My initial reaction is that sounds good, but how is it different then params,
or maybe a hidden param? Maybe they are conditionally assigned? Conditional
params would be awesome too though. If param 1 is not set, then param 2 is
required...
Thanks,
Kevin
From:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Qiming Teng
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:40:33AM +0200, Thomas Herve wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As the patches for conditions support are incoming, I've found
>> something in the code (and the spec) I'm not really happy with. We're
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Thomas Herve wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As the patches for conditions support are incoming, I've found
> something in the code (and the spec) I'm not really happy with. We're
> creating a new top-level section in the template called "conditions"
>
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:40:33AM +0200, Thomas Herve wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As the patches for conditions support are incoming, I've found
> something in the code (and the spec) I'm not really happy with. We're
> creating a new top-level section in the template called "conditions"
> which holds