Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Add an extension "btree_gist" to Postgresql

2016-07-21 Thread na...@vn.fujitsu.com
Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > That’s an interesting precedent. I understand that since we gate on > postgresql and mysql only, the solution is good enough to pass in the gate. > But are we ok fixing a bug just for those two backends, knowing that it’s > left exposed for other backends? Could you

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Add an extension "btree_gist" to Postgresql

2016-07-18 Thread Sean M. Collins
Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > That’s an interesting precedent. I understand that since we gate on > postgresql and mysql only, the solution is good enough to pass in the gate. > But are we ok fixing a bug just for those two backends, knowing that it’s > left exposed for other backends? Could you think

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Add an extension "btree_gist" to Postgresql

2016-07-18 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
na...@vn.fujitsu.com wrote: Hi everyone, I am trying to fix a bug that created two subnets on *one* network with overlap CIDR [1]. My solution is to focus on Database interaction [2]. I am encountering/facing a problem with Postgresql (There is no problem with MySQL). For Postgresql, I used