Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2015-01-09 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2015-01-09 14:57:21 -0800: On 08/01/15 05:39, Anant Patil wrote: 1. The stack was failing when there were single disjoint resources or just one resource in template. The graph did not include this resource due to a minor bug in dependency_names(). I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2015-01-09 Thread Zane Bitter
On 08/01/15 05:39, Anant Patil wrote: 1. The stack was failing when there were single disjoint resources or just one resource in template. The graph did not include this resource due to a minor bug in dependency_names(). I have added a test case and fix here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2015-01-08 Thread Anant Patil
On 08-Jan-15 16:09, Anant Patil wrote: On 16-Dec-14 09:41, Zane Bitter wrote: On 15/12/14 09:32, Anant Patil wrote: On 12-Dec-14 06:29, Zane Bitter wrote: On 11/12/14 01:14, Anant Patil wrote: On 04-Dec-14 10:49, Zane Bitter wrote: On 01/12/14 02:02, Anant Patil wrote: On

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2015-01-08 Thread Anant Patil
On 16-Dec-14 09:41, Zane Bitter wrote: On 15/12/14 09:32, Anant Patil wrote: On 12-Dec-14 06:29, Zane Bitter wrote: On 11/12/14 01:14, Anant Patil wrote: On 04-Dec-14 10:49, Zane Bitter wrote: On 01/12/14 02:02, Anant Patil wrote: On GitHub:https://github.com/anantpatil/heat-convergence-poc

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-12-18 Thread Gurjar, Unmesh
-Original Message- From: Zane Bitter [mailto:zbit...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 7:42 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown On 17/12/14 13:05, Gurjar, Unmesh wrote: I'm storing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-12-18 Thread Clint Byrum
- From: Zane Bitter [mailto:zbit...@redhat.com] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 6:37 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown On 11/12/14 08:26, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote: [Murugan, Visnusaran] In case

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-12-18 Thread Zane Bitter
On 15/12/14 07:47, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote: We have similar questions regarding other areas in your implementation, which we believe if we understand the outline of your implementation. It is difficult to get a hold on your approach just by looking at code. Docs strings / Etherpad will help.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-12-17 Thread Gurjar, Unmesh
-Original Message- From: Zane Bitter [mailto:zbit...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 9:43 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown On 15/12/14 07:47, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote: Hi Zane, We

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-12-17 Thread Zane Bitter
On 17/12/14 13:05, Gurjar, Unmesh wrote: I'm storing a tuple of its name and database ID. The data structure is resource.GraphKey. I was originally using the name for something, but I suspect I could probably drop it now and just store the database ID, but I haven't tried it yet. (Having the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-12-16 Thread Anant Patil
, 2014 6:37 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown On 11/12/14 08:26, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote: [Murugan, Visnusaran] In case of rollback where we have to cleanup earlier version of resources, we could get the order

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-12-15 Thread Murugan, Visnusaran
-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown On 12/12/14 05:29, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote: -Original Message- From: Zane Bitter [mailto:zbit...@redhat.com] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 6:37 AM To: openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-12-15 Thread Anant Patil
On 12-Dec-14 06:29, Zane Bitter wrote: On 11/12/14 01:14, Anant Patil wrote: On 04-Dec-14 10:49, Zane Bitter wrote: On 01/12/14 02:02, Anant Patil wrote: On GitHub:https://github.com/anantpatil/heat-convergence-poc I'm trying to review this code at the moment, and finding some stuff I don't

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-12-15 Thread Anant Patil
On 13-Dec-14 05:42, Zane Bitter wrote: On 12/12/14 05:29, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote: -Original Message- From: Zane Bitter [mailto:zbit...@redhat.com] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 6:37 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-12-15 Thread Clint Byrum
@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown On 11/12/14 08:26, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote: [Murugan, Visnusaran] In case of rollback where we have to cleanup earlier version of resources, we could get the order from old template. We'd

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-12-15 Thread Zane Bitter
On 15/12/14 09:32, Anant Patil wrote: On 12-Dec-14 06:29, Zane Bitter wrote: On 11/12/14 01:14, Anant Patil wrote: On 04-Dec-14 10:49, Zane Bitter wrote: On 01/12/14 02:02, Anant Patil wrote: On GitHub:https://github.com/anantpatil/heat-convergence-poc I'm trying to review this code at the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-12-15 Thread Zane Bitter
: Saturday, December 13, 2014 5:43 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown On 12/12/14 05:29, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote: -Original Message- From: Zane Bitter [mailto:zbit...@redhat.com] Sent: Friday, December 12

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-12-15 Thread Zane Bitter
: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown On 11/12/14 08:26, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote: [Murugan, Visnusaran] In case of rollback where we have to cleanup earlier version of resources, we could get the order from old template. We'd prefer not to have a graph table. In theory you

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-12-12 Thread Murugan, Visnusaran
-Original Message- From: Zane Bitter [mailto:zbit...@redhat.com] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 6:37 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown On 11/12/14 08:26, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote: [Murugan

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-12-12 Thread Murugan, Visnusaran
: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown -Original Message- From: Zane Bitter [mailto:zbit...@redhat.com] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 6:37 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-12-12 Thread Zane Bitter
On 12/12/14 05:29, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote: -Original Message- From: Zane Bitter [mailto:zbit...@redhat.com] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 6:37 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown On 11/12/14 08:26

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-12-11 Thread Murugan, Visnusaran
-Original Message- From: Zane Bitter [mailto:zbit...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 11:17 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown You really need to get a real email client with quoting

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-12-11 Thread Zane Bitter
On 11/12/14 01:14, Anant Patil wrote: On 04-Dec-14 10:49, Zane Bitter wrote: On 01/12/14 02:02, Anant Patil wrote: On GitHub:https://github.com/anantpatil/heat-convergence-poc I'm trying to review this code at the moment, and finding some stuff I don't understand:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-12-11 Thread Zane Bitter
On 11/12/14 08:26, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote: [Murugan, Visnusaran] In case of rollback where we have to cleanup earlier version of resources, we could get the order from old template. We'd prefer not to have a graph table. In theory you could get it by keeping old templates around. But that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-12-10 Thread Murugan, Visnusaran
-Original Message- From: Zane Bitter [mailto:zbit...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 3:50 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown On 08/12/14 07:00, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote: Hi Zane Michael

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-12-10 Thread Zane Bitter
You really need to get a real email client with quoting support ;) On 10/12/14 06:42, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote: Well, we still have to persist the dependencies of each version of a resource _somehow_, because otherwise we can't know how to clean them up in the correct order. But what I think

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-12-08 Thread Zane Bitter
On 08/12/14 07:00, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote: Hi Zane Michael, Please have a look @ https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/execution-stream-and-aggregator-based-convergence Updated with a combined approach which does not require persisting graph and backup stack removal. Well, we still have to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-12-03 Thread Zane Bitter
On 01/12/14 02:02, Anant Patil wrote: On GitHub:https://github.com/anantpatil/heat-convergence-poc I'm trying to review this code at the moment, and finding some stuff I don't understand: https://github.com/anantpatil/heat-convergence-poc/blob/master/heat/engine/stack.py#L911-L916 This

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-12-02 Thread Anant Patil
, November 27, 2014 9:46 AM *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com mailto:zbit...@redhat.com wrote: A bunch

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-12-02 Thread Anant Patil
Your Thoughts. Happy Thanksgiving. Vishnu. *From:*Angus Salkeld [mailto:asalk...@mirantis.com] *Sent:* Thursday, November 27, 2014 9:46 AM *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-12-02 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Anant Patil's message of 2014-12-02 10:37:31 -0800: Yes, that's the synchronization block for which we use the stack lock. Currently, a thread spin waits to acquire the lock to enter this critical section. I don't really know how to do application level transaction. Is there an

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-12-01 Thread Clint Byrum
: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com mailto:zbit...@redhat.com wrote: A bunch of us have spent the last few weeks working independently on proof of concept designs for the convergence

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-11-30 Thread Anant Patil
[mailto:asalk...@mirantis.com] *Sent:* Thursday, November 27, 2014 9:46 AM *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com mailto:zbit

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-11-27 Thread Jastrzebski, Michal
W dniu 11/27/2014 o 5:15 AM, Angus Salkeld pisze: On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com mailto:zbit...@redhat.com wrote: A bunch of us have spent the last few weeks working independently on proof of concept designs for the convergence architecture.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-11-27 Thread Murugan, Visnusaran
: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.commailto:zbit...@redhat.com wrote: A bunch of us have spent the last few weeks working independently on proof of concept designs for the convergence architecture. I think

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence proof-of-concept showdown

2014-11-26 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote: A bunch of us have spent the last few weeks working independently on proof of concept designs for the convergence architecture. I think those efforts have now reached a sufficient level of maturity that we should start