is pretty simple - the number of files touched is a side- >>>> effect of having three V2 APIs that report quota information and the need >>>> to >>>> protect the change in V2 via yet another extension. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104957/ >>>>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116073/ >>>>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116079/ >>>>> >>>>> I am happy to sponsor this work. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Ken'ichi ohmichi >>>>> >>>>> ___ >>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>>>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>>> >>>> These look like they are also all blocked by Tempest because it's changing >>>> return chunks. How does one propose to resolve that, as I don't think there >>>> is an agreed path up there for to get this into a passing state from my >>>> reading >>>> of the reviews. >>>> >>>> -Sean >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sean Dague >>>> http://dague.net >>>> >>>> ___ >>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >>> ___ >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> >> > > > -- > Sean Dague > http://dague.net > > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Rackspace Australia ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas
I looked at the Tempest change, it should be landable. I'll sign up for review on these, as the rest of the patches are pretty straight forward. -Sean On 09/05/2014 06:32 PM, Michael Still wrote: > So, this one is looking for one more core. Any takers? > > Michael > > On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Day, Phil wrote: >> The corresponding Tempest change is also ready to roll (thanks to Ken'inci): >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/112474/1 so its kind of just a question >> of getting the sequence right. >> >> Phil >> >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net] >>> Sent: 05 September 2014 17:05 >>> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas >>> >>> On 09/05/2014 11:28 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: >>>> 2014-09-05 21:56 GMT+09:00 Day, Phil : >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to ask for a FFE for the 3 patchsets that implement quotas for >>> server groups. >>>>> >>>>> Server groups (which landed in Icehouse) provides a really useful anti- >>> affinity filter for scheduling that a lot of customers woudl like to use, >>> but >>> without some form of quota control to limit the amount of anti-affinity its >>> impossible to enable it as a feature in a public cloud. >>>>> >>>>> The code itself is pretty simple - the number of files touched is a side- >>> effect of having three V2 APIs that report quota information and the need to >>> protect the change in V2 via yet another extension. >>>>> >>>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104957/ >>>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116073/ >>>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116079/ >>>> >>>> I am happy to sponsor this work. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Ken'ichi ohmichi >>>> >>>> ___ >>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >>> These look like they are also all blocked by Tempest because it's changing >>> return chunks. How does one propose to resolve that, as I don't think there >>> is an agreed path up there for to get this into a passing state from my >>> reading >>> of the reviews. >>> >>> -Sean >>> >>> -- >>> Sean Dague >>> http://dague.net >>> >>> ___ >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> ___ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > -- Sean Dague http://dague.net ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas
So, this one is looking for one more core. Any takers? Michael On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Day, Phil wrote: > The corresponding Tempest change is also ready to roll (thanks to Ken'inci): > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/112474/1 so its kind of just a question of > getting the sequence right. > > Phil > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net] >> Sent: 05 September 2014 17:05 >> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas >> >> On 09/05/2014 11:28 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: >> > 2014-09-05 21:56 GMT+09:00 Day, Phil : >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I'd like to ask for a FFE for the 3 patchsets that implement quotas for >> server groups. >> >> >> >> Server groups (which landed in Icehouse) provides a really useful anti- >> affinity filter for scheduling that a lot of customers woudl like to use, but >> without some form of quota control to limit the amount of anti-affinity its >> impossible to enable it as a feature in a public cloud. >> >> >> >> The code itself is pretty simple - the number of files touched is a side- >> effect of having three V2 APIs that report quota information and the need to >> protect the change in V2 via yet another extension. >> >> >> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104957/ >> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116073/ >> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116079/ >> > >> > I am happy to sponsor this work. >> > >> > Thanks >> > Ken'ichi ohmichi >> > >> > ___ >> > OpenStack-dev mailing list >> > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> These look like they are also all blocked by Tempest because it's changing >> return chunks. How does one propose to resolve that, as I don't think there >> is an agreed path up there for to get this into a passing state from my >> reading >> of the reviews. >> >> -Sean >> >> -- >> Sean Dague >> http://dague.net >> >> ___ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Rackspace Australia ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas
The corresponding Tempest change is also ready to roll (thanks to Ken'inci): https://review.openstack.org/#/c/112474/1 so its kind of just a question of getting the sequence right. Phil > -Original Message- > From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net] > Sent: 05 September 2014 17:05 > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas > > On 09/05/2014 11:28 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: > > 2014-09-05 21:56 GMT+09:00 Day, Phil : > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'd like to ask for a FFE for the 3 patchsets that implement quotas for > server groups. > >> > >> Server groups (which landed in Icehouse) provides a really useful anti- > affinity filter for scheduling that a lot of customers woudl like to use, but > without some form of quota control to limit the amount of anti-affinity its > impossible to enable it as a feature in a public cloud. > >> > >> The code itself is pretty simple - the number of files touched is a side- > effect of having three V2 APIs that report quota information and the need to > protect the change in V2 via yet another extension. > >> > >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104957/ > >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116073/ > >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116079/ > > > > I am happy to sponsor this work. > > > > Thanks > > Ken'ichi ohmichi > > > > ___ > > OpenStack-dev mailing list > > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > These look like they are also all blocked by Tempest because it's changing > return chunks. How does one propose to resolve that, as I don't think there > is an agreed path up there for to get this into a passing state from my > reading > of the reviews. > > -Sean > > -- > Sean Dague > http://dague.net > > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas
On 09/05/2014 11:28 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: > 2014-09-05 21:56 GMT+09:00 Day, Phil : >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to ask for a FFE for the 3 patchsets that implement quotas for >> server groups. >> >> Server groups (which landed in Icehouse) provides a really useful >> anti-affinity filter for scheduling that a lot of customers woudl like to >> use, but without some form of quota control to limit the amount of >> anti-affinity its impossible to enable it as a feature in a public cloud. >> >> The code itself is pretty simple - the number of files touched is a >> side-effect of having three V2 APIs that report quota information and the >> need to protect the change in V2 via yet another extension. >> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104957/ >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116073/ >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116079/ > > I am happy to sponsor this work. > > Thanks > Ken'ichi ohmichi > > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev These look like they are also all blocked by Tempest because it's changing return chunks. How does one propose to resolve that, as I don't think there is an agreed path up there for to get this into a passing state from my reading of the reviews. -Sean -- Sean Dague http://dague.net ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas
2014-09-05 21:56 GMT+09:00 Day, Phil : > Hi, > > I'd like to ask for a FFE for the 3 patchsets that implement quotas for > server groups. > > Server groups (which landed in Icehouse) provides a really useful > anti-affinity filter for scheduling that a lot of customers woudl like to > use, but without some form of quota control to limit the amount of > anti-affinity its impossible to enable it as a feature in a public cloud. > > The code itself is pretty simple - the number of files touched is a > side-effect of having three V2 APIs that report quota information and the > need to protect the change in V2 via yet another extension. > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104957/ > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116073/ > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116079/ I am happy to sponsor this work. Thanks Ken'ichi ohmichi ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas
I'm willing to sponsor this Chris — Sent from Mailbox On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Day, Phil wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to ask for a FFE for the 3 patchsets that implement quotas for > server groups. > Server groups (which landed in Icehouse) provides a really useful > anti-affinity filter for scheduling that a lot of customers woudl like to > use, but without some form of quota control to limit the amount of > anti-affinity its impossible to enable it as a feature in a public cloud. > The code itself is pretty simple - the number of files touched is a > side-effect of having three V2 APIs that report quota information and the > need to protect the change in V2 via yet another extension. > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104957/ > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116073/ > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116079/ > Phil >> -Original Message- >> From: Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui [mailto:sahid.ferdja...@redhat.com] >> Sent: 04 September 2014 13:42 >> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE request serial-ports >> >> Hello, >> >> I would like to request a FFE for 4 changesets to complete the blueprint >> serial-ports. >> >> Topic on gerrit: >> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+br >> anch:master+topic:bp/serial-ports,n,z >> >> Blueprint on launchpad.net: >> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/serial-ports >> >> They have already been approved but didn't get enough time to be merged >> by the gate. >> >> Sponsored by: >> Daniel Berrange >> Nikola Dipanov >> >> s. >> >> ___ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas
+1 for ServerGroup quotas. It's been a while since this feature is discussed and approved. As a public cloud provider we really want to get ServerGroup into production. However, without quotas it is more harm than gain. Since ServerGroup (and even its novaclient's command) is merged in Icehouse, IMO it is reasonable to secure it in Juno. Otherwise it's a waste. And as Phil said it is not much a change. Toan > -Message d'origine- > De : Day, Phil [mailto:philip@hp.com] > Envoyé : vendredi 5 septembre 2014 14:57 > À : OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Objet : [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas > > Hi, > > I'd like to ask for a FFE for the 3 patchsets that implement quotas for server > groups. > > Server groups (which landed in Icehouse) provides a really useful anti-affinity > filter for scheduling that a lot of customers woudl like to use, but without some > form of quota control to limit the amount of anti-affinity its impossible to > enable it as a feature in a public cloud. > > The code itself is pretty simple - the number of files touched is a side-effect of > having three V2 APIs that report quota information and the need to protect the > change in V2 via yet another extension. > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104957/ > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116073/ > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116079/ > > Phil > > > -Original Message- > > From: Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui [mailto:sahid.ferdja...@redhat.com] > > Sent: 04 September 2014 13:42 > > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > > Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE request serial-ports > > > > Hello, > > > > I would like to request a FFE for 4 changesets to complete the > > blueprint serial-ports. > > > > Topic on gerrit: > > > > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+br > > anch:master+topic:bp/serial-ports,n,z > > > > Blueprint on launchpad.net: > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/serial-ports > > > > They have already been approved but didn't get enough time to be > > merged by the gate. > > > > Sponsored by: > > Daniel Berrange > > Nikola Dipanov > > > > s. > > > > ___ > > OpenStack-dev mailing list > > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas
Hi, I'd like to ask for a FFE for the 3 patchsets that implement quotas for server groups. Server groups (which landed in Icehouse) provides a really useful anti-affinity filter for scheduling that a lot of customers woudl like to use, but without some form of quota control to limit the amount of anti-affinity its impossible to enable it as a feature in a public cloud. The code itself is pretty simple - the number of files touched is a side-effect of having three V2 APIs that report quota information and the need to protect the change in V2 via yet another extension. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104957/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116073/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116079/ Phil > -Original Message- > From: Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui [mailto:sahid.ferdja...@redhat.com] > Sent: 04 September 2014 13:42 > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE request serial-ports > > Hello, > > I would like to request a FFE for 4 changesets to complete the blueprint > serial-ports. > > Topic on gerrit: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+br > anch:master+topic:bp/serial-ports,n,z > > Blueprint on launchpad.net: > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/serial-ports > > They have already been approved but didn't get enough time to be merged > by the gate. > > Sponsored by: > Daniel Berrange > Nikola Dipanov > > s. > > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
