Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Re-evaluate conditions specification

2016-03-31 Thread Fox, Kevin M
My initial reaction is that sounds good, but how is it different then params, or maybe a hidden param? Maybe they are conditionally assigned? Conditional params would be awesome too though. If param 1 is not set, then param 2 is required... Thanks, Kevin From:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Re-evaluate conditions specification

2016-03-31 Thread Thomas Herve
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Qiming Teng wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:40:33AM +0200, Thomas Herve wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> As the patches for conditions support are incoming, I've found >> something in the code (and the spec) I'm not really happy with. We're

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Re-evaluate conditions specification

2016-03-31 Thread Thomas Herve
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Thomas Herve wrote: > Hi all, > > As the patches for conditions support are incoming, I've found > something in the code (and the spec) I'm not really happy with. We're > creating a new top-level section in the template called "conditions" >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Re-evaluate conditions specification

2016-03-31 Thread Qiming Teng
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:40:33AM +0200, Thomas Herve wrote: > Hi all, > > As the patches for conditions support are incoming, I've found > something in the code (and the spec) I'm not really happy with. We're > creating a new top-level section in the template called "conditions" > which holds