Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-09 Thread Nikhil Komawar
From: Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2015 11:45 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations. On 3/8/15, 2:34 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-08 Thread Nikhil Komawar
: Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2015 11:45 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations. On 3/8/15, 2:34 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 07/03/15 23:16 +, Nikhil Komawar wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-08 Thread Flavio Percoco
7:15 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations. I like the idea of a 'core-member'. But, how are core-members different from core-reviewers? For instance, with core-reviewers it is very clear that these are folks you

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-08 Thread Gary Kotton
: Hemanth Makkapati hemanth.makkap...@rackspace.com Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 7:15 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations. I like the idea of a 'core-member'. But, how are core-members different from core-reviewers

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-07 Thread Nikhil Komawar
, at least for the time being! Cheers -Nikhil From: Hemanth Makkapati hemanth.makkap...@rackspace.com Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 7:15 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-06 Thread Hemanth Makkapati
. -Hemanth. From: Nikhil Komawar nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 4:04 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations. Thank you all for the input outside of the program

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-06 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com wrote: I like that idea. Can you start it out with Nova or Neutron’s guidelines? FYI, the core reviewer guidelines for Neutron are in-tree now [1], along with all of our other policies around operating in Neutron [2].

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-06 Thread Ian Cordasco
I like that idea. Can you start it out with Nova or Neutron’s guidelines? On 3/5/15, 17:38, Mikhail Fedosin mfedo...@mirantis.com wrote: I think yes, it does. But I mean that now we're writing a document called Glance Review Guidelines

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-06 Thread Nikhil Komawar
rotation in the following weeks. Hope it works! Regards, -Nikhil From: Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 12:45 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-06 Thread Ian Cordasco
: Friday, March 6, 2015 12:45 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations. On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com wrote: I like that idea. Can you start it out with Nova or Neutron’s

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-06 Thread Flavio Percoco
for taking care of this, Flavio Regards, -Nikhil From: Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 12:45 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations. On Fri

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-05 Thread Mikhail Fedosin
I think yes, it does. But I mean that now we're writing a document called Glance Review Guidelines https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Iia0BjQoXvry9XSbf30DRwQt--ODglw-ZTT_5RJabsI/edit?usp=sharing and it has a section For cores. It's easy to include some concrete rules there to add more clarity.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-05 Thread John Bresnahan
On 3/4/15 11:31 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Flavio Percoco wrote: [...] I personally don't think adding new cores without cleaning up that list is something healthy for our community, which is what we're trying to improve here. Therefore I'm still -2-W on adding new folks without removing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-05 Thread Thierry Carrez
Flavio Percoco wrote: [...] I personally don't think adding new cores without cleaning up that list is something healthy for our community, which is what we're trying to improve here. Therefore I'm still -2-W on adding new folks without removing non-active core members. It's also *extremely*

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-05 Thread Mikhail Fedosin
Yes, it's absolutely right. For example, Nova and Neutron have official rules for that: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/CoreTeam where it says: A member of the team may be removed at any time by the PTL. This is typically due to a drop off of involvement by the member such that they are no

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-05 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/05/2015 11:35 AM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: Yes, it's absolutely right. For example, Nova and Neutron have official rules for that: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/CoreTeam where it says: A member of the team may be removed at any time by

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-04 Thread Bhandaru, Malini K
-Original Message- From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 4:09 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: krag...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations. On 03/03/15 16:10 +, Nikhil Komawar

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-04 Thread Flavio Percoco
: Kuvaja, Erno kuv...@hp.com Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 9:48 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Daniel P. Berrange Cc: krag...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations. Nikhil, If I recall correctly this matter was discussed last time

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-04 Thread Louis Taylor
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 07:38:42AM -0430, Flavio Percoco wrote: I'm sorry but no. I don't think there's anything that requires extra patience than 2 (or even more) cycles without provaiding reviews or even any kind of active contribution. I personally don't think adding new cores without

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-04 Thread Kuvaja, Erno
From: Nikhil Komawar [mailto:nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 4:10 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Daniel P. Berrange Cc: krag...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations. If it was not clear in my

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-03 Thread Nikhil Komawar
kuv...@hp.com Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 9:48 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Daniel P. Berrange Cc: krag...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations. Nikhil, If I recall correctly this matter was discussed last time at the start

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-03 Thread Ian Cordasco
From: Kuvaja, Erno kuv...@hp.com Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 9:48 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Daniel P. Berrange Cc: krag...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations. Nikhil, If I recall correctly

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-03 Thread Kuvaja, Erno
...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations. +1 on both proposals: rotation is definitely a step in right direction. -- Regards, Alexander Tivelkov On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.commailto:berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 24

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-02 Thread Nikhil Komawar
From: Alexander Tivelkov ativel...@mirantis.com Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 7:26 AM To: Daniel P. Berrange; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: krag...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations. +1 on both