Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] OSAAA-Policy

2014-12-09 Thread Brad Topol
+1!  Makes sense.

--Brad


Brad Topol, Ph.D.
IBM Distinguished Engineer
OpenStack
(919) 543-0646
Internet:  bto...@us.ibm.com
Assistant: Kendra Witherspoon (919) 254-0680



From:   Morgan Fainberg morgan.fainb...@gmail.com
To: Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com, OpenStack Development Mailing 
List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date:   12/08/2014 06:07 PM
Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] OSAAA-Policy



I agree that this library should not have “Keystone” in the name. This is 
more along the lines of pycadf, something that is housed under the 
OpenStack Identity Program but it is more interesting for general use-case 
than exclusively something that is tied to Keystone specifically.

Cheers,
Morgan

-- 
Morgan Fainberg

On December 8, 2014 at 4:55:20 PM, Adam Young (ayo...@redhat.com) wrote:
The Policy libraray has been nominated for promotion from Oslo 
incubator. The Keystone team was formally known as the Identity 
Program, but now is Authentication, Authorization, and Audit, or AAA. 

Does the prefeix OSAAA for the library make sense? It should not be 
Keystone-policy. 

___ 
OpenStack-dev mailing list 
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org 
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev 
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] OSAAA-Policy

2014-12-09 Thread Adam Young

On 12/09/2014 10:57 AM, Brad Topol wrote:

+1!  Makes sense.

--Brad


Brad Topol, Ph.D.
IBM Distinguished Engineer
OpenStack
(919) 543-0646
Internet:  bto...@us.ibm.com
Assistant: Kendra Witherspoon (919) 254-0680



From: Morgan Fainberg morgan.fainb...@gmail.com
To: Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com, OpenStack Development Mailing 
List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Date: 12/08/2014 06:07 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] OSAAA-Policy




I agree that this library should not have “Keystone” in the name. This 
is more along the lines of pycadf, something that is housed under the 
OpenStack Identity Program but it is more interesting for general 
use-case than exclusively something that is tied to Keystone specifically.


openstack-policy?  osid-policy?  It really should not position itself as 
a standard.  pycadf is more general purpose, but we are not looking to 
replace all of the rules languages out there.








Cheers,
Morgan

--
Morgan Fainberg

On December 8, 2014 at 4:55:20 PM, Adam Young (_ayoung@redhat.com_ 
mailto:ayo...@redhat.com) wrote:


The Policy libraray has been nominated for promotion from Oslo
incubator. The Keystone team was formally known as the Identity
Program, but now is Authentication, Authorization, and Audit, or AAA.

Does the prefeix OSAAA for the library make sense? It should not be
Keystone-policy.

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] OSAAA-Policy

2014-12-09 Thread Morgan Fainberg
On December 9, 2014 at 10:43:51 AM, Adam Young (ayo...@redhat.com) wrote:
On 12/09/2014 10:57 AM, Brad Topol wrote:
+1!  Makes sense.

--Brad


Brad Topol, Ph.D.
IBM Distinguished Engineer
OpenStack
(919) 543-0646
Internet:  bto...@us.ibm.com
Assistant: Kendra Witherspoon (919) 254-0680



From:        Morgan Fainberg morgan.fainb...@gmail.com
To:        Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com, OpenStack Development Mailing List 
(not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date:        12/08/2014 06:07 PM
Subject:        Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] OSAAA-Policy



I agree that this library should not have “Keystone” in the name. This is more 
along the lines of pycadf, something that is housed under the OpenStack 
Identity Program but it is more interesting for general use-case than 
exclusively something that is tied to Keystone specifically.

openstack-policy?  osid-policy?  It really should not position itself as a 
standard.  pycadf is more general purpose, but we are not looking to replace 
all of the rules languages out there.



Just keep in mind we’re a policy rules enforcement library (with whatever name 
we end up with). This is obviously one of the hard computer science issues 
(naming things).

I wasn’t clear, I didn’t mean to imply usage would be like pycadf (a more 
global standard), but just that it was not exclusive (at least within the 
OpenStack world) to be used with Keystone.

Cheers,
Morgan

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] OSAAA-Policy

2014-12-08 Thread Morgan Fainberg
As a quick note, the OpenStack Identity Program was not renamed to AAA (based 
upon the discussion with the TC) but increased scope to adopt Audit on top of 
the already included scope of Authorization and Authentication.

Cheers,
Morgan

-- 
Morgan Fainberg
On December 8, 2014 at 5:05:51 PM, Morgan Fainberg (morgan.fainb...@gmail.com) 
wrote:

I agree that this library should not have “Keystone” in the name. This is more 
along the lines of pycadf, something that is housed under the OpenStack 
Identity Program but it is more interesting for general use-case than 
exclusively something that is tied to Keystone specifically.

Cheers,
Morgan

-- 
Morgan Fainberg

On December 8, 2014 at 4:55:20 PM, Adam Young (ayo...@redhat.com) wrote:

The Policy libraray has been nominated for promotion from Oslo
incubator. The Keystone team was formally known as the Identity
Program, but now is Authentication, Authorization, and Audit, or AAA.

Does the prefeix OSAAA for the library make sense? It should not be
Keystone-policy.

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev