Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA

2014-07-12 Thread Clark, Robert Graham
Just a quick update on this, I started work on a basic plugin but quickly
found I was running out of time.

I handed over to Tim Kelsey, who had a few concerns about the plumbing
required to make this work, I’ve CC’d him on this thread.

-Rob





On 28/06/2014 08:03, John Wood john.w...@rackspace.com wrote:

Hello folks,

Just trying clarify things...are we talking about a dev plugin to
generate asymmetric keys, or else one to mimic working with a CA to
create SSL certificates via workflow (so including firing off
certificate-generated events, for example)?

If we are talking about the former, then you would be interested in a
plugin that implements a method such as this one:
https://github.com/openstack/barbican/blob/master/barbican/plugin/interfac
e/secret_store.py#L167

If you are talking about the latter, then that would be a different type
of plugin that handles CA workflows, as proposed in this blueprint:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/99221/

Thanks,
John


From: Nathan Kinder [nkin...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 9:43 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions);
a...@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA

On 06/25/2014 02:42 PM, Clark, Robert Graham wrote:

 Ok, I’ll hack together a dev plugin over the next week or so, other work
 notwithstanding. Where possible I’ll probably borrow from the dog tag
 plugin as I’ve not looked closely at the plugin infrastructure in
Barbican
 recently.

My understanding is that Barbican's plugin interface is currently in the
midst of a redesign, so be careful not to copy something that will be
changing shortly.

-NGK


 Is this something you’d like a blueprint for first?

 -Rob




 On 25/06/2014 18:30, Ade Lee a...@redhat.com wrote:

 I think the plan is to create a Dogtag instance so that integration
 tests can be run whenever code is checked in (both with and without a
 Dogtag backend).

 Dogtag isn't that difficult to deploy, but being a Java app, it does
 bring in a set of dependencies that developers may not want to deal
with
 for basic/ devstack testing.

 So, I agree that a simple OpenSSL CA may be useful at least initially
as
 a 'dev' plugin.

 Ade

 On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 16:31 +, Jarret Raim wrote:
 Rob,

 RedHat is working on a backend for Dogtag, which should be capable of
 doing something like that. That's still a bit hard to deploy, so it
 would
 make sense to extend the 'dev' plugin to include those features.


 Jarret


 On 6/24/14, 4:04 PM, Clark, Robert Graham robert.cl...@hp.com
wrote:

 Yeah pretty much.

 That¹s something I¹d be interested to work on, if work isn¹t ongoing
 already.

 -Rob





 On 24/06/2014 18:57, John Wood john.w...@rackspace.com wrote:

 Hello Robert,

 I would actually hope we have a self-contained certificate plugin
 implementation that runs 'out of the box' to enable certificate
 generation orders to be evaluated and demo-ed on local boxes.

 Is this what you were thinking though?

 Thanks,
 John



 
 From: Clark, Robert Graham [robert.cl...@hp.com]
 Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:36 AM
 To: OpenStack List
 Subject: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA

 Hi all,

 I¹m sure this has been discussed somewhere and I¹ve just missed it.

 Is there any value in creating a basic ŒCA¹ and plugin to satisfy
 tests/integration in Barbican? I¹m thinking something that probably
 performs OpenSSL certificate operations itself, ugly but perhaps
 useful
 for some things?

 -Rob

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack

Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA

2014-06-28 Thread John Wood
Hello folks,

Just trying clarify things...are we talking about a dev plugin to generate 
asymmetric keys, or else one to mimic working with a CA to create SSL 
certificates via workflow (so including firing off certificate-generated 
events, for example)?  

If we are talking about the former, then you would be interested in a plugin 
that implements a method such as this one: 
https://github.com/openstack/barbican/blob/master/barbican/plugin/interface/secret_store.py#L167

If you are talking about the latter, then that would be a different type of 
plugin that handles CA workflows, as proposed in this blueprint: 
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/99221/

Thanks,
John


From: Nathan Kinder [nkin...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 9:43 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); 
a...@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA

On 06/25/2014 02:42 PM, Clark, Robert Graham wrote:

 Ok, I’ll hack together a dev plugin over the next week or so, other work
 notwithstanding. Where possible I’ll probably borrow from the dog tag
 plugin as I’ve not looked closely at the plugin infrastructure in Barbican
 recently.

My understanding is that Barbican's plugin interface is currently in the
midst of a redesign, so be careful not to copy something that will be
changing shortly.

-NGK


 Is this something you’d like a blueprint for first?

 -Rob




 On 25/06/2014 18:30, Ade Lee a...@redhat.com wrote:

 I think the plan is to create a Dogtag instance so that integration
 tests can be run whenever code is checked in (both with and without a
 Dogtag backend).

 Dogtag isn't that difficult to deploy, but being a Java app, it does
 bring in a set of dependencies that developers may not want to deal with
 for basic/ devstack testing.

 So, I agree that a simple OpenSSL CA may be useful at least initially as
 a 'dev' plugin.

 Ade

 On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 16:31 +, Jarret Raim wrote:
 Rob,

 RedHat is working on a backend for Dogtag, which should be capable of
 doing something like that. That's still a bit hard to deploy, so it
 would
 make sense to extend the 'dev' plugin to include those features.


 Jarret


 On 6/24/14, 4:04 PM, Clark, Robert Graham robert.cl...@hp.com wrote:

 Yeah pretty much.

 That¹s something I¹d be interested to work on, if work isn¹t ongoing
 already.

 -Rob





 On 24/06/2014 18:57, John Wood john.w...@rackspace.com wrote:

 Hello Robert,

 I would actually hope we have a self-contained certificate plugin
 implementation that runs 'out of the box' to enable certificate
 generation orders to be evaluated and demo-ed on local boxes.

 Is this what you were thinking though?

 Thanks,
 John



 
 From: Clark, Robert Graham [robert.cl...@hp.com]
 Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:36 AM
 To: OpenStack List
 Subject: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA

 Hi all,

 I¹m sure this has been discussed somewhere and I¹ve just missed it.

 Is there any value in creating a basic ŒCA¹ and plugin to satisfy
 tests/integration in Barbican? I¹m thinking something that probably
 performs OpenSSL certificate operations itself, ugly but perhaps
 useful
 for some things?

 -Rob

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA

2014-06-26 Thread Clark, Robert Graham

On 26/06/2014 03:43, Nathan Kinder nkin...@redhat.com wrote:



On 06/25/2014 02:42 PM, Clark, Robert Graham wrote:
 
 Ok, I’ll hack together a dev plugin over the next week or so, other work
 notwithstanding. Where possible I’ll probably borrow from the dog tag
 plugin as I’ve not looked closely at the plugin infrastructure in
Barbican
 recently.

My understanding is that Barbican's plugin interface is currently in the
midst of a redesign, so be careful not to copy something that will be
changing shortly.

-NGK

Good point, thanks Nathan, I’ll try to keep the ‘do-poi-stuff’ bit nicely
decoupled from the ‘barbican’ bit.


 
 Is this something you’d like a blueprint for first?
 
 -Rob
 
 
 
 
 On 25/06/2014 18:30, Ade Lee a...@redhat.com wrote:
 
 I think the plan is to create a Dogtag instance so that integration
 tests can be run whenever code is checked in (both with and without a
 Dogtag backend).

 Dogtag isn't that difficult to deploy, but being a Java app, it does
 bring in a set of dependencies that developers may not want to deal
with
 for basic/ devstack testing.

 So, I agree that a simple OpenSSL CA may be useful at least initially
as
 a 'dev' plugin.

 Ade

 On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 16:31 +, Jarret Raim wrote:
 Rob,

 RedHat is working on a backend for Dogtag, which should be capable of
 doing something like that. That's still a bit hard to deploy, so it
 would
 make sense to extend the 'dev' plugin to include those features.


 Jarret


 On 6/24/14, 4:04 PM, Clark, Robert Graham robert.cl...@hp.com
wrote:

 Yeah pretty much.

 That¹s something I¹d be interested to work on, if work isn¹t ongoing
 already.

 -Rob





 On 24/06/2014 18:57, John Wood john.w...@rackspace.com wrote:

 Hello Robert,

 I would actually hope we have a self-contained certificate plugin
 implementation that runs 'out of the box' to enable certificate
 generation orders to be evaluated and demo-ed on local boxes.

 Is this what you were thinking though?

 Thanks,
 John



 
 From: Clark, Robert Graham [robert.cl...@hp.com]
 Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:36 AM
 To: OpenStack List
 Subject: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA

 Hi all,

 I¹m sure this has been discussed somewhere and I¹ve just missed it.

 Is there any value in creating a basic ŒCA¹ and plugin to satisfy
 tests/integration in Barbican? I¹m thinking something that probably
 performs OpenSSL certificate operations itself, ugly but perhaps
 useful
 for some things?

 -Rob

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
 
 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
 

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA

2014-06-25 Thread Ade Lee
I think the plan is to create a Dogtag instance so that integration
tests can be run whenever code is checked in (both with and without a
Dogtag backend).

Dogtag isn't that difficult to deploy, but being a Java app, it does
bring in a set of dependencies that developers may not want to deal with
for basic/ devstack testing.

So, I agree that a simple OpenSSL CA may be useful at least initially as
a 'dev' plugin.

Ade

On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 16:31 +, Jarret Raim wrote:
 Rob,
 
 RedHat is working on a backend for Dogtag, which should be capable of
 doing something like that. That's still a bit hard to deploy, so it would
 make sense to extend the 'dev' plugin to include those features.
 
 
 Jarret
 
 
 On 6/24/14, 4:04 PM, Clark, Robert Graham robert.cl...@hp.com wrote:
 
 Yeah pretty much.
 
 That¹s something I¹d be interested to work on, if work isn¹t ongoing
 already.
 
 -Rob
 
 
 
 
 
 On 24/06/2014 18:57, John Wood john.w...@rackspace.com wrote:
 
 Hello Robert,
 
 I would actually hope we have a self-contained certificate plugin
 implementation that runs 'out of the box' to enable certificate
 generation orders to be evaluated and demo-ed on local boxes.
 
 Is this what you were thinking though?
 
 Thanks,
 John
 
 
 
 
 From: Clark, Robert Graham [robert.cl...@hp.com]
 Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:36 AM
 To: OpenStack List
 Subject: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA
 
 Hi all,
 
 I¹m sure this has been discussed somewhere and I¹ve just missed it.
 
 Is there any value in creating a basic ŒCA¹ and plugin to satisfy
 tests/integration in Barbican? I¹m thinking something that probably
 performs OpenSSL certificate operations itself, ugly but perhaps useful
 for some things?
 
 -Rob
 
 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
 
 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
 
 
 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA

2014-06-25 Thread Clark, Robert Graham

Ok, I’ll hack together a dev plugin over the next week or so, other work
notwithstanding. Where possible I’ll probably borrow from the dog tag
plugin as I’ve not looked closely at the plugin infrastructure in Barbican
recently.

Is this something you’d like a blueprint for first?

-Rob




On 25/06/2014 18:30, Ade Lee a...@redhat.com wrote:

I think the plan is to create a Dogtag instance so that integration
tests can be run whenever code is checked in (both with and without a
Dogtag backend).

Dogtag isn't that difficult to deploy, but being a Java app, it does
bring in a set of dependencies that developers may not want to deal with
for basic/ devstack testing.

So, I agree that a simple OpenSSL CA may be useful at least initially as
a 'dev' plugin.

Ade

On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 16:31 +, Jarret Raim wrote:
 Rob,
 
 RedHat is working on a backend for Dogtag, which should be capable of
 doing something like that. That's still a bit hard to deploy, so it
would
 make sense to extend the 'dev' plugin to include those features.
 
 
 Jarret
 
 
 On 6/24/14, 4:04 PM, Clark, Robert Graham robert.cl...@hp.com wrote:
 
 Yeah pretty much.
 
 That¹s something I¹d be interested to work on, if work isn¹t ongoing
 already.
 
 -Rob
 
 
 
 
 
 On 24/06/2014 18:57, John Wood john.w...@rackspace.com wrote:
 
 Hello Robert,
 
 I would actually hope we have a self-contained certificate plugin
 implementation that runs 'out of the box' to enable certificate
 generation orders to be evaluated and demo-ed on local boxes.
 
 Is this what you were thinking though?
 
 Thanks,
 John
 
 
 
 
 From: Clark, Robert Graham [robert.cl...@hp.com]
 Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:36 AM
 To: OpenStack List
 Subject: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA
 
 Hi all,
 
 I¹m sure this has been discussed somewhere and I¹ve just missed it.
 
 Is there any value in creating a basic ŒCA¹ and plugin to satisfy
 tests/integration in Barbican? I¹m thinking something that probably
 performs OpenSSL certificate operations itself, ugly but perhaps
useful
 for some things?
 
 -Rob
 
 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
 
 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
 
 
 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA

2014-06-25 Thread Nathan Kinder


On 06/25/2014 02:42 PM, Clark, Robert Graham wrote:
 
 Ok, I’ll hack together a dev plugin over the next week or so, other work
 notwithstanding. Where possible I’ll probably borrow from the dog tag
 plugin as I’ve not looked closely at the plugin infrastructure in Barbican
 recently.

My understanding is that Barbican's plugin interface is currently in the
midst of a redesign, so be careful not to copy something that will be
changing shortly.

-NGK

 
 Is this something you’d like a blueprint for first?
 
 -Rob
 
 
 
 
 On 25/06/2014 18:30, Ade Lee a...@redhat.com wrote:
 
 I think the plan is to create a Dogtag instance so that integration
 tests can be run whenever code is checked in (both with and without a
 Dogtag backend).

 Dogtag isn't that difficult to deploy, but being a Java app, it does
 bring in a set of dependencies that developers may not want to deal with
 for basic/ devstack testing.

 So, I agree that a simple OpenSSL CA may be useful at least initially as
 a 'dev' plugin.

 Ade

 On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 16:31 +, Jarret Raim wrote:
 Rob,

 RedHat is working on a backend for Dogtag, which should be capable of
 doing something like that. That's still a bit hard to deploy, so it
 would
 make sense to extend the 'dev' plugin to include those features.


 Jarret


 On 6/24/14, 4:04 PM, Clark, Robert Graham robert.cl...@hp.com wrote:

 Yeah pretty much.

 That¹s something I¹d be interested to work on, if work isn¹t ongoing
 already.

 -Rob





 On 24/06/2014 18:57, John Wood john.w...@rackspace.com wrote:

 Hello Robert,

 I would actually hope we have a self-contained certificate plugin
 implementation that runs 'out of the box' to enable certificate
 generation orders to be evaluated and demo-ed on local boxes.

 Is this what you were thinking though?

 Thanks,
 John



 
 From: Clark, Robert Graham [robert.cl...@hp.com]
 Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:36 AM
 To: OpenStack List
 Subject: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA

 Hi all,

 I¹m sure this has been discussed somewhere and I¹ve just missed it.

 Is there any value in creating a basic ŒCA¹ and plugin to satisfy
 tests/integration in Barbican? I¹m thinking something that probably
 performs OpenSSL certificate operations itself, ugly but perhaps
 useful
 for some things?

 -Rob

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
 
 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
 

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA

2014-06-24 Thread John Wood
Hello Robert,

I would actually hope we have a self-contained certificate plugin 
implementation that runs 'out of the box' to enable certificate generation 
orders to be evaluated and demo-ed on local boxes. 

Is this what you were thinking though?

Thanks,
John




From: Clark, Robert Graham [robert.cl...@hp.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:36 AM
To: OpenStack List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA

Hi all,

I’m sure this has been discussed somewhere and I’ve just missed it.

Is there any value in creating a basic ‘CA’ and plugin to satisfy 
tests/integration in Barbican? I’m thinking something that probably performs 
OpenSSL certificate operations itself, ugly but perhaps useful for some things?

-Rob

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA

2014-06-24 Thread Clark, Robert Graham
Yeah pretty much.

That¹s something I¹d be interested to work on, if work isn¹t ongoing
already.

-Rob





On 24/06/2014 18:57, John Wood john.w...@rackspace.com wrote:

Hello Robert,

I would actually hope we have a self-contained certificate plugin
implementation that runs 'out of the box' to enable certificate
generation orders to be evaluated and demo-ed on local boxes.

Is this what you were thinking though?

Thanks,
John




From: Clark, Robert Graham [robert.cl...@hp.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:36 AM
To: OpenStack List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Barebones CA

Hi all,

I¹m sure this has been discussed somewhere and I¹ve just missed it.

Is there any value in creating a basic ŒCA¹ and plugin to satisfy
tests/integration in Barbican? I¹m thinking something that probably
performs OpenSSL certificate operations itself, ugly but perhaps useful
for some things?

-Rob

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev