Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Migrate to Postrgresql 9

2014-04-22 Thread Mike Scherbakov
Ideally such things should land at the beginning of new release cycle, and definitely not after feature freeze. Let's make an exception, if it is very well tested by many on dev envs. If we make an exception, I suggest to switch it quickly - in order to have more time before release for testing,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Migrate to Postrgresql 9

2014-04-22 Thread Dmitry Pyzhov
I've created a ticket: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1311030 On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.comwrote: Ideally such things should land at the beginning of new release cycle, and definitely not after feature freeze. Let's make an exception, if it

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Migrate to Postrgresql 9

2014-04-21 Thread Jay Pipes
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 00:55 +0400, Dmitry Pyzhov wrote: We use postgresql 8 on master node right now. At some point we will have to migrate to 9th version. And database migration can became painful part of master node upgrade at that point. At the moment part of our developers use psql9 in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Migrate to Postrgresql 9

2014-04-21 Thread Dmitry Borodaenko
+++ We already use PostgreSQL 9 on some of our dev boxes, and Nailgun works fine in fake mode and unit tests, so the risk of upgrading it now is minimal. I agree with Dmitry P. that it will cost us more to postpone it and make that upgrade a part of Fuel upgrade. -DmitryB On Mon, Apr 21, 2014

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Migrate to Postrgresql 9

2014-04-21 Thread Vladimir Kuklin
+MAX_ULONG :-) On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:28 AM, Dmitry Borodaenko dborodae...@mirantis.com wrote: +++ We already use PostgreSQL 9 on some of our dev boxes, and Nailgun works fine in fake mode and unit tests, so the risk of upgrading it now is minimal. I agree with Dmitry P. that it will