Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki

2014-03-20 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki Oleg, thanks for the updates. Eugene, High/Medium/Low is fine with me. I really just wanted to find a way to rank even amongst all of 'X' priorities. As people start adding more items we may need more columns to add things

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki

2014-03-20 Thread Stephen Balukoff
Hi y'all! It's good to be back, eh! On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.comwrote: - Active/Passive Failover - I think this is solved with multiple pools. The multiple pools support that is coming with L7 rules is to support content-switching

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki

2014-03-20 Thread Jorge Miramontes
Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki Hi folks, my comments inlined: On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 6:13 AM, Youcef Laribi youcef.lar

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki

2014-03-20 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
- Active/Passive Failover - I think this is solved with multiple pools. The multiple pools support that is coming with L7 rules is to support content-switching based on L7 HTTP information (URL, headers, etc.). There is no support today for an active vs. passive pool. I'm not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki

2014-03-20 Thread Youcef Laribi
] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki Hi y'all! It's good to be back, eh! On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.commailto:enikano...@mirantis.com wrote: * Active/Passive Failover * I think this is solved with multiple pools. The multiple pools support

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki

2014-03-20 Thread Jorge Miramontes
: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki * Active/Passive Failover * I think this is solved with multiple pools. The multiple pools support that is coming with L7 rules is to support content-switching based on L7 HTTP information (URL, headers, etc.). There is no support today

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki

2014-03-20 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki - Active/Passive Failover - I think this is solved with multiple pools. The multiple pools support that is coming with L7 rules

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki

2014-03-20 Thread Youcef Laribi
: Thursday, March 20, 2014 1:35 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki Hi folks, my comments inlined: On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 6:13 AM

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki

2014-03-20 Thread Stephen Balukoff
Aah! Yes-- you are correct. I was thinking a the load balancer level, not the pool level. (Maybe we can clarify this distinction in the requirements doc?) But I would also be surprised if there are load balancers today that don't intrinsically offer active / backup pool membership as a standard

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki

2014-03-19 Thread Oleg Bondarev
Hi Jorge, Thanks for taking care of this and bringing it all together! This will be really useful for LBaaS discussions. I updated the wiki to include L7 rules support and also marking already implemented requirements. Thanks, Oleg On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Jorge Miramontes

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki

2014-03-19 Thread Ryan O'Hara
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:57:15PM +, Jorge Miramontes wrote: Hey Neutron LBaaS folks, Per last week's IRC meeting I have created a preliminary requirements use case wiki page. I requested adding such a page since there appears to be a lot of new interest in load balancing and feel that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki

2014-03-19 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
Hi Jorge, Thanks for taking care of the page. I've added priorities, although I'm not sure we need precise priority weights. Those features that still have '?' need further clarification. Thanks, Eugene. On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Oleg Bondarev obonda...@mirantis.comwrote: Hi Jorge,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki

2014-03-19 Thread Samuel Bercovici
+1 -Original Message- From: Ryan O'Hara [mailto:roh...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 2:37 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:57:15PM +, Jorge

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki

2014-03-19 Thread Jorge Miramontes
19, 2014 7:32 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki Hi Jorge, Thanks for taking care of the page. I've added priorities, although

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki

2014-03-19 Thread Youcef Laribi
in that service? Youcef From: Jorge Miramontes [mailto:jorge.miramon...@rackspace.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 11:44 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki Oleg, thanks for the updates. Eugene