Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Documentation Process changed

2014-10-09 Thread Dmitry Pyzhov
We definitely need to assign these bugs to the fuel-docs team. And there is a good point from Alexandra Fedorova that commit message needs to have enough information for tech writer. And reviewers should not merge fixes that do not apply this rule. Otherwise we will end up with new bottlenecks.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Documentation Process changed

2014-10-09 Thread Dmitry Borodaenko
Filtering bugs by tags works fine in advanced search, the only problem is that you can't combine it with filtering by releases (since that's broken in advanced search and you have to use milestone page for that). On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Dmitry Pyzhov dpyz...@mirantis.com wrote: We

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Documentation Process changed

2014-10-08 Thread Dmitry Borodaenko
At the moment OpenStack infrastructure doesn't allow to customize the bugs it creates, we should propose a patch at some point to implement that. When we do, I think we should assign such bugs automatically to fuel-docs team. I don't think we should separate user and dev docs bugs, we're working

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Documentation Process changed

2014-10-08 Thread Mike Scherbakov
Thanks Dmitry, let's try to go this way and correct process if needed when we get first results. Where is your 80% dev vs user docs figure coming from? it's no more than my guess. We will see real number over time. On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Dmitry Borodaenko dborodae...@mirantis.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Documentation Process changed

2014-10-08 Thread Sergii Golovatiuk
Hi, Dima, that's really good approach. Mike, technical writer may ask developer and assign bug to him/her if bug impacts developer documentation only. Best Regards, Sergii Golovatiuk On 08 Oct 2014, at 21:08, Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.com wrote: Thanks Dmitry, let's try to go