Re: [openstack-dev] [API] Do we need to specify follow the HTTP RFCs?

2015-03-26 Thread Everett Toews
Top posting the relevant review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/161946/ Everett On Feb 13, 2015, at 8:44 AM, michael mccune m...@redhat.commailto:m...@redhat.com wrote: On 02/12/2015 02:20 PM, Ryan Brown wrote: +1 I think the way to go would be: We suggest (pretty please) that you comply

Re: [openstack-dev] [API] Do we need to specify follow the HTTP RFCs?

2015-02-13 Thread michael mccune
On 02/12/2015 02:20 PM, Ryan Brown wrote: +1 I think the way to go would be: We suggest (pretty please) that you comply with RFCs 7230-5 and if you have any questions ask us. Also here are some examples of usage that is/isn't RFC compliant for clarity +1, i like the idea of pointing readers

Re: [openstack-dev] [API] Do we need to specify follow the HTTP RFCs?

2015-02-13 Thread Chris Dent
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015, Ian Cordasco wrote: So that particular problem you mention is an issue with the Routes package. It assumes you will define very (method, route) that you wish to handle and it’ll 404 everything else (because no definition was found). If we used better (slightly higher level)

Re: [openstack-dev] [API] Do we need to specify follow the HTTP RFCs?

2015-02-12 Thread Ryan Brown
On 02/12/2015 01:08 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 02/12/2015 01:01 PM, Chris Dent wrote: I meant to get to this in today's meeting[1] but we ran out of time and based on the rest of the conversation it was likely to lead to a spiral of different interpretations, so I thought I'd put it up here.

Re: [openstack-dev] [API] Do we need to specify follow the HTTP RFCs?

2015-02-12 Thread Jay Pipes
On 02/12/2015 01:01 PM, Chris Dent wrote: I meant to get to this in today's meeting[1] but we ran out of time and based on the rest of the conversation it was likely to lead to a spiral of different interpretations, so I thought I'd put it up here. $SUBJECT says it all: When writing guidelines

Re: [openstack-dev] [API] Do we need to specify follow the HTTP RFCs?

2015-02-12 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 2/12/15, 12:01, Chris Dent chd...@redhat.com wrote: I meant to get to this in today's meeting[1] but we ran out of time and based on the rest of the conversation it was likely to lead to a spiral of different interpretations, so I thought I'd put it up here. $SUBJECT says it all: When