On 02/06/2014 09:14 AM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
Probably all PTLs could be asked to prepare initial report for
requirements like it was done last time for graduating projects.
Yes, that sounds reasonable and would likely help the process along.
--
Russell Bryant
On 02/06/2014 08:47 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Dina Belova wrote:
Perhaps we should start putting each project on the TC agenda for a
review of its current standing. For any gaps, I think we should set a
specific timeframe for when we expect these gaps to be filled.
Really good
On Feb 7, 2014, at 4:17 PM, Russell Bryant
rbry...@redhat.commailto:rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/06/2014 08:47 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Dina Belova wrote:
Perhaps we should start putting each project on the TC agenda for a
review of its current standing. For any gaps, I think we
Dina Belova wrote:
Perhaps we should start putting each project on the TC agenda for a
review of its current standing. For any gaps, I think we should set a
specific timeframe for when we expect these gaps to be filled.
Really good idea. New requirements are great, but frankly
I propose we do this in future TC meetings, time permitting. I
propose we start with projects where the PTL was also elected to the TC,
so that we give this new review's process some mileage.
+1, good idea
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote:
Dina
Probably all PTLs could be asked to prepare initial report for requirements
like it was done last time for graduating projects.
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Dina Belova dbel...@mirantis.com wrote:
I propose we do this in future TC meetings, time permitting. I
propose we start with projects
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
In the TC we have been going through a process to better define our
requirements for incubation and graduation to being an integrated
project. The current version can be found in the governance repo:
On 02/05/2014 02:31 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
mailto:rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
In the TC we have been going through a process to better define our
requirements for incubation and graduation to
On 02/06/2014 06:31 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 02/05/2014 02:31 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
mailto:rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
In the TC we have been going through a process to better define our
On 02/05/2014 10:38 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 02/06/2014 06:31 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 02/05/2014 02:31 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
mailto:rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
In the TC we have been going through
Perhaps we should start putting each project on the TC agenda for a
review of its current standing. For any gaps, I think we should set a
specific timeframe for when we expect these gaps to be filled.
Really good idea. New requirements are great, but frankly speaking not all
currently
11 matches
Mail list logo
