Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][Nova][Neutron] 6WIND Networking CI - approval for posting comments

2015-11-02 Thread John Garbutt 
On 31 October 2015 at 23:06, Armando M.  wrote:
> On 30 October 2015 at 23:59, Matt Riedemann 
> wrote:
>> On 10/30/2015 7:41 AM, Armando M. wrote:
>>> On 30 October 2015 at 18:41, Francesco Santoro
>>> > wrote:
>>> Hi Armando,
>>> thanks for you answer.
>>>
>>> We actually just want approval for posting non voting comments to
>>> neutron.
>>> As you said we don't have a significant history on Gerrit because,
>>> after some successful tests, we stopped posting comments on neutron
>>> (and nova) waiting for core maintainers approval.
>>> Our current CI activity is obviously not long enough to request
>>> voting rights.
>>>
>>> We are still commenting back to Gerrit on ci-devstack but there is
>>> no big activity on this project.
>>> Since our idea (for future) is to obtain voting rights we need to
>>> post comments to have a stronger Gerrit activity and to let you
>>> evaluate the stability of our CI.
>>>
>>> Do you suggest to keep posting on ci-devstack or can we enable
>>> comments to neutron as well?
>>>
>>>
>>> I would be ok to have this voting for now.
>>>
>>> Having said that, Mike (cc-ed here) will be working closely with the
>>> Neutron team to re-align/improve Neutron 3rd party CI support, so stay
>>> tuned for progresses on this front.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Armando
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Francesco
>>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Armando M. >> > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 30 October 2015 at 02:49, Matt Riedemann
>>> >
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/29/2015 12:13 PM, Francesco Santoro wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Infra team,
>>>
>>> According to the requirements specified in [1] posting
>>> comments on
>>> patches needs approval from core maintainers of projects.
>>>
>>> Here at 6WIND we deployed and successfully tested [2]
>>> (using ci-sandbox
>>> project) our third party CI system [4] following all the
>>> steps defined
>>> in [1].
>>> We also run our CI on nova (and neutron) patches without
>>> posting
>>> comments just to test a bigger jobs load.
>>> Example artifacts are available at [3]
>>>
>>> For this reason we would like to get your official
>>> approval for posting
>>> non voting comments to both nova and neutron.
>>>
>>>
>>> The CI hasn't been doing this long enough [1] to really see how
>>> reliable it is, but it's been promising so far.
>>>
>>>
>>> [1]
>>>
>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%226WIND+Networking+CI+%253Copenstack-networking-ci%25406wind.com%253E%22+project:openstack/neutron,n,z
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Francesco
>>>
>>> [1]
>>>
>>> http://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/third_party.html#requirements
>>> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/238139/ or
>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/226956/
>>> [3]
>>> http://openstack-ci.6wind.com/networking-6wind-ci/230537
>>> or
>>> http://openstack-ci.6wind.com/networking-6wind-ci/202098
>>> [4]
>>>
>>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems/6WIND_Networking_CI
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
>>> questions)
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>>
>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> Do you have any code in nova that's specific to your
>>> configuration?
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Matt Riedemann
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> 
>>>
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][Nova][Neutron] 6WIND Networking CI - approval for posting comments

2015-10-31 Thread Armando M. 
On 30 October 2015 at 23:59, Matt Riedemann 
wrote:

>
>
> On 10/30/2015 7:41 AM, Armando M. wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 30 October 2015 at 18:41, Francesco Santoro
>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi Armando,
>> thanks for you answer.
>>
>> We actually just want approval for posting non voting comments to
>> neutron.
>> As you said we don't have a significant history on Gerrit because,
>> after some successful tests, we stopped posting comments on neutron
>> (and nova) waiting for core maintainers approval.
>> Our current CI activity is obviously not long enough to request
>> voting rights.
>>
>> We are still commenting back to Gerrit on ci-devstack but there is
>> no big activity on this project.
>> Since our idea (for future) is to obtain voting rights we need to
>> post comments to have a stronger Gerrit activity and to let you
>> evaluate the stability of our CI.
>>
>> Do you suggest to keep posting on ci-devstack or can we enable
>> comments to neutron as well?
>>
>>
>> I would be ok to have this voting for now.
>>
>> Having said that, Mike (cc-ed here) will be working closely with the
>> Neutron team to re-align/improve Neutron 3rd party CI support, so stay
>> tuned for progresses on this front.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Armando
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Francesco
>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Armando M. > > wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 30 October 2015 at 02:49, Matt Riedemann
>> >
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/29/2015 12:13 PM, Francesco Santoro wrote:
>>
>> Dear Infra team,
>>
>> According to the requirements specified in [1] posting
>> comments on
>> patches needs approval from core maintainers of projects.
>>
>> Here at 6WIND we deployed and successfully tested [2]
>> (using ci-sandbox
>> project) our third party CI system [4] following all the
>> steps defined
>> in [1].
>> We also run our CI on nova (and neutron) patches without
>> posting
>> comments just to test a bigger jobs load.
>> Example artifacts are available at [3]
>>
>> For this reason we would like to get your official
>> approval for posting
>> non voting comments to both nova and neutron.
>>
>>
>> The CI hasn't been doing this long enough [1] to really see how
>> reliable it is, but it's been promising so far.
>>
>>
>> [1]
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%226WIND+Networking+CI+%253Copenstack-networking-ci%25406wind.com%253E%22+project:openstack/neutron,n,z
>>
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Francesco
>>
>> [1]
>>
>> http://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/third_party.html#requirements
>> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/238139/ or
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/226956/
>> [3]
>> http://openstack-ci.6wind.com/networking-6wind-ci/230537
>> or
>> http://openstack-ci.6wind.com/networking-6wind-ci/202098
>> [4]
>>
>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems/6WIND_Networking_CI
>>
>>
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
>> questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>>
>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> <
>> http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>> Do you have any code in nova that's specific to your
>> configuration?
>>
>> --
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Matt Riedemann
>>
>>
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> 
>>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> <
>> http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][Nova][Neutron] 6WIND Networking CI - approval for posting comments

2015-10-30 Thread Armando M. 
On 30 October 2015 at 18:41, Francesco Santoro 
wrote:

>
> Hi Armando,
> thanks for you answer.
>
> We actually just want approval for posting non voting comments to neutron.
> As you said we don't have a significant history on Gerrit because, after
> some successful tests, we stopped posting comments on neutron (and nova)
> waiting for core maintainers approval.
> Our current CI activity is obviously not long enough to request voting
> rights.
>
> We are still commenting back to Gerrit on ci-devstack but there is no big
> activity on this project.
> Since our idea (for future) is to obtain voting rights we need to post
> comments to have a stronger Gerrit activity and to let you evaluate the
> stability of our CI.
>
> Do you suggest to keep posting on ci-devstack or can we enable comments to
> neutron as well?
>

I would be ok to have this voting for now.

Having said that, Mike (cc-ed here) will be working closely with the
Neutron team to re-align/improve Neutron 3rd party CI support, so stay
tuned for progresses on this front.

Cheers,
Armando


>
> Regards,
> Francesco
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Armando M.  wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 30 October 2015 at 02:49, Matt Riedemann 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/29/2015 12:13 PM, Francesco Santoro wrote:
>>>
 Dear Infra team,

 According to the requirements specified in [1] posting comments on
 patches needs approval from core maintainers of projects.

 Here at 6WIND we deployed and successfully tested [2] (using ci-sandbox
 project) our third party CI system [4] following all the steps defined
 in [1].
 We also run our CI on nova (and neutron) patches without posting
 comments just to test a bigger jobs load.
 Example artifacts are available at [3]

 For this reason we would like to get your official approval for posting
 non voting comments to both nova and neutron.

>>>
>> The CI hasn't been doing this long enough [1] to really see how reliable
>> it is, but it's been promising so far.
>>
>
>> [1]
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%226WIND+Networking+CI+%253Copenstack-networking-ci%25406wind.com%253E%22+project:openstack/neutron,n,z
>>
>>
>>>
 Kind regards,
 Francesco

 [1]

 http://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/third_party.html#requirements
 [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/238139/ or
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/226956/
 [3] http://openstack-ci.6wind.com/networking-6wind-ci/230537 or
 http://openstack-ci.6wind.com/networking-6wind-ci/202098
 [4]
 https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems/6WIND_Networking_CI



 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe:
 openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


>>> Do you have any code in nova that's specific to your configuration?
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Matt Riedemann
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][Nova][Neutron] 6WIND Networking CI - approval for posting comments

2015-10-30 Thread Matt Riedemann 



On 10/30/2015 7:41 AM, Armando M. wrote:



On 30 October 2015 at 18:41, Francesco Santoro
> wrote:


Hi Armando,
thanks for you answer.

We actually just want approval for posting non voting comments to
neutron.
As you said we don't have a significant history on Gerrit because,
after some successful tests, we stopped posting comments on neutron
(and nova) waiting for core maintainers approval.
Our current CI activity is obviously not long enough to request
voting rights.

We are still commenting back to Gerrit on ci-devstack but there is
no big activity on this project.
Since our idea (for future) is to obtain voting rights we need to
post comments to have a stronger Gerrit activity and to let you
evaluate the stability of our CI.

Do you suggest to keep posting on ci-devstack or can we enable
comments to neutron as well?


I would be ok to have this voting for now.

Having said that, Mike (cc-ed here) will be working closely with the
Neutron team to re-align/improve Neutron 3rd party CI support, so stay
tuned for progresses on this front.

Cheers,
Armando


Regards,
Francesco
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Armando M. > wrote:



On 30 October 2015 at 02:49, Matt Riedemann
>
wrote:



On 10/29/2015 12:13 PM, Francesco Santoro wrote:

Dear Infra team,

According to the requirements specified in [1] posting
comments on
patches needs approval from core maintainers of projects.

Here at 6WIND we deployed and successfully tested [2]
(using ci-sandbox
project) our third party CI system [4] following all the
steps defined
in [1].
We also run our CI on nova (and neutron) patches without
posting
comments just to test a bigger jobs load.
Example artifacts are available at [3]

For this reason we would like to get your official
approval for posting
non voting comments to both nova and neutron.


The CI hasn't been doing this long enough [1] to really see how
reliable it is, but it's been promising so far.


[1]

https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%226WIND+Networking+CI+%253Copenstack-networking-ci%25406wind.com%253E%22+project:openstack/neutron,n,z



Kind regards,
Francesco

[1]

http://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/third_party.html#requirements
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/238139/ or
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/226956/
[3]
http://openstack-ci.6wind.com/networking-6wind-ci/230537 or
http://openstack-ci.6wind.com/networking-6wind-ci/202098
[4]

https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems/6WIND_Networking_CI



__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe



http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Do you have any code in nova that's specific to your
configuration?

--

Thanks,

Matt Riedemann



__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe 

http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][Nova][Neutron] 6WIND Networking CI - approval for posting comments

2015-10-30 Thread Francesco Santoro 
Hi Armando,
thanks for you answer.

We actually just want approval for posting non voting comments to neutron.
As you said we don't have a significant history on Gerrit because, after
some successful tests, we stopped posting comments on neutron (and nova)
waiting for core maintainers approval.
Our current CI activity is obviously not long enough to request voting
rights.

We are still commenting back to Gerrit on ci-devstack but there is no big
activity on this project.
Since our idea (for future) is to obtain voting rights we need to post
comments to have a stronger Gerrit activity and to let you evaluate the
stability of our CI.

Do you suggest to keep posting on ci-devstack or can we enable comments to
neutron as well?

Regards,
Francesco
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Armando M.  wrote:

>
>
> On 30 October 2015 at 02:49, Matt Riedemann 
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 10/29/2015 12:13 PM, Francesco Santoro wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Infra team,
>>>
>>> According to the requirements specified in [1] posting comments on
>>> patches needs approval from core maintainers of projects.
>>>
>>> Here at 6WIND we deployed and successfully tested [2] (using ci-sandbox
>>> project) our third party CI system [4] following all the steps defined
>>> in [1].
>>> We also run our CI on nova (and neutron) patches without posting
>>> comments just to test a bigger jobs load.
>>> Example artifacts are available at [3]
>>>
>>> For this reason we would like to get your official approval for posting
>>> non voting comments to both nova and neutron.
>>>
>>
> The CI hasn't been doing this long enough [1] to really see how reliable
> it is, but it's been promising so far.
>

> [1]
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%226WIND+Networking+CI+%253Copenstack-networking-ci%25406wind.com%253E%22+project:openstack/neutron,n,z
>
>
>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Francesco
>>>
>>> [1]
>>>
>>> http://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/third_party.html#requirements
>>> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/238139/ or
>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/226956/
>>> [3] http://openstack-ci.6wind.com/networking-6wind-ci/230537 or
>>> http://openstack-ci.6wind.com/networking-6wind-ci/202098
>>> [4]
>>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems/6WIND_Networking_CI
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>> Do you have any code in nova that's specific to your configuration?
>>
>> --
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Matt Riedemann
>>
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][Nova][Neutron] 6WIND Networking CI - approval for posting comments

2015-10-29 Thread Matt Riedemann 



On 10/29/2015 12:13 PM, Francesco Santoro wrote:

Dear Infra team,

According to the requirements specified in [1] posting comments on
patches needs approval from core maintainers of projects.

Here at 6WIND we deployed and successfully tested [2] (using ci-sandbox
project) our third party CI system [4] following all the steps defined
in [1].
We also run our CI on nova (and neutron) patches without posting
comments just to test a bigger jobs load.
Example artifacts are available at [3]

For this reason we would like to get your official approval for posting
non voting comments to both nova and neutron.

Kind regards,
Francesco

[1]
http://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/third_party.html#requirements
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/238139/ or
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/226956/
[3] http://openstack-ci.6wind.com/networking-6wind-ci/230537 or
http://openstack-ci.6wind.com/networking-6wind-ci/202098
[4] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems/6WIND_Networking_CI


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



Do you have any code in nova that's specific to your configuration?

--

Thanks,

Matt Riedemann


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][Nova][Neutron] 6WIND Networking CI - approval for posting comments

2015-10-29 Thread Armando M. 
On 30 October 2015 at 02:49, Matt Riedemann 
wrote:

>
>
> On 10/29/2015 12:13 PM, Francesco Santoro wrote:
>
>> Dear Infra team,
>>
>> According to the requirements specified in [1] posting comments on
>> patches needs approval from core maintainers of projects.
>>
>> Here at 6WIND we deployed and successfully tested [2] (using ci-sandbox
>> project) our third party CI system [4] following all the steps defined
>> in [1].
>> We also run our CI on nova (and neutron) patches without posting
>> comments just to test a bigger jobs load.
>> Example artifacts are available at [3]
>>
>> For this reason we would like to get your official approval for posting
>> non voting comments to both nova and neutron.
>>
>
The CI hasn't been doing this long enough [1] to really see how reliable it
is, but it's been promising so far.

[1]
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%226WIND+Networking+CI+%253Copenstack-networking-ci%25406wind.com%253E%22+project:openstack/neutron,n,z


>
>> Kind regards,
>> Francesco
>>
>> [1]
>>
>> http://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/third_party.html#requirements
>> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/238139/ or
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/226956/
>> [3] http://openstack-ci.6wind.com/networking-6wind-ci/230537 or
>> http://openstack-ci.6wind.com/networking-6wind-ci/202098
>> [4] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems/6WIND_Networking_CI
>>
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
> Do you have any code in nova that's specific to your configuration?
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt Riedemann
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][Nova][Neutron] 6WIND Networking CI - approval for posting comments

2015-10-29 Thread Maxime Leroy 
Hi Matt, Armando,

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Armando M.  wrote:
>>
>> Do you have any code in nova that's specific to your configuration?
>>

This CI is testing against our ML2 mechanism driver. This one uses the
vhostuser vif_type. So the specific code related to Nova is
get_config_vhostuser in libvirt.

We also plan to extend the vhostuser vif_type for your mechanism
driver for unplug/plug method in the mitaka release (see
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/libvirt-vif-vhostuser-ovs-fp)

For now, we are testing this new modification with a monkey patch on
top of Nova.

Before enabling the comments, we should, I presume:
- nova: have our modification in vhost-user vif-type reviewed/merged
in the nova tree
- neutron/nova: The CI should be prove to be reliable for a long time.

Thanks,

Maxime

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev