Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements

2014-11-06 Thread Stephen Balukoff
(not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org *Date: *Tuesday, November 4, 2014 11:10 AM *To: *OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org *Subject: *Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements Jorge I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements

2014-11-05 Thread Eichberger, German
[mailto:jorge.miramon...@rackspace.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 8:20 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements Hi Susanne, Thanks for the reply. As Angus pointed out, the one big item that needs

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements

2014-11-05 Thread Jorge Miramontes
@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements Hi Jorge, I am still not convinced that we need to use logging for usage metrics. We can also use the haproxy stats interface (which the haproxy team is willing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements

2014-11-04 Thread Susanne Balle
, October 22, 2014 2:41 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements Hi Jorge, Good discussion so far + glad to have you back J I am not a big fan of using logs

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements

2014-10-28 Thread Jorge Miramontes
Thanks for the reply Angus, DDoS attacks are definitely a concern we are trying to address here. My assumptions are based on a solution that is engineered for this type of thing. Are you more concerned with network I/O during a DoS attack or storing the logs? Under the idea I had, I wanted to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements

2014-10-28 Thread Angus Lees
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 04:42:27 PM Jorge Miramontes wrote: Thanks for the reply Angus, DDoS attacks are definitely a concern we are trying to address here. My assumptions are based on a solution that is engineered for this type of thing. Are you more concerned with network I/O during a DoS

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements

2014-10-27 Thread Jorge Miramontes
Miramontes [mailto:jorge.miramon...@rackspace.com] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 3:30 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements Hey German/Susanne, To continue our conversation from our IRC

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements

2014-10-24 Thread Eichberger, German
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements Hey German/Susanne, To continue our conversation from our IRC meeting could you all provide more insight into you usage requirements? Also, I'd like to clarify a few

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements

2014-10-23 Thread Jorge Miramontes
Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements Hi Jorge, Good discussion so far + glad to have you back J I am not a big fan of using logs for billing information since ultimately (at least

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements

2014-10-22 Thread Stephen Balukoff
Hi Jorge! Welcome back, eh! You've been missed. Anyway, I just wanted to say that your proposal sounds great to me, and it's good to finally be closer to having concrete requirements for logging, eh. Once this discussion is nearing a conclusion, could you write up the specifics of logging into a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements

2014-10-22 Thread Robert van Leeuwen
I,d like to start a conversation on usage requirements and have a few suggestions. I advocate that, since we will be using TCP and HTTP/HTTPS based protocols, we inherently enable connection logging for load balancers for several reasons: Just request from the operator side of things: Please

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements

2014-10-22 Thread Jorge Miramontes
:04 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements Hi Jorge! Welcome back, eh! You've been missed. Anyway, I just wanted to say

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements

2014-10-22 Thread Eichberger, German
@lists.openstack.org Date: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 4:04 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements Hi Jorge! Welcome back, eh