On 04/11/16 01:16, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03 2016, Adrian Turjak wrote:
>
>> I'd need to double check exactly what query it is, but it effectively
>> amounts to:
>> "List all instance metric samples where project_id is and timestamp
>> is in time range -"
>>
>> The time range is an
On 02/11/16 08:10 PM, Adrian Turjak wrote:
>
> On 03/11/16 03:01, gordon chung wrote:
>> gnocchi captures the state of a resource and it's history. this is
>> accessible by looking at resource history. i'm not entirely sure if that
>> handles your case, may you could provide the queries you use
On Thu, Nov 03 2016, Maxime Belanger wrote:
Hi Maxime,
> We had this project of our own for a couple years and it was not meant to
> replace Ceilometer at all. For our billing use case, yes it did replace
> Ceilometer because scaling issues. We just wanted to propose it to the
> community as a
On Thu, Nov 03 2016, Adrian Turjak wrote:
> I'd need to double check exactly what query it is, but it effectively
> amounts to:
> "List all instance metric samples where project_id is and timestamp
> is in time range -"
>
> The time range is an hour + leadin from last hour to catch the last
>
te solution than CloudKitty + Gnocchi but
> suites our needs for now.
>
> Maxime
>
>
> From: Raghunath D <raghunat...@tcs.com>
> Sent: October 25, 2016 5:32:13 AM
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-
On 03/11/16 03:01, gordon chung wrote:
> gnocchi captures the state of a resource and it's history. this is
> accessible by looking at resource history. i'm not entirely sure if that
> handles your case, may you could provide the queries you use and we
> could figure out equivalent gnocchi
udKitty + Gnocchi but
> suites our needs for now.
>
> Maxime
>
>
> From: Raghunath D <raghunat...@tcs.com>
> Sent: October 25, 2016 5:32:13 AM
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer]: Instance
a less complete solution than CloudKitty + Gnocchi but suites
our needs for now.
Maxime
From: Raghunath D <raghunat...@tcs.com>
Sent: October 25, 2016 5:32:13 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer]: Instance cr
On 02/11/16 01:39 AM, Adrian Turjak wrote:
> Been vaguely following this thread and I have a question.
>
> Just to confirm, as I haven't touched ceilometer code in ages, the
> instance metric still exists? Or at least something like it?
it sort of exists currently. we don't build it from
Been vaguely following this thread and I have a question.
Just to confirm, as I haven't touched ceilometer code in ages, the
instance metric still exists? Or at least something like it?
We're currently using ceilometer as the data collection for our billing,
and the instance metric is our
That's correct.
We can have meters only for those things which we can measure like cpu,
memory etc.
If we want to keep a count of instance creation and deletion, you will need
to monitor the events and look for specific event types like
compute.instance.create.end or compute.instance.delete.end.
On 01/11/16 05:30 AM, Raghunath D wrote:
> My requirement is to get sample/counter with "instance" name ,with
> event_type *compute.instance.**
we don't build instance meter anymore because it's not a meter as it's
not measuring anything.
--
gord
>
>
> -Ganpat Agarwal <gans.develo...@gmail.com> wrote: -
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> From: Ganpat Agarwal <gans.develo...@gmail.com>
Ganpat Agarwal <gans.develo...@gmail.com> wrote: -
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> From: Ganpat Agarwal <gans.develo...@gmail.com>
> Date: 10/27/2016 12:02PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ce
t Agarwal <gans.develo...@gmail.com>
Date: 10/27/2016 12:02PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer]: Instance creation and deletion
metrics in ceilometer !
Hi Raghunath,
I am not able to understand your use case for compute.instance.* events.
You are trying to catch the instance star
evelo...@gmail.com> wrote: -
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> From: Ganpat Agarwal <gans.develo...@gmail.com>
> Date: 10/25/2016 09:32PM
>
> Subject: Re: [opens
t for usage questions)"
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
From: Ganpat Agarwal <gans.develo...@gmail.com>
Date: 10/25/2016 09:32PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer]: Instance creation and deletion
metrics in ceilometer !
Hi Raghunath,
You can look at t
Agarwal <gans.develo...@gmail.com> wrote: -
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> From: Ganpat Agarwal <gans.develo...@gmail.com>
> Date: 10/25/2016 05:05PM
> Subject: Re: [ope
-Ganpat Agarwal <gans.develo...@gmail.com> wrote: -
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
From: Ganpat Agarwal <gans.develo...@gmail.com>
Date: 10/25/2016 05:05PM
Subject: Re:
Hi,
I am able to get event notifications on kafka by applying these
configurations:
nova.conf
instance_usage_audit = True
instance_usage_audit_period = hour
notify_on_state_change = vm_and_task_state
notification_driver = messagingv2
Restart nova compute service
ceilometer.conf
[event]
Hi ,
Can some one please suggest how to instance notifications in ceilometer.
With Best Regards
Raghunath Dudyala
Tata Consultancy Services Limited
Mailto: raghunat...@tcs.com
Website: http://www.tcs.com
Experience certainty. IT Services
21 matches
Mail list logo
