Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of ISO

2016-09-19 Thread Vladimir Kozhukalov 
Ruijing,

In a nutshell, the guide would be
0) install vanilla Centos 7
1) install fuel-release package (it configures necessary yum repos)
wget
http://packages.fuel-infra.org/repositories/centos/master-centos7/snapshots/os-2016-09-19-093900/x86_64/Packages/fuel-release-10.0.0-1.mos6376.git.a8c98d0.noarch.rpm
rpm -Uvh fuel-release-10.0.0-1.mos6376.git.a8c98d0.noarch.rpm
2) install fuel-setup package
yum install fuel-setup
3) run bootstrap script (be aware, that bootstrap script reconfigures some
of system parameters)
/usr/sbin/bootstrap_admin_node.sh

I'll describe the whole procedure on the Fuel wiki page. Fuel deployment
procedure is to be improved in Ocata.

Regarding your previous question about docker image, we are not planning to
provide a single Fuel docker image (docker containers are not VMs).
Container is an isolated process and Fuel assumes we run multiple processes
(API, RPC, etc.). Given that, Fuel should be a set of docker containers. We
used to run Fuel in containers, but those were kind of mess when we ran
puppet when building images and we put those images inside rpms and inside
ISO. We definitely don't want to have something like this again. But if you
use Docker images that are built from pure Dockerfiles (not using puppet,
from source code) and publishing them on docker registry that could be a
way to provide development environment (for plugin developers it could be
super convenient). Yes, that was in our plans for Newton, but we didn't
manage to implement this. Maybe in Ocata.




Vladimir Kozhukalov

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Guo, Ruijing  wrote:

> Hi, Vladimir
>
>
>
> Any guide to install from rpm?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Ruijing
>
> *From:* Vladimir Kozhukalov [mailto:vkozhuka...@mirantis.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 16, 2016 4:58 PM
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of ISO
>
>
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> We finally have working custom deployment job that deploys Fuel admin node
> using online RPM repositories (not ISO) on vanilla Centos 7.0.
>
> Currently all Fuel system and deployment tests use ISO and we are planning
> to re-implement all these jobs (including BVT, SWARM, and Fuel CI jobs) to
> exclude ISO from the pipeline. That will allow us to get rid of ISO as our
> deliverable and instead rely totally on package repositories. Linux
> distributions like Ubuntu, Debian, RHEL, etc. are already delivered via
> ISO/qcow2/etc. images and we'd better stop reinventing a wheel and support
> our own ISO build code. That will allow us to make Fuel admin node
> deployment more flexible.
>
>
>
> I will infrom about our next steps here in the thread.
>
>
> Vladimir Kozhukalov
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of ISO

2016-09-19 Thread Guo, Ruijing 
Hi, Vladimir

Any guide to install from rpm?

Thanks,
-Ruijing
From: Vladimir Kozhukalov [mailto:vkozhuka...@mirantis.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 4:58 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 

Subject: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of ISO

Dear colleagues,
We finally have working custom deployment job that deploys Fuel admin node 
using online RPM repositories (not ISO) on vanilla Centos 7.0.

Currently all Fuel system and deployment tests use ISO and we are planning to 
re-implement all these jobs (including BVT, SWARM, and Fuel CI jobs) to exclude 
ISO from the pipeline. That will allow us to get rid of ISO as our deliverable 
and instead rely totally on package repositories. Linux distributions like 
Ubuntu, Debian, RHEL, etc. are already delivered via ISO/qcow2/etc. images and 
we'd better stop reinventing a wheel and support our own ISO build code. That 
will allow us to make Fuel admin node deployment more flexible.

I will infrom about our next steps here in the thread.

Vladimir Kozhukalov
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of ISO

2016-09-07 Thread Guo, Ruijing 
Congratuations. any plan to have fuel docker image?

From: Oleg Gelbukh [mailto:ogelb...@mirantis.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2016 4:28 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of ISO

Congratulations, Vladimir, that's a huge step in a right direction for Fuel.

--
Best regards,
Oleg Gelbukh

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Vladimir Kozhukalov 
<vkozhuka...@mirantis.com<mailto:vkozhuka...@mirantis.com>> wrote:
Dear colleagues,
I'm glad to announce that we have working BVT jobs on Fuel CI that do not use 
ISO but instead deploy Fuel admin node from packages onto vanilla Centos 7.
Please take a look at [1]. There are jobs '10.0.repos.*' [2], [3], [4].
We continue to work on re-implementing review jobs like this one [5] for 
example.


[1] https://ci.fuel-infra.org/view/BVT/
[2] https://ci.fuel-infra.org/view/BVT/job/10.0.repos.snapshot/
[3] https://ci.fuel-infra.org/view/BVT/job/10.0.repos.main.ubuntu.bvt_2/
[4] https://ci.fuel-infra.org/view/BVT/job/10.0.repos.main.ubuntu.smoke_neutron/
[5] 
https://ci.fuel-infra.org/job/master.fuel-astute.pkgs.ubuntu.review_astute_patched/



Vladimir Kozhukalov

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Roman Prykhodchenko 
<m...@romcheg.me<mailto:m...@romcheg.me>> wrote:
This is so awesome! Thanks!

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 4:30 PM Jay Pipes 
<jaypi...@gmail.com<mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 08/16/2016 04:58 AM, Vladimir Kozhukalov wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> We finally have working custom deployment job that deploys Fuel admin
> node using online RPM repositories (not ISO) on vanilla Centos 7.0.

Bravo! :)

> Currently all Fuel system and deployment tests use ISO and we are
> planning to re-implement all these jobs (including BVT, SWARM, and Fuel
> CI jobs) to exclude ISO from the pipeline. That will allow us to get rid
> of ISO as our deliverable and instead rely totally on package
> repositories. Linux distributions like Ubuntu, Debian, RHEL, etc. are
> already delivered via ISO/qcow2/etc. images and we'd better stop
> reinventing a wheel and support our own ISO build code. That will allow
> us to make Fuel admin node deployment more flexible.
>
> I will infrom about our next steps here in the thread.

Thanks, Vova, this is an excellent step forward for ease-of-use with Fuel.

Nice work,
-jay

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of ISO

2016-09-07 Thread Oleg Gelbukh 
Congratulations, Vladimir, that's a huge step in a right direction for Fuel.

--
Best regards,
Oleg Gelbukh

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Vladimir Kozhukalov <
vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote:

> Dear colleagues,
>
> I'm glad to announce that we have working BVT jobs on Fuel CI that do not
> use ISO but instead deploy Fuel admin node from packages onto vanilla
> Centos 7.
>
> Please take a look at [1]. There are jobs '10.0.repos.*' [2], [3], [4].
>
> We continue to work on re-implementing review jobs like this one [5] for
> example.
>
>
> [1] https://ci.fuel-infra.org/view/BVT/
> [2] https://ci.fuel-infra.org/view/BVT/job/10.0.repos.snapshot/
> [3] https://ci.fuel-infra.org/view/BVT/job/10.0.repos.main.ubuntu.bvt_2/
> [4] https://ci.fuel-infra.org/view/BVT/job/10.0.repos.main.
> ubuntu.smoke_neutron/
> [5] https://ci.fuel-infra.org/job/master.fuel-astute.pkgs.
> ubuntu.review_astute_patched/
>
>
>
>
> Vladimir Kozhukalov
>
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Roman Prykhodchenko  wrote:
>
>> This is so awesome! Thanks!
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 4:30 PM Jay Pipes  wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/16/2016 04:58 AM, Vladimir Kozhukalov wrote:
>>> > Dear colleagues,
>>> >
>>> > We finally have working custom deployment job that deploys Fuel admin
>>> > node using online RPM repositories (not ISO) on vanilla Centos 7.0.
>>>
>>> Bravo! :)
>>>
>>> > Currently all Fuel system and deployment tests use ISO and we are
>>> > planning to re-implement all these jobs (including BVT, SWARM, and Fuel
>>> > CI jobs) to exclude ISO from the pipeline. That will allow us to get
>>> rid
>>> > of ISO as our deliverable and instead rely totally on package
>>> > repositories. Linux distributions like Ubuntu, Debian, RHEL, etc. are
>>> > already delivered via ISO/qcow2/etc. images and we'd better stop
>>> > reinventing a wheel and support our own ISO build code. That will allow
>>> > us to make Fuel admin node deployment more flexible.
>>> >
>>> > I will infrom about our next steps here in the thread.
>>>
>>> Thanks, Vova, this is an excellent step forward for ease-of-use with
>>> Fuel.
>>>
>>> Nice work,
>>> -jay
>>>
>>> 
>>> __
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.op
>>> enstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>
>> 
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscrib
>> e
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of ISO

2016-09-07 Thread Vladimir Kozhukalov 
Dear colleagues,

I'm glad to announce that we have working BVT jobs on Fuel CI that do not
use ISO but instead deploy Fuel admin node from packages onto vanilla
Centos 7.

Please take a look at [1]. There are jobs '10.0.repos.*' [2], [3], [4].

We continue to work on re-implementing review jobs like this one [5] for
example.


[1] https://ci.fuel-infra.org/view/BVT/
[2] https://ci.fuel-infra.org/view/BVT/job/10.0.repos.snapshot/
[3] https://ci.fuel-infra.org/view/BVT/job/10.0.repos.main.ubuntu.bvt_2/
[4]
https://ci.fuel-infra.org/view/BVT/job/10.0.repos.main.ubuntu.smoke_neutron/
[5]
https://ci.fuel-infra.org/job/master.fuel-astute.pkgs.ubuntu.review_astute_patched/




Vladimir Kozhukalov

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Roman Prykhodchenko  wrote:

> This is so awesome! Thanks!
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 4:30 PM Jay Pipes  wrote:
>
>> On 08/16/2016 04:58 AM, Vladimir Kozhukalov wrote:
>> > Dear colleagues,
>> >
>> > We finally have working custom deployment job that deploys Fuel admin
>> > node using online RPM repositories (not ISO) on vanilla Centos 7.0.
>>
>> Bravo! :)
>>
>> > Currently all Fuel system and deployment tests use ISO and we are
>> > planning to re-implement all these jobs (including BVT, SWARM, and Fuel
>> > CI jobs) to exclude ISO from the pipeline. That will allow us to get rid
>> > of ISO as our deliverable and instead rely totally on package
>> > repositories. Linux distributions like Ubuntu, Debian, RHEL, etc. are
>> > already delivered via ISO/qcow2/etc. images and we'd better stop
>> > reinventing a wheel and support our own ISO build code. That will allow
>> > us to make Fuel admin node deployment more flexible.
>> >
>> > I will infrom about our next steps here in the thread.
>>
>> Thanks, Vova, this is an excellent step forward for ease-of-use with Fuel.
>>
>> Nice work,
>> -jay
>>
>> 
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:
>> unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of ISO

2016-09-01 Thread Roman Prykhodchenko 
This is so awesome! Thanks!

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 4:30 PM Jay Pipes  wrote:

> On 08/16/2016 04:58 AM, Vladimir Kozhukalov wrote:
> > Dear colleagues,
> >
> > We finally have working custom deployment job that deploys Fuel admin
> > node using online RPM repositories (not ISO) on vanilla Centos 7.0.
>
> Bravo! :)
>
> > Currently all Fuel system and deployment tests use ISO and we are
> > planning to re-implement all these jobs (including BVT, SWARM, and Fuel
> > CI jobs) to exclude ISO from the pipeline. That will allow us to get rid
> > of ISO as our deliverable and instead rely totally on package
> > repositories. Linux distributions like Ubuntu, Debian, RHEL, etc. are
> > already delivered via ISO/qcow2/etc. images and we'd better stop
> > reinventing a wheel and support our own ISO build code. That will allow
> > us to make Fuel admin node deployment more flexible.
> >
> > I will infrom about our next steps here in the thread.
>
> Thanks, Vova, this is an excellent step forward for ease-of-use with Fuel.
>
> Nice work,
> -jay
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of ISO

2016-08-16 Thread Jay Pipes 

On 08/16/2016 04:58 AM, Vladimir Kozhukalov wrote:

Dear colleagues,

We finally have working custom deployment job that deploys Fuel admin
node using online RPM repositories (not ISO) on vanilla Centos 7.0.


Bravo! :)


Currently all Fuel system and deployment tests use ISO and we are
planning to re-implement all these jobs (including BVT, SWARM, and Fuel
CI jobs) to exclude ISO from the pipeline. That will allow us to get rid
of ISO as our deliverable and instead rely totally on package
repositories. Linux distributions like Ubuntu, Debian, RHEL, etc. are
already delivered via ISO/qcow2/etc. images and we'd better stop
reinventing a wheel and support our own ISO build code. That will allow
us to make Fuel admin node deployment more flexible.

I will infrom about our next steps here in the thread.


Thanks, Vova, this is an excellent step forward for ease-of-use with Fuel.

Nice work,
-jay

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev