On 09/04/2014 07:42 PM, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) wrote:
Anyway, not enough to -1 it, but enough to at least say something.
.. but I do not want to get into the discussion about software testing
here, not the place really.
However, I do think it
Since this did not get an 'Approved' as of yet, I want to make sure that
this is not because the number of sponsors. 2 core members have already
sponsored it, and as per [1] cores can sponsor their own FFEs so that's 3.
N.
[1]
On 09/05/2014 04:48 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
Quick response as not to hijack the thread:
I think we all agree on the benefits of having resources you can turn
off and on at will.
I don't agree at all. There's no cost whatsoever in turning on a
resource. It doesn't need to be extensible.
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 04:20:14PM +0100, John Garbutt wrote:
On 5 September 2014 13:59, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote:
Since this did not get an 'Approved' as of yet, I want to make sure that
this is not because the number of sponsors. 2 core members have already
sponsored it,
On 09/05/2014 11:20 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
On 5 September 2014 13:59, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote:
Since this did not get an 'Approved' as of yet, I want to make sure that
this is not because the number of sponsors. 2 core members have already
sponsored it, and as per [1] cores
For better or for worse we have already merged about half of the
patches for this series, so I think stopping now because of concerns
about CI is pretty arbitrary. I do think Sean's point about scheduler
tests outside of tempest is valid though and I'd like to see it
reflected in the review
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 01:58:58PM +0200, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
Hi team,
I am requesting the exception for the feature from the subject (find
specs at [1] and outstanding changes at [2]).
Some reasons why we may want to grant it:
First of all all patches have been approved in time and
On 09/04/2014 07:58 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
Hi team,
I am requesting the exception for the feature from the subject (find
specs at [1] and outstanding changes at [2]).
Some reasons why we may want to grant it:
First of all all patches have been approved in time and just lost the
gate
On 09/04/2014 12:58 PM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
Hi team,
I am requesting the exception for the feature from the subject (find
specs at [1] and outstanding changes at [2]).
Some reasons why we may want to grant it:
First of all all patches have been approved in time and just lost the
gate
On 09/04/2014 02:31 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 09/04/2014 07:58 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
Hi team,
I am requesting the exception for the feature from the subject (find
specs at [1] and outstanding changes at [2]).
Some reasons why we may want to grant it:
First of all all patches have been
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 03:07:24PM +0200, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
On 09/04/2014 02:31 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 09/04/2014 07:58 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
Hi team,
I am requesting the exception for the feature from the subject (find
specs at [1] and outstanding changes at [2]).
Some
On 09/04/2014 09:21 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 03:07:24PM +0200, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
On 09/04/2014 02:31 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 09/04/2014 07:58 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
Hi team,
I am requesting the exception for the feature from the subject (find
specs at
On 9/4/14, 4:30 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 09/04/2014 09:21 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 03:07:24PM +0200, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
On 09/04/2014 02:31 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 09/04/2014 07:58 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
Hi team,
I am requesting the
On 4 September 2014 14:07, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/04/2014 02:31 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 09/04/2014 07:58 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
Hi team,
I am requesting the exception for the feature from the subject (find
specs at [1] and outstanding changes at [2]).
Some
On 09/04/2014 04:51 PM, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) wrote:
On 4 September 2014 14:07, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/04/2014 02:31 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 09/04/2014 07:58 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
Hi team,
I am requesting the exception for the feature from the
-Original Message-
From: Nikola Đipanov [mailto:ndipa...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 4:22 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][FFE] Feature freeze exception for virt-
driver-numa-placement
On 09/04/2014 04:51 PM, Murray
Anyway, not enough to -1 it, but enough to at least say something.
.. but I do not want to get into the discussion about software testing
here, not the place really.
However, I do think it is very harmful to respond to FFE request with
such blanket statements and generalizations,
17 matches
Mail list logo
